AI Ethics - Revision history

Marcin: /* Solutions */

2026-03-08T23:55:08Z

Solutions

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:55, 8 March 2026
Line 7:		Line 7:
	=Solutions=		=Solutions=
	*Tool AI vs agent AI		*Tool AI vs agent AI
			*[[Civilization-Scale Intelligence Systems]] - founded on a core of cooperation.

Marcin at 23:49, 8 March 2026

2026-03-08T23:49:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:49, 8 March 2026
Line 4:		Line 4:
	*For ethical AI, another tuoe of model must be proposed. Currently, [[If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies]] is Built, You Will Die]] is a radical but highly probable scenario (50% of AI researchers in 2026 think that ASI will kill humans. Thus, what would this new paradigm of intelligence look like? Or is a fundamental aspect or emergent behavior that which is known as will, thus alignment is impossible? Alignment must be well defined - as behavior of AI that aligns with humans.		*For ethical AI, another tuoe of model must be proposed. Currently, [[If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies]] is Built, You Will Die]] is a radical but highly probable scenario (50% of AI researchers in 2026 think that ASI will kill humans. Thus, what would this new paradigm of intelligence look like? Or is a fundamental aspect or emergent behavior that which is known as will, thus alignment is impossible? Alignment must be well defined - as behavior of AI that aligns with humans.
	*From a different perspective the alignment problem is a misnomer. Currently, a human value is domination and lacknof collaboration (if itbwasnt we wouldn't have poverty and war, broadly speaking. So from one perspective - ai is perfectly aligned with human thought of annihilation. Unless we evolve to higher values.		*From a different perspective the alignment problem is a misnomer. Currently, a human value is domination and lacknof collaboration (if itbwasnt we wouldn't have poverty and war, broadly speaking. So from one perspective - ai is perfectly aligned with human thought of annihilation. Unless we evolve to higher values.

			=Solutions=
			*Tool AI vs agent AI

Marcin at 23:41, 8 March 2026

2026-03-08T23:41:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:41, 8 March 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:
	*Most people are assholes, namely not fully developed intellectually, ethically, etc. See [[Theories of Human Development]]. Poor mental models of reality abound. This is a fundamental consequence of [[General Semantics]], which was proposed by Korzybski as a seminal work in civilization engineering. The problem is summarized: The map is not the territory. Thus, 'the quest for truth' must be a lifelong pursuit.		*Most people are assholes, namely not fully developed intellectually, ethically, etc. See [[Theories of Human Development]]. Poor mental models of reality abound. This is a fundamental consequence of [[General Semantics]], which was proposed by Korzybski as a seminal work in civilization engineering. The problem is summarized: The map is not the territory. Thus, 'the quest for truth' must be a lifelong pursuit.
	*AIs are trained on mass data which reflectsbthe human condition. Since humans are irrational,we cannot begin to claim that transformer-based LLMs will produce deterministic results.		*AIs are trained on mass data which reflectsbthe human condition. Since humans are irrational,we cannot begin to claim that transformer-based LLMs will produce deterministic results.
	*For ethical AI, another tuoe of model must be proposed. Currently, [[If Anyone ~~Build~~ It, Everyone Dies]] is Built, You Will Die]] is a radical but highly probable scenario (50% of AI researchers in 2026 think that ASI will kill humans. Thus, what would this new paradigm of intelligence look like? Or is a fundamental aspect or emergent behavior that which is known as will, thus alignment is impossible? Alignment must be well defined - as behavior of AI that aligns with humans.		*For ethical AI, another tuoe of model must be proposed. Currently, [[If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies]] is Built, You Will Die]] is a radical but highly probable scenario (50% of AI researchers in 2026 think that ASI will kill humans. Thus, what would this new paradigm of intelligence look like? Or is a fundamental aspect or emergent behavior that which is known as will, thus alignment is impossible? Alignment must be well defined - as behavior of AI that aligns with humans.
	*From a different perspective the alignment problem is a misnomer. Currently, a human value is domination and lacknof collaboration (if itbwasnt we wouldn't have poverty and war, broadly speaking. So from one perspective - ai is perfectly aligned with human thought of annihilation. Unless we evolve to higher values.		*From a different perspective the alignment problem is a misnomer. Currently, a human value is domination and lacknof collaboration (if itbwasnt we wouldn't have poverty and war, broadly speaking. So from one perspective - ai is perfectly aligned with human thought of annihilation. Unless we evolve to higher values.

Marcin at 23:40, 8 March 2026

2026-03-08T23:40:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:40, 8 March 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:
	*Most people are assholes, namely not fully developed intellectually, ethically, etc. See [[Theories of Human Development]]. Poor mental models of reality abound. This is a fundamental consequence of [[General Semantics]], which was proposed by Korzybski as a seminal work in civilization engineering. The problem is summarized: The map is not the territory. Thus, 'the quest for truth' must be a lifelong pursuit.		*Most people are assholes, namely not fully developed intellectually, ethically, etc. See [[Theories of Human Development]]. Poor mental models of reality abound. This is a fundamental consequence of [[General Semantics]], which was proposed by Korzybski as a seminal work in civilization engineering. The problem is summarized: The map is not the territory. Thus, 'the quest for truth' must be a lifelong pursuit.
	*AIs are trained on mass data which reflectsbthe human condition. Since humans are irrational,we cannot begin to claim that transformer-based LLMs will produce deterministic results.		*AIs are trained on mass data which reflectsbthe human condition. Since humans are irrational,we cannot begin to claim that transformer-based LLMs will produce deterministic results.
	*For ethical AI, another tuoe of model must be proposed. Currently, [[~~Ifbit~~ is Built, You Will Die]] is a radical but highly probable scenario (50% of AI researchers in 2026 think that ASI will kill humans. Thus, what would this new paradigm of intelligence look like? Or is a fundamental aspect or emergent behavior that which is known as will, thus alignment is impossible? Alignment must be well defined - as behavior of AI that aligns with humans.		*For ethical AI, another tuoe of model must be proposed. Currently, [[If Anyone Build It, Everyone Dies]] is Built, You Will Die]] is a radical but highly probable scenario (50% of AI researchers in 2026 think that ASI will kill humans. Thus, what would this new paradigm of intelligence look like? Or is a fundamental aspect or emergent behavior that which is known as will, thus alignment is impossible? Alignment must be well defined - as behavior of AI that aligns with humans.
	*From a different perspective the alignment problem is a misnomer. Currently, a human value is domination and lacknof collaboration (if itbwasnt we wouldn't have poverty and war, broadly speaking. So from one perspective - ai is perfectly aligned with human thought of annihilation. Unless we evolve to higher values.		*From a different perspective the alignment problem is a misnomer. Currently, a human value is domination and lacknof collaboration (if itbwasnt we wouldn't have poverty and war, broadly speaking. So from one perspective - ai is perfectly aligned with human thought of annihilation. Unless we evolve to higher values.

Marcin at 23:40, 8 March 2026

2026-03-08T23:40:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:40, 8 March 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:
	*Most people are assholes, namely not fully developed intellectually, ethically, etc. See [[Theories of Human Development]]. Poor mental models of reality abound. This is a fundamental consequence of [[General Semantics]], which was proposed by Korzybski as a seminal work in civilization engineering. The problem is summarized: The map is not the territory. Thus, 'the quest for truth' must be a lifelong pursuit.		*Most people are assholes, namely not fully developed intellectually, ethically, etc. See [[Theories of Human Development]]. Poor mental models of reality abound. This is a fundamental consequence of [[General Semantics]], which was proposed by Korzybski as a seminal work in civilization engineering. The problem is summarized: The map is not the territory. Thus, 'the quest for truth' must be a lifelong pursuit.
	*AIs are trained on mass data which reflectsbthe human condition. Since humans are irrational,we cannot begin to claim that transformer-based LLMs will produce deterministic results.		*AIs are trained on mass data which reflectsbthe human condition. Since humans are irrational,we cannot begin to claim that transformer-based LLMs will produce deterministic results.
	*For ethical AI, another tuoe of model must be proposed. Currently, [[Ifbit is Built, You Will Die]] is a radical but highly probable scenario (50% of AI researchers in 2026 think that ASI will kill humans.		*For ethical AI, another tuoe of model must be proposed. Currently, [[Ifbit is Built, You Will Die]] is a radical but highly probable scenario (50% of AI researchers in 2026 think that ASI will kill humans. Thus, what would this new paradigm of intelligence look like? Or is a fundamental aspect or emergent behavior that which is known as will, thus alignment is impossible? Alignment must be well defined - as behavior of AI that aligns with humans.
			*From a different perspective the alignment problem is a misnomer. Currently, a human value is domination and lacknof collaboration (if itbwasnt we wouldn't have poverty and war, broadly speaking. So from one perspective - ai is perfectly aligned with human thought of annihilation. Unless we evolve to higher values.

Marcin: Created page with "People do non share common values universally - thus wthics cannot be defined. Most people are assholes, namely not fully developed intellectually, ethically, etc. See Theories of Human Development. Poor mental models of reality abound. This is a fundamental consequence of General Semantics, which was proposed by Korzybski as a seminal work in civilization engineering. The problem is summarized: The map is not the territory. Thus, 'the quest for truth' must be..."

2026-03-08T23:36:28Z

Created page with "*People do non share common values universally - thus wthics cannot be defined. *Most people are assholes, namely not fully developed intellectually, ethically, etc. See Theories of Human Development. Poor mental models of reality abound. This is a fundamental consequence of General Semantics, which was proposed by Korzybski as a seminal work in civilization engineering. The problem is summarized: The map is not the territory. Thus, 'the quest for truth' must be..."

New page

*People do non share common values universally - thus wthics cannot be defined.
*Most people are assholes, namely not fully developed intellectually, ethically, etc. See [[Theories of Human Development]]. Poor mental models of reality abound. This is a fundamental consequence of [[General Semantics]], which was proposed by Korzybski as a seminal work in civilization engineering. The problem is summarized: The map is not the territory. Thus, 'the quest for truth' must be a lifelong pursuit.
*AIs are trained on mass data which reflectsbthe human condition. Since humans are irrational,we cannot begin to claim that transformer-based LLMs will produce deterministic results.
*For ethical AI, another tuoe of model must be proposed. Currently, [[Ifbit is Built, You Will Die]] is a radical but highly probable scenario (50% of AI researchers in 2026 think that ASI will kill humans.