3D Printer Workshop - Revision history

Marcin at 18:52, 23 February 2016

2016-02-23T18:52:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:52, 23 February 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:

	<html><iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ia4pJ2C_UsM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></html>		<html><iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ia4pJ2C_UsM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></html>

			=Links=
			Several noteworthy links included in the video:
			*[[3D Printer Roadmap]]
			*[[Distributive Enterprise]]
			*[[Open Source Product Development]]

	=Critique=		=Critique=

Marcin: /* Critique */

2016-02-23T18:11:59Z

Critique

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:11, 23 February 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:

	=Critique=		=Critique=
	It is useful to note the [[3D Printer Workshop Critique]], which states that 3D printers have hit rock bottom price and OSE should stick to larger machines. While this is true, the 3D Printer Workshop offers, among other things, for OSE to engage in the last stages of the complete [[Open Source Product Development]] (OSPD) life cycle - which is the creation of [[Distributive Enterprise]]. Further, this does not mean that we are not developing larger machines - on the contrary - our goal is to accelerate their development by bootsrap funding that comes from our distributive enterprises. Our model is to run workshops that provide funding for further development - and stable, ongoing workshop offerings can provide a stable revenue stream that can not only support OSE ~~Internation~~, but can scale broadly to other OSE Chapters and allied organizations. The goal is to create an OSPD consortium which results in viral market substitution of proprietary enterprise with open enterprise.		It is useful to note the [[3D Printer Workshop Critique]], which states that 3D printers have hit rock bottom price and OSE should stick to larger machines. While this is true, the 3D Printer Workshop offers, among other things, for OSE to engage in the last stages of the complete [[Open Source Product Development]] (OSPD) life cycle - which is the creation of [[Distributive Enterprise]]. Further, this does not mean that we are not developing larger machines - on the contrary - our goal is to accelerate their development by bootsrap funding that comes from our distributive enterprises. Our model is to run workshops that provide funding for further development - and stable, ongoing workshop offerings can provide a stable revenue stream that can not only support OSE International, but can scale broadly to other OSE Chapters and allied organizations. The goal is to create an OSPD consortium which results in viral market substitution of proprietary enterprise with open enterprise.

	[[category:3D Printer]]		[[category:3D Printer]]

Marcin: /* Critique */

2016-02-22T23:45:13Z

Critique

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:45, 22 February 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:

	=Critique=		=Critique=
	~~See~~ [[3D Printer Workshop Critique]]		It is useful to note the [[3D Printer Workshop Critique]], which states that 3D printers have hit rock bottom price and OSE should stick to larger machines. While this is true, the 3D Printer Workshop offers, among other things, for OSE to engage in the last stages of the complete [[Open Source Product Development]] (OSPD) life cycle - which is the creation of [[Distributive Enterprise]]. Further, this does not mean that we are not developing larger machines - on the contrary - our goal is to accelerate their development by bootsrap funding that comes from our distributive enterprises. Our model is to run workshops that provide funding for further development - and stable, ongoing workshop offerings can provide a stable revenue stream that can not only support OSE Internation, but can scale broadly to other OSE Chapters and allied organizations. The goal is to create an OSPD consortium which results in viral market substitution of proprietary enterprise with open enterprise.

	[[category:3D Printer]]		[[category:3D Printer]]

Marcin at 22:48, 22 February 2016

2016-02-22T22:48:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:48, 22 February 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
			=Introduction=
			See announcement at http://opensourceecology.org/3d-printer-build-workshop/


			OSE is offering its first ongoing and regular workshop - the One Day Build of the 3D Printer. You can see the vision for thimls in our intro video:

			<html><iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ia4pJ2C_UsM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></html>

	=Critique=		=Critique=
	See [[3D Printer Workshop Critique]]		See [[3D Printer Workshop Critique]]

	[[category:3D Printer]]		[[category:3D Printer]]

Marcin: Replaced content with "=Critique= See 3D Printer Workshop Critique category:3D Printer"

2016-02-22T22:43:21Z

Replaced content with "=Critique= See 3D Printer Workshop Critique category:3D Printer"

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 =Critique=
 See [[3D Printer Workshop Critique]]
 [[category:3D Printer]]

Marcin at 22:42, 22 February 2016

2016-02-22T22:42:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:42, 22 February 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=~~Concept~~=		=Critique=
			See [[3D Printer Workshop Critique]]
	From an interesting FB discussion - https://www.facebook.com/OpenSourceEcology/posts/10153836167851562		From an interesting FB discussion - https://www.facebook.com/OpenSourceEcology/posts/10153836167851562

Marcin at 06:14, 3 May 2015

2015-05-03T06:14:47Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-=Introduction=
+=Concept=
-'''Measures of Success:'''
+From an interesting FB discussion - https://www.facebook.com/OpenSourceEcology/posts/10153836167851562
-'''Milestones:'''
+Greg Colbourn Regarding 3D printers as a revenue model - as I've said before in a comment on a post on this page, I think that boat has well and truly sailed! This is speaking from experience, having sold RepRap kits for 3 years (Semi-Utilitronic Industries is my business), and now facing a continued (and likely terminal) slump in sales.
-#Conference Evaluations assessed/improvements for next session made
+In essence the RepRap community is now a victim of it's own success! With Prusa i3s from China on ebay for <$400, and the Tiko on Kickstarter for $179, I think there's no longer much of a market for open-source printers that cost >$1000. I'd advise OSE to stick to projects where it has a comparative advantage (i.e. machines from the GVCS that very few other people are working on).
-=3D Printer Critical Path=
+A more general point is that with this example, I'm reassessing the long-term viability of a business based on Open Source Hardware. It seems that replication is becoming quicker and quicker, resulting in a race to the bottom with prices, and a potential malthusian catastrophe for people trying to make a living from it. Of course this is beneficial for "consumers" (or "prosumers", aka people buying the machines), and for the economy as a whole, but the end game for producers is likely a few big winners, and many losers, as with all technologies. Although if we reach a post-scarcity (or zero-marginal cost) economy as a result, this wouldn't matter as the cost of living would be negligible (dependent on other reforms like LVT, particularly in places where land is expensive, like where I am in the UK).
-[https://docs.google.com/a/opensourceecology.org/drawings/d/1kFoUxVkCSfuXphav1jyCIeB4QwWApV4PAzJR-zUdsLQ/edit edit]
+Still, I'm hoping to further other goals, involving making lots of money to donate to Effective Altruist causes. Remaining competetive is going to be difficult!
-=Milestones and Tasks=
+Response:
-<html><iframe width=100% height='500' frameborder='0' src='https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0ArpE5Y9PpJCXdEpkZm9jUG45MEdwT19oTVVfWG5SbEE&output=html&widget=true'></iframe></html>
+Open Source Ecology Greg Colbourn - Thanks for the comment, the Tiko on Kickstarter apears to be quite innovative if it works. Regarding our approach, the physical product is perhaps 1/2 the story. The more interesting part is the social element. So our 3 requirements are: (1) open source; (2) immersion education a la Build Yourself, Build Your World; (3) crowd prototyping ability through the people we train; (4) Social Process. Our package is the Extreme Manufacturing concept - essentially: (1) unparalleled rapid team build effort; (2) socially fun because we work as a team on a build challenge; (3) a test of Useful Documentation - perfecting documentation to a high state to make the build speed achievable; (4) empowerment of people as they do what they have never been done before, shattering their limits. In essence, the combination of excellence on the social front, rapid learning and on the technical front makes our Extreme Manufacturing concept compelling. We ship product, too. But the physical product is not the big part - we're really selling an experience.
 =Links=
-*[[Project Review]]
+*[[3D Printer Workshop 2014]]
 [[category:3D Printer]]

KhalidH: cat

2013-12-29T22:59:27Z

cat

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:59, 29 December 2013
Line 90:		Line 90:

	=Review Comments=		=Review Comments=
			[[category:3D Printer]]

Marcin at 21:16, 29 December 2013

2013-12-29T21:16:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:16, 29 December 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~'''~~Introduction~~'''~~		=Introduction=
	#Project Title: 3-D Printer Workshop		#Project Title: 3-D Printer Workshop
	#Time/Date/Start: March 28-30, 2014		#Time/Date/Start: March 28-30, 2014

Marcin: /* Links */

2013-12-29T21:16:38Z

Links

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:16, 29 December 2013
Line 88:		Line 88:
	=Links=		=Links=
	*[[Project Review]]		*[[Project Review]]

			=Review Comments=