<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Stuart</id>
	<title>Open Source Ecology - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Stuart"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Stuart"/>
	<updated>2026-04-18T07:46:18Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.13</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Stuart_Landsee&amp;diff=30175</id>
		<title>Stuart Landsee</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Stuart_Landsee&amp;diff=30175"/>
		<updated>2011-06-03T05:25:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stuart: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Team Culturing]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * Name/Nationality/Ethnicity - Stuart Landsee Born in U.S.A.&lt;br /&gt;
    * Location – St. George, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
    * Contact Information – slandsee@yahoo.com I am on Skype with slandsee&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Brief Overview of my Career Life. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-I have a degree in physics that I received in 2005. I began with an interest in mixing dance and physics, and left with interests in teaching biophysics through yoga.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-I have been teaching yoga since 2003. I have two teacher certifications that span from how to handle big classes of people, to deep knowledge of the theory, lifestyle, and practice of a yogi in today&#039;s world.   I have taught most ages and body types concepts of breathing, meditation, postures, and yoga philosophy in three countries.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-I have been around computers since I was five.  I started writing very simple code then in BASIC to run my commodore.  Later I was introduced to Lotus, then a little bit of html when I worked with the Department of Education in Colorado.  I am not too bad with MATLAB, Maple, and Java and I can pick up most any computer language if there are enough comment lines in the sample code. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Most of my childhood and young adult life was spent on farms or working in construction.  I have years of experience using tractors, mowers, saws (mason and wood),  wrenches, sanders, grinders, screwdrivers, hammers, axes, shovels, motors, wheels, batteries, sticks, pine pitch, poop, rakes, hoes, and water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Currently I am attending school at Dixie State College fooling around with the idea of going to into graduate school. Also,  I am working with the Aerospace Corporation using data from NIRS and the SABER instruments on the International Space Station and the TIMED satellites respectively,  learning more about the atmosphere from 70km - 150km above the earths surface.  In June I am heading to Goddard Space Flight Center to build and launch a bunch of satellites with a workshop called Rock-On!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Why are you motivated to support/develop this work?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The world is a very sick place right now.  Nutritionally we are poisoned stupid with commercials, food, and manufacturing.  I don&#039;t feel comfortable punching a timecard to a place that makes missiles, automobiles for rich folk or poor folk that can&#039;t afford them,  or pre-packaged food. Nor am I interested teaching standardized curricula, but most importantly I would one day like to live without needing money without sacrificing my health, my ability to communicate with my family, or other&#039;s  well being.  From my perspective the focus with OSE, rather than making money, is to create a world where humans more comfortably and happily live,  and I would love to be a part of it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Do you endorse open source culture? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes.  Nature has followed open source culture since the beginning of time.   Fish was not upset when reptile got scales, nor was insect upset when fish got legs.  Ownership of ideas, inventions, beliefs, philosophies, knowledge, perspectives all are very foolish business that leads to false discrimination.  If we share, help each other out, play more, follow curiosities, our planet is going to be a healthier and more sustainable place.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Why are you interested in this work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OSE liberates information for life on the planet rather than patent royalties or pocket books.   The intention of the movement is to work with nature and not against it as global corporations are quite persistent with.  I feel that there is a part of me that has been trying to do this with most of the work that I have done for most of my work in life already.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in teaching about the GVCS? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have taught at the preschool, grade school, high school, and college levels ranging in subjects from math, art, dance, computers, and physics. With my background, I think that I could complement what the GVCS has to offer.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in economic relocalization possibilities arising from the GVCS? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The time is now.  Currently our society measures its worth off of the GDP. This number becomes greater as more people become imprisoned, how much oil is sold, and the number of arms manufactured and sold.   The GDP doesn&#039;t measure hummus in our soil, variety of species, health of life, happiness, or cleanliness of air.  Endlessly it seems that people&#039;s motivations are going toward increasing this GDP for their businesses, rather than what they think with their own wits or morality for what is right in the world and this is creating a more ugly planet endangering all life. My concern is to improve the quality of life on the planet and not add to the business the mad culture is chasing.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Do you want to use the GVCS technologies yourself? Do you want to build them yourself? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I would like to build or help build anything in the set. Currently  I am reviewing an article called `The Calculus of Computer Vision&#039; for a class. Hopefully I can start writing some code for 3D visualizing technology that is modular for the GVCS. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in starting up enterprise using the GVCS technologies? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that it is a way of living that I will pursue when I understand what resources I need at my hands to make the projects happen. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in having the GVCS technologies fabricated by your local custom fabricator? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sounds awesome! If you teach me the process of fabrication I will teach others this process. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in applying the GVCS to third world development? To redevelopment of crisis areas? To development of derelict areas in the developed world? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I worked in Central Africa with the Peace Corps for a few months before getting a pretty nasty case of dysentery and leaving the country early.  One day I would like to know enough about sustainability to live anywhere and be open teach all around me how to live abundantly as well.  Until I know how to do it in the U.S.A. I don&#039;t want to go somewhere else and destroy yet another ecology.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in starting up Industry 2.0 flexible fabrication enterprises for your local community, by drawing from a global repository of freely down-loadable designs and fabricating using open source fabrication equipment? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I live in the middle of the desert and manufacturing centered around harnessing the energy of the sun to help others harness the energy of the sun would be quite fruitful.  If this idea could be mixed with some reforestation projects using techniques of permaculture I could not be more excited about my life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in the potential of the GVCS for developing local food systems? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have a garden and it is amateur at best.  It would be wonderful to not only stock my garden, but get some vertical farming into throughout my house.  When there is no more room in the house I would like to start pirate farming in public spaces as art installations.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in doing academic studies/papers, publishing books, or doing other analysis of our efforts? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I run across something that is too interesting for others to now know about, generally I will find a way of expressing it: stories, articles, or analyses.  If something crosses my path about a technology that can provide abundance for the impoverished, I will not only be ambitious to write about it, I will also find ways of expressing it in other languages, for broader audiences, and through as many types of media as possible. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in financial investment opportunities arising from our work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I want to live with abundance so I don&#039;t have to be involved in the drama of fighting for the last crumb.  If people want to invest financially so that I can cultivate resources for my community, I don&#039;t think I am ready to stop them.  One day I would be very happy to say that I have and will continue to have everything that I need in my life and for my community and for my earth.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in building renewable energy production facilities based on open hardware (solar concentrator electric, wind, biomass power). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am going to assume that by renewable you mean something that is not a fossil fuel or radioactive.   Where can I start? I am super excited about: harnessing energy with kites, creating habitat for biofuel, borrowing from habitats for biofuel, retooling cars to work with biofuel,  open source geothermal, and building my first car.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in building resilient communities based on access to the GVCS? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don&#039;t feel comfortable not building or working on a resilient community.  Life in the mainstream is psychotic and diseased.  I want to provide an outlet not only for myself, but for others to live on the planet in a healthy meaningful way.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in creating a bug-out hut using GVCS technologies? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bugging out is something to do when there is scarcity. I hope to create abundance of friendship and resources so that that bugging-out will be of no concern.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How do you think that the GVCS can help alleviate the instabilities of global monetary systems? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If people have what they need then what will be the need to go to the store, the government, or dogma?  Using earth modeling with 3D scanners we can figure out what is scarce and what is abundant.  Hopefully from there people conserve that which is scarce or not use it all together, then share what is abundant.  Perhaps we could bypass the monetary system altogether.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How do you think that the GVCS can address issues related to resource conflicts? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there is abundance, then there is nothing worth fighting for. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How do you think that the GVCS can address issues of overpopulatoin? &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
If the GVCS adequately demonstrates abundance, then areas that were once overly populated could handle more people than before.  People have babies to do the work for them when they get older. If mechanization is provided then folks won&#039;t need so many babies to take care of them when they get older. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How do you think that the GVCS can address issues of resource depletion and environmental degradation? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 3d scanner is the tool of the set that is more than just a box that can scan objects and figure out what shape the object has.  I think that the scanner is a concept that can be modulated into the other pieces of the set so as the tools are used the user can be aware of what is happening with the resources around.  In doing this with the construction set we will constantly be assessing our resources so that we do not overuse our resources.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What have you already contributed to the OSE project? &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Talking with people:  I participate in a open mic night and discuss the work that is being done, why it is being done, and the hope that the folks of OSE have for the future. Frequently the conversation with friends and family is about the horrors of the world and this is an avenue of hope that I share with them pertaining to the work that I would like to be a part of.  &lt;br /&gt;
   &lt;br /&gt;
Searching and editing the wiki: I like to look for typos, old hyperlinks, and I try to add clarity to some of the concept of the vision of Open Source Ecology.   Daily, I am inspired by the wiki from the stories of ferrocement, to the reprap, 3D torch table, the liberator, open source cars....&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Dreaming: Recently the idea of kite energy has crossed my mind and I have been trying to figure out ways to connect kites to generators ever since.  Using automation fascinates me and if there is any component of self-replication I cannot help but spend hours and hours trying to figure out how to get it to work better.  &lt;br /&gt;
     &lt;br /&gt;
Getting ready for a visit to the farm:  Found some folks back home in Illinois to learn to weld with that I hope to cross paths with in a few weeks at the end of June or the beginning of July.  Hopefully I can learn enough to become a part of the team. &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
*Communications&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am happy writing about anything, filming, editing,  and sharing information. I am comfortable in front of audiences of all sizes.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Computer Support&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I work on a mac and a pc for my job.  I am sure I will be fine with linux as I have been working with computers since DOS and Commodores.  My math and physics background should be a reasonable primer for CAD and CNC software although I have never touched the two, but I really want to start playing.  I am quick to learn on a computer so given a task and or minimal mentoring I can get something done.  I enjoy writing clear code that enables anyone to look at the source code, and understand how to manipulate the variables to make it work flexibility. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Finances&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don&#039;t know that I have much to offer from my own bank account.  If we are trying to sell the idea to specific people or balance accounts I can help completely. I worked on teams that write, approve, and read grants for state and national governments.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Home Economics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am good at cleaning bathtubs from some of the nastiest slimes in the world.  I don&#039;t mind pushing a broom or doing dishes.   Messes of wire I love entangling, piles of junk I love to sort, and  clutter I enjoy reworking into order. I don&#039;t mind balancing budgets, writing lists, or conducting surveys.  Ask me if I can do it, pretty sure if I have the time, we will work well together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Design&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don&#039;t think of myself as a designer yet. After exposing myself to 3d printing and robotics I can&#039;t stop thinking about it.  One robot: soil analyzer with arms, making shelters, swales, smelting metal, enriching the soil, every imaginable all in one machine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Building&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As stated before. I can run tractors, mowers, saws, wrenches, sanders, grinders, screwdrivers, hammers, axes, shovels, motors, wheels, batteries, sticks, and water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Electronics and Magnetics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have taken Electricity and Magnetism and Physics II. Most of what I see in circuits is just an extension of one or the other.  When I build the satellite there will be a workshop that I learn how to program the satellite&#039;s instruments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Automation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Very curious about what can be done with the 3d printer idea.  I would like to be involved in developing a recreation of what the folks with reprap printers or d-shape are doing to create structures.  &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
*Metallurgy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have taken two semesters in chemistry and did well.  I started making a forge with a friend, but after the refractory was built the project had to be postponed due to finances.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineering&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have tutored engineers with their physics and taken engineering thermodynamics.  Along with thermodynamics came a strong understanding of heat engines and how to model entropy, enthalpy, and heat exchange in engines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How are you interested in contributing to the work of GVCS development? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Help in the development any of the tools of the GVCS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Give talks about OSE.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Learn how I can integrate these tools into my life.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Develop manuals, guides, and curricula. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Can you volunteer to work with us, and if so, how many hours per week? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am happy with a few tasks per week that will take between five and ten hours.  Late June/early July I plan to head to Illinois to learn to weld and visit with family. After then I hope to join the farm.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in working with us for pay? If so, what services can you offer, and what is your hourly or per-project rate? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All of the projects that I have seen on your wiki I would love to develop or help develop.  I guess I just need a starting point for what work I can do.   If I were to be paid I think a reasonable start would be $\$20/hour$.  I am not very attached to money as long as I have food, water and and a dry place to sleep.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in purchasing equipment from us to help bootstrap development? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don&#039;t have very much money, finding resources in my community to build tools of the GVCS is much more realistic.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in bidding for consulting/design/prototyping work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Would you like to see yourself working with us on a full-time basis? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in using the technologies that we are developing directly? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These tools are all welcome in my life.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stuart</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Stuart_Landsee&amp;diff=30173</id>
		<title>Stuart Landsee</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Stuart_Landsee&amp;diff=30173"/>
		<updated>2011-06-03T05:18:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stuart: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Team Culturing]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * Name/Nationality/Ethnicity - Stuart Landsee Born in U.S.A.&lt;br /&gt;
    * Location – St. George, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
    * Contact Information – slandsee@yahoo.com I am on Skype with slandsee&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Brief Overview of my Career Life. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-I have a degree in physics that I received in 2005. I began with an interest in mixing dance and physics, and left with interests in teaching biophysics through yoga.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-I have been teaching yoga since 2003. I have two teacher certifications that span from how to handle big classes of people, to deep knowledge of the theory, lifestyle, and practice of a yogi in today&#039;s world.   I have taught most ages and body types concepts of breathing, meditation, postures, and yoga philosophy in three countries.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-I have been around computers since I was five.  I started writing very simple code then in BASIC to run my commodore.  Later I was introduced to Lotus, then a little bit of html when I worked with the Department of Education in Colorado.  I am not too bad with MATLAB, Maple, and Java and I can pick up most any computer language if there are enough comment lines in the sample code. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Most of my childhood and young adult life was spent on farms or working in construction.  I have years of experience using tractors, mowers, saws (mason and wood),  wrenches, sanders, grinders, screwdrivers, hammers, axes, shovels, motors, wheels, batteries, sticks, pine pitch, poop, rakes, hoes, and water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Currently I am attending school at Dixie State College fooling around with the idea of going to into graduate school. Also,  I am working with the Aerospace Corporation using data from NIRS and the SABER instruments on the International Space Station and the TIMED satellites respectively,  learning more about the atmosphere from 70km - 150km above the earths surface.  In June I am heading to Goddard Space Flight Center to build and launch a bunch of satellites with a workshop called Rock-On!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Why are you motivated to support/develop this work?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The world is a very sick place right now.  Nutritionally we are poisoned stupid with commercials, food, and manufacturing.  I don&#039;t feel comfortable punching a timecard to a place that makes missiles, automobiles for rich folk or poor folk that can&#039;t afford them,  or pre-packaged food. Nor am I interested teaching standardized curricula, but most importantly I would one day like to live without needing money without sacrificing my health, my ability to communicate with my family, or other&#039;s  well being.  From my perspective the focus with OSE, rather than making money, is to create a world where humans more comfortably and happily live,  and I would love to be a part of it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Do you endorse open source culture? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes.  Nature has followed open source culture since the beginning of time.   Fish was not upset when reptile got scales, nor was insect upset when fish got legs.  Ownership of ideas, inventions, beliefs, philosophies, knowledge, perspectives all are very foolish business that leads to false discrimination.  If we share, help each other out, play more, follow curiosities, our planet is going to be a healthier and more sustainable place.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Why are you interested in this work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OSE liberates information for life on the planet rather than patent royalties or pocket books.   The intention of the movement is to work with nature and not against it as global corporations are quite persistent with.  I feel that there is a part of me that has been trying to do this with most of the work that I have done for most of my work in life already.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in teaching about the GVCS? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have taught at the preschool, grade school, high school, and college levels ranging in subjects from math, art, dance, computers, and physics. With my background, I think that I could complement what the GVCS has to offer.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in economic relocalization possibilities arising from the GVCS? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The time is now.  Currently our society measures its worth off of the GDP. This number becomes greater as more people become imprisoned, how much oil is sold, and the number of arms manufactured and sold.   The GDP doesn&#039;t measure hummus in our soil, variety of species, health of life, happiness, or cleanliness of air.  Endlessly it seems that people&#039;s motivations are going toward increasing this GDP for their businesses, rather than what they think with their own wits or morality for what is right in the world and this is creating a more ugly planet endangering all life. My concern is to improve the quality of life on the planet and not add to the business the mad culture is chasing.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Do you want to use the GVCS technologies yourself? Do you want to build them yourself? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I would like to build or help build anything in the set. Currently  I am reviewing an article called `The Calculus of Computer Vision&#039; for a class. Hopefully I can start writing some code for 3D visualizing technology that is modular for the GVCS. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in starting up enterprise using the GVCS technologies? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that it is a way of living that I will pursue when I understand what resources I need at my hands to make the projects happen. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in having the GVCS technologies fabricated by your local custom fabricator? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sounds awesome! If you teach me the process of fabrication I will teach others this process. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in applying the GVCS to third world development? To redevelopment of crisis areas? To development of derelict areas in the developed world? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I worked in Central Africa with the Peace Corps for a few months before getting a pretty nasty case of dysentery and leaving the country early.  One day I would like to know enough about sustainability to live anywhere and be open teach all around me how to live abundantly as well.  Until I know how to do it in the U.S.A. I don&#039;t want to go somewhere else and destroy yet another ecology.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in starting up Industry 2.0 flexible fabrication enterprises for your local community, by drawing from a global repository of freely down-loadable designs and fabricating using open source fabrication equipment? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I live in the middle of the desert and manufacturing centered around harnessing the energy of the sun to help others harness the energy of the sun would be quite fruitful.  If this idea could be mixed with some reforestation projects using techniques of permaculture I could not be more excited about my life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in the potential of the GVCS for developing local food systems? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have a garden and it is amateur at best.  It would be wonderful to not only stock my garden, but get some vertical farming into throughout my house.  When there is no more room in the house I would like to start pirate farming in public spaces as art installations.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in doing academic studies/papers, publishing books, or doing other analysis of our efforts? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I run across something that is too interesting for others to now know about, generally I will find a way of expressing it: stories, articles, or analyses.  If something crosses my path about a technology that can provide abundance for the impoverished, I will not only be ambitious to write about it, I will also find ways of expressing it in other languages, for broader audiences, and through as many types of media as possible. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in financial investment opportunities arising from our work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I want to live with abundance so I don&#039;t have to be involved in the drama of fighting for the last crumb.  If people want to invest financially so that I can cultivate resources for my community, I don&#039;t think I am ready to stop them.  One day I would be very happy to say that I have and will continue to have everything that I need in my life and for my community and for my earth.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in building renewable energy production facilities based on open hardware (solar concentrator electric, wind, biomass power). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am going to assume that by renewable you mean something that is not a fossil fuel or radioactive.   Where can I start? I am super excited about: harnessing energy with kites, creating habitat for biofuel, borrowing from habitats for biofuel, retooling cars to work with biofuel,  open source geothermal, and building my first car.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in building resilient communities based on access to the GVCS? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don&#039;t feel comfortable not building or working on a resilient community.  Life in the mainstream is psychotic and diseased.  I want to provide an outlet not only for myself, but for others to live on the planet in a healthy meaningful way.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in creating a bug-out hut using GVCS technologies? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bugging out is something to do when there is scarcity. I hope to create abundance of friendship and resources so that that bugging-out will be of no concern.  Wars should be fought with planes of resources and good food, not life destroyers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How do you think that the GVCS can help alleviate the instabilities of global monetary systems? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If people have what they need then what will be the need to go to the store, the government, or dogma?  Using earth modeling we can figure out what is scarce and what is abundant.  Hopefully from there people conserve that which is scarce or not use it all together, then share what is abundant.  With the current global monetary system we don&#039;t have a measure for what is abundant because what is abundant `has no value&#039; when all things have an ability to cultivate life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How do you think that the GVCS can address issues related to resource conflicts? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there is abundance and sharing, then there is nothing worth fighting for. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How do you think that the GVCS can address issues of overpopulatoin? &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
If the GVCS adequately demonstrates abundance, then areas that were once overly populated could handle more people than before.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How do you think that the GVCS can address issues of resource depletion and environmental degradation? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 3d scanner is the tool of the set that is more than just a box that can scan objects and figure out what shape the object has.  I think that the scanner is a concept that can be modulated into the other pieces of the set so as the tools are used the user can be aware of what is happening with the resources around.  In doing this with the construction set we will constantly be assessing our resources so that we do not overuse our resources.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What have you already contributed to the OSE project? &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Talking with people:  I participate in a open mic night and discuss the work that is being done, why it is being done, and the hope that the folks of OSE have for the future. Frequently the conversation with friends and family is about the horrors of the world and this is an avenue of hope that I share with them pertaining to the work that I would like to be a part of.  &lt;br /&gt;
   &lt;br /&gt;
Searching and editing the wiki: I like to look for typos, old hyperlinks, and I try to add clarity to some of the concept of the vision of Open Source Ecology.   Daily, I am inspired by the wiki from the stories of ferrocement, to the reprap, 3D torch table, the liberator, open source cars....&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Dreaming: Recently the idea of kite energy has crossed my mind and I have been trying to figure out ways to connect kites to generators ever since.  Using automation fascinates me and if there is any component of self-replication I cannot help but spend hours and hours trying to figure out how to get it to work better.  &lt;br /&gt;
     &lt;br /&gt;
Getting ready for a visit to the farm:  Found some folks back home in Illinois to learn to weld with that I hope to cross paths with in a few weeks at the end of June or the beginning of July.  Hopefully I can learn enough to become a part of the team. &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
*Communications&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am happy writing about anything, filming, editing,  and sharing information. I am comfortable in front of audiences of all sizes.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Computer Support&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I work on a mac and a pc for my job.  I am sure I will be fine with linux as I have been working with computers since DOS and Commodores.  My math and physics background should be a reasonable primer for CAD and CNC software although I have never touched the two, but I really want to start playing.  I am quick to learn on a computer so given a task and or minimal mentoring I can get something done.  I enjoy writing clear code that enables anyone to look at the source code, and understand how to manipulate the variables to make it work flexibility. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Finances&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don&#039;t know that I have much to offer from my own bank account.  If we are trying to sell the idea to specific people or balance accounts I can help completely. I worked on teams that write, approve, and read grants for state and national governments.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Home Economics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am good at cleaning bathtubs from some of the nastiest slimes in the world.  I don&#039;t mind pushing a broom or doing dishes.   Messes of wire I love entangling, piles of junk I love to sort, and  clutter I enjoy reworking into order. I don&#039;t mind balancing budgets, writing lists, or conducting surveys.  Ask me if I can do it, pretty sure if I have the time, we will work well together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Design&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don&#039;t think of myself as a designer yet. After exposing myself to 3d printing and robotics I can&#039;t stop thinking about it.  One robot: soil analyzer with arms, making shelters, swales, smelting metal, enriching the soil, every imaginable all in one machine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Building&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As stated before. I can run tractors, mowers, saws, wrenches, sanders, grinders, screwdrivers, hammers, axes, shovels, motors, wheels, batteries, sticks, and water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Electronics and Magnetics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have taken Electricity and Magnetism and Physics II. Most of what I see in circuits is just an extension of one or the other.  When I build the satellite there will be a workshop that I learn how to program the satellite&#039;s instruments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Automation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Very curious about what can be done with the 3d printer idea.  I would like to be involved in developing a recreation of what the folks with reprap printers or d-shape are doing to create structures.  &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
*Metallurgy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have taken two semesters in chemistry and did well.  I started making a forge with a friend, but after the refractory was built the project had to be postponed due to finances.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineering&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have tutored engineers with their physics and taken engineering thermodynamics.  Along with thermodynamics came a strong understanding of heat engines and how to model entropy, enthalpy, and heat exchange in engines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How are you interested in contributing to the work of GVCS development? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Help in the development any of the tools of the GVCS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Give talks about OSE.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Learn how I can integrate these tools into my life.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Develop manuals, guides, and curricula. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Can you volunteer to work with us, and if so, how many hours per week? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am happy with a few tasks per week that will take between five and ten hours.  Late June/early July I plan to head to Illinois to learn to weld and visit with family. After then I hope to join the farm.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in working with us for pay? If so, what services can you offer, and what is your hourly or per-project rate? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All of the projects that I have seen on your wiki I would love to develop or help develop.  I guess I just need a starting point for what work I can do.   If I were to be paid I think a reasonable start would be $\$20/hour$.  I am not very attached to money as long as I have food, water and and a dry place to sleep.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in purchasing equipment from us to help bootstrap development? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don&#039;t have very much money, finding resources in my community to build tools of the GVCS is much more realistic.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in bidding for consulting/design/prototyping work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Would you like to see yourself working with us on a full-time basis? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in using the technologies that we are developing directly? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These tools are all welcome in my life.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stuart</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Stuart_Landsee&amp;diff=30172</id>
		<title>Stuart Landsee</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Stuart_Landsee&amp;diff=30172"/>
		<updated>2011-06-03T05:15:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stuart: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Team Culturing]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    * Name/Nationality/Ethnicity - Stuart Landsee Born in U.S.A.&lt;br /&gt;
    * Location – St. George, Utah&lt;br /&gt;
    * Contact Information – slandsee@yahoo.com I am on Skype with slandsee&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Brief Overview of my Career Life. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-I have a degree in physics that I received in 2005. I began with an interest in mixing dance and physics, and left with interests in teaching biophysics through yoga.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-I have been teaching yoga since 2003. I have two teacher certifications that span from how to handle big classes of people, to deep knowledge of the theory, lifestyle, and practice of a yogi in today&#039;s world.   I have taught most ages and body types concepts of breathing, meditation, postures, and yoga philosophy in three countries.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-I have been around computers since I was five.  I started writing very simple code then in BASIC to run my commodore.  Later I was introduced to Lotus, then a little bit of html when I worked with the Department of Education in Colorado.  I am not too bad with MATLAB, Maple, and Java and I can pick up most any computer language if there are enough comment lines in the sample code. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Most of my childhood and young adult life was spent on farms or working in construction.  I have years of experience using tractors, mowers, saws (mason and wood),  wrenches, sanders, grinders, screwdrivers, hammers, axes, shovels, motors, wheels, batteries, sticks, pine pitch, poop, rakes, hoes, and water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Currently I am attending school at Dixie State College fooling around with the idea of going to into graduate school. Also,  I am working with the Aerospace Corporation using data from NIRS and the SABER instruments on the International Space Station and the TIMED satellites respectively,  learning more about the atmosphere from 70km - 150km above the earths surface.  In June I am heading to Goddard Space Flight Center to build and launch a bunch of satellites with a workshop called Rock-On!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Why are you motivated to support/develop this work?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The world is a very sick place right now.  Nutritionally we are poisoned stupid with commercials, food, and manufacturing.  I don&#039;t feel comfortable punching a timecard to a place that makes missiles, automobiles for rich folk or poor folk that can&#039;t afford them,  or pre-packaged food. Nor am I interested teaching standardized curricula, but most importantly I would one day like to live without needing money without sacrificing my health, my ability to communicate with my family, or other&#039;s  well being.  From my perspective the focus with OSE, rather than making money, is to create a world where humans more comfortably and happily live,  and I would love to be a part of it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Do you endorse open source culture? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes.  Nature has followed open source culture since the beginning of time.   Fish was not upset when reptile got scales, nor was insect upset when fish got legs.  Ownership of ideas, inventions, beliefs, philosophies, knowledge, perspectives all are very foolish business that leads to false discrimination.  If we share, help each other out, play more, follow curiosities, our planet is going to be a healthier and more sustainable place.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Why are you interested in this work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OSE liberates information for life on the planet rather than patent royalties or pocket books.   The intention of the movement is to work with nature and not against it as global corporations are quite persistent with.  I feel that there is a part of me that has been trying to do this with most of the work that I have done for most of my work in life already.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in teaching about the GVCS? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have taught at the preschool, grade school, high school, and college levels ranging in subjects from math, art, dance, computers, and physics. With my background, I think that I could complement what the GVCS has to offer.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in economic relocalization possibilities arising from the GVCS? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The time is now.  Currently our society measures its worth off of the GDP. This number becomes greater as more people become imprisoned, how much oil is sold, and the number of arms manufactured and sold.   The GDP doesn&#039;t measure hummus in our soil, variety of species, health of life, happiness, or cleanliness of air.  Endlessly it seems that people&#039;s motivations are going toward increasing this GDP for their businesses, rather than what they think with their own wits or morality for what is right in the world and this is creating a more ugly planet endangering all life. My concern is to improve the quality of life on the planet and not add to the business the mad culture is chasing.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Do you want to use the GVCS technologies yourself? Do you want to build them yourself? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I would like to build or help build anything in the set. Currently  I am reviewing an article called `The Calculus of Computer Vision&#039; for a class. Hopefully I can start writing some code for 3D visualizing technology that is modular for the GVCS. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in starting up enterprise using the GVCS technologies? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that it is a way of living that I will pursue when I understand what resources I need at my hands to make the projects happen. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in having the GVCS technologies fabricated by your local custom fabricator? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sounds awesome! If you teach me the process of fabrication I will teach others this process. I am not too arrogant to go dumpster diving, ask for resource donations, or beg for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in applying the GVCS to third world development? To redevelopment of crisis areas? To development of derelict areas in the developed world? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I worked in Central Africa with the Peace Corps for a few months before getting a pretty nasty case of dysentery and leaving the country early.  One day I would like to know enough about sustainability to live anywhere and teach all around me how to live abundantly as well.  Until I know how to do it in the U.S.A. I don&#039;t want to go somewhere else and destroy someone else&#039;s ecology.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in starting up Industry 2.0 flexible fabrication enterprises for your local community, by drawing from a global repository of freely down-loadable designs and fabricating using open source fabrication equipment? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I live in the middle of the desert and manufacturing centered around harnessing the energy of the sun to help others harness the energy of the sun would be quite fruitful.  If this idea could be mixed with some reforestation projects using techniques of permaculture I could not be more excited about my life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in the potential of the GVCS for developing local food systems? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have a garden and it is amateur at best.  It would be wonderful to not only stock my garden, but get some vertical farming into throughout my house.  When there is no more room in the house I would like to start pirate farming in public spaces as art installations.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in doing academic studies/papers, publishing books, or doing other analysis of our efforts? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I run across something that is too interesting for others to now know about, generally I will find a way of expressing it: stories, articles, or analyses.  If something crosses my path about a technology that can provide abundance for the impoverished, I will not only be ambitious to write about it, I will also find ways of expressing it in other languages, for broader audiences, and through as many types of media as possible. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in financial investment opportunities arising from our work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I want to live with abundance so I don&#039;t have to be involved in the drama of fighting for the last crumb.  If people want to invest financially so that I can cultivate resources for my community, I don&#039;t think I am ready to stop them.  One day I would be very happy to say that I have and will continue to have everything that I need in my life and for my community and for my earth.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in building renewable energy production facilities based on open hardware (solar concentrator electric, wind, biomass power). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am going to assume that by renewable you mean something that is not a fossil fuel or radioactive.   Where can I start? I am super excited about: harnessing energy with kites, creating habitat for biofuel, borrowing from habitats for biofuel, retooling cars to work with biofuel,  open source geothermal, and building my first car.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in building resilient communities based on access to the GVCS? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don&#039;t feel comfortable not building or working on a resilient community.  Life in the mainstream is psychotic and diseased.  I want to provide an outlet not only for myself, but for others to live on the planet in a healthy meaningful way.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in creating a bug-out hut using GVCS technologies? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bugging out is something to do when there is scarcity. I hope to create abundance of friendship and resources so that that bugging-out will be of no concern.  Wars should be fought with planes of resources and good food, not life destroyers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How do you think that the GVCS can help alleviate the instabilities of global monetary systems? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If people have what they need then what will be the need to go to the store, the government, or dogma?  Using earth modeling we can figure out what is scarce and what is abundant.  Hopefully from there people conserve that which is scarce or not use it all together, then share what is abundant.  With the current global monetary system we don&#039;t have a measure for what is abundant because what is abundant `has no value&#039; when all things have an ability to cultivate life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How do you think that the GVCS can address issues related to resource conflicts? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there is abundance and sharing, then there is nothing worth fighting for. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How do you think that the GVCS can address issues of overpopulatoin? &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
If the GVCS adequately demonstrates abundance, then areas that were once overly populated could handle more people than before.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How do you think that the GVCS can address issues of resource depletion and environmental degradation? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 3d scanner is the tool of the set that is more than just a box that can scan objects and figure out what shape the object has.  I think that the scanner is a concept that can be modulated into the other pieces of the set so as the tools are used the user can be aware of what is happening with the resources around.  In doing this with the construction set we will constantly be assessing our resources so that we do not overuse our resources.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What have you already contributed to the OSE project? &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Talking with people:  I participate in a open mic night and discuss the work that is being done, why it is being done, and the hope that the folks of OSE have for the future. Frequently the conversation with friends and family is about the horrors of the world and this is an avenue of hope that I share with them pertaining to the work that I would like to be a part of.  &lt;br /&gt;
   &lt;br /&gt;
Searching and editing the wiki: I like to look for typos, old hyperlinks, and I try to add clarity to some of the concept of the vision of Open Source Ecology.   Daily, I am inspired by the wiki from the stories of ferrocement, to the reprap, 3D torch table, the liberator, open source cars....&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Dreaming: Recently the idea of kite energy has crossed my mind and I have been trying to figure out ways to connect kites to generators ever since.  Using automation fascinates me and if there is any component of self-replication I cannot help but spend hours and hours trying to figure out how to get it to work better.  &lt;br /&gt;
     &lt;br /&gt;
Getting ready for a visit to the farm:  Found some folks back home in Illinois to learn to weld with that I hope to cross paths with in a few weeks at the end of June or the beginning of July.  Hopefully I can learn enough to become a part of the team. &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
*Communications&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am happy writing about anything, filming, editing,  and sharing information. I am comfortable in front of audiences of all sizes.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Computer Support&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I work on a mac and a pc for my job.  I am sure I will be fine with linux as I have been working with computers since DOS and Commodores.  My math and physics background should be a reasonable primer for CAD and CNC software although I have never touched the two, but I really want to start playing.  I am quick to learn on a computer so given a task and or minimal mentoring I can get something done.  I enjoy writing clear code that enables anyone to look at the source code, and understand how to manipulate the variables to make it work flexibility. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Finances&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don&#039;t know that I have much to offer from my own bank account.  If we are trying to sell the idea to specific people or balance accounts I can help completely. I worked on teams that write, approve, and read grants for state and national governments.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Home Economics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am good at cleaning bathtubs from some of the nastiest slimes in the world.  I don&#039;t mind pushing a broom or doing dishes.   Messes of wire I love entangling, piles of junk I love to sort, and  clutter I enjoy reworking into order. I don&#039;t mind balancing budgets, writing lists, or conducting surveys.  Ask me if I can do it, pretty sure if I have the time, we will work well together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Design&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don&#039;t think of myself as a designer yet. After exposing myself to 3d printing and robotics I can&#039;t stop thinking about it.  One robot: soil analyzer with arms, making shelters, swales, smelting metal, enriching the soil, every imaginable all in one machine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Building&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As stated before. I can run tractors, mowers, saws, wrenches, sanders, grinders, screwdrivers, hammers, axes, shovels, motors, wheels, batteries, sticks, and water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Electronics and Magnetics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have taken Electricity and Magnetism and Physics II. Most of what I see in circuits is just an extension of one or the other.  When I build the satellite there will be a workshop that I learn how to program the satellite&#039;s instruments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Automation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Very curious about what can be done with the 3d printer idea.  I would like to be involved in developing a recreation of what the folks with reprap printers or d-shape are doing to create structures.  &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
*Metallurgy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have taken two semesters in chemistry and did well.  I started making a forge with a friend, but after the refractory was built the project had to be postponed due to finances.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Engineering&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have tutored engineers with their physics and taken engineering thermodynamics.  Along with thermodynamics came a strong understanding of heat engines and how to model entropy, enthalpy, and heat exchange in engines.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How are you interested in contributing to the work of GVCS development? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Help in the development any of the tools of the GVCS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Give talks about OSE.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Learn how I can integrate these tools into my life.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Develop manuals, guides, and curricula. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Can you volunteer to work with us, and if so, how many hours per week? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am happy with a few tasks per week that will take between five and ten hours.  Late June/early July I plan to head to Illinois to learn to weld and visit with family. After then I hope to join the farm.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in working with us for pay? If so, what services can you offer, and what is your hourly or per-project rate? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All of the projects that I have seen on your wiki I would love to develop or help develop.  I guess I just need a starting point for what work I can do.   If I were to be paid I think a reasonable start would be $\$20/hour$.  I am not very attached to money as long as I have food, water and and a dry place to sleep.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in purchasing equipment from us to help bootstrap development? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don&#039;t have very much money, finding resources in my community to build tools of the GVCS is much more realistic.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in bidding for consulting/design/prototyping work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Would you like to see yourself working with us on a full-time basis? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Are you interested in using the technologies that we are developing directly? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These tools are all welcome in my life.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stuart</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Espalier&amp;diff=29763</id>
		<title>Espalier</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Espalier&amp;diff=29763"/>
		<updated>2011-05-29T19:50:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stuart: /* External Links */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Category=Growing plants}}&lt;br /&gt;
=Background=&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:espalier.jpg|400px|thumb|Espalier pears at an exhibit in Germany, July 2009; bamboo used for support.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Espalier is a centuries-old horticultural technique to grow fruit trees in a &amp;quot;flat&amp;quot; way, and often against a wall. The main advantage is that space requirements are minimized. This technique is more labor intensive than regular fruit growing and requires more knowledge and care. However, there are also advantages, such as easier fruit picking and simpler netting to protect fruits from birds and other pests. The espalier trees are also highly ornamental. Suitable are apples, pears, apricots, peaches and many others. These trees may be grown in high latitudes against a sunny wall, which will serve as a heat buffer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=External Links=&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.abc.net.au/gardening/stories/s2058240.htm&lt;br /&gt;
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Espalier&lt;br /&gt;
* article: [http://www.woodbridgefruittrees.com.au/woodbridgefruittrees/articles/162-espaliering-made-even-easier---knnn-method.html Espaliering Made Even Easier - KNNN method]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stuart</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26797</id>
		<title>Distributive Economics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26797"/>
		<updated>2011-05-19T18:40:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stuart: /* Introduction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Distributive Economics]] is an economic paradigm which promotes the equitable distribution of wealth through a combination of: open design (of products, processes, services, and other economically significant information), [[Flexible Fabrication]], and [[Open Business Models]], towards replicability. This means that replication is promoted to as many economic players as possible. Here at OSE, an apolitical approach is taken where design is improved by local solutions without invoking the context of centralized power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive economics has several requirements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Design repository&#039;&#039;&#039; - a global repository of freely-downloadable design can help any producer start an enterprise, from a small farmer to a high-tech innovator - by providing immediate access to best practices of economically significant products and production - without having to reinvent the wheel. In today&#039;s competitive world, there is no repository of optimized designs (these are either proprietary or patented), and by default, most producers provide inferior products, while a few produce the state-of-art. This is a model that works, but wastes tremendous amounts of human creativity and energy. By opening up access to best practices, costs would go down, and access to the best products would increase.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Appropriate scale&#039;&#039;&#039; - in, his seminal book, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Is_Beautiful Small is Beautiful], E. F. Schumacher discussed that the most holistically-efficient economic processes occur not on the global scale, but on the regional and community scale. Schumacher&#039;s viewpoint, while generally accepted as true, is not widely practiced today. Distributive economics favors a scale which does not incur inefficiencies of large scale (overhead costs, bureaucracy, communication costs, logistics, others). Schumacher&#039;s conclusion is that human organizations break down after they reach a certain large size, which suggests that in order for enterprise to be efficients, it should not be overly large.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Flexible fabrication&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximum distribution of the fruits of production occurs via [[Flexible Fabrication]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Lifetime design&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximizing the useful lifetime of a product, by design, reduces the cost of access to that product. For example, if a product lasts 100 years instead of 10 years, its cost is essentially reduced by a factor of 10, assuming that the initial product cost is the same.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Free enterprise&#039;&#039;&#039; - this means truly free enterprise where the playing field is leveled by open access to best-practice information (optimized product design, optimized production process design, and other economic analysis). This is the opposite of monopoly capitalism enforced by welfare-state [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics Keynesian economics]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Responsibility&#039;&#039;&#039; - accountability of communities for creating complete local economies implies autonomy on a local scale, while providing positive feedback loops for social and environmental responsibility. The intervening role of the welfare state is diminished as the people in take responsibility for their own well-being within their own communities.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Radical cost reduction&#039;&#039;&#039; - Lifetime design, combined with DIY production - can result in 100-fold cost reduction for a given product. For a whole set of products, such as the infrastructure for an entire community - [[Radical Hypermodularity]] can result in another factor 10 reduction - if a given component is used over in other applications, like industrial-strength Lego blocks. Thus, radical cost reduction of 1000 times is possible when a community seizes complete control over its own economic production by attending to lifetime desing, local production, and hypermodularity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Links on Distributive Production=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Shoshanna Zuboff, [http://drfd.hbs.edu/fit/public/facultyInfo.do?facInfo=res&amp;amp;facEmId=szuboff%40hbs.edu distributed capitalism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm Democratizing Innovation] - Eric von Hippel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=FAQ=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why are distributive economics important?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The distribution of wealth is continuing to deteriorate, as the rich get richer and the poor is poorer. This phenomenon is accompanied by human abuse and environmental degradation. While it may appear that the advent of advanced technology and of the information age would favor more equitable distribution of wealth, that is not the case.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there a metric for quantifying the success of distributive economics?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is a qualitative metric known as the [[Gross National Happiness]]. To date, it has been adopted as the official policy only in the country of Bhutan. [[OSE Specifications]] are a metric for quantifying distributive economic potential by attaching a score to a particular product or activity.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would there be enough wealth for everybody if all the capital in the world were distributed among all the earth&#039;s denizens?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The answer is positive only if there were not a single greedy person on the planet.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would the distributive economics paradigm disrupt the mainstream economic system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is no reason why both systems can not co-exist side-by-side. On an equal playing field, both would compete for market share, and the best one would win, assuming that there is no foul play.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;You &#039;&#039;effin&#039;&#039; communists, are you trying to bring down the entire economic system, which has brought us all the quality of life that we all enjoy today?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
We are apolitical, we do not promote state capitalism or any political ideology - we are providing a set of tools that can be used in numerous applications. Nor do we think that &amp;quot;we all enjoy today&amp;quot; a high standard of living. A high standard of living applies only to a small fraction of the global population. &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Are you suggesting a new economic concept?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is nothing new about the concept of &#039;&#039;distributive economics&#039;&#039;. Buckminster Fuller, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, among other thought leaders, have discussed the concept at length, though by using different languaging. It is a concept endorsed in theory by liberals, conservatives, environmentalists, radicals, anarchists, fundamentalists, capitalists, socialists, and many others, but it is rarely practiced. Social enterprise and the [[Bright Green]] approach are on the right track, but short of articulating the full scope of the open source/open business model paradigm. http://floing.org is a site that attempts to document this emerging paradigm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Guiding philosophies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stuart</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26795</id>
		<title>Distributive Economics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26795"/>
		<updated>2011-05-19T18:39:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stuart: /* Introduction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Distributive Economics]] is an economic paradigm which promotes the equitable distribution of wealth through a combination of: open design (of products, processes, services, and other economically significant information), [[Flexible Fabrication]], and [[Open Business Models]], towards replicability. This means that replication is promoted to as many economic players as possible. Here at OSE, an apolitical approach is taken where design is improved by local solutions without invoking the context of centralized power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive economics has several requirements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Design repository&#039;&#039;&#039; - a global repository of freely-downloadable design can help any producer start an enterprise, from a small farmer to a high-tech innovator - by providing immediate access to best practices of economically significant products and production - without having to reinvent the wheel. In today&#039;s competitive world, there is no repository of optimized designs (these are either proprietary or patented), and by default, most producers provide inferior products, while a few produce the state-of-art. This is a model that works, but wastes tremendous amounts of human creativity and energy. By opening up access to best practices, costs would go down, and access to the best products would increase.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Appropriate scale&#039;&#039;&#039; - in, his seminal book, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Is_Beautiful Small is Beautiful], E. F. Schumacher discussed that the most holistically-efficient economic processes occur not on the global scale, but on the regional and community scale. Schumacher&#039;s viewpoint, while generally accepted as true, is not widely practiced today. Distributive economics favors a scale which does not incur inefficiencies of large scale (overhead costs, bureaucracy, communication costs, logistics, others). Schumacher&#039;s conclusion is that human organizations break down after they reach a certain large size, which suggests that in order for enterprise to be efficients, it should not be overly large.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Flexible fabrication&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximum distribution of the fruits of production occurs via [[Flexible Fabrication]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Lifetime design&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximizing the useful lifetime of a product, by design, reduces the cost of access to that product. For example, if a product lasts 100 years instead of 10 years, its cost is essentially reduced by a factor of 10, assuming that the initial product cost is the same.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Free enterprise&#039;&#039;&#039; - this means truly free enterprise where the playing field is leveled by open access to best-practice information (optimized product design, optimized production process design, and other economic analysis). This is the opposite of monopoly capitalism enforced by welfare-state [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics Keynesian economics]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Responsibility&#039;&#039;&#039; - accountability of communities for creating complete local economies implies autonomy on a local scale, while providing positive feedback loops for social and environmental responsibility. The intervening role of the welfare state is diminished as the people in take responsibility for their own well-being within their own communities.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Radical cost reduction&#039;&#039;&#039; - Lifetime design, combined with DIY production - can result in 100-fold cost reduction for a given product. For a whole set of products, such as the infrastructure for an entire community - [[Radical Hypermodularity]] can result in another factor 10 reduction - if a given component is used over in other applications, like industrial-strength Lego blocks. Thus, radical cost reduction of 1000 times is possible when a community seizes complete control over its own economic production by attending to lifetime desing, local production, and hypermodularity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Links on Distributive Production=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Shoshanna Zuboff, [http://drfd.hbs.edu/fit/public/facultyInfo.do?facInfo=res&amp;amp;facEmId=szuboff%40hbs.edu distributed capitalism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm Democratizing Innovation] - Eric von Hippel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=FAQ=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why are distributive economics important?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The distribution of wealth is continuing to deteriorate, as the rich get richer and the poor is poorer. This phenomenon is accompanied by human abuse and environmental degradation. While it may appear that the advent of advanced technology and of the information age would favor more equitable distribution of wealth, that is not the case.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there a metric for quantifying the success of distributive economics?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is a qualitative metric known as the [[Gross National Happiness]]. To date, it has been adopted as the official policy only in the country of Bhutan. [[OSE Specifications]] are a metric for quantifying distributive economic potential by attaching a score to a particular product or activity.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would there be enough wealth for everybody if all the capital in the world were distributed among all the earth&#039;s denizens?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The answer is positive only if there were not a single greedy person on the planet.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would the distributive economics paradigm disrupt the mainstream economic system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is no reason why both systems can not co-exist side-by-side. On an equal playing field, both would compete for market share, and the best one would win, assuming that there is no foul play.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;You &#039;&#039;effin&#039;&#039; communists, are you trying to bring down the entire economic system, which has brought us all the quality of life that we all enjoy today?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
We are apolitical, we do not promote state capitalism or any political ideology - we are providing a set of tools that can be used in numerous applications. Nor do we think that &amp;quot;we all enjoy today&amp;quot; a high standard of living. A high standard of living applies only to a small fraction of the global population. &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Are you suggesting a new economic concept?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is nothing new about the concept of &#039;&#039;distributive economics&#039;&#039;. Buckminster Fuller, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, among other thought leaders, have discussed the concept at length, though by using different languaging. It is a concept endorsed in theory by liberals, conservatives, environmentalists, radicals, anarchists, fundamentalists, capitalists, socialists, and many others, but it is rarely practiced. Social enterprise and the [[Bright Green]] approach are on the right track, but short of articulating the full scope of the open source/open business model paradigm. http://floing.org is a site that attempts to document this emerging paradigm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Guiding philosophies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stuart</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26792</id>
		<title>Distributive Economics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26792"/>
		<updated>2011-05-19T18:39:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stuart: /* Introduction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Distributive Economics]] is an economic paradigm which promotes the equitable distribution of wealth through a combination of: open design (of products, processes, services, and other economically significant information), [[Flexible Fabrication]], and [[Open Business Models]], towards replicability. This means that replication is promoted to as many economic players as possible. Here at OSE, an apolitical approach is taken where design is improved by local solutions without invoking the context of centralized power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive economics has several requirements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Design repository&#039;&#039;&#039; - a global repository of freely-downloadable design can help any producer start an enterprise, from a small farmer to a high-tech innovator - by providing immediate access to best practices of economically significant products and production - without having to reinvent the wheel. In today&#039;s competitive world, there is no repository of optimized designs (these are either proprietary or patented), and by default, most producers provide inferior products, while a few produce the state-of-art. This is a model that works, but wastes tremendous amounts of human creativity and energy. By opening up access to best practices, costs would go down, and access to the best products would increase.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Appropriate scale&#039;&#039;&#039; - in, his seminal book, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Is_Beautiful Small is Beautiful], E. F. Schumacher discussed that the most holistically-efficient economic processes occur not on the global scale, but on the regional and community scale. Schumacher&#039;s viewpoint, while generally accepted as true, is not widely practiced today. Distributive economics favors a scale which does not incur inefficiencies of large scale (overhead costs, bureaucracy, communication costs, logistics, others). Schumacher&#039;s conclusion is that human organizations break down after they reach a certain large size, which suggests that in order for enterprise to be efficients, it should not be overly large.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Flexible fabrication&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximum distribution of the fruits of production occurs via [[Flexible Fabrication]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Lifetime design&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximizing the useful lifetime of a product, by design, reduces the cost of access to that product. For example, if a product lasts 100 years instead of 10 years, its cost is essentially reduced by a factor of 10, assuming that the initial product cost is the same.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Free enterprise&#039;&#039;&#039; - this means truly free enterprise where the playing field is leveled by open access to best-practice information (optimized product design, optimized production process design, and other economic analysis). This is the opposite of monopoly capitalism enforced by welfare-state [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics Keynesian economics]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Responsibility&#039;&#039;&#039; - accountability of communities for creating complete local economies implies autonomy on a local scale, while providing positive feedback loops for social and environmental responsibility. The intervening role of the welfare state is diminished as the people in take responsibility for their own well-being within their own communities.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Radical cost reduction&#039;&#039;&#039; - Lifetime design, combined with DIY production - can result in 100-fold cost reduction for a given product. For a whole set of products, such as the infrastructure for an entire community - [[Radical Hypermodularity]] can result in another factor 10 reduction - if a given component is used over in other applications, like industrial-strength Lego blocks. Thus, radical cost reduction of 1000 times is possible when a community seizes complete control over its own economic production by attending to lifetime desing, local production, and hypermodularity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Links on Distributive Production=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Shoshanna Zuboff, [http://drfd.hbs.edu/fit/public/facultyInfo.do?facInfo=res&amp;amp;facEmId=szuboff%40hbs.edu distributed capitalism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm Democratizing Innovation] - Eric von Hippel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=FAQ=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why are distributive economics important?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The distribution of wealth is continuing to deteriorate, as the rich get richer and the poor is poorer. This phenomenon is accompanied by human abuse and environmental degradation. While it may appear that the advent of advanced technology and of the information age would favor more equitable distribution of wealth, that is not the case.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there a metric for quantifying the success of distributive economics?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is a qualitative metric known as the [[Gross National Happiness]]. To date, it has been adopted as the official policy only in the country of Bhutan. [[OSE Specifications]] are a metric for quantifying distributive economic potential by attaching a score to a particular product or activity.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would there be enough wealth for everybody if all the capital in the world were distributed among all the earth&#039;s denizens?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The answer is positive only if there were not a single greedy person on the planet.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would the distributive economics paradigm disrupt the mainstream economic system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is no reason why both systems can not co-exist side-by-side. On an equal playing field, both would compete for market share, and the best one would win, assuming that there is no foul play.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;You &#039;&#039;effin&#039;&#039; communists, are you trying to bring down the entire economic system, which has brought us all the quality of life that we all enjoy today?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
We are apolitical, we do not promote state capitalism or any political ideology - we are providing a set of tools that can be used in numerous applications. Nor do we think that &amp;quot;we all enjoy today&amp;quot; a high standard of living. A high standard of living applies only to a small fraction of the global population. &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Are you suggesting a new economic concept?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is nothing new about the concept of &#039;&#039;distributive economics&#039;&#039;. Buckminster Fuller, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, among other thought leaders, have discussed the concept at length, though by using different languaging. It is a concept endorsed in theory by liberals, conservatives, environmentalists, radicals, anarchists, fundamentalists, capitalists, socialists, and many others, but it is rarely practiced. Social enterprise and the [[Bright Green]] approach are on the right track, but short of articulating the full scope of the open source/open business model paradigm. http://floing.org is a site that attempts to document this emerging paradigm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Guiding philosophies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stuart</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26749</id>
		<title>Distributive Economics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26749"/>
		<updated>2011-05-19T07:38:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stuart: /* Introduction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive Economics is an economic paradigm which promotes the equitable distribution of wealth through a combination of: open design (of products, processes, services, and other economically significant information), [[Flexible Fabrication]], and [[Open Business Models]], towards replicability. This economics promotes its use to as many economic players as possible making its wealth abundant. Here an apolitical approach is taken where design is improved by local solutions without invoking the context of centralized power, as implied in &#039;&#039;distributed economics&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive economics has several requirements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Design repository&#039;&#039;&#039; - a global repository of freely-downloadable design can help any producer start an enterprise, from a small farmer to a high-tech innovator - by providing immediate access to best practices of economically significant products and production - without having to reinvent the wheel. In today&#039;s competitive world, there is no repository of optimized designs (these are either proprietary or patented), and by default, most producers provide inferior products, while a few produce the state-of-art. This is a model that works, but wastes tremendous amounts of human creativity and energy. By opening up access to best practices, costs would go down, and access to the best products would increase.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Appropriate scale&#039;&#039;&#039; - in, his seminal book, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Is_Beautiful Small is Beautiful], E. F. Schumacher discussed that the most holistically-efficient economic processes occur not on the global scale, but on the regional and community scale. Schumacher&#039;s viewpoint, while generally accepted as true, is not widely practiced today. Distributive economics favors a scale which does not incur inefficiencies of large scale (overhead costs, bureaucracy, communication costs, logistics, others). Schumacher&#039;s conclusion is that human organizations break down after they reach a certain large size, which suggests that in order for enterprise to be efficients, it should not be overly large.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Flexible fabrication&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximum distribution of the fruits of production occurs via [[Flexible Fabrication]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Lifetime design&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximizing the useful lifetime of a product, by design, reduces the cost of access to that product. For example, if a product lasts 100 years instead of 10 years, its cost is essentially reduced by a factor of 10, assuming that the initial product cost is the same.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Free enterprise&#039;&#039;&#039; - this means truly free enterprise where the playing field is leveled by open access to best-practice information (optimized product design, optimized production process design, and other economic analysis). This is the opposite of monopoly capitalism enforced by welfare-state [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics Keynesian economics]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Responsibility&#039;&#039;&#039; - accountability of communities for creating complete local economies implies autonomy on a local scale, while providing positive feedback loops for social and environmental responsibility. The intervening role of the welfare state is diminished as the people in take responsibility for their own well-being within their own communities.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Radical cost reduction&#039;&#039;&#039; - Lifetime design, combined with DIY production - can result in 100-fold cost reduction for a given product. For a whole set of products, such as the infrastructure for an entire community - [[Radical Hypermodularity]] can result in another factor 10 reduction - if a given component is used over in other applications, like industrial-strength Lego blocks. Thus, radical cost reduction of 1000 times is possible when a community seizes complete control over its own economic production by attending to lifetime desing, local production, and hypermodularity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Links on Distributive Production=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Shoshanna Zuboff, [http://drfd.hbs.edu/fit/public/facultyInfo.do?facInfo=res&amp;amp;facEmId=szuboff%40hbs.edu distributed capitalism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm Democratizing Innovation] - Eric von Hippel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=FAQ=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why are distributive economics important?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The distribution of wealth is continuing to deteriorate, as the rich get richer and the poor is poorer. This phenomenon is accompanied by human abuse and environmental degradation. While it may appear that the advent of advanced technology and of the information age would favor more equitable distribution of wealth, that is not the case.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there a metric for quantifying the success of distributive economics?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is a qualitative metric known as the [[Gross National Happiness]]. To date, it has been adopted as the official policy only in the country of Bhutan. [[OSE Specifications]] are a metric for quantifying distributive economic potential by attaching a score to a particular product or activity.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would there be enough wealth for everybody if all the capital in the world were distributed among all the earth&#039;s denizens?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The answer is positive only if there were not a single greedy person on the planet.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would the distributive economics paradigm disrupt the mainstream economic system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is no reason why both systems can not co-exist side-by-side. On an equal playing field, both would compete for market share, and the best one would win, assuming that there is no foul play.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;You &#039;&#039;effin&#039;&#039; communists, are you trying to bring down the entire economic system, which has brought us all the quality of life that we all enjoy today?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
We are apolitical, we do not promote state capitalism or any political ideology - we are providing a set of tools that can be used in numerous applications. Nor do we think that &amp;quot;we all enjoy today&amp;quot; a high standard of living. A high standard of living applies only to a small fraction of the global population. &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Are you suggesting a new economic concept?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is nothing new about the concept of &#039;&#039;distributive economics&#039;&#039;. Buckminster Fuller, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, among other thought leaders, have discussed the concept at length, though by using different languaging. It is a concept endorsed in theory by liberals, conservatives, environmentalists, radicals, anarchists, fundamentalists, capitalists, socialists, and many others, but it is rarely practiced. Social enterprise and the [[Bright Green]] approach are on the right track, but short of articulating the full scope of the open source/open business model paradigm. http://floing.org is a site that attempts to document this emerging paradigm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Guiding philosophies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stuart</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26748</id>
		<title>Distributive Economics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26748"/>
		<updated>2011-05-19T07:34:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stuart: /* Introduction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive Economics is an economic paradigm which promotes the equitable distribution of wealth through a combination of: open design (of products, processes, services, and other economically significant information), [[Flexible Fabrication]], and [[Open Business Models]], towards the replicability of such enterprise. This economics promotes its use to as many economic players as possible making its wealth abundant. Here an apolitical approach is taken where design is improved by local solutions without invoking the context of centralized power, as implied in &#039;&#039;distributed economics&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive economics has several requirements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Design repository&#039;&#039;&#039; - a global repository of freely-downloadable design can help any producer start an enterprise, from a small farmer to a high-tech innovator - by providing immediate access to best practices of economically significant products and production - without having to reinvent the wheel. In today&#039;s competitive world, there is no repository of optimized designs (these are either proprietary or patented), and by default, most producers provide inferior products, while a few produce the state-of-art. This is a model that works, but wastes tremendous amounts of human creativity and energy. By opening up access to best practices, costs would go down, and access to the best products would increase.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Appropriate scale&#039;&#039;&#039; - in, his seminal book, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Is_Beautiful Small is Beautiful], E. F. Schumacher discussed that the most holistically-efficient economic processes occur not on the global scale, but on the regional and community scale. Schumacher&#039;s viewpoint, while generally accepted as true, is not widely practiced today. Distributive economics favors a scale which does not incur inefficiencies of large scale (overhead costs, bureaucracy, communication costs, logistics, others). Schumacher&#039;s conclusion is that human organizations break down after they reach a certain large size, which suggests that in order for enterprise to be efficients, it should not be overly large.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Flexible fabrication&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximum distribution of the fruits of production occurs via [[Flexible Fabrication]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Lifetime design&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximizing the useful lifetime of a product, by design, reduces the cost of access to that product. For example, if a product lasts 100 years instead of 10 years, its cost is essentially reduced by a factor of 10, assuming that the initial product cost is the same.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Free enterprise&#039;&#039;&#039; - this means truly free enterprise where the playing field is leveled by open access to best-practice information (optimized product design, optimized production process design, and other economic analysis). This is the opposite of monopoly capitalism enforced by welfare-state [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics Keynesian economics]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Responsibility&#039;&#039;&#039; - accountability of communities for creating complete local economies implies autonomy on a local scale, while providing positive feedback loops for social and environmental responsibility. The intervening role of the welfare state is diminished as the people in take responsibility for their own well-being within their own communities.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Radical cost reduction&#039;&#039;&#039; - Lifetime design, combined with DIY production - can result in 100-fold cost reduction for a given product. For a whole set of products, such as the infrastructure for an entire community - [[Radical Hypermodularity]] can result in another factor 10 reduction - if a given component is used over in other applications, like industrial-strength Lego blocks. Thus, radical cost reduction of 1000 times is possible when a community seizes complete control over its own economic production by attending to lifetime desing, local production, and hypermodularity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Links on Distributive Production=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Shoshanna Zuboff, [http://drfd.hbs.edu/fit/public/facultyInfo.do?facInfo=res&amp;amp;facEmId=szuboff%40hbs.edu distributed capitalism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm Democratizing Innovation] - Eric von Hippel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=FAQ=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why are distributive economics important?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The distribution of wealth is continuing to deteriorate, as the rich get richer and the poor is poorer. This phenomenon is accompanied by human abuse and environmental degradation. While it may appear that the advent of advanced technology and of the information age would favor more equitable distribution of wealth, that is not the case.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there a metric for quantifying the success of distributive economics?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is a qualitative metric known as the [[Gross National Happiness]]. To date, it has been adopted as the official policy only in the country of Bhutan. [[OSE Specifications]] are a metric for quantifying distributive economic potential by attaching a score to a particular product or activity.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would there be enough wealth for everybody if all the capital in the world were distributed among all the earth&#039;s denizens?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The answer is positive only if there were not a single greedy person on the planet.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would the distributive economics paradigm disrupt the mainstream economic system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is no reason why both systems can not co-exist side-by-side. On an equal playing field, both would compete for market share, and the best one would win, assuming that there is no foul play.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;You &#039;&#039;effin&#039;&#039; communists, are you trying to bring down the entire economic system, which has brought us all the quality of life that we all enjoy today?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
We are apolitical, we do not promote state capitalism or any political ideology - we are providing a set of tools that can be used in numerous applications. Nor do we think that &amp;quot;we all enjoy today&amp;quot; a high standard of living. A high standard of living applies only to a small fraction of the global population. &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Are you suggesting a new economic concept?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is nothing new about the concept of &#039;&#039;distributive economics&#039;&#039;. Buckminster Fuller, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, among other thought leaders, have discussed the concept at length, though by using different languaging. It is a concept endorsed in theory by liberals, conservatives, environmentalists, radicals, anarchists, fundamentalists, capitalists, socialists, and many others, but it is rarely practiced. Social enterprise and the [[Bright Green]] approach are on the right track, but short of articulating the full scope of the open source/open business model paradigm. http://floing.org is a site that attempts to document this emerging paradigm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Guiding philosophies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stuart</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26747</id>
		<title>Distributive Economics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26747"/>
		<updated>2011-05-19T07:34:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stuart: /* Introduction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive Economics is an economic paradigm which promotes the equitable distribution of wealth through a combination of: open design (of products, processes, services, and other economically significant information), [[Flexible Fabrication]], and [[Open Business Models]], towards the replicability of such enterprise. This economics promotes its use to as many economic players as possible making its wealth abundant. Here an apolitical approach is taken where design is improved by local solutions without invoking the context of centralized power, as implied in &#039;&#039;distributed economics&#039;&#039;, . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive economics has several requirements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Design repository&#039;&#039;&#039; - a global repository of freely-downloadable design can help any producer start an enterprise, from a small farmer to a high-tech innovator - by providing immediate access to best practices of economically significant products and production - without having to reinvent the wheel. In today&#039;s competitive world, there is no repository of optimized designs (these are either proprietary or patented), and by default, most producers provide inferior products, while a few produce the state-of-art. This is a model that works, but wastes tremendous amounts of human creativity and energy. By opening up access to best practices, costs would go down, and access to the best products would increase.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Appropriate scale&#039;&#039;&#039; - in, his seminal book, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Is_Beautiful Small is Beautiful], E. F. Schumacher discussed that the most holistically-efficient economic processes occur not on the global scale, but on the regional and community scale. Schumacher&#039;s viewpoint, while generally accepted as true, is not widely practiced today. Distributive economics favors a scale which does not incur inefficiencies of large scale (overhead costs, bureaucracy, communication costs, logistics, others). Schumacher&#039;s conclusion is that human organizations break down after they reach a certain large size, which suggests that in order for enterprise to be efficients, it should not be overly large.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Flexible fabrication&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximum distribution of the fruits of production occurs via [[Flexible Fabrication]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Lifetime design&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximizing the useful lifetime of a product, by design, reduces the cost of access to that product. For example, if a product lasts 100 years instead of 10 years, its cost is essentially reduced by a factor of 10, assuming that the initial product cost is the same.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Free enterprise&#039;&#039;&#039; - this means truly free enterprise where the playing field is leveled by open access to best-practice information (optimized product design, optimized production process design, and other economic analysis). This is the opposite of monopoly capitalism enforced by welfare-state [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics Keynesian economics]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Responsibility&#039;&#039;&#039; - accountability of communities for creating complete local economies implies autonomy on a local scale, while providing positive feedback loops for social and environmental responsibility. The intervening role of the welfare state is diminished as the people in take responsibility for their own well-being within their own communities.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Radical cost reduction&#039;&#039;&#039; - Lifetime design, combined with DIY production - can result in 100-fold cost reduction for a given product. For a whole set of products, such as the infrastructure for an entire community - [[Radical Hypermodularity]] can result in another factor 10 reduction - if a given component is used over in other applications, like industrial-strength Lego blocks. Thus, radical cost reduction of 1000 times is possible when a community seizes complete control over its own economic production by attending to lifetime desing, local production, and hypermodularity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Links on Distributive Production=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Shoshanna Zuboff, [http://drfd.hbs.edu/fit/public/facultyInfo.do?facInfo=res&amp;amp;facEmId=szuboff%40hbs.edu distributed capitalism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm Democratizing Innovation] - Eric von Hippel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=FAQ=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why are distributive economics important?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The distribution of wealth is continuing to deteriorate, as the rich get richer and the poor is poorer. This phenomenon is accompanied by human abuse and environmental degradation. While it may appear that the advent of advanced technology and of the information age would favor more equitable distribution of wealth, that is not the case.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there a metric for quantifying the success of distributive economics?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is a qualitative metric known as the [[Gross National Happiness]]. To date, it has been adopted as the official policy only in the country of Bhutan. [[OSE Specifications]] are a metric for quantifying distributive economic potential by attaching a score to a particular product or activity.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would there be enough wealth for everybody if all the capital in the world were distributed among all the earth&#039;s denizens?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The answer is positive only if there were not a single greedy person on the planet.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would the distributive economics paradigm disrupt the mainstream economic system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is no reason why both systems can not co-exist side-by-side. On an equal playing field, both would compete for market share, and the best one would win, assuming that there is no foul play.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;You &#039;&#039;effin&#039;&#039; communists, are you trying to bring down the entire economic system, which has brought us all the quality of life that we all enjoy today?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
We are apolitical, we do not promote state capitalism or any political ideology - we are providing a set of tools that can be used in numerous applications. Nor do we think that &amp;quot;we all enjoy today&amp;quot; a high standard of living. A high standard of living applies only to a small fraction of the global population. &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Are you suggesting a new economic concept?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is nothing new about the concept of &#039;&#039;distributive economics&#039;&#039;. Buckminster Fuller, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, among other thought leaders, have discussed the concept at length, though by using different languaging. It is a concept endorsed in theory by liberals, conservatives, environmentalists, radicals, anarchists, fundamentalists, capitalists, socialists, and many others, but it is rarely practiced. Social enterprise and the [[Bright Green]] approach are on the right track, but short of articulating the full scope of the open source/open business model paradigm. http://floing.org is a site that attempts to document this emerging paradigm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Guiding philosophies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stuart</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26746</id>
		<title>Distributive Economics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26746"/>
		<updated>2011-05-19T07:32:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stuart: /* Introduction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive Economics is an economic paradigm which promotes the equitable distribution of wealth through a combination of: open design (of products, processes, services, and other economically significant information), [[Flexible Fabrication]], and [[Open Business Models]], towards the replicability of such enterprise. This economics promotes its use to as many economic players as possible making its wealth replicable. Here an apolitical approach is taken where design is improved by local solutions without invoking the context of centralized power, as implied in &#039;&#039;distributed economics&#039;&#039;, . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive economics has several requirements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Design repository&#039;&#039;&#039; - a global repository of freely-downloadable design can help any producer start an enterprise, from a small farmer to a high-tech innovator - by providing immediate access to best practices of economically significant products and production - without having to reinvent the wheel. In today&#039;s competitive world, there is no repository of optimized designs (these are either proprietary or patented), and by default, most producers provide inferior products, while a few produce the state-of-art. This is a model that works, but wastes tremendous amounts of human creativity and energy. By opening up access to best practices, costs would go down, and access to the best products would increase.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Appropriate scale&#039;&#039;&#039; - in, his seminal book, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Is_Beautiful Small is Beautiful], E. F. Schumacher discussed that the most holistically-efficient economic processes occur not on the global scale, but on the regional and community scale. Schumacher&#039;s viewpoint, while generally accepted as true, is not widely practiced today. Distributive economics favors a scale which does not incur inefficiencies of large scale (overhead costs, bureaucracy, communication costs, logistics, others). Schumacher&#039;s conclusion is that human organizations break down after they reach a certain large size, which suggests that in order for enterprise to be efficients, it should not be overly large.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Flexible fabrication&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximum distribution of the fruits of production occurs via [[Flexible Fabrication]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Lifetime design&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximizing the useful lifetime of a product, by design, reduces the cost of access to that product. For example, if a product lasts 100 years instead of 10 years, its cost is essentially reduced by a factor of 10, assuming that the initial product cost is the same.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Free enterprise&#039;&#039;&#039; - this means truly free enterprise where the playing field is leveled by open access to best-practice information (optimized product design, optimized production process design, and other economic analysis). This is the opposite of monopoly capitalism enforced by welfare-state [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics Keynesian economics]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Responsibility&#039;&#039;&#039; - accountability of communities for creating complete local economies implies autonomy on a local scale, while providing positive feedback loops for social and environmental responsibility. The intervening role of the welfare state is diminished as the people in take responsibility for their own well-being within their own communities.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Radical cost reduction&#039;&#039;&#039; - Lifetime design, combined with DIY production - can result in 100-fold cost reduction for a given product. For a whole set of products, such as the infrastructure for an entire community - [[Radical Hypermodularity]] can result in another factor 10 reduction - if a given component is used over in other applications, like industrial-strength Lego blocks. Thus, radical cost reduction of 1000 times is possible when a community seizes complete control over its own economic production by attending to lifetime desing, local production, and hypermodularity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Links on Distributive Production=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Shoshanna Zuboff, [http://drfd.hbs.edu/fit/public/facultyInfo.do?facInfo=res&amp;amp;facEmId=szuboff%40hbs.edu distributed capitalism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm Democratizing Innovation] - Eric von Hippel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=FAQ=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why are distributive economics important?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The distribution of wealth is continuing to deteriorate, as the rich get richer and the poor is poorer. This phenomenon is accompanied by human abuse and environmental degradation. While it may appear that the advent of advanced technology and of the information age would favor more equitable distribution of wealth, that is not the case.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there a metric for quantifying the success of distributive economics?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is a qualitative metric known as the [[Gross National Happiness]]. To date, it has been adopted as the official policy only in the country of Bhutan. [[OSE Specifications]] are a metric for quantifying distributive economic potential by attaching a score to a particular product or activity.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would there be enough wealth for everybody if all the capital in the world were distributed among all the earth&#039;s denizens?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The answer is positive only if there were not a single greedy person on the planet.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would the distributive economics paradigm disrupt the mainstream economic system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is no reason why both systems can not co-exist side-by-side. On an equal playing field, both would compete for market share, and the best one would win, assuming that there is no foul play.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;You &#039;&#039;effin&#039;&#039; communists, are you trying to bring down the entire economic system, which has brought us all the quality of life that we all enjoy today?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
We are apolitical, we do not promote state capitalism or any political ideology - we are providing a set of tools that can be used in numerous applications. Nor do we think that &amp;quot;we all enjoy today&amp;quot; a high standard of living. A high standard of living applies only to a small fraction of the global population. &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Are you suggesting a new economic concept?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is nothing new about the concept of &#039;&#039;distributive economics&#039;&#039;. Buckminster Fuller, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, among other thought leaders, have discussed the concept at length, though by using different languaging. It is a concept endorsed in theory by liberals, conservatives, environmentalists, radicals, anarchists, fundamentalists, capitalists, socialists, and many others, but it is rarely practiced. Social enterprise and the [[Bright Green]] approach are on the right track, but short of articulating the full scope of the open source/open business model paradigm. http://floing.org is a site that attempts to document this emerging paradigm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Guiding philosophies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stuart</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26745</id>
		<title>Distributive Economics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26745"/>
		<updated>2011-05-19T07:32:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stuart: /* Introduction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive Economics is an economic paradigm which promotes the equitable distribution of wealth through a combination of: open design (of products, processes, services, and other economically significant information), [[Flexible Fabrication]], and [[Open Business Models]], towards the replicability of such enterprise. This economics promotes its use to as many economic players as possible making its wealth replicable. Here an apolitical approach is taken where designe is improved by local solutions without invoking the context of centralized power, as implied in &#039;&#039;distributed economics&#039;&#039;, . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive economics has several requirements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Design repository&#039;&#039;&#039; - a global repository of freely-downloadable design can help any producer start an enterprise, from a small farmer to a high-tech innovator - by providing immediate access to best practices of economically significant products and production - without having to reinvent the wheel. In today&#039;s competitive world, there is no repository of optimized designs (these are either proprietary or patented), and by default, most producers provide inferior products, while a few produce the state-of-art. This is a model that works, but wastes tremendous amounts of human creativity and energy. By opening up access to best practices, costs would go down, and access to the best products would increase.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Appropriate scale&#039;&#039;&#039; - in, his seminal book, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Is_Beautiful Small is Beautiful], E. F. Schumacher discussed that the most holistically-efficient economic processes occur not on the global scale, but on the regional and community scale. Schumacher&#039;s viewpoint, while generally accepted as true, is not widely practiced today. Distributive economics favors a scale which does not incur inefficiencies of large scale (overhead costs, bureaucracy, communication costs, logistics, others). Schumacher&#039;s conclusion is that human organizations break down after they reach a certain large size, which suggests that in order for enterprise to be efficients, it should not be overly large.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Flexible fabrication&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximum distribution of the fruits of production occurs via [[Flexible Fabrication]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Lifetime design&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximizing the useful lifetime of a product, by design, reduces the cost of access to that product. For example, if a product lasts 100 years instead of 10 years, its cost is essentially reduced by a factor of 10, assuming that the initial product cost is the same.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Free enterprise&#039;&#039;&#039; - this means truly free enterprise where the playing field is leveled by open access to best-practice information (optimized product design, optimized production process design, and other economic analysis). This is the opposite of monopoly capitalism enforced by welfare-state [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics Keynesian economics]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Responsibility&#039;&#039;&#039; - accountability of communities for creating complete local economies implies autonomy on a local scale, while providing positive feedback loops for social and environmental responsibility. The intervening role of the welfare state is diminished as the people in take responsibility for their own well-being within their own communities.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Radical cost reduction&#039;&#039;&#039; - Lifetime design, combined with DIY production - can result in 100-fold cost reduction for a given product. For a whole set of products, such as the infrastructure for an entire community - [[Radical Hypermodularity]] can result in another factor 10 reduction - if a given component is used over in other applications, like industrial-strength Lego blocks. Thus, radical cost reduction of 1000 times is possible when a community seizes complete control over its own economic production by attending to lifetime desing, local production, and hypermodularity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Links on Distributive Production=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Shoshanna Zuboff, [http://drfd.hbs.edu/fit/public/facultyInfo.do?facInfo=res&amp;amp;facEmId=szuboff%40hbs.edu distributed capitalism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm Democratizing Innovation] - Eric von Hippel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=FAQ=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why are distributive economics important?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The distribution of wealth is continuing to deteriorate, as the rich get richer and the poor is poorer. This phenomenon is accompanied by human abuse and environmental degradation. While it may appear that the advent of advanced technology and of the information age would favor more equitable distribution of wealth, that is not the case.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there a metric for quantifying the success of distributive economics?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is a qualitative metric known as the [[Gross National Happiness]]. To date, it has been adopted as the official policy only in the country of Bhutan. [[OSE Specifications]] are a metric for quantifying distributive economic potential by attaching a score to a particular product or activity.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would there be enough wealth for everybody if all the capital in the world were distributed among all the earth&#039;s denizens?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The answer is positive only if there were not a single greedy person on the planet.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would the distributive economics paradigm disrupt the mainstream economic system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is no reason why both systems can not co-exist side-by-side. On an equal playing field, both would compete for market share, and the best one would win, assuming that there is no foul play.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;You &#039;&#039;effin&#039;&#039; communists, are you trying to bring down the entire economic system, which has brought us all the quality of life that we all enjoy today?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
We are apolitical, we do not promote state capitalism or any political ideology - we are providing a set of tools that can be used in numerous applications. Nor do we think that &amp;quot;we all enjoy today&amp;quot; a high standard of living. A high standard of living applies only to a small fraction of the global population. &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Are you suggesting a new economic concept?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is nothing new about the concept of &#039;&#039;distributive economics&#039;&#039;. Buckminster Fuller, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, among other thought leaders, have discussed the concept at length, though by using different languaging. It is a concept endorsed in theory by liberals, conservatives, environmentalists, radicals, anarchists, fundamentalists, capitalists, socialists, and many others, but it is rarely practiced. Social enterprise and the [[Bright Green]] approach are on the right track, but short of articulating the full scope of the open source/open business model paradigm. http://floing.org is a site that attempts to document this emerging paradigm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Guiding philosophies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stuart</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26744</id>
		<title>Distributive Economics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26744"/>
		<updated>2011-05-19T07:31:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stuart: /* Introduction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive Economics is an economic paradigm which promotes the equitable distribution of wealth through a combination of: open design (of products, processes, services, and other economically significant information), [[Flexible Fabrication]], and [[Open Business Models]], towards the replicability of such enterprise. This economics promotes its use to as many economic players as possible making its wealth replicable. Here an apolitical approach is taken where designed is improved by local solutions without invoking the context of centralized power, as implied in &#039;&#039;distributed economics&#039;&#039;, . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive economics has several requirements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Design repository&#039;&#039;&#039; - a global repository of freely-downloadable design can help any producer start an enterprise, from a small farmer to a high-tech innovator - by providing immediate access to best practices of economically significant products and production - without having to reinvent the wheel. In today&#039;s competitive world, there is no repository of optimized designs (these are either proprietary or patented), and by default, most producers provide inferior products, while a few produce the state-of-art. This is a model that works, but wastes tremendous amounts of human creativity and energy. By opening up access to best practices, costs would go down, and access to the best products would increase.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Appropriate scale&#039;&#039;&#039; - in, his seminal book, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Is_Beautiful Small is Beautiful], E. F. Schumacher discussed that the most holistically-efficient economic processes occur not on the global scale, but on the regional and community scale. Schumacher&#039;s viewpoint, while generally accepted as true, is not widely practiced today. Distributive economics favors a scale which does not incur inefficiencies of large scale (overhead costs, bureaucracy, communication costs, logistics, others). Schumacher&#039;s conclusion is that human organizations break down after they reach a certain large size, which suggests that in order for enterprise to be efficients, it should not be overly large.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Flexible fabrication&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximum distribution of the fruits of production occurs via [[Flexible Fabrication]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Lifetime design&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximizing the useful lifetime of a product, by design, reduces the cost of access to that product. For example, if a product lasts 100 years instead of 10 years, its cost is essentially reduced by a factor of 10, assuming that the initial product cost is the same.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Free enterprise&#039;&#039;&#039; - this means truly free enterprise where the playing field is leveled by open access to best-practice information (optimized product design, optimized production process design, and other economic analysis). This is the opposite of monopoly capitalism enforced by welfare-state [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics Keynesian economics]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Responsibility&#039;&#039;&#039; - accountability of communities for creating complete local economies implies autonomy on a local scale, while providing positive feedback loops for social and environmental responsibility. The intervening role of the welfare state is diminished as the people in take responsibility for their own well-being within their own communities.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Radical cost reduction&#039;&#039;&#039; - Lifetime design, combined with DIY production - can result in 100-fold cost reduction for a given product. For a whole set of products, such as the infrastructure for an entire community - [[Radical Hypermodularity]] can result in another factor 10 reduction - if a given component is used over in other applications, like industrial-strength Lego blocks. Thus, radical cost reduction of 1000 times is possible when a community seizes complete control over its own economic production by attending to lifetime desing, local production, and hypermodularity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Links on Distributive Production=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Shoshanna Zuboff, [http://drfd.hbs.edu/fit/public/facultyInfo.do?facInfo=res&amp;amp;facEmId=szuboff%40hbs.edu distributed capitalism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm Democratizing Innovation] - Eric von Hippel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=FAQ=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why are distributive economics important?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The distribution of wealth is continuing to deteriorate, as the rich get richer and the poor is poorer. This phenomenon is accompanied by human abuse and environmental degradation. While it may appear that the advent of advanced technology and of the information age would favor more equitable distribution of wealth, that is not the case.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there a metric for quantifying the success of distributive economics?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is a qualitative metric known as the [[Gross National Happiness]]. To date, it has been adopted as the official policy only in the country of Bhutan. [[OSE Specifications]] are a metric for quantifying distributive economic potential by attaching a score to a particular product or activity.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would there be enough wealth for everybody if all the capital in the world were distributed among all the earth&#039;s denizens?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The answer is positive only if there were not a single greedy person on the planet.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would the distributive economics paradigm disrupt the mainstream economic system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is no reason why both systems can not co-exist side-by-side. On an equal playing field, both would compete for market share, and the best one would win, assuming that there is no foul play.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;You &#039;&#039;effin&#039;&#039; communists, are you trying to bring down the entire economic system, which has brought us all the quality of life that we all enjoy today?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
We are apolitical, we do not promote state capitalism or any political ideology - we are providing a set of tools that can be used in numerous applications. Nor do we think that &amp;quot;we all enjoy today&amp;quot; a high standard of living. A high standard of living applies only to a small fraction of the global population. &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Are you suggesting a new economic concept?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is nothing new about the concept of &#039;&#039;distributive economics&#039;&#039;. Buckminster Fuller, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, among other thought leaders, have discussed the concept at length, though by using different languaging. It is a concept endorsed in theory by liberals, conservatives, environmentalists, radicals, anarchists, fundamentalists, capitalists, socialists, and many others, but it is rarely practiced. Social enterprise and the [[Bright Green]] approach are on the right track, but short of articulating the full scope of the open source/open business model paradigm. http://floing.org is a site that attempts to document this emerging paradigm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Guiding philosophies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stuart</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26743</id>
		<title>Distributive Economics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26743"/>
		<updated>2011-05-19T07:29:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stuart: /* Introduction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive Economics is an economic paradigm which promotes the equitable distribution of wealth through a combination of: open design (of products, processes, services, and other economically significant information), [[Flexible Fabrication]], and [[Open Business Models]], towards the replicability of such enterprise. This economics promotes its use to as many economic players as possible making its wealth replicable. Here an apolitical approach of improvement by design of local solutions without invoking the context of centralized power, as implied in &#039;&#039;distributed economics&#039;&#039;, is taken. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive economics has several requirements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Design repository&#039;&#039;&#039; - a global repository of freely-downloadable design can help any producer start an enterprise, from a small farmer to a high-tech innovator - by providing immediate access to best practices of economically significant products and production - without having to reinvent the wheel. In today&#039;s competitive world, there is no repository of optimized designs (these are either proprietary or patented), and by default, most producers provide inferior products, while a few produce the state-of-art. This is a model that works, but wastes tremendous amounts of human creativity and energy. By opening up access to best practices, costs would go down, and access to the best products would increase.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Appropriate scale&#039;&#039;&#039; - in, his seminal book, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Is_Beautiful Small is Beautiful], E. F. Schumacher discussed that the most holistically-efficient economic processes occur not on the global scale, but on the regional and community scale. Schumacher&#039;s viewpoint, while generally accepted as true, is not widely practiced today. Distributive economics favors a scale which does not incur inefficiencies of large scale (overhead costs, bureaucracy, communication costs, logistics, others). Schumacher&#039;s conclusion is that human organizations break down after they reach a certain large size, which suggests that in order for enterprise to be efficients, it should not be overly large.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Flexible fabrication&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximum distribution of the fruits of production occurs via [[Flexible Fabrication]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Lifetime design&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximizing the useful lifetime of a product, by design, reduces the cost of access to that product. For example, if a product lasts 100 years instead of 10 years, its cost is essentially reduced by a factor of 10, assuming that the initial product cost is the same.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Free enterprise&#039;&#039;&#039; - this means truly free enterprise where the playing field is leveled by open access to best-practice information (optimized product design, optimized production process design, and other economic analysis). This is the opposite of monopoly capitalism enforced by welfare-state [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics Keynesian economics]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Responsibility&#039;&#039;&#039; - accountability of communities for creating complete local economies implies autonomy on a local scale, while providing positive feedback loops for social and environmental responsibility. The intervening role of the welfare state is diminished as the people in take responsibility for their own well-being within their own communities.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Radical cost reduction&#039;&#039;&#039; - Lifetime design, combined with DIY production - can result in 100-fold cost reduction for a given product. For a whole set of products, such as the infrastructure for an entire community - [[Radical Hypermodularity]] can result in another factor 10 reduction - if a given component is used over in other applications, like industrial-strength Lego blocks. Thus, radical cost reduction of 1000 times is possible when a community seizes complete control over its own economic production by attending to lifetime desing, local production, and hypermodularity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Links on Distributive Production=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Shoshanna Zuboff, [http://drfd.hbs.edu/fit/public/facultyInfo.do?facInfo=res&amp;amp;facEmId=szuboff%40hbs.edu distributed capitalism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm Democratizing Innovation] - Eric von Hippel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=FAQ=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why are distributive economics important?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The distribution of wealth is continuing to deteriorate, as the rich get richer and the poor is poorer. This phenomenon is accompanied by human abuse and environmental degradation. While it may appear that the advent of advanced technology and of the information age would favor more equitable distribution of wealth, that is not the case.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there a metric for quantifying the success of distributive economics?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is a qualitative metric known as the [[Gross National Happiness]]. To date, it has been adopted as the official policy only in the country of Bhutan. [[OSE Specifications]] are a metric for quantifying distributive economic potential by attaching a score to a particular product or activity.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would there be enough wealth for everybody if all the capital in the world were distributed among all the earth&#039;s denizens?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The answer is positive only if there were not a single greedy person on the planet.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would the distributive economics paradigm disrupt the mainstream economic system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is no reason why both systems can not co-exist side-by-side. On an equal playing field, both would compete for market share, and the best one would win, assuming that there is no foul play.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;You &#039;&#039;effin&#039;&#039; communists, are you trying to bring down the entire economic system, which has brought us all the quality of life that we all enjoy today?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
We are apolitical, we do not promote state capitalism or any political ideology - we are providing a set of tools that can be used in numerous applications. Nor do we think that &amp;quot;we all enjoy today&amp;quot; a high standard of living. A high standard of living applies only to a small fraction of the global population. &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Are you suggesting a new economic concept?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is nothing new about the concept of &#039;&#039;distributive economics&#039;&#039;. Buckminster Fuller, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, among other thought leaders, have discussed the concept at length, though by using different languaging. It is a concept endorsed in theory by liberals, conservatives, environmentalists, radicals, anarchists, fundamentalists, capitalists, socialists, and many others, but it is rarely practiced. Social enterprise and the [[Bright Green]] approach are on the right track, but short of articulating the full scope of the open source/open business model paradigm. http://floing.org is a site that attempts to document this emerging paradigm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Guiding philosophies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stuart</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26742</id>
		<title>Distributive Economics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26742"/>
		<updated>2011-05-19T07:26:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stuart: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive Economics is an economic paradigm which promotes: the equitable distribution of wealth through a combination of open design (of products, processes, services, and other economically significant information), [[Flexible Fabrication]], and [[Open Business Models]], towards the replicability of such enterprise. This economics promotes its use to as many economic players as possible making its wealth replicable. Here an apolitical approach of improvement by design of local solutions without invoking the context of centralized power, as implied in &#039;&#039;distributed economics&#039;&#039;, is taken. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive economics has several requirements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Design repository&#039;&#039;&#039; - a global repository of freely-downloadable design can help any producer start an enterprise, from a small farmer to a high-tech innovator - by providing immediate access to best practices of economically significant products and production - without having to reinvent the wheel. In today&#039;s competitive world, there is no repository of optimized designs (these are either proprietary or patented), and by default, most producers provide inferior products, while a few produce the state-of-art. This is a model that works, but wastes tremendous amounts of human creativity and energy. By opening up access to best practices, costs would go down, and access to the best products would increase.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Appropriate scale&#039;&#039;&#039; - in, his seminal book, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Is_Beautiful Small is Beautiful], E. F. Schumacher discussed that the most holistically-efficient economic processes occur not on the global scale, but on the regional and community scale. Schumacher&#039;s viewpoint, while generally accepted as true, is not widely practiced today. Distributive economics favors a scale which does not incur inefficiencies of large scale (overhead costs, bureaucracy, communication costs, logistics, others). Schumacher&#039;s conclusion is that human organizations break down after they reach a certain large size, which suggests that in order for enterprise to be efficients, it should not be overly large.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Flexible fabrication&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximum distribution of the fruits of production occurs via [[Flexible Fabrication]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Lifetime design&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximizing the useful lifetime of a product, by design, reduces the cost of access to that product. For example, if a product lasts 100 years instead of 10 years, its cost is essentially reduced by a factor of 10, assuming that the initial product cost is the same.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Free enterprise&#039;&#039;&#039; - this means truly free enterprise where the playing field is leveled by open access to best-practice information (optimized product design, optimized production process design, and other economic analysis). This is the opposite of monopoly capitalism enforced by welfare-state [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics Keynesian economics]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Responsibility&#039;&#039;&#039; - accountability of communities for creating complete local economies implies autonomy on a local scale, while providing positive feedback loops for social and environmental responsibility. The intervening role of the welfare state is diminished as the people in take responsibility for their own well-being within their own communities.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Radical cost reduction&#039;&#039;&#039; - Lifetime design, combined with DIY production - can result in 100-fold cost reduction for a given product. For a whole set of products, such as the infrastructure for an entire community - [[Radical Hypermodularity]] can result in another factor 10 reduction - if a given component is used over in other applications, like industrial-strength Lego blocks. Thus, radical cost reduction of 1000 times is possible when a community seizes complete control over its own economic production by attending to lifetime desing, local production, and hypermodularity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Links on Distributive Production=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Shoshanna Zuboff, [http://drfd.hbs.edu/fit/public/facultyInfo.do?facInfo=res&amp;amp;facEmId=szuboff%40hbs.edu distributed capitalism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm Democratizing Innovation] - Eric von Hippel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=FAQ=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why are distributive economics important?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The distribution of wealth is continuing to deteriorate, as the rich get richer and the poor is poorer. This phenomenon is accompanied by human abuse and environmental degradation. While it may appear that the advent of advanced technology and of the information age would favor more equitable distribution of wealth, that is not the case.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there a metric for quantifying the success of distributive economics?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is a qualitative metric known as the [[Gross National Happiness]]. To date, it has been adopted as the official policy only in the country of Bhutan. [[OSE Specifications]] are a metric for quantifying distributive economic potential by attaching a score to a particular product or activity.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would there be enough wealth for everybody if all the capital in the world were distributed among all the earth&#039;s denizens?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The answer is positive only if there were not a single greedy person on the planet.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would the distributive economics paradigm disrupt the mainstream economic system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is no reason why both systems can not co-exist side-by-side. On an equal playing field, both would compete for market share, and the best one would win, assuming that there is no foul play.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;You &#039;&#039;effin&#039;&#039; communists, are you trying to bring down the entire economic system, which has brought us all the quality of life that we all enjoy today?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
We are apolitical, we do not promote state capitalism or any political ideology - we are providing a set of tools that can be used in numerous applications. Nor do we think that &amp;quot;we all enjoy today&amp;quot; a high standard of living. A high standard of living applies only to a small fraction of the global population. &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Are you suggesting a new economic concept?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is nothing new about the concept of &#039;&#039;distributive economics&#039;&#039;. Buckminster Fuller, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, among other thought leaders, have discussed the concept at length, though by using different languaging. It is a concept endorsed in theory by liberals, conservatives, environmentalists, radicals, anarchists, fundamentalists, capitalists, socialists, and many others, but it is rarely practiced. Social enterprise and the [[Bright Green]] approach are on the right track, but short of articulating the full scope of the open source/open business model paradigm. http://floing.org is a site that attempts to document this emerging paradigm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Guiding philosophies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stuart</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26741</id>
		<title>Distributive Economics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26741"/>
		<updated>2011-05-19T07:25:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stuart: /* Introduction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive Economics is an economic paradigm which promotes: the equitable distribution of wealth through a combination of open design (of products, processes, services, and other economically significant information), [[Flexible Fabrication]], and [[Open Business Models]], towards the replicability of such enterprise. This economics promotes its use to as many economic players as possible making its wealth replicable. Here an apolitical approach of improvement by design of local solutions without invoking the context of centralized power as implied in &#039;&#039;distributed economics&#039;&#039; is taken. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive economics has several requirements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Design repository&#039;&#039;&#039; - a global repository of freely-downloadable design can help any producer start an enterprise, from a small farmer to a high-tech innovator - by providing immediate access to best practices of economically significant products and production - without having to reinvent the wheel. In today&#039;s competitive world, there is no repository of optimized designs (these are either proprietary or patented), and by default, most producers provide inferior products, while a few produce the state-of-art. This is a model that works, but wastes tremendous amounts of human creativity and energy. By opening up access to best practices, costs would go down, and access to the best products would increase.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Appropriate scale&#039;&#039;&#039; - in, his seminal book, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Is_Beautiful Small is Beautiful], E. F. Schumacher discussed that the most holistically-efficient economic processes occur not on the global scale, but on the regional and community scale. Schumacher&#039;s viewpoint, while generally accepted as true, is not widely practiced today. Distributive economics favors a scale which does not incur inefficiencies of large scale (overhead costs, bureaucracy, communication costs, logistics, others). Schumacher&#039;s conclusion is that human organizations break down after they reach a certain large size, which suggests that in order for enterprise to be efficients, it should not be overly large.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Flexible fabrication&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximum distribution of the fruits of production occurs via [[Flexible Fabrication]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Lifetime design&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximizing the useful lifetime of a product, by design, reduces the cost of access to that product. For example, if a product lasts 100 years instead of 10 years, its cost is essentially reduced by a factor of 10, assuming that the initial product cost is the same.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Free enterprise&#039;&#039;&#039; - this means truly free enterprise where the playing field is leveled by open access to best-practice information (optimized product design, optimized production process design, and other economic analysis). This is the opposite of monopoly capitalism enforced by welfare-state [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics Keynesian economics]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Responsibility&#039;&#039;&#039; - accountability of communities for creating complete local economies implies autonomy on a local scale, while providing positive feedback loops for social and environmental responsibility. The intervening role of the welfare state is diminished as the people in take responsibility for their own well-being within their own communities.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Radical cost reduction&#039;&#039;&#039; - Lifetime design, combined with DIY production - can result in 100-fold cost reduction for a given product. For a whole set of products, such as the infrastructure for an entire community - [[Radical Hypermodularity]] can result in another factor 10 reduction - if a given component is used over in other applications, like industrial-strength Lego blocks. Thus, radical cost reduction of 1000 times is possible when a community seizes complete control over its own economic production by attending to lifetime desing, local production, and hypermodularity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Links on Distributive Production=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Shoshanna Zuboff, [http://drfd.hbs.edu/fit/public/facultyInfo.do?facInfo=res&amp;amp;facEmId=szuboff%40hbs.edu distributed capitalism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm Democratizing Innovation] - Eric von Hippel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=FAQ=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why are distributive economics important?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The distribution of wealth is continuing to deteriorate, as the rich get richer and the poor is poorer. This phenomenon is accompanied by human abuse and environmental degradation. While it may appear that the advent of advanced technology and of the information age would favor more equitable distribution of wealth, that is not the case.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there a metric for quantifying the success of distributive economics?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is a qualitative metric known as the [[Gross National Happiness]]. To date, it has been adopted as the official policy only in the country of Bhutan. [[OSE Specifications]] are a metric for quantifying distributive economic potential by attaching a score to a particular product or activity.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would there be enough wealth for everybody if all the capital in the world were distributed among all the earth&#039;s denizens?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The answer is positive only if there were not a single greedy person on the planet.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would the distributive economics paradigm disrupt the mainstream economic system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is no reason why both systems can not co-exist side-by-side. On an equal playing field, both would compete for market share, and the best one would win, assuming that there is no foul play.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;You &#039;&#039;effin&#039;&#039; communists, are you trying to bring down the entire economic system, which has brought us all the quality of life that we all enjoy today?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
We are apolitical, we do not promote state capitalism or any political ideology - we are providing a set of tools that can be used in numerous applications. Nor do we think that &amp;quot;we all enjoy today&amp;quot; a high standard of living. A high standard of living applies only to a small fraction of the global population. &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Are you suggesting a new economic concept?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is nothing new about the concept of &#039;&#039;distributive economics&#039;&#039;. Buckminster Fuller, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, among other thought leaders, have discussed the concept at length, though by using different languaging. It is a concept endorsed in theory by liberals, conservatives, environmentalists, radicals, anarchists, fundamentalists, capitalists, socialists, and many others, but it is rarely practiced. Social enterprise and the [[Bright Green]] approach are on the right track, but short of articulating the full scope of the open source/open business model paradigm. http://floing.org is a site that attempts to document this emerging paradigm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Guiding philosophies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stuart</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26740</id>
		<title>Distributive Economics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26740"/>
		<updated>2011-05-19T07:21:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stuart: /* Introduction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive Economics is an economic paradigm which promotes: the equitable distribution of wealth through a combination of open design (of products, processes, services, and other economically significant information), [[Flexible Fabrication]], and [[Open Business Models]], towards the replicability of such enterprise. This economics is not only replicable, but cultivates wealth as replicable. Here an apolitical approach of improvement by design of local solutions without invoking the context of centralized power as implied in &#039;&#039;distributed economics&#039;&#039; is taken. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive economics has several requirements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Design repository&#039;&#039;&#039; - a global repository of freely-downloadable design can help any producer start an enterprise, from a small farmer to a high-tech innovator - by providing immediate access to best practices of economically significant products and production - without having to reinvent the wheel. In today&#039;s competitive world, there is no repository of optimized designs (these are either proprietary or patented), and by default, most producers provide inferior products, while a few produce the state-of-art. This is a model that works, but wastes tremendous amounts of human creativity and energy. By opening up access to best practices, costs would go down, and access to the best products would increase.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Appropriate scale&#039;&#039;&#039; - in, his seminal book, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Is_Beautiful Small is Beautiful], E. F. Schumacher discussed that the most holistically-efficient economic processes occur not on the global scale, but on the regional and community scale. Schumacher&#039;s viewpoint, while generally accepted as true, is not widely practiced today. Distributive economics favors a scale which does not incur inefficiencies of large scale (overhead costs, bureaucracy, communication costs, logistics, others). Schumacher&#039;s conclusion is that human organizations break down after they reach a certain large size, which suggests that in order for enterprise to be efficients, it should not be overly large.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Flexible fabrication&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximum distribution of the fruits of production occurs via [[Flexible Fabrication]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Lifetime design&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximizing the useful lifetime of a product, by design, reduces the cost of access to that product. For example, if a product lasts 100 years instead of 10 years, its cost is essentially reduced by a factor of 10, assuming that the initial product cost is the same.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Free enterprise&#039;&#039;&#039; - this means truly free enterprise where the playing field is leveled by open access to best-practice information (optimized product design, optimized production process design, and other economic analysis). This is the opposite of monopoly capitalism enforced by welfare-state [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics Keynesian economics]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Responsibility&#039;&#039;&#039; - accountability of communities for creating complete local economies implies autonomy on a local scale, while providing positive feedback loops for social and environmental responsibility. The intervening role of the welfare state is diminished as the people in take responsibility for their own well-being within their own communities.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Radical cost reduction&#039;&#039;&#039; - Lifetime design, combined with DIY production - can result in 100-fold cost reduction for a given product. For a whole set of products, such as the infrastructure for an entire community - [[Radical Hypermodularity]] can result in another factor 10 reduction - if a given component is used over in other applications, like industrial-strength Lego blocks. Thus, radical cost reduction of 1000 times is possible when a community seizes complete control over its own economic production by attending to lifetime desing, local production, and hypermodularity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Links on Distributive Production=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Shoshanna Zuboff, [http://drfd.hbs.edu/fit/public/facultyInfo.do?facInfo=res&amp;amp;facEmId=szuboff%40hbs.edu distributed capitalism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm Democratizing Innovation] - Eric von Hippel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=FAQ=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why are distributive economics important?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The distribution of wealth is continuing to deteriorate, as the rich get richer and the poor is poorer. This phenomenon is accompanied by human abuse and environmental degradation. While it may appear that the advent of advanced technology and of the information age would favor more equitable distribution of wealth, that is not the case.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there a metric for quantifying the success of distributive economics?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is a qualitative metric known as the [[Gross National Happiness]]. To date, it has been adopted as the official policy only in the country of Bhutan. [[OSE Specifications]] are a metric for quantifying distributive economic potential by attaching a score to a particular product or activity.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would there be enough wealth for everybody if all the capital in the world were distributed among all the earth&#039;s denizens?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The answer is positive only if there were not a single greedy person on the planet.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would the distributive economics paradigm disrupt the mainstream economic system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is no reason why both systems can not co-exist side-by-side. On an equal playing field, both would compete for market share, and the best one would win, assuming that there is no foul play.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;You &#039;&#039;effin&#039;&#039; communists, are you trying to bring down the entire economic system, which has brought us all the quality of life that we all enjoy today?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
We are apolitical, we do not promote state capitalism or any political ideology - we are providing a set of tools that can be used in numerous applications. Nor do we think that &amp;quot;we all enjoy today&amp;quot; a high standard of living. A high standard of living applies only to a small fraction of the global population. &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Are you suggesting a new economic concept?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is nothing new about the concept of &#039;&#039;distributive economics&#039;&#039;. Buckminster Fuller, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, among other thought leaders, have discussed the concept at length, though by using different languaging. It is a concept endorsed in theory by liberals, conservatives, environmentalists, radicals, anarchists, fundamentalists, capitalists, socialists, and many others, but it is rarely practiced. Social enterprise and the [[Bright Green]] approach are on the right track, but short of articulating the full scope of the open source/open business model paradigm. http://floing.org is a site that attempts to document this emerging paradigm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Guiding philosophies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stuart</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26739</id>
		<title>Distributive Economics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Distributive_Economics&amp;diff=26739"/>
		<updated>2011-05-19T07:15:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stuart: /* Introduction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Introduction=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive Economics is an economic paradigm which promotes the equitable distribution of wealth through a combination of open design (of products, processes, services, and other economically significant information), [[Flexible Fabrication]], and [[Open Business Models]], towards the replicability of such enterprise. This is distinct from distributed economics - as &#039;&#039;distributive economics&#039;&#039; are economics that are not only distributed, but include an element of replicability - or that they tend to promote the replication to as many economic players as possible. We also distinguish the OSE meaning of distributive economics - as an apolitical approach of improvement by design of local solutions - without invoking the context of political systems or states, as implied in [distributism].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive Economics is an economic paradigm which promotes: the equitable distribution of wealth through a combination of open design (of products, processes, services, and other economically significant information), [[Flexible Fabrication]], and [[Open Business Models]], towards the replicability of such enterprise making wealth replicable. This economics is as an apolitical approach of improvement by design of local solutions without invoking the context of centralized power as implied in distributed economics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive economics has several requirements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Design repository&#039;&#039;&#039; - a global repository of freely-downloadable design can help any producer start an enterprise, from a small farmer to a high-tech innovator - by providing immediate access to best practices of economically significant products and production - without having to reinvent the wheel. In today&#039;s competitive world, there is no repository of optimized designs (these are either proprietary or patented), and by default, most producers provide inferior products, while a few produce the state-of-art. This is a model that works, but wastes tremendous amounts of human creativity and energy. By opening up access to best practices, costs would go down, and access to the best products would increase.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Appropriate scale&#039;&#039;&#039; - in, his seminal book, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Is_Beautiful Small is Beautiful], E. F. Schumacher discussed that the most holistically-efficient economic processes occur not on the global scale, but on the regional and community scale. Schumacher&#039;s viewpoint, while generally accepted as true, is not widely practiced today. Distributive economics favors a scale which does not incur inefficiencies of large scale (overhead costs, bureaucracy, communication costs, logistics, others). Schumacher&#039;s conclusion is that human organizations break down after they reach a certain large size, which suggests that in order for enterprise to be efficients, it should not be overly large.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Flexible fabrication&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximum distribution of the fruits of production occurs via [[Flexible Fabrication]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Lifetime design&#039;&#039;&#039; - maximizing the useful lifetime of a product, by design, reduces the cost of access to that product. For example, if a product lasts 100 years instead of 10 years, its cost is essentially reduced by a factor of 10, assuming that the initial product cost is the same.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Free enterprise&#039;&#039;&#039; - this means truly free enterprise where the playing field is leveled by open access to best-practice information (optimized product design, optimized production process design, and other economic analysis). This is the opposite of monopoly capitalism enforced by welfare-state [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_economics Keynesian economics]&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Responsibility&#039;&#039;&#039; - accountability of communities for creating complete local economies implies autonomy on a local scale, while providing positive feedback loops for social and environmental responsibility. The intervening role of the welfare state is diminished as the people in take responsibility for their own well-being within their own communities.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Radical cost reduction&#039;&#039;&#039; - Lifetime design, combined with DIY production - can result in 100-fold cost reduction for a given product. For a whole set of products, such as the infrastructure for an entire community - [[Radical Hypermodularity]] can result in another factor 10 reduction - if a given component is used over in other applications, like industrial-strength Lego blocks. Thus, radical cost reduction of 1000 times is possible when a community seizes complete control over its own economic production by attending to lifetime desing, local production, and hypermodularity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Links on Distributive Production=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Shoshanna Zuboff, [http://drfd.hbs.edu/fit/public/facultyInfo.do?facInfo=res&amp;amp;facEmId=szuboff%40hbs.edu distributed capitalism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm Democratizing Innovation] - Eric von Hippel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=FAQ=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why are distributive economics important?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The distribution of wealth is continuing to deteriorate, as the rich get richer and the poor is poorer. This phenomenon is accompanied by human abuse and environmental degradation. While it may appear that the advent of advanced technology and of the information age would favor more equitable distribution of wealth, that is not the case.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Is there a metric for quantifying the success of distributive economics?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is a qualitative metric known as the [[Gross National Happiness]]. To date, it has been adopted as the official policy only in the country of Bhutan. [[OSE Specifications]] are a metric for quantifying distributive economic potential by attaching a score to a particular product or activity.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would there be enough wealth for everybody if all the capital in the world were distributed among all the earth&#039;s denizens?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
The answer is positive only if there were not a single greedy person on the planet.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Would the distributive economics paradigm disrupt the mainstream economic system?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is no reason why both systems can not co-exist side-by-side. On an equal playing field, both would compete for market share, and the best one would win, assuming that there is no foul play.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;You &#039;&#039;effin&#039;&#039; communists, are you trying to bring down the entire economic system, which has brought us all the quality of life that we all enjoy today?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
We are apolitical, we do not promote state capitalism or any political ideology - we are providing a set of tools that can be used in numerous applications. Nor do we think that &amp;quot;we all enjoy today&amp;quot; a high standard of living. A high standard of living applies only to a small fraction of the global population. &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Are you suggesting a new economic concept?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
There is nothing new about the concept of &#039;&#039;distributive economics&#039;&#039;. Buckminster Fuller, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, among other thought leaders, have discussed the concept at length, though by using different languaging. It is a concept endorsed in theory by liberals, conservatives, environmentalists, radicals, anarchists, fundamentalists, capitalists, socialists, and many others, but it is rarely practiced. Social enterprise and the [[Bright Green]] approach are on the right track, but short of articulating the full scope of the open source/open business model paradigm. http://floing.org is a site that attempts to document this emerging paradigm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Guiding philosophies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stuart</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Talk:OSE_Specifications&amp;diff=26737</id>
		<title>Talk:OSE Specifications</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Talk:OSE_Specifications&amp;diff=26737"/>
		<updated>2011-05-19T06:21:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stuart: /* Old version */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I would think &amp;quot;Open Source Ecology&amp;quot; would be about having the Sources of Ecology Open.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not just the &#039;virtual&#039; Sources such as genetics (DNA) or plans and knowledge about how to raise organisms, what about the [[Physical Sources]]?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Will any part of OSE ever be about Opening the [[Material Inputs]]?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do we care about insuring access to instances of the designs that have been on the planet for millions of years, or about access to instances of the new designs that are created and opened here?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What if I travel to the OpenFarmTech land in Missouri?  Can I rent land or tools?  Can I become a part owner?  How will such a facility grow?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We need investors.  If those investors are future consumers, they will expect product instead of profit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sincerely, -- [[User:AGNUcius|AGNUcius]] 09:55, 25 February 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Old version=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before you read further, please see the [[OSE Mission]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OSE Specifications are a way of identifying tools that will allow people to  create abundant local economic production as a basis for community prosperity in an interconnected world. The OSE Specifications are a list of qualities; technologies that have these qualities are technologies that allow people to use their local resource-base to create abundance. Material abundance leaves people with free time and energy to fuel cultural and scientific progress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These values are to be embodied in the development process, in the recruitment of volunteers, in OSE&#039;s organizational structure and in all operations, public and private:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wanted|Shorten this list and simplify it. A lot of these just repeat other values (In work, see [[Requirements Analysis]]) [[User:DanielRavenNest|DanielRavenNest]] 06:42, 5 May 2011 (PDT)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Open&#039;&#039;&#039; - Open Source Ecology endorses the open-source culture of sharing and collaborative development. This applies to all components of the project: technical design, organizational structure, finances, business and marketing methods etc. Everything we know, you know. We encourage members to collaborate openly, in a culture of respect. We are aiming to create collaboration structures (such as wikis and web forums) to facilitate this open flow of information. We encourage everybody on the development team to be transparent about their work, and to ask openly for collaborative assistance. We encourage everybody to give information away for free – as the cost of sharing information is zero.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It is imperative that the technical details of the [[Global Village Construction Set]] tools be published openly on the Internet, with no restrictions, patents or trade secrets. Bills of materials, 3D designs, schematics, build instructions,  and product manuals are to be published on our wiki. This gives the user the power to design, produce, and modify the [[GVCS]] tools according to his or her wishes. The same person is therefore consumer, producer and designer. This leads to robust, tailor-made goods. This allows a global team of developers to improve the tools. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Business models should be published openly so that others can replicate any enterprise. We believe it is best to publish plans early and often. This exposes our errors and dead ends to the scrutiny of our online community and leads to faster, better design. We value sharing and collaborative development over greed and exclusiveness. This type of culture promotes co-operation, as opposed to fear-based aggressiveness. &lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Distributive Economics&#039;&#039;&#039; – We believe in decentralizing economic activity. We aim to decentralize the production of food through [[:Category:Food and Agriculture|local food systems]], and decentralize the production of technology by combining local [[Digital Fabrication|digital fabrication]] with global collaborative design to create what we call &#039;[[Industry 2.0]]&#039;.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In distributive economics, information should be free because the cost of distributing information is negligible. However, atoms or physical objects are not &#039;free&#039; in the same sense, as significant energy is required to produce and distribute physical goods.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Low-Cost&#039;&#039;&#039; - The cost of buying or making our machines are, on average, 5-10x cheaper than buying from an industrial manufacturer-  including an average labor cost of $25 hour for a GVCS fabricator. Commentary: &lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Modular&#039;&#039;&#039; – Components of the GVCS function as interchangeable modules. Motors, parts, assemblies, and power units can interchange, where units can grouped together to diversify the functionality that is achievable from a small set of units. To see how the different parts fit together - see [[Product Ecologies]]. &lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Closed-Loop Material Cycles&#039;&#039;&#039; – As in nature, nothing goes to waste, but instead becomes an input for another process. Our project relies on recycling metal into virgin feedstock for producing further GVCS technologies - thereby allowing for cradle-to-cradle manufacturing cycles. &lt;br /&gt;
{{Wanted|Resolve the clash between &amp;quot;High Performance&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Sufficiency&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;High Performance&#039;&#039;&#039; - Performance standards must match or exceed those of industrial counterparts for the GVCS to provide a comparable or better standard of living.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Sufficiency&#039;&#039;&#039; – We understand that we need to reach a certain level of performance, and that is sufficient. This is distinct from continuous addition of frivolous bells and whistles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Ecological Design&#039;&#039;&#039; -  Our products promote a harmonious co-existence between nature and humans. The entire process and technology must fit the criteria for being environmentally friendly and regenerative.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Adaptability&#039;&#039;&#039;– The systems that we are designing are designed to be adaptable. This arises from the ability to modify, scale and replicate the components and systems to meet requirement of constantly changing conditions. The tools are useful anywhere - from the 1st to the 4th worlds, from the city to the country, from high technology to low technology applications, at different scales of operation.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Systems Design&#039;&#039;&#039; – Our designs consider the whole system of life support, in terms of how the different machines and services interface with one another. Different machines can functions as modules in a wide array of integrated systems. We do not choose technologies with peak point performance, but with peak systems performance as they fit into a resilient community integrated with its natural life support systems. Part of the systems design is synergy – in that the GVCS is intended to attain its maximum potential when all of its components are working with one another.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Lifetime Design&#039;&#039;&#039; – Our products are designed for a lifetime of use. Open-source design, where the designer is the user, has no interest in planning obsolescence. Design-for-disassembly, simplicity, transparency, and open-source documentation allows the user to understand, take apart, modify, service, maintain, and fix tools without relying on expensive repairmen.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Substitutability&#039;&#039;&#039; – Our products substitute common resources for less common resources. &lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Flexibility&#039;&#039;&#039; – Our tools can be used flexibly in a wide range of applications. Our digital fabrication equipment can flexibly produce a huge variety of products, in contrast with a factory robot that can only produce the same thing over and over again. Our means to [[flexible fabrication]] is the [[open source fab lab]].&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Simplicity&#039;&#039;&#039; - We design for simplicity without sacrificing performance standards&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Complete Economy&#039;&#039;&#039; – The work of OSE is intended to be a workable blueprint for a complete economy. Our designs are geared for a  maker lifestyle on the part of community members. This is also known as a neo-subsistence lifestyle – where communities can provide all the requirements of a complete economy, such that trade is only an option, not a necessity. &lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Scalability and holography&#039;&#039;&#039; – The GVCS tools are designed to be scalable to different sizes of operations, from individual households to agglomerations of villages (cities). The design should be holographic, in that each unit of operation should be self-contained (complete) and resilient. With modern technology, human organization can be scaled down to the village scale – empowered by open access to information.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;We look at the village scale of about 200 people as the optimal scale of human organization for several reasons. First, it&#039;s a historically proven number. Second, it follows [[Dunbar&#039;s Number]] to allow for persistent and meaningful social interaction. Third, it is easily manageable from an organizational point of view without requiring bureaucratic overhead. Fourth, it is sufficiently large to allow specialization via division of labor. Fifth, it allows for a walking- or biking-distance community. Sixth, it is a basic building block - where larger communities may be designed as units of this small scale for the highest possible resilience - as opposed to organization on a larger scale. Seventh, it has been pointed out by the industrial economist, E. F. Schumacher, in his seminal book, [[Small is Beautiful]], that human organization simply breaks down after it reaches a certain scale.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Technological Recursion&#039;&#039;&#039; – The flexible fabrication technology also allows producers to produce more complex machines and parts. This allows a local community to, eventually, attain the capacity to produce any technology known to humankind. &lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Local Resources&#039;&#039;&#039; – The GVCS is fueled by local resources, such as water, sunlight, rock and soil. Via technological recursion, these are transformed into useful technology.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Community&#039;&#039;&#039; – The GVCS toolset is designed to promote a just, equitable, and life-giving social contract for a community. The tools are designed to be used by a village-scale community, not by individuals. Within this village, there is a social contract based on division of labor, so that the work of each member contributes to the well-being of the whole community. The role of the individual is lifelong learning, stewardship of land and resources and nonviolence. This co-operative arrangement, along with increased freedom from material constraints, promotes connection between people. This reconnection also includes reconnection to one&#039;s true needs, to one&#039;s family, and to the global family of all living creatures.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Proven Techniques&#039;&#039;&#039; – We focus on time-proven concepts, techniques, and technologies. All are principles are generally regarded as common, historical knowledge or wisdom learned through eons of civilization. &lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Cross-Disciplinary Integration&#039;&#039;&#039;  – We provide cutting edge practice in so far as they are integrations of knowledge from many fields and disciplines. We value unabashed boundary-crossing and cross-fertilization, drawing from as many cultures, regions, and time periods as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;New Economics&#039;&#039;&#039; – One aspect of OSE is that it allows for the creation of a resource based economy, where true wealth is based on the value of natural, primarily local resources, where wealth is created from adding value to natural resources by transforming them to human-usable form.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Replicability&#039;&#039;&#039; – OSE work is intended to be replicable, self-replicating, and viral. The open-source nature, low-cost, and simplicity of our designs are key to this.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Meaning&#039;&#039;&#039; – Technology, when used appropriately, is intended to reconnect one to meaning, and to natural ecosystems. Reconnection to nature can occur from constant interplay between humans and nature, as natural resources are stewarded responsibly to meet human needs by benign processes.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Appropriate Automation&#039;&#039;&#039; – We favor automation of repetitive, difficult, dangerous or unrewarding tasks.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Long Term Approach&#039;&#039;&#039; – OSE is seeking long-term solutions on the 100 year scale into the future, not band-aids on superficial issues. We are looking at issues for the long haul, with lasting peace and stability for humanity as the goal.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Networked model communities&#039;&#039;&#039; – We are interested in creating a network of like-minded communities that follow OSE values, so that cultural exchange can happen between different communities. This is the [[1000 Global Villages]] concept - 1000 villages that serve as model communities and influence the rest of the world in a positive way. &lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Land and Resource Stewardship&#039;&#039;&#039; – Each OSE facility functions as a land steward. Land is not for sale, but is preserved for ever as a permanent site of human heritage and cultural growth. Resources are stewarded so that they improve in quality with time, as opposed to becoming depleted.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Iconoclastic Innovation and Transformation&#039;&#039;&#039; – OSE favors iconoclastic approaches which address issues at the root, not symptoms – towards addressing pressing world issues (war, poverty, corruption, distribution of wealth, disease, etc.). We are not looking for mass-culture compromises swayed by political or special interests, but for authentic solutions based on virtues common to all humankind.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Absolute Creative Approaches&#039;&#039;&#039;  - We do not promote destroying anything, just creating a better solution that makes the old paradigm obsolete. We have no use for the concept of &amp;quot;enemy&amp;quot;. We do not hate any group or politic, because we are all in this together. We believe in positive psychology, inspiration, and bringing out the virtues in people – by appealing to their absolute creative, transcendent potential for solutions. We do not endorse fear- or punishment-based motivation tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Realism&#039;&#039;&#039; - We favor a realistic approach that can be implemented today, not futuristic dreaming. &lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Abundance&#039;&#039;&#039;- We believe that there are abundant resources – minerals, energy, food, water etc. – for everyone, if we use them efficiently and intelligently. We promote social and technological arrangements that lead to abundance, allowing people free time to pursue their happiness&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Methods and Strategic Approaches=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Distributive Economics&#039;&#039;&#039; - We recognize the challenges of sharing information openly – in that someone else can &#039;steal&#039; an idea and capitalize on it. We address this issue by encouraging people to publish openly, so that prior art makes information accessible to all, and therefore, making information un-patentable and therefore incapable of being appropriated. In order to capture value, we encourage humans to organize around information resource commons, while building in a physical, productive infrastructure to convert information into the substance of modern-day living via benign, industrial processes&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Notes on Patents&#039;&#039;&#039;. These make sense only in a world based on scarcity. We encourage each community that adopts OSE principles to build complete, open source, economic productivity – where true wealth can be generated easily. In this case, what is the need for patents? If a community can provide all of its needs - then we enter into the concept of sufficiency. State-of-art point technologies that optimize one feature of performance are not necessarily useful for an ecological tool set. We are interested more in overall, or ecological, performance - as opposed to point performance.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Creative Approach&#039;&#039;&#039; - There is a number of movements that cater to fears regarding the end of the world or other comprehensive collapse scenarios. Our approach is intended to empower people from a perspective of what is a-priori favorable and benign - whether or not any cataclysm is on the horizon. IT is important to underscore that we focus on positive psychology and transcendence, which we favor over an approach based on fear, because fear-based response is not as likely to create long-lasting solutions.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Modular, lifetime design&#039;&#039;&#039; – The core of lifetime design is design-for-disassembly and modularity. Design-for-disassembly is synonymous with user ability to &#039;look under the hood&#039; of a certain device. Modules are interchangeable units of functionality.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Closed Loop Manufacturing&#039;&#039;&#039; – OSE endorses closed loop eco-industry, where waste does not exist as the waste is turned into feedstock for other processes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Components of OSE Specifications=&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wanted|Get rid of this list by merging it into the other lists above}}&lt;br /&gt;
OSE Specifications cover a number of aspects of economically-significant production, covering the development and production aspects:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Economic significance&lt;br /&gt;
*Open documentation&lt;br /&gt;
*Distributive economic nature&lt;br /&gt;
*Transformative nature of enterprise&lt;br /&gt;
*Systems design&lt;br /&gt;
*Transparency and participatory nature of production model and development process&lt;br /&gt;
*Creation of post-scarcity levels of production&lt;br /&gt;
*Simplicity and low cost&lt;br /&gt;
*Lifetime, modular design; design-for-disassembly; design-for-scalability &lt;br /&gt;
*Localization of material sourcing and of production&lt;br /&gt;
*Ecological qualities &lt;br /&gt;
*Economic Feasibility and Replicability&lt;br /&gt;
**Minimization of waste, overhead, and bureaucracy&lt;br /&gt;
**Product Evolution&lt;br /&gt;
**Fabrication Facilities&lt;br /&gt;
**Open Franchising or Open Business Model&lt;br /&gt;
**Startup Assistance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Resources (e.g. land) needed for the tool should be locally available&lt;br /&gt;
* The need the tool meets should be essential to a large market. No specialist goods or luxuries.&lt;br /&gt;
* Provision of a robust village economy and sufficient surplus for further developments&lt;br /&gt;
* Generative nature of the product, thus promoting self-replication of the village&lt;br /&gt;
* The GVCS tools together should cover every essential service for a village.&lt;br /&gt;
* Viability of a community on a village scale, perhaps 100 people, but as few as 2 or as many as sustained by the land base&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic Significance==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Economic significance refers to the overall economic importance of a given product or service. The assumption here that economic significance is defined on the basis of relevance for meeting the material needs of humans. For example, fuels and tractors constitute multibillion dollar global markets, and are thus economically significant. On the other hand, plain discussion may have little economic significance, if is not more than hot air.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Open Documentation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Readily accessible or downloadble documentation and design===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributed information in the computer age is made most readily accessible if it is available for immediate download from the internet. If material is available in electronic format, it may be manipulated or utilized readily with software tools. For example, digital designs may be edited or used immediately in CAD or CAM. If CAM formats are available, then data at one point in space can be readily transformed into a physical object at another point in space, in the presence of digital fabrication capacities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Design Drawings===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a start towards replicability.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Bill of Materials (BOM)===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wanted|Move this section to [[Product Template]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
Next to design drawing, the BOM is the second most important towards replicability. This is a detailed listing of all parts used, sourcing, and prices. Relevant comments should be made alongside the BOM, such as, quality or reliability of certain vendors, their quality of service, and any other useful comments. The only difficulty with a BOM may be that if the audience is global, sourcing may not be readily available or shipping may be prohibitive, so local substitution of parts must be made. If a BOM is available, then the building of a specific product can commence immediately: there is no guessing which parts would work, or which supplier is reliable. At best, the process for one-off individual production can be as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
#an individual decides that they need a certain product&lt;br /&gt;
#they look that product up on an online repository of open source products, download fabrication procedures and parts lists&lt;br /&gt;
#purchase parts locally all on the same day if they are located in an urban area where many suppliers are available&lt;br /&gt;
#and start building a certain project.&lt;br /&gt;
All these steps can potentially be completed in one day when the BOM is available. Open design drawings and plans are only one aspect, but the critical point to enabling immediate production is the availability of BOMs, as the last step prior to actual fabrication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possibility then emerges that a large number of people can stop buying goods from who-knows-where and begin to fabricate them locally. This is feasibile on the individual level for anyone equipped with a robust Fab Lab, or when small groups (a few to a dozen people) get together to purchase low-cost, open source, digital fabrication equipment. These people could operate out of backyard garages, rented workshop spaces, co-working facilities, or other community supported manufacturing operations. The types of products that yield themselves particularly to this type of production are those items that fall beyond the class of disposable goods, and are more or less long-use items. These items include electronics, mechanized tools, semi-heavy machinery, green vehicles, renewable energy systems, among others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Tools====&lt;br /&gt;
[[CAD by Mariano Alvira]] and [[SKDB]] are two different tools that can improve and automate different aspects of handling a BOM.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Free information===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If information is free, it is most easily accessible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Distributive Economics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distributive economics refer to economic models that tend to distribute economic power as opposed to monopolizing this power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transformative Nature of Enterprise==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We are interested in transformative economics, or those economics which tend towards community and global resilience, while having qualities that, proactively, move the world away from: concentration of societal power; perennial warfare; loss of meaning; bureaucracy; globalization of economic activity; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newspeak newspeak]; loss of freedom; and so forth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Systems Design==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Systems design refers to design of economic paradigms which consider the whole human and natural ecosystem, and the relationships involved, not just an isolated part of that system. For example, non-systems thinking may lead one to conclude that a modern steam engine for transportation is a bad idea compared to biodiesel or fuel alcohol because the thermodynamic efficiency of a steam engine is two times lower than that of diesel engines or gasoline engines. The systems design perspective will claim that the steam engine is a great idea, because biomass pellets can be used as fuel, and the yield of cellulosic biomass per acre is about 10 times higher than the yield of oil or alcohol. The systems thinker will continue, by stating that if the whole system is considered, biomass pellet production is much simpler to accomplish, and that biomass-growing areas can be integrated with other uses such as orcharding or livestock raising, and the systems thinker will continue to make other claims that such an energy source allows for absolute decentralization of production and resilience of communities using the simplest means possible. The point to be made is that the systems thinker can continue to make a large number of claims on how a particular activity is desirable based on a number of systems connections, which the non-systems thinker dismisses as simply not being part of the question.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We believe that destructive non-systems thinking is so pervasive in our society, that in general, individual and societal decision-making is completely partisan, thin on logic, and downright retarded. We are including a metric for systems design in the OSE Specifications to raise awareness of this issue, with a hope, which even if futile, attempts to bring a glimmer of light to the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Systems Engineering]]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the engineering discipline devoted to the entire life cycle of a complex man-made system.  This is distinct from specialty disciplines such as mechanical or electrical engineering which are devoted to specific elements of a system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transparency of Production Model and Development Process==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The development process for products, and their production model, should be transparent to any interested observer. This allows for study of, input into, and improvement of the topic of interest. Transparency allows feedback loops to become active, and empowers those who are interested in learning more about a topic. Transparency is one of several qualities of a distributive, economic process. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transparency of some program implies that the program is open to suggestions, correction, or replication of itself, stemming from an ethical foundation of the given program. Therefore, tools such as non-disclosure agreements, patents, trade secrets, and other means of protectionism are inconsistent with the creation of transparency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Development Process===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Participation in the development process is entirely voluntary. No compensation for alienation is necessary. As a result, the best designs are produced from the commitment of passionate stakeholders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Anyone may join or leave the development group at any time&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Collaborative development process utilizes the input of diverse stakeholders&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Steps and results of the development process are documented&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Creation of Post-Scarcity Levels of Production==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Post-scarcity levels of production imply the availability of effective tools of production, including both hardware and techniques - which allow for the ample meeting of human needs. Post-scarcity levels of production also imply that local, nonstrategic resources can be utilized effectively, reliably, and with the capacity to produce significant surplus. The goal of attaining post-scarcity levels of production of something are thus synonymous with a particular community being able to transcend physical survival as a basis for evolving to pursuits beyond mere survival.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Simplicity and Low Cost==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The design and implementation of any product or service should be the simplest from both the fabrication and cost perspective, such that it is the most readily replicable. Attaining simplicity is indeed the most difficult design challenge. Most people confuse high performance with extra features, because they externalize the hidden liabilities that accompany the extra features. Simplicity is synonymous with efficient resource use. Simplicity should also apply to the fabrication procedure of an object. As such, simplicity is also synonymous with low cost. The basic design philosophy of OSE is to include simplicity in design and fabrication - ie, design-for-fabrication should be applied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lifetime, Modular Design; Design-for-Disassembly; Design-for-Scalability (DfS)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Note: For mainstream reference on lifetime design, see the work of [[Saul Griffith]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Simplicity of design promotes the features of lifetime, modular, and scalable design-for-disassembly (DfD). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lifetime design implies that the value of a product does not depreciate over time. This implies freedom from labor required to replace a certain product, which has direct implication for one&#039;s access to free time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Modular design is a design which allows different modules to be used and interchanged, giving the user control over and flexibility with the object of use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DfD means that parts of modules may be replaced readily, by taking the module apart. This has profound implications to lifetime design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DfS is more than a design that can be scaled. It is the principle of designing things with ease of scalability as one of the features - ie, design that can be scaled easily. This is a slight improvement over design that can be scaled, in that DfS includes explicit features that make scalability easy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scalability means that a basic building block can be used to make larger or smaller versions. This contributes to low cost and efficiency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Multipurpose Modular Design===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Objects should be designed so that they are made as building blocks, or modules, of other or larger objects. This way, objects can be modified. Instead of a whole object having to be replaced to add new functionality, a module may be added. This gives products a flexibility that is built into their very nature, such that the user has additional control with minimum expense. Modularity may sometimes be synonymous with inter-operability, and may sometimes be synonymous with scalability. It may contribute to lifetime design if an object is 100% modular and each module may be replaced. Modularity also means that an object may function as a building block of other objects. In all cases, modularity implies that an object may be modified. The combination of flexibility, adaptability, scalability, interoperability are desirable. These features expand the range of applications, increase lifetime, reduce cost, as well as provide and retain high value. In a material world, these are features that contribute to wealth and prosperity. In a nutshell, modularity provides large value and has low associated costs. These are good implications for individual and community well-being.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If modular design is followed, then the type of interoperability of using building blocks leads us to a [[Pattern Language]] of technology. In this pattern language, the modules or building blocks serve as the sentences of a larger language, or technology infrastructure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scalability===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Products should be designed so that they can be scaled up or down - such as by addition of new modules, or using multiples of a part in parallel. For example, a solar concentrator system designed according to the principle of scalability should be a linear design (see [[Solar Power Generator]]), so that it could be enlarged either by lengthening or widening the array.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Localization of Material Sourcing and of Production==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For community resilience, ability to use local resources is key. While it is important that a community have this ability for essential needs, it is optional, though desirable, for other nonessential items.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using local resources may necessitate that a given community have additional technology to produce a certain item. For example, if a given community does not have the conditions to grow a certain crop easily, it may want to invest in the additional technology required to grow that crop successfully. Or, if a certain community does not have adequate water, it should invest in well-drilling or roof-catchment technology, instead of importing water from unsecured sources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A community should thus, in general, strive to increase its technology base to accommodate the provision of all essentials, and not settle on its ability to trade to procure these essentials, as trade may be vulnerable to disruption. Trade is quite acceptable for non-essential items, such as musical instruments, since disruption of such supply does not threaten the survival of a community. The level of technology in which a community is autonomous should be determined on practical grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, in today&#039;s world, we already hear about &#039;produced locally.&#039; We should add &#039;sourced locally&#039; to our vocabulary - as resilience implies not only local production, but also local sourcing. Local sourcing typically requires that a community have additional technological infrastructure and knowhow for providing the necessary feedstocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Localization Levels===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Level 1 - production is local&lt;br /&gt;
*Level 2 - sourcing of materials used in production is local&lt;br /&gt;
*Level 3 - raw material production is local&lt;br /&gt;
*Level 4 - production machinery used in the production process above is open source and locally fabricated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Localization applies to the creation of natural economies, or those economies based on the substance of their own, natural resources, free of supply chain disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An example of Level 3 is that local aluminum is made by smelting aluminum from local clays.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If localization is taken to all the 4 levels, for all necessities of sustaining its population - that means that a region is autonomous, and as such, has no built-in tendency to wage war for others&#039; resources. This is the &lt;br /&gt;
critical point of localization - its benign effect on global geopolitical struggle. In simple words, people don&#039;t kill and steal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ecological Qualities==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The product of interest must be good for the environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic Feasibility and Replicability==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minimization of Waste, Overhead, and Bureaucracy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key point to the competitiveness of agile, open source enterprise is its lean structure with minimal overhead. Minimization of waste occurs by collaborative development, such that R&amp;amp;D costs are shared by a number of stakeholders. Competitive waste is eliminated by open enterprise giving services away rather than competing for market share, which is the ethical marketing strategy for open enterprise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other strategies for keeping overhead low are [http://openfarmtech.org/weblog/?p=391 crowd-funding the production facility], such as in Factor e Farm&#039;s case. We also propose paperwork reduction by operating as an un-incorporated entity, with contractually-based fiscal fiduciaries and liability management, operation in the Republic via private contract, and by in-house legal literacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Product Evolution===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A process should be in place for continued maintenance and development of a product. This could be a support community, foundation, or users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fabrication Facilities===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Concrete Flexible Fabrication mechanism exists for others to purchase the product at reasonable cost. This is a means to assuring that a diversity of suppliers exists, such that monopoly is avoided.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Open Franchising or [[Open Business Model]]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This point defines how easily one can obtain access to replicable enterprise design. See our motivation with respect to Open Business Models, as described under the [[OSE License]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a number of details that goes into enterprise replications. These are all the standard details found in a [[Business Plan]], plus the actual technical details that go into that plan, such as designs and CAD, fabrication procedures, BOM and sourcing information, economic analysis, ergonomic analysis, and so forth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are interested in replicating an enterprise, then please inquire with us regarding practical considerations. For those interested in replication, we are looking for long-term commitment to provide the necessary due diligence of business model documentation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Startup Assistance===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Producer training is the key to assisting others to start up enterprise. Dedicated workshops should be available for others to learn the trade. We plan on offering a 2 year immersion program, which includes not only workshop skills, but agriculture, as well as theoretical and organizational aspects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Calculation of a Metric Score=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The questionnaire below can be used to determine whether a product meets the OSE specifications. There are 42 questions, so the maximum score is 42.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic Significance===&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it relevant for meeting the material needs of humans?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Distributive Economics===&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the economic model distribute economic power?&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Transformative Nature of Enterprise&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*Does it promote community and global resilience?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Systems Design===&lt;br /&gt;
*Does it consider the complete human and natural ecosystem?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ecology===&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it good for the environment?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Development Process===&lt;br /&gt;
*Is participation in the process entirely voluntary? &lt;br /&gt;
*Can anyone join or leave the development group at any time?&lt;br /&gt;
*Does the collaborative development process utilize the input of diverse stakeholders?&lt;br /&gt;
*Are the steps and results of the development process documented?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simplicity of design===&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it low Cost?&lt;br /&gt;
*Does it have Long Life?&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it modular?&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it designed for disassembly?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Design for scalability===&lt;br /&gt;
*Can it be scaled up?&lt;br /&gt;
*Can it be scaled down?&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it easily scalable?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Localization===&lt;br /&gt;
====Materials====&lt;br /&gt;
*Are materials used in production local?&lt;br /&gt;
*Is raw material production local?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Production====&lt;br /&gt;
*Is product production local?&lt;br /&gt;
*Is the machinery used in production process open source?&lt;br /&gt;
*Is the machinery used in production process locally fabricated?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic Feasibility and Replicability===&lt;br /&gt;
*Is there minimal overhead? &lt;br /&gt;
*Is there minimal waste?&lt;br /&gt;
*Are R&amp;amp;D costs shared by a number of stakeholders?&lt;br /&gt;
*Are services given away? &lt;br /&gt;
*Are production facilities Crowd-funded?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Product Evolution===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is there continual produce maintenance? &lt;br /&gt;
*Is there continual product development?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fabrication Facilities===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is there a flexible fabrication mechanism? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Open Business Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is there a Business Plan?&lt;br /&gt;
*Are there technical details in the business plan?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Open Documentation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is content Open Source?&lt;br /&gt;
*Is content readily accessible (downloadable)?&lt;br /&gt;
*Are there design drawings?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Designs====&lt;br /&gt;
*Are design drawings CAD?&lt;br /&gt;
*Are fabrication procedures detailed?&lt;br /&gt;
*Is economic analysis available?&lt;br /&gt;
*Is ergonomic analysis available?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Bill of Materials (BOM)====&lt;br /&gt;
*Is there a parts list?&lt;br /&gt;
*Is Sourcing of parts listed?&lt;br /&gt;
*Are prices of parts listed?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Startup Assistance===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is producer training available?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Summary=&lt;br /&gt;
In summary, we aim to raise the standards embodied in open source product development efforts by articulating the possibilities. OSE Specification describes all the desirable features that can be embodied in open economic development, under the assumption that maximum advancement of distributive production is the best route to human prosperity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OSE Specifications, as applied to technology - imply &#039;&#039;liberatory technology&#039;&#039; - defined as technology which serves the true needs of people and liberates time for other pursuits beyond survival. This is distinct from technology which controls people - where in today&#039;s world - with ever-advancing technology, people enjoy less free time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Application of OSE Specifications to Assessing the Liberatory Potential of Technologies=&lt;br /&gt;
OSE Specifications, when applied to production of physical products, allow for transparent assessment of the overall openness or accessibility of &#039;&#039;so-called&#039;&#039; open source products. This specification is intended to help people assess distributive production aspects of projects, by distinguishing between the various degrees of ‘opensource-ness’ embodied in projects. This is because some projects call themselves ‘open source’ when only a small portion of the hardware, or even no physical portion, is open source. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, in the case of the [http://green.autoblog.com/2007/10/16/autobloggreen-qanda-open-source-green-vehicle-project/ OS Green Vehicle], the only open source component is an apparent design process, but the output of the design process is proprietary. As quoted from the website, ‘Your rights to use, modify and re-distribute any data from this web site are limited.’ Moreover, the components used in the car are proprietary. Therefore, the OS Green Vehicle has a low OSE Specifications metric score.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Access refers to use for both private or market purposes. The specification is not neutral in its goals, just as no technologies are ever neutral. The intent goes so far as to point out the nuances that contribute to a particular direction of: (1), promoting ecological integrity, (2), contributing to the highest possible quality of life, and (3), creating the widest possible distribution of wealth. Because the open source method of product development has immense potential in transforming the economic system, the OSE Specification aims to address the evaluation of positive change endorsed by various open source projects. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The scope of OSE Specifications is far-reaching: it considers all the steps necessary for a product to be user-accessible. This includes open access to relevant information and affordable access to physical products. The goal is distributive economics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OSE Specification stipulates access to physical production facilities that can build wealth in re-localized communities. But OSE Specifications go even further: replication and viral spread of wealth - or distributive production. OSE Specifications address the means for replicating the production process itself. This includes not only self-replicating machines and systems, but the development of open business models, training materials, and apprenticeships for entrepreneurs. As the final step, we consider the availability of capitalization assistance within the metric. The capitalization assistance may be part of a new entrepreneur&#039;s apprenticeship - where, for example - real products can be made and sold within the apprenticeship. We redefine the &#039;capital&#039; in &#039;capitalization assistance&#039; from &#039;money&#039; to &#039;the ability to produce just about anything required for business startup at low cost.&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such level of commitment to the success of replication may imply a hidden agenda behind this program. Indeed there is: the greatest possible empowerment of people and communities to be the masters of their destinies, by unleashed human productivity fueled by open access to information and enabling hardware.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OSE Spec addresses access to both producers and users - both on the individual and community scale. Production could occur by do-it-yourself means on the individual scale in flexible fabrication facilities. The community scale promotes division of labor, and therefore a high standard of living. The OSE Spec addresses the availability of blueprints or digital designs, which can be used readily in manual or automated, computer-controlled fabrication facilities.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stuart</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>