Business Development - Revision history

Marcin: /* Online Digital Community and Mastermind Community */

2019-03-05T14:12:19Z

Online Digital Community and Mastermind Community

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:12, 5 March 2019
Line 51:		Line 51:
	2. Abundance-Digital Online Community: I’ve also created a Digital/Online community of bold, abundance-minded entrepreneurs called Abundance-Digital.		2. Abundance-Digital Online Community: I’ve also created a Digital/Online community of bold, abundance-minded entrepreneurs called Abundance-Digital.

	Abundance-Digital is my ‘onramp’ for exponential entrepreneurs – those who want to get involved and play at a higher level. Click here to learn more.		Abundance-Digital is my ‘onramp’ for exponential entrepreneurs – those who want to get involved and play at a higher level. Click here to learn more.

			=Discussion=
			*See Conversation with [[Greg Gage]] on Backyard Brains education kits

	=Links=		=Links=

	*[[Business Development 2011]]		*[[Business Development 2011]]

Marcin: /* Roadmap */

2019-03-02T18:08:53Z

Roadmap

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:08, 2 March 2019
Line 18:		Line 18:
	#Develop open source management and operations for scaling to other operators.		#Develop open source management and operations for scaling to other operators.
	#Vet others. Involve them in XM workshops and the Dev Team, with clear deliverables of product development. If Dev Team succeeds in a feature release, and their XM participation is successful, then we can consider training them for XM production. They pay for that, as there is no guarantee of being hired. It must be a person motivated to learn enough to go on their own, but collaborative enough to understand that we can get more done by working together. Choice is theirs.		#Vet others. Involve them in XM workshops and the Dev Team, with clear deliverables of product development. If Dev Team succeeds in a feature release, and their XM participation is successful, then we can consider training them for XM production. They pay for that, as there is no guarantee of being hired. It must be a person motivated to learn enough to go on their own, but collaborative enough to understand that we can get more done by working together. Choice is theirs.
	#Train the candidates. Cohort of 2 or more people, 2 weeks off-site, and 2 weeks on-site. 60 hour weeks during training phase.		#Train the candidates. Cohort of 2 or more people, 2 weeks off-site, and 2 weeks on-site. 60 hour weeks during training phase. This is the Heavyweight Package. Lightweight package includes a Collaborator Track, not an OSE Fellow track.
	#Hire successful candidates. 6 days per month of Extreme Manufacturing work (25%), and rest is further R&D of additional products.		#Hire successful candidates. 6 days per month of Extreme Manufacturing work (25%), and rest is further R&D of additional products.

Marcin: /* Roadmap */

2019-03-01T15:06:01Z

Roadmap

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:06, 1 March 2019
Line 20:		Line 20:
	#Train the candidates. Cohort of 2 or more people, 2 weeks off-site, and 2 weeks on-site. 60 hour weeks during training phase.		#Train the candidates. Cohort of 2 or more people, 2 weeks off-site, and 2 weeks on-site. 60 hour weeks during training phase.
	#Hire successful candidates. 6 days per month of Extreme Manufacturing work (25%), and rest is further R&D of additional products.		#Hire successful candidates. 6 days per month of Extreme Manufacturing work (25%), and rest is further R&D of additional products.

			=Other Business Models=
			#[[Teacher Training Business Model]]

	=Swag=		=Swag=

Marcin: /* Roadmap */

2019-02-28T17:33:21Z

Roadmap

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:33, 28 February 2019
Line 19:		Line 19:
	#Vet others. Involve them in XM workshops and the Dev Team, with clear deliverables of product development. If Dev Team succeeds in a feature release, and their XM participation is successful, then we can consider training them for XM production. They pay for that, as there is no guarantee of being hired. It must be a person motivated to learn enough to go on their own, but collaborative enough to understand that we can get more done by working together. Choice is theirs.		#Vet others. Involve them in XM workshops and the Dev Team, with clear deliverables of product development. If Dev Team succeeds in a feature release, and their XM participation is successful, then we can consider training them for XM production. They pay for that, as there is no guarantee of being hired. It must be a person motivated to learn enough to go on their own, but collaborative enough to understand that we can get more done by working together. Choice is theirs.
	#Train the candidates. Cohort of 2 or more people, 2 weeks off-site, and 2 weeks on-site. 60 hour weeks during training phase.		#Train the candidates. Cohort of 2 or more people, 2 weeks off-site, and 2 weeks on-site. 60 hour weeks during training phase.
			#Hire successful candidates. 6 days per month of Extreme Manufacturing work (25%), and rest is further R&D of additional products.

	=Swag=		=Swag=

Marcin: /* Roadmap */

2019-02-28T17:31:42Z

Roadmap

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 28 February 2019
Line 13:		Line 13:

	=Roadmap=		=Roadmap=
	To address issues above, here is ~~one possible~~ route:		To address issues above, here is OSE's current business development route under testing:

	#Develop product for solopreneurship, for $1k/day replicable revenue generation. This implies development of guerilla marketing initially, and word-of-mouth eventually.		#Develop product for solopreneurship, for $1k/day, replicable, Extreme Manufacturing revenue generation. This implies development of guerilla marketing initially, and word-of-mouth eventually.
	#Develop open source management and operations for ~~training others~~.		#Develop open source management and operations for scaling to other operators.
	#Vet others. Involve them in XM workshops and the Dev Team, with clear deliverables of product development. If Dev Team succeeds in a feature release, and their XM participation is successful, then we can consider training them for XM production. They pay for that, as there is no guarantee of being hired. It must be a person motivated to learn enough to go on their own, but collaborative enough to understand that we can get more done by working together. Choice is theirs.		#Vet others. Involve them in XM workshops and the Dev Team, with clear deliverables of product development. If Dev Team succeeds in a feature release, and their XM participation is successful, then we can consider training them for XM production. They pay for that, as there is no guarantee of being hired. It must be a person motivated to learn enough to go on their own, but collaborative enough to understand that we can get more done by working together. Choice is theirs.
	#Train the candidates. ~~Class~~ of 2 or more, 2 weeks off-site, and 2 weeks on-site. 60 hour weeks during training phase.		#Train the candidates. Cohort of 2 or more people, 2 weeks off-site, and 2 weeks on-site. 60 hour weeks during training phase.

	=Swag=		=Swag=

Marcin: /* Approch */

2019-02-28T16:51:07Z

Approch

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:51, 28 February 2019
Line 11:		Line 11:
	#'''Overcoming the disciplinary approach.''' It appears that the most fitting profile of a potential developer is a generalist and a social entrepreneur. However, entrepreneurs typically have a short term vision of survival, unless there is a significant runway. The ideal profile would be that of an R&D person, marketer, extreme manufacturer, and civic leader. Such characteristics in a single person are rare - and more so when it comes to the social entrepreneur embodying open source culture.		#'''Overcoming the disciplinary approach.''' It appears that the most fitting profile of a potential developer is a generalist and a social entrepreneur. However, entrepreneurs typically have a short term vision of survival, unless there is a significant runway. The ideal profile would be that of an R&D person, marketer, extreme manufacturer, and civic leader. Such characteristics in a single person are rare - and more so when it comes to the social entrepreneur embodying open source culture.
	#'''Open Source Culture''' - Googling 'open source social enterprise' yields zero hits. Let me say that again: Googling 'open source social enterprise' yields zero hits. Even the most well known social entrepreneur, [[Muhammad Yunus]], does not have an open source platform (ie, where the enterprise is a [[Distributive Enterprise]]). From the point of open source ecology, the myriad do-good projects - of which most use proprietary technology - are a contradiction in terms and ineffective - when considering the prospects for true distribution of wealth or further distribution of such enterprises to other contexts.		#'''Open Source Culture''' - Googling 'open source social enterprise' yields zero hits. Let me say that again: Googling 'open source social enterprise' yields zero hits. Even the most well known social entrepreneur, [[Muhammad Yunus]], does not have an open source platform (ie, where the enterprise is a [[Distributive Enterprise]]). From the point of open source ecology, the myriad do-good projects - of which most use proprietary technology - are a contradiction in terms and ineffective - when considering the prospects for true distribution of wealth or further distribution of such enterprises to other contexts.

			=Roadmap=
			To address issues above, here is one possible route:

			#Develop product for solopreneurship, for $1k/day replicable revenue generation. This implies development of guerilla marketing initially, and word-of-mouth eventually.
			#Develop open source management and operations for training others.
			#Vet others. Involve them in XM workshops and the Dev Team, with clear deliverables of product development. If Dev Team succeeds in a feature release, and their XM participation is successful, then we can consider training them for XM production. They pay for that, as there is no guarantee of being hired. It must be a person motivated to learn enough to go on their own, but collaborative enough to understand that we can get more done by working together. Choice is theirs.
			#Train the candidates. Class of 2 or more, 2 weeks off-site, and 2 weeks on-site. 60 hour weeks during training phase.

	=Swag=		=Swag=

Marcin: /* Approch */

2019-02-28T16:44:28Z

Approch

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 28 February 2019
Line 7:		Line 7:

	=Approch=		=Approch=
	OSE's work is challenging because as ~~we push the limits towards~~ the open source microfactory, there are several development points:		OSE's work is challenging because as aim for eradication of artificial scarcity via the open source microfactory concept, there are several development points:
	#'''Uncovering an incentive structure for mass scale open source product development.''' Theoretically, if the reward is multibillion dollar industries - even for a seemingly small item such as the $7B global market of the [[Open Source 3D Printed Cordless Drill]] - then motivating collaborators should in theory be feasible. The question is execution.		#'''Uncovering an incentive structure for mass scale open source product development.''' Theoretically, if the reward is multibillion dollar industries - even for a seemingly small item such as the $7B global market of the [[Open Source 3D Printed Cordless Drill]] - then motivating collaborators should in theory be feasible. The question is execution.
	#'''Overcoming the disciplinary approach.''' It appears that the most fitting profile of a potential developer is a generalist and a social entrepreneur. However, entrepreneurs typically have a short term vision of survival, unless there is a significant runway. The ideal profile would be that of an R&D person, marketer, extreme manufacturer, and civic leader. Such characteristics in a single person are rare - and more so when it comes to the social entrepreneur embodying open source culture.		#'''Overcoming the disciplinary approach.''' It appears that the most fitting profile of a potential developer is a generalist and a social entrepreneur. However, entrepreneurs typically have a short term vision of survival, unless there is a significant runway. The ideal profile would be that of an R&D person, marketer, extreme manufacturer, and civic leader. Such characteristics in a single person are rare - and more so when it comes to the social entrepreneur embodying open source culture.

Marcin: /* Approch */

2019-02-28T15:33:38Z

Approch

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:33, 28 February 2019
Line 10:		Line 10:
	#'''Uncovering an incentive structure for mass scale open source product development.''' Theoretically, if the reward is multibillion dollar industries - even for a seemingly small item such as the $7B global market of the [[Open Source 3D Printed Cordless Drill]] - then motivating collaborators should in theory be feasible. The question is execution.		#'''Uncovering an incentive structure for mass scale open source product development.''' Theoretically, if the reward is multibillion dollar industries - even for a seemingly small item such as the $7B global market of the [[Open Source 3D Printed Cordless Drill]] - then motivating collaborators should in theory be feasible. The question is execution.
	#'''Overcoming the disciplinary approach.''' It appears that the most fitting profile of a potential developer is a generalist and a social entrepreneur. However, entrepreneurs typically have a short term vision of survival, unless there is a significant runway. The ideal profile would be that of an R&D person, marketer, extreme manufacturer, and civic leader. Such characteristics in a single person are rare - and more so when it comes to the social entrepreneur embodying open source culture.		#'''Overcoming the disciplinary approach.''' It appears that the most fitting profile of a potential developer is a generalist and a social entrepreneur. However, entrepreneurs typically have a short term vision of survival, unless there is a significant runway. The ideal profile would be that of an R&D person, marketer, extreme manufacturer, and civic leader. Such characteristics in a single person are rare - and more so when it comes to the social entrepreneur embodying open source culture.
	#'''Open Source Culture''' - Googling 'open source social enterprise' yields zero hits. Let me say that again: Googling 'open source social enterprise' yields zero hits. Even the most well known social entrepreneur, [[Muhammad Yunus]], does not have an open source platform (ie, where the enterprise is a [[Distributive Enterprise]]		#'''Open Source Culture''' - Googling 'open source social enterprise' yields zero hits. Let me say that again: Googling 'open source social enterprise' yields zero hits. Even the most well known social entrepreneur, [[Muhammad Yunus]], does not have an open source platform (ie, where the enterprise is a [[Distributive Enterprise]]). From the point of open source ecology, the myriad do-good projects - of which most use proprietary technology - are a contradiction in terms and ineffective - when considering the prospects for true distribution of wealth or further distribution of such enterprises to other contexts.

	=Swag=		=Swag=

Marcin: /* Business Development Introduction */

2019-02-28T15:27:33Z

Business Development Introduction

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:27, 28 February 2019
Line 3:		Line 3:

	All the sections below are a list of ideas for business development. An OSE business development group will be added to the OSE Dev Team.		All the sections below are a list of ideas for business development. An OSE business development group will be added to the OSE Dev Team.

			We start with approach.

			=Approch=
			OSE's work is challenging because as we push the limits towards the open source microfactory, there are several development points:
			#'''Uncovering an incentive structure for mass scale open source product development.''' Theoretically, if the reward is multibillion dollar industries - even for a seemingly small item such as the $7B global market of the [[Open Source 3D Printed Cordless Drill]] - then motivating collaborators should in theory be feasible. The question is execution.
			#'''Overcoming the disciplinary approach.''' It appears that the most fitting profile of a potential developer is a generalist and a social entrepreneur. However, entrepreneurs typically have a short term vision of survival, unless there is a significant runway. The ideal profile would be that of an R&D person, marketer, extreme manufacturer, and civic leader. Such characteristics in a single person are rare - and more so when it comes to the social entrepreneur embodying open source culture.
			#'''Open Source Culture''' - Googling 'open source social enterprise' yields zero hits. Let me say that again: Googling 'open source social enterprise' yields zero hits. Even the most well known social entrepreneur, [[Muhammad Yunus]], does not have an open source platform (ie, where the enterprise is a [[Distributive Enterprise]]

	=Swag=		=Swag=
	*T-shirt, sticker for any of the products		*T-shirt, sticker for any of the products

Marcin: /* Power Cube */

2018-03-05T14:29:13Z

Power Cube

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:29, 5 March 2018
Line 15:		Line 15:
	*heavy duty cnc machine		*heavy duty cnc machine
	=Power Cube=		=Power Cube=
	*Micro power cube can be a small kit, solar powered. For high torque, slow speed applications.		*Micro power cube can be a small kit, solar powered. For high torque, slow speed applications.

			=MicroTrac=
			*CV robotic controller
			*Metal kit

	=Online Digital Community and Mastermind Community=		=Online Digital Community and Mastermind Community=