Book - Revision history

Marcin: /* Big Idea */

2026-04-08T13:57:37Z

Big Idea

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:57, 8 April 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:

	=Big Idea=		=Big Idea=
	*Civilization 101 experiments as a parallel paradigm in civilization. All the good ~~ppavea~~ are taken, though? Wrong! Explain why that is not the case, and opportunity abounds.		*Civilization 101 experiments as a parallel paradigm in civilization. All the good places are taken, though? Wrong! Explain why that is not the case, and opportunity abounds.

	=Approaches=		=Approaches=

Marcin at 13:57, 8 April 2026

2026-04-08T13:57:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:57, 8 April 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''aka Open Source Ecology: a Case for Abundance'''		'''aka Open Source Ecology: a Case for Abundance'''

			=Big Idea=
			*Civilization 101 experiments as a parallel paradigm in civilization. All the good ppavea are taken, though? Wrong! Explain why that is not the case, and opportunity abounds.

	=Approaches=		=Approaches=

Marcin: /* Platform */

2026-03-27T05:44:25Z

Platform

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:44, 27 March 2026
Line 187:		Line 187:
	Freedom from taxation - one of the critical unsolved riddles of the economy - tax the robots! But who owns the robots? Responsible people. Robots make lots of $, so we can tax them. Get into an incisive analysis of post-labor, post-capital economy in an experimental node, framing the package as - at what scale (100-10000 or so) do we achieve post-labor, and at what scale can we achieve an economy of replication.		Freedom from taxation - one of the critical unsolved riddles of the economy - tax the robots! But who owns the robots? Responsible people. Robots make lots of $, so we can tax them. Get into an incisive analysis of post-labor, post-capital economy in an experimental node, framing the package as - at what scale (100-10000 or so) do we achieve post-labor, and at what scale can we achieve an economy of replication.

	=Platform=		=Platform: Sectoral Transformation=
	*Iconic CAD - distributed production digitized and democratized.		*Iconic CAD - distributed production digitized and democratized.
	*Building a network of abundance nodes.		*Building a network of abundance nodes.
Line 198:		Line 198:
	**Governance		**Governance
	**Education		**Education
	**Finance - fake money vs backed money. The structural unemployment and exploitation thingy to post-work and post-capital abundance economy.		**AI Empire - a special case of its own.
			**Finance - fake money vs backed money. Ethical economy transition, from the current state which is designed to do exactly what it does. The structural unemployment and exploitation thingy to post-work and post-capital abundance economy.
	**Geopolitics - the economy in general, achieved above. Discuss how each element solves various issues as opposed to the current system of othering and man-hatin'		**Geopolitics - the economy in general, achieved above. Discuss how each element solves various issues as opposed to the current system of othering and man-hatin'

Marcin: /* Platform */

2026-03-27T05:43:21Z

Platform

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:43, 27 March 2026
Line 190:		Line 190:
	*Iconic CAD - distributed production digitized and democratized.		*Iconic CAD - distributed production digitized and democratized.
	*Building a network of abundance nodes.		*Building a network of abundance nodes.
	*Transforming current trends in a parallel system.		*Transforming current trends in a parallel system - taking each infrastructure of civilization and transforming it.
			**Housing
			**Energy
			**Food
			**Manufacturing
			**Consumer goods - the distributive version of Amazon and Walmart.
			**Governance
			**Education
			**Finance - fake money vs backed money. The structural unemployment and exploitation thingy to post-work and post-capital abundance economy.
			**Geopolitics - the economy in general, achieved above. Discuss how each element solves various issues as opposed to the current system of othering and man-hatin'

	=Adoption=		=Adoption=

Marcin: /* Pure Passion: Freedom is the Goal */

2026-03-26T22:50:51Z

Pure Passion: Freedom is the Goal

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:50, 26 March 2026
Line 184:		Line 184:

	Freedom is the goal, so we should realize what Sartre called the 'curse of freedom'. Freedom is infinite power of will, with which comes infinite responsibility. But freedom is not possible without appropriate technology, ie, technology which serves human needs, not that which make us dependent, disempowered, or controlled. Democracy is not possible without liberated technology - where anyone has access to powerful tools, and where anyone can design or build what they want.		Freedom is the goal, so we should realize what Sartre called the 'curse of freedom'. Freedom is infinite power of will, with which comes infinite responsibility. But freedom is not possible without appropriate technology, ie, technology which serves human needs, not that which make us dependent, disempowered, or controlled. Democracy is not possible without liberated technology - where anyone has access to powerful tools, and where anyone can design or build what they want.

			Freedom from taxation - one of the critical unsolved riddles of the economy - tax the robots! But who owns the robots? Responsible people. Robots make lots of $, so we can tax them. Get into an incisive analysis of post-labor, post-capital economy in an experimental node, framing the package as - at what scale (100-10000 or so) do we achieve post-labor, and at what scale can we achieve an economy of replication.

	=Platform=		=Platform=

Marcin: /* Macroeconomics */

2026-03-26T22:45:52Z

Macroeconomics

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:45, 26 March 2026
Line 194:		Line 194:

	=Macroeconomics=		=Macroeconomics=
	Big picture numbers and how [[Distributive Abundance Economics]] grows compared to big cap stocks		Big picture numbers and how [[Distributive Abundance Economics]] grows compared to big cap stocks. Examples of how fast economies of replication can grow compared to economies of scale, while remaining within the limits of physics.

	=Links=		=Links=
	*[[OSE Book One]]		*[[OSE Book One]]

Marcin: /* Adoption */

2026-03-25T22:19:38Z

Adoption

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 25 March 2026
Line 192:		Line 192:
	=Adoption=		=Adoption=
	I'm personally looking to adopt a few children. At best, it would be a million open source children who learn and practice abundance, the natural state of the world.		I'm personally looking to adopt a few children. At best, it would be a million open source children who learn and practice abundance, the natural state of the world.

			=Macroeconomics=
			Big picture numbers and how [[Distributive Abundance Economics]] grows compared to big cap stocks

	=Links=		=Links=
	*[[OSE Book One]]		*[[OSE Book One]]

Marcin: /* State of the world */

2026-03-25T22:13:49Z

State of the world

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:13, 25 March 2026
Line 67:		Line 67:
	*Commie Capitalist Nazi Fascists - go through the political systems critique core of the lucid [[Escape from Capitalism]]. Commie experiment didn't work, as it was an implementation of state capitalism with power concentration and loss of agency greater than capitalism. Fascism is a method of imposing austerity (curbservices, raise taxes on the poor). Nazism abounds today in the form of very borders. Each is a substitute for an open and collaborative approach, which yet has no political name. Ask why none of these degenerated to open collaboration - why all mental models seem to aim at power concentration. Expose the mental model of scarcity (capital in capitalism, natural resources in progressive environemtalism) - both philosophies being scarcity-based.		*Commie Capitalist Nazi Fascists - go through the political systems critique core of the lucid [[Escape from Capitalism]]. Commie experiment didn't work, as it was an implementation of state capitalism with power concentration and loss of agency greater than capitalism. Fascism is a method of imposing austerity (curbservices, raise taxes on the poor). Nazism abounds today in the form of very borders. Each is a substitute for an open and collaborative approach, which yet has no political name. Ask why none of these degenerated to open collaboration - why all mental models seem to aim at power concentration. Expose the mental model of scarcity (capital in capitalism, natural resources in progressive environemtalism) - both philosophies being scarcity-based.
	*The Last Class War - is onboarding to AI. This will divide the rich and poor further if unchecked. This class war is most interesting because it brings capital much closer to abundance, which would seem like it would up-end scarcity economics. But will it?		*The Last Class War - is onboarding to AI. This will divide the rich and poor further if unchecked. This class war is most interesting because it brings capital much closer to abundance, which would seem like it would up-end scarcity economics. But will it?

			= state of the future world, i.e. where we want to go=
			*[[Advanced Security Policy]]

	=What is Paradise=		=What is Paradise=

Marcin: /* Platform */

2026-03-24T20:01:49Z

Platform

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:01, 24 March 2026
Line 186:		Line 186:
	*Building a network of abundance nodes.		*Building a network of abundance nodes.
	*Transforming current trends in a parallel system.		*Transforming current trends in a parallel system.

			=Adoption=
			I'm personally looking to adopt a few children. At best, it would be a million open source children who learn and practice abundance, the natural state of the world.

	=Links=		=Links=
	*[[OSE Book One]]		*[[OSE Book One]]

Marcin: /* Neo-subsistence Model */

2026-03-24T19:58:27Z

Neo-subsistence Model

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 24 March 2026
Line 151:		Line 151:
	*[[Gini Coefficient]] discussion. Is it getting better or worse?		*[[Gini Coefficient]] discussion. Is it getting better or worse?
	*And the base figure of top 12 people in the world having 1/2 of the wealth of the world. Is this way worse than feudalism?		*And the base figure of top 12 people in the world having 1/2 of the wealth of the world. Is this way worse than feudalism?
	*what is an honest assessment of [[The Better Angels of Our Nature]]? Gross crime against ~~hanity~~ decreased, but less people are happy and free today - in terms of true freedom?		*what is an honest assessment of [[The Better Angels of Our Nature]]? Gross crime against humanity decreased, but less people are happy and free today - in terms of true freedom?
	*The new model of non-slabery comes.from being able to produce. The only last frontier is lowering taxes by efficiency, and decreasing regulation by responsibility. That is impossible - a perfect problem to take on in earnest. But it is actually simpler than it looks: [[Structural Governance]] for abundance: an incentive model for pro-social behavior.		*The new model of non-slabery comes.from being able to produce. The only last frontier is lowering taxes by efficiency, and decreasing regulation by responsibility. That is impossible - a perfect problem to take on in earnest. But it is actually simpler than it looks: [[Structural Governance]] for abundance: an incentive model for pro-social behavior. All we need to do is withdraw funding for crime against humanity.

	=Viral Replication=		=Viral Replication=