<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Lkunkee</id>
	<title>Open Source Ecology - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Lkunkee"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Lkunkee"/>
	<updated>2026-04-06T05:23:23Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.13</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Electron_beam_cutter&amp;diff=33814</id>
		<title>Electron beam cutter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Electron_beam_cutter&amp;diff=33814"/>
		<updated>2011-07-18T04:59:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lkunkee: electron beams vs laser beams for cutting&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Work exists on creating a 3D printer using electron beam melting to create 3D objects.  The electron beam might be useful for cutting instead of a laser beam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--The electron gun can be fabricated without needing to mix the gases for a tube(even a CO2 laser uses a host of other gases, some hard to get), making it potentially easier to use&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--the needed vacuum does not need to enclose the entire work area.  A beam can get through a fair amount of air without dissipating, and open end vacuum tube designs exist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--Due to the absorption spectrum, an electron beam is more efficient at cutting metal than the cheaper CO2 lasers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--the gun design would also likely be used in a RepRap Metalica type printer, giving part commonality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are concerns with an electron beam though:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--Power levels shown for electron beams seem to be higher than those for lasers for similar purposes, but efficiency in beam creation might make up for this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--When cutting materials with heavier atomic weights, X-rays can be produced.  Precautions for working with X-rays would have to be observed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--Cutting materials like plastic and wood make smoke, and this might cause more trouble for an electron beam than a laser.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--While electron beams have been used for a while in metal fabrication and a host of institutional knowledge exists, a brief Google search doesn&#039;t see anything on plastics or wood being cut, so this area would be new territory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
references:&lt;br /&gt;
[[electron beam melting]]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.twi.co.uk/content/eb_variants.html electron beam variants]&lt;br /&gt;
[[laser cutter]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lkunkee</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>