Analysis of Industry Standards Protocol - Revision history

Marcin at 14:03, 1 March 2021

2021-03-01T14:03:37Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 =Introduction=
@@ Line 40: / Line 25: @@
 The analysis of history and industry standards is a good starting point for a Modules Breakdown Diagram, and for extracting working mechanisms for a Tech Tree of Choices.
 =Evaluation=
 *Someone who has learned the background research on a given technology may qualify to be a wiki page [[Maintainer]] for a given technology or its subset.

Marcin: /* Introduction */

2021-03-01T14:03:02Z

Introduction

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:03, 1 March 2021
Line 16:		Line 16:

	=Introduction=		=Introduction=
			The best starting point for open source product development is to study what has been done already: history, prior art (patents), and industry standards.

	Industry Standards refers to what is in common use for a given technology. Industry standards can refer to off-the-shelf products that are being produced in the current economy. This may include proprietary and open source products.		Industry Standards refers to what is in common use for a given technology. Industry standards can refer to off-the-shelf products that are being produced in the current economy. This may include proprietary and open source products.
Line 24:		Line 25:

	Open Source Ecology takes industry standards as the starting point converting these norms to ones that are based on [[Open Source Ecology]]. Once these industry standards are understood, they can be modified to fit the needs of open source, appropriate technology ([[OSAT]]).		Open Source Ecology takes industry standards as the starting point converting these norms to ones that are based on [[Open Source Ecology]]. Once these industry standards are understood, they can be modified to fit the needs of open source, appropriate technology ([[OSAT]]).

	~~The best starting point for building any device or machine is to study what has been done already: history, prior art (patents), and industry standards.~~

	It is an assumption of OSE that here are no inventions, but only small incremental developments on a large, existing pool of knowledge. These are known as innovations.		It is an assumption of OSE that here are no inventions, but only small incremental developments on a large, existing pool of knowledge. These are known as innovations.

Marcin: /* Introduction */

2020-06-03T15:11:58Z

Introduction

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:11, 3 June 2020
Line 17:		Line 17:
	=Introduction=		=Introduction=

	Industry Standards refers to what is in common use for a given technology. It can be off-the-shelf products that are being produced in the current economy. This may include proprietary and open source products.		Industry Standards refers to what is in common use for a given technology. Industry standards can refer to off-the-shelf products that are being produced in the current economy. This may include proprietary and open source products.

			A study of industry standards is an indispensible part of an [[Open Source Product Development]] process.

	The study of industry standards should this include those products which alraedy exist in the mainstream economy, and those open source products and processes that are merely emerging - especially as [[Distributive Enterprise]] via [[OSPD]].		The study of industry standards should this include those products which alraedy exist in the mainstream economy, and those open source products and processes that are merely emerging - especially as [[Distributive Enterprise]] via [[OSPD]].

Marcin: /* Protocol */

2020-03-25T19:04:45Z

Protocol

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:04, 25 March 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Protocol=		=Protocol=
	{{Hint\|*Start by linking to representative products, commenting on notable features, or why the features are important and noteworthy. The end goal is finding patterns or common ways and costs in which services/functions are provided.		{{Hint\|*Start by linking to representative products, patents, 'how it works' descriptions, commenting on notable features, or why the features are important and noteworthy. The end goal is finding patterns or common ways and costs in which services/functions are provided.
	*Delve into details of the products - to explore working mechanisms of the different products		*Delve into details of the products - to explore working mechanisms of the different products
	*Start identifying patterns of features - such as, "everyone seems to use x as opposed by y because..."		*Start identifying patterns of features - such as, "everyone seems to use x as opposed by y because..."
Line 14:		Line 14:
	#Research the machine or module on the internet.		#Research the machine or module on the internet.
	#Publish on the wiki and link in your [[Work Log]].}}		#Publish on the wiki and link in your [[Work Log]].}}


	=Introduction=		=Introduction=

Marcin at 20:15, 26 September 2019

2019-09-26T20:15:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:15, 26 September 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			=Protocol=
			{{Hint\|*Start by linking to representative products, commenting on notable features, or why the features are important and noteworthy. The end goal is finding patterns or common ways and costs in which services/functions are provided.
			*Delve into details of the products - to explore working mechanisms of the different products
			*Start identifying patterns of features - such as, "everyone seems to use x as opposed by y because..."
			*Filter the technology through OSE Specifications - such as, "how does the instance of the technology endorse OSE values and design methods, and how does it contribute to the OSE product ecology?"

			==Crowd Protocol==
			#Use [[Coggle]] as a collaborative mindmap to work on this collaboratively. Paste in pictures and key performance and cost data. See example of embedding with including an edit link below the embed:
			<html><iframe width='400' height='300' src='https://embed.coggle.it/diagram/UjyEStgsvqlxAE6U/a45f88079c65c5df50eb798159b1d4d8b9ab12685caec974a66d79157fa8676f' frameborder='0' allowfullscreen></iframe></html>

			[https://embed.coggle.it/diagram/UjyEStgsvqlxAE6U/a45f88079c65c5df50eb798159b1d4d8b9ab12685caec974a66d79157fa8676f edit]

			#Use [[Study of Industry Standards Template]] for an idea of the key performance data points.
			#Research the machine or module on the internet.
			#Publish on the wiki and link in your [[Work Log]].}}


	=Introduction=		=Introduction=

Marcin: /* Protocol */

2019-09-26T20:15:18Z

Protocol

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 The analysis of history and industry standards is a good starting point for a Modules Breakdown Diagram, and for extracting working mechanisms for a Tech Tree of Choices.
 =Evaluation=
 *Someone who has learned the background research on a given technology may qualify to be a wiki page [[Maintainer]] for a given technology or its subset.

Marcin: /* Protocol */

2019-09-26T20:15:03Z

Protocol

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:15, 26 September 2019
Line 25:		Line 25:

	=Protocol=		=Protocol=
	*Start by linking to representative products, commenting on notable features, or why the features are important and noteworthy. The end goal is finding patterns or common ways and costs in which services/functions are provided.		{{Hint\|*Start by linking to representative products, commenting on notable features, or why the features are important and noteworthy. The end goal is finding patterns or common ways and costs in which services/functions are provided.
	*Delve into details of the products - to explore working mechanisms of the different products		*Delve into details of the products - to explore working mechanisms of the different products
	*Start identifying patterns of features - such as, "everyone seems to use x as opposed by y because..."		*Start identifying patterns of features - such as, "everyone seems to use x as opposed by y because..."
Line 38:		Line 38:
	#Use [[Study of Industry Standards Template]] for an idea of the key performance data points.		#Use [[Study of Industry Standards Template]] for an idea of the key performance data points.
	#Research the machine or module on the internet.		#Research the machine or module on the internet.
	#Publish on the wiki and link in your [[Work Log]].		#Publish on the wiki and link in your [[Work Log]].}}

	=Evaluation=		=Evaluation=
	*Someone who has learned the background research on a given technology may qualify to be a wiki page [[Maintainer]] for a given technology or its subset.		*Someone who has learned the background research on a given technology may qualify to be a wiki page [[Maintainer]] for a given technology or its subset.

Marcin: /* Protocol */

2019-09-26T20:14:06Z

Protocol

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 26 September 2019
Line 25:		Line 25:

	=Protocol=		=Protocol=
	*Start by linking to representative products, commenting on notable features, or why the features are important and noteworthy. The end goal is finding patterns or common ways in which services/functions are provided.		*Start by linking to representative products, commenting on notable features, or why the features are important and noteworthy. The end goal is finding patterns or common ways and costs in which services/functions are provided.
	*Delve into details of the products - to explore working mechanisms of the different products		*Delve into details of the products - to explore working mechanisms of the different products
	*Start identifying patterns of features - such as, "everyone seems to use x as opposed by y because..."		*Start identifying patterns of features - such as, "everyone seems to use x as opposed by y because..."

Marcin: /* Protocol */

2019-09-26T20:13:17Z

Protocol

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:13, 26 September 2019
Line 25:		Line 25:

	=Protocol=		=Protocol=
	*Start by linking to representative products, commenting on notable features, or why the features are important and noteworthy.		*Start by linking to representative products, commenting on notable features, or why the features are important and noteworthy. The end goal is finding patterns or common ways in which services/functions are provided.
	*Delve into details of the products - to explore working mechanisms of the different products		*Delve into details of the products - to explore working mechanisms of the different products
	*Start identifying patterns of features - such as, "everyone seems to use x as opposed by y because..."		*Start identifying patterns of features - such as, "everyone seems to use x as opposed by y because..."

Marcin: /* Evaluation */

2018-01-21T01:12:51Z

Evaluation

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:12, 21 January 2018
Line 42:		Line 42:
	=Evaluation=		=Evaluation=
	*Someone who has learned the background research on a given technology may qualify to be a wiki page [[Maintainer]] for a given technology or its subset.		*Someone who has learned the background research on a given technology may qualify to be a wiki page [[Maintainer]] for a given technology or its subset.
	*Sample test questions:
	:*Provide 3 technology tree of choices options for the given machine, and state 3 main reasons for why the OSE choice has been made, and state 3 important reasons for why the next best choice has been eliminated.
	~~:*Provide an [[OSE Specification Scorecard]] for a given technology that has been chosen.~~
	:*Provide an [[OSE Specification Scorecard]] (quantitative) for a specific module of any of the 50 technologies, and discuss how that score compares to the one that has not been chosen (also provide a quantitative score).
	~~:*State the acceptable performance level (production rate, cost, operator labor requirement) of a given GVCS machine that is currently under development~~
	~~:*What is the current status of the machine/technology?~~
	~~:*What is the priority level of the tecnology based on the [[OSE Roadmap]]?~~
	~~:*Who are the active Dev Team members and Ad-Hoc contributors contributing on the critical path for that project?~~
	~~:*What needs to be done next to organize the next production workshop on the machine?~~
	~~:*What are the main unresolved issues for project completion?~~
	~~:*What are the known bugs?~~