Collaboration Architecture Log - Revision history

Marcin: /* Thu Apr 23, 2020 */

2020-04-23T21:36:38Z

Thu Apr 23, 2020

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:36, 23 April 2020
Line 2:		Line 2:

	=Thu Apr 23, 2020=		=Thu Apr 23, 2020=
	Shift thinking to Collaborative Microfactory, as opposed to Open Source Microfactory. Develop a community of developers interested in going into it for right livelihood, ie, right now - jump out of your current state, or begin a serious transition to right livelihood. Why right livelihood? Appropriate sourcing and circular economies are the end of ecocide and war, so there is an ethical economic consideration. Thus for the Open Source Microfactory, develop it as a Collaborative Microfactory. That means - not what is ~~ideal~~, but what a number of people can replicate in a co-creative process. On my side, OSE must provide a $10k/month guaranteed package pending learning and ramp-up of startup entrepreneurs. They must pay dearly for it to show their commitment to entrepreneurship. OSE provides a decade of development. Others provide their time and effort with the 3D printer enterprise which builds a microfactory with it. It's not just an assemply plant - it's an integrated Collaborative Microfactory, where naturally - in order to diversify, we must build in productive capacity of parts. The distinction here is we are shifting away from specialization towards integration, and developing diversified product business models to get there. Specialization is for insects.		Shift thinking to Collaborative Microfactory, as opposed to Open Source Microfactory. Develop a community of developers interested in going into it for right livelihood, ie, right now - jump out of your current state, or begin a serious transition to right livelihood. Why right livelihood? Appropriate sourcing and circular economies are the end of ecocide and war, so there is an ethical economic consideration. Thus for the Open Source Microfactory, develop it as a Collaborative Microfactory. That means - not what is imagined, but what a number of people can replicate in a co-creative process - ie, listening to the customers' needs and abilities. While not reducing the vision or goals - the role of OSE is to steward the goals and vision. On my side, OSE must provide a $10k/month guaranteed package pending learning and ramp-up of startup entrepreneurs. They must pay dearly for it to show their commitment to entrepreneurship. OSE provides a decade of development. Others provide their time and effort with the 3D printer enterprise which builds a microfactory with it. It's not just an assemply plant - it's an integrated Collaborative Microfactory, where naturally - in order to diversify, we must build in productive capacity of parts. The distinction here is we are shifting away from specialization towards integration, and developing diversified product business models to get there. Specialization is for insects.

	=Wed Apr 22, 2020=		=Wed Apr 22, 2020=

Marcin: /* Wed Apr 22, 2020 */

2020-04-23T21:35:24Z

Wed Apr 22, 2020

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:35, 23 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	See [[Collaboration Architecture]]		See [[Collaboration Architecture]]

			=Thu Apr 23, 2020=
			Shift thinking to Collaborative Microfactory, as opposed to Open Source Microfactory. Develop a community of developers interested in going into it for right livelihood, ie, right now - jump out of your current state, or begin a serious transition to right livelihood. Why right livelihood? Appropriate sourcing and circular economies are the end of ecocide and war, so there is an ethical economic consideration. Thus for the Open Source Microfactory, develop it as a Collaborative Microfactory. That means - not what is ideal, but what a number of people can replicate in a co-creative process. On my side, OSE must provide a $10k/month guaranteed package pending learning and ramp-up of startup entrepreneurs. They must pay dearly for it to show their commitment to entrepreneurship. OSE provides a decade of development. Others provide their time and effort with the 3D printer enterprise which builds a microfactory with it. It's not just an assemply plant - it's an integrated Collaborative Microfactory, where naturally - in order to diversify, we must build in productive capacity of parts. The distinction here is we are shifting away from specialization towards integration, and developing diversified product business models to get there. Specialization is for insects.

	=Wed Apr 22, 2020=		=Wed Apr 22, 2020=

Marcin: /* Wed Apr 22, 2020 */

2020-04-23T05:35:43Z

Wed Apr 22, 2020

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:35, 23 April 2020
Line 6:		Line 6:
	I believe that we can provide significant impact by enabling a rapid development process for economic revival, where products are developed on unprecedented time scales. Such that it takes, say, 1 year for a trillion of economic activity to sprout readily. Can this be done with 3D printing, filament making from waste streams, CNC torch tables, and a screw machine - if all these tools are readily replicable at about $10k of investment? I think so. The hardware would need to be accompanied by collaborative design training, and applications to using steel, plastic, and electronic components to rebuild economies in a deep way.		I believe that we can provide significant impact by enabling a rapid development process for economic revival, where products are developed on unprecedented time scales. Such that it takes, say, 1 year for a trillion of economic activity to sprout readily. Can this be done with 3D printing, filament making from waste streams, CNC torch tables, and a screw machine - if all these tools are readily replicable at about $10k of investment? I think so. The hardware would need to be accompanied by collaborative design training, and applications to using steel, plastic, and electronic components to rebuild economies in a deep way.

	Take a minimum subset - and operationalize it: 3D printers, high temperature build chamber, filament makers, CNC torch tables - and we can account for a significant fraction of the plastics industry ($400 billion), household appliances ($500 billion), produce (fruit and veg) industry via Universal Axis [[Farmbots]] and [[Miracle Orchards]] ($250B), tractors ($140B), footwear ($40B).		Take a minimum subset - and operationalize it: 3D printers, high temperature build chamber, filament makers, CNC torch tables - and we can account for a significant fraction of the plastics industry ($400 billion), household appliances ($500 billion), produce (fruit and veg) industry via Universal Axis [[Farmbots]] and [[Miracle Orchards]] ($250B), tractors ($140B), footwear ($40B), power tools ($33B), and housing ($9T).

	Higher up is that afforded by induction ~~furnace and~~ hot metal processing - steel at $1T, concrete at $680B.		Higher up in tech is that afforded by screw machines, and induction furnaces for hot metal processing - steel at $1T, concrete at $680B, and cars at $2T.
	.

			Next up is semiconductors, produced with technology that requires the use of [[Air Bearings]].

	=Fri Apr 17, 2020=		=Fri Apr 17, 2020=

Marcin: /* Wed Apr 22, 2020 */

2020-04-23T05:28:12Z

Wed Apr 22, 2020

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:28, 23 April 2020
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Take a minimum subset - and operationalize it: 3D printers, high temperature build chamber, filament makers, CNC torch tables - and we can account for a significant fraction of the plastics industry ($400 billion), household appliances ($500 billion), produce (fruit and veg) industry via Universal Axis [[Farmbots]] and [[Miracle Orchards]] ($250B), tractors ($140B), footwear ($40B).		Take a minimum subset - and operationalize it: 3D printers, high temperature build chamber, filament makers, CNC torch tables - and we can account for a significant fraction of the plastics industry ($400 billion), household appliances ($500 billion), produce (fruit and veg) industry via Universal Axis [[Farmbots]] and [[Miracle Orchards]] ($250B), tractors ($140B), footwear ($40B).

	Higher up is that afforded by induction furnace and hot metal processing - steel at $1T.		Higher up is that afforded by induction furnace and hot metal processing - steel at $1T, concrete at $680B.
	.		.

Marcin: /* Wed Apr 22, 2020 */

2020-04-23T05:25:16Z

Wed Apr 22, 2020

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:25, 23 April 2020
Line 6:		Line 6:
	I believe that we can provide significant impact by enabling a rapid development process for economic revival, where products are developed on unprecedented time scales. Such that it takes, say, 1 year for a trillion of economic activity to sprout readily. Can this be done with 3D printing, filament making from waste streams, CNC torch tables, and a screw machine - if all these tools are readily replicable at about $10k of investment? I think so. The hardware would need to be accompanied by collaborative design training, and applications to using steel, plastic, and electronic components to rebuild economies in a deep way.		I believe that we can provide significant impact by enabling a rapid development process for economic revival, where products are developed on unprecedented time scales. Such that it takes, say, 1 year for a trillion of economic activity to sprout readily. Can this be done with 3D printing, filament making from waste streams, CNC torch tables, and a screw machine - if all these tools are readily replicable at about $10k of investment? I think so. The hardware would need to be accompanied by collaborative design training, and applications to using steel, plastic, and electronic components to rebuild economies in a deep way.

	Take a minimum subset - and operationalize it: 3D printers, high temperature build chamber, filament makers, CNC torch tables - and we can account for a significant fraction of the plastics industry ($400 billion), household appliances ($500 billion), produce (fruit and veg) industry via Universal Axis [[Farmbots]] and [[Miracle Orchards]] ($250B), ~~and~~ tractors ($140B).		Take a minimum subset - and operationalize it: 3D printers, high temperature build chamber, filament makers, CNC torch tables - and we can account for a significant fraction of the plastics industry ($400 billion), household appliances ($500 billion), produce (fruit and veg) industry via Universal Axis [[Farmbots]] and [[Miracle Orchards]] ($250B), tractors ($140B), footwear ($40B).

			Higher up is that afforded by induction furnace and hot metal processing - steel at $1T.
			.

	=Fri Apr 17, 2020=		=Fri Apr 17, 2020=

Marcin: /* Wed Apr 22, 2020 */

2020-04-23T05:21:42Z

Wed Apr 22, 2020

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:21, 23 April 2020
Line 6:		Line 6:
	I believe that we can provide significant impact by enabling a rapid development process for economic revival, where products are developed on unprecedented time scales. Such that it takes, say, 1 year for a trillion of economic activity to sprout readily. Can this be done with 3D printing, filament making from waste streams, CNC torch tables, and a screw machine - if all these tools are readily replicable at about $10k of investment? I think so. The hardware would need to be accompanied by collaborative design training, and applications to using steel, plastic, and electronic components to rebuild economies in a deep way.		I believe that we can provide significant impact by enabling a rapid development process for economic revival, where products are developed on unprecedented time scales. Such that it takes, say, 1 year for a trillion of economic activity to sprout readily. Can this be done with 3D printing, filament making from waste streams, CNC torch tables, and a screw machine - if all these tools are readily replicable at about $10k of investment? I think so. The hardware would need to be accompanied by collaborative design training, and applications to using steel, plastic, and electronic components to rebuild economies in a deep way.

	Take a minimum subset - and operationalize it: 3D printers, high temperature build chamber, filament makers, CNC torch tables - and we can account for a significant fraction of the plastics industry ($400 billion), household appliances ($500 billion), produce (fruit and veg) industry via Universal Axis [[Farmbots]] and [[Miracle ~~Orchargs~~]] ($250B), and tractors ($140B).		Take a minimum subset - and operationalize it: 3D printers, high temperature build chamber, filament makers, CNC torch tables - and we can account for a significant fraction of the plastics industry ($400 billion), household appliances ($500 billion), produce (fruit and veg) industry via Universal Axis [[Farmbots]] and [[Miracle Orchards]] ($250B), and tractors ($140B).

	=Fri Apr 17, 2020=		=Fri Apr 17, 2020=

Marcin: /* Wed Apr 22, 2020 */

2020-04-23T05:21:10Z

Wed Apr 22, 2020

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:21, 23 April 2020
Line 6:		Line 6:
	I believe that we can provide significant impact by enabling a rapid development process for economic revival, where products are developed on unprecedented time scales. Such that it takes, say, 1 year for a trillion of economic activity to sprout readily. Can this be done with 3D printing, filament making from waste streams, CNC torch tables, and a screw machine - if all these tools are readily replicable at about $10k of investment? I think so. The hardware would need to be accompanied by collaborative design training, and applications to using steel, plastic, and electronic components to rebuild economies in a deep way.		I believe that we can provide significant impact by enabling a rapid development process for economic revival, where products are developed on unprecedented time scales. Such that it takes, say, 1 year for a trillion of economic activity to sprout readily. Can this be done with 3D printing, filament making from waste streams, CNC torch tables, and a screw machine - if all these tools are readily replicable at about $10k of investment? I think so. The hardware would need to be accompanied by collaborative design training, and applications to using steel, plastic, and electronic components to rebuild economies in a deep way.

	Take a minimum subset - and operationalize it: 3D printers, high temperature build chamber, filament makers, CNC torch tables - and we can account for a significant fraction of the plastics industry ($400 billion), household appliances ($500 billion), ~~heavy machines~~		Take a minimum subset - and operationalize it: 3D printers, high temperature build chamber, filament makers, CNC torch tables - and we can account for a significant fraction of the plastics industry ($400 billion), household appliances ($500 billion), produce (fruit and veg) industry via Universal Axis [[Farmbots]] and [[Miracle Orchargs]] ($250B), and tractors ($140B).

	=Fri Apr 17, 2020=		=Fri Apr 17, 2020=

Marcin: /* Wed Apr 22, 2020 */

2020-04-23T05:07:22Z

Wed Apr 22, 2020

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:07, 23 April 2020
Line 2:		Line 2:

	=Wed Apr 22, 2020=		=Wed Apr 22, 2020=
	One outcome of COVID is a recognition for OSE that our infrastructure is not refined well enough to provide a deep solution to COVID. In principle, we should be in a good position to rebuild economies, via massive collaborative design - where activity can spread rapidly in a distributed fashion - using widely-available resources from local economies. However, our tools for mass creation of right livelihood are not well-developed. Therefore a relevant question arises - what is the support and infrastructure that OSE can provide to lift an economy out of depression?		One outcome of COVID is a recognition for OSE that our infrastructure is not refined well enough to provide a deep solution to COVID. In principle, we should be in a good position to rebuild economies, via massive collaborative design - where activity can spread rapidly in a distributed fashion - using widely-available resources from local economies. However, our tools for mass creation of right livelihood are not well-developed. Therefore a relevant question arises: what is the support and infrastructure that OSE can provide to lift an economy out of depression?

			I believe that we can provide significant impact by enabling a rapid development process for economic revival, where products are developed on unprecedented time scales. Such that it takes, say, 1 year for a trillion of economic activity to sprout readily. Can this be done with 3D printing, filament making from waste streams, CNC torch tables, and a screw machine - if all these tools are readily replicable at about $10k of investment? I think so. The hardware would need to be accompanied by collaborative design training, and applications to using steel, plastic, and electronic components to rebuild economies in a deep way.

			Take a minimum subset - and operationalize it: 3D printers, high temperature build chamber, filament makers, CNC torch tables - and we can account for a significant fraction of the plastics industry ($400 billion), household appliances ($500 billion), heavy machines

	=Fri Apr 17, 2020=		=Fri Apr 17, 2020=

Marcin: /* Fri Apr 17, 2020 */

2020-04-23T05:00:59Z

Fri Apr 17, 2020

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:00, 23 April 2020
Line 6:		Line 6:
	=Fri Apr 17, 2020=		=Fri Apr 17, 2020=
	*Add Mechanisms Template - every mechanism from shaft in bearings to split ring planetary gear. This will update our [[Technology Modules]] to their basic mechanisms. This requires for holistic Approach: [[OSE Meetups]], [[University Chapters]], [[School Chapters]], [[Franchises]], [[STEAM Camp Instructors]], [[Hackathons]], [[Crowdfunding]], [[Incentive Challenges]], [[OSE Campuses]], [[STEAM Camp Instructors]], [[Regional Chapters]], and [[Fab Cities]]. [[Startup Camps]]. [[Summer X]]. [[XM Workshops]] are just a product line of any of these aneterprises.		*Add Mechanisms Template - every mechanism from shaft in bearings to split ring planetary gear. This will update our [[Technology Modules]] to their basic mechanisms. This requires for holistic Approach: [[OSE Meetups]], [[University Chapters]], [[School Chapters]], [[Franchises]], [[STEAM Camp Instructors]], [[Hackathons]], [[Crowdfunding]], [[Incentive Challenges]], [[OSE Campuses]], [[STEAM Camp Instructors]], [[Regional Chapters]], and [[Fab Cities]]. [[Startup Camps]]. [[Summer X]]. [[XM Workshops]] are just a product line of any of these aneterprises.
	*Add Incentive Challenge Template: breaking down a Distributive Enterprise into all its elements. ~~Tested Septemer,~~		*Add Incentive Challenge Template: breaking down a Distributive Enterprise into all its elements.

	Ecology:		Ecology:

Marcin: /* Fri Apr 17, 2020 */

2020-04-23T05:00:44Z

Fri Apr 17, 2020

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:00, 23 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	See [[Collaboration Architecture]]		See [[Collaboration Architecture]]

			=Wed Apr 22, 2020=
			One outcome of COVID is a recognition for OSE that our infrastructure is not refined well enough to provide a deep solution to COVID. In principle, we should be in a good position to rebuild economies, via massive collaborative design - where activity can spread rapidly in a distributed fashion - using widely-available resources from local economies. However, our tools for mass creation of right livelihood are not well-developed. Therefore a relevant question arises - what is the support and infrastructure that OSE can provide to lift an economy out of depression?

	=Fri Apr 17, 2020=		=Fri Apr 17, 2020=