Commonwealth Fusion Systems - Revision history

Marcin at 11:28, 13 February 2021

2021-02-13T11:28:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:28, 13 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	https://cfs.energy/technology#alcator-c-mod-plasma-physics-basis		https://cfs.energy/technology#alcator-c-mod-plasma-physics-basis

	~~Promising~~ fusion ~~commercially~~ in this decade, with $215M funding.		They are promising commercially feasible fusion in this decade, with $215M funding.

	Laughable. Hey, all great progress is first laughable. I don't see this working because of radioactivity. Sure we can get fusion, but those pesky neutrons will make everything radioactive. Unless we produce no neutrons, which is not yet possible, even in aneutronic fusion. If someone can convince me that this will be environmentally benign, I'll join. Right now, this is only for incomplete humans who dismiss the radioactivity issue, in my opinion. But maybe someone will find a way to beat nature. Personally I doubt it, because if they had an inkling of how to beat nature, they would be talking about it - and none of their copy says anything about how they will deal with the radioactivity. I like their boldness. However, it appears to be hubris.		Laughable. Hey, all great progress is first laughable. I don't see this working because of radioactivity. Sure we can get fusion, but those pesky neutrons will make everything radioactive. Unless we produce no neutrons, which is not yet possible, even in aneutronic fusion. If someone can convince me that this will be environmentally benign, I'll join. Right now, this is only for incomplete humans who dismiss the radioactivity issue, in my opinion. But maybe someone will find a way to beat nature. Personally I doubt it, because if they had an inkling of how to beat nature, they would be talking about it - and none of their copy says anything about how they will deal with the radioactivity. I like their boldness. However, it appears to be hubris.

Marcin at 11:28, 13 February 2021

2021-02-13T11:28:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:28, 13 February 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Promising fusion commercially in this decade, with $215M funding.		Promising fusion commercially in this decade, with $215M funding.

	Laughable. Hey, all great progress is first laughable. I don't see this working because of radioactivity. Sure we can get fusion, but those pesky neutrons will make everything radioactive. Unless we produce no neutrons, which is not yet possible, even in aneutronic fusion. If someone can convince me that this will be environmentally benign, I'll join. Right now, this is only for incomplete humans who dismiss the radioactivity issue, in my opinion. But maybe someone will find a way to beat nature. Personally I doubt it, because if they had an inkling of how to beat nature, they would be talking about it - and none of their copy says anything about how they will deal with the radioactivity.		Laughable. Hey, all great progress is first laughable. I don't see this working because of radioactivity. Sure we can get fusion, but those pesky neutrons will make everything radioactive. Unless we produce no neutrons, which is not yet possible, even in aneutronic fusion. If someone can convince me that this will be environmentally benign, I'll join. Right now, this is only for incomplete humans who dismiss the radioactivity issue, in my opinion. But maybe someone will find a way to beat nature. Personally I doubt it, because if they had an inkling of how to beat nature, they would be talking about it - and none of their copy says anything about how they will deal with the radioactivity. I like their boldness. However, it appears to be hubris.

Marcin at 11:27, 13 February 2021

2021-02-13T11:27:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:27, 13 February 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Promising fusion commercially in this decade, with $215M funding.		Promising fusion commercially in this decade, with $215M funding.

	Laughable. Hey, all great progress is first laughable. I don't see this working because of radioactivity. Sure we can get fusion, but those pesky neutrons will make everything radioactive. Unless we produce no neutrons, which is not yet possible, even in aneutronic fusion. If someone can convince me that this will be environmentally benign, I'll join. Right now, this is only for incomplete humans who dismiss the radioactivity issue, in my opinion. But maybe someone will find a way to beat nature.		Laughable. Hey, all great progress is first laughable. I don't see this working because of radioactivity. Sure we can get fusion, but those pesky neutrons will make everything radioactive. Unless we produce no neutrons, which is not yet possible, even in aneutronic fusion. If someone can convince me that this will be environmentally benign, I'll join. Right now, this is only for incomplete humans who dismiss the radioactivity issue, in my opinion. But maybe someone will find a way to beat nature. Personally I doubt it, because if they had an inkling of how to beat nature, they would be talking about it - and none of their copy says anything about how they will deal with the radioactivity.

Marcin: Created page with "https://cfs.energy/technology#alcator-c-mod-plasma-physics-basis Promising fusion commercially in this decade, with $215M funding. Laughable. Hey, all great progress is fir..."

2021-02-13T11:26:19Z

Created page with "https://cfs.energy/technology#alcator-c-mod-plasma-physics-basis Promising fusion commercially in this decade, with $215M funding. Laughable. Hey, all great progress is fir..."

New page

https://cfs.energy/technology#alcator-c-mod-plasma-physics-basis

Promising fusion commercially in this decade, with $215M funding.

Laughable. Hey, all great progress is first laughable. I don't see this working because of radioactivity. Sure we can get fusion, but those pesky neutrons will make everything radioactive. Unless we produce no neutrons, which is not yet possible, even in aneutronic fusion. If someone can convince me that this will be environmentally benign, I'll join. Right now, this is only for incomplete humans who dismiss the radioactivity issue, in my opinion. But maybe someone will find a way to beat nature.