Critique of Open Source - Revision history

Marcin at 22:20, 27 October 2024

2024-10-27T22:20:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:20, 27 October 2024
Line 3:		Line 3:
	**This is good in terms of open standards bodies		**This is good in terms of open standards bodies
	**This may not be good in how the open standards body is created, its overhead, etc. it must be fully open access, not a proprietary consortiumm.		**This may not be good in how the open standards body is created, its overhead, etc. it must be fully open access, not a proprietary consortiumm.
	*In general, the courageous approach is ([[Brene Brown]] style) vulnerability, which recognizes that there is an elephant in the room - the system that is already in place to kill, steal, and plunder. Only solution is personal responsibility to not participate, which is currently impossible but must be worked on.		*In general, the courageous approach is ([[Brene Brown]] style) vulnerability, which recognizes that there is an elephant in the room - the system that is already in place to kill, steal, and plunder. Only solution is personal responsibility to not participate, which is currently impossible but must be worked on. TLDR; - evil is already open source, ie, the means to do bad things. Adding evil AI is not new because we already operate on the basis of evil AI (Artificial Ignorance) obtained from [[Deleting Possibility as Humans Grow Up]].

Marcin at 22:17, 27 October 2024

2024-10-27T22:17:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:17, 27 October 2024
Line 3:		Line 3:
	**This is good in terms of open standards bodies		**This is good in terms of open standards bodies
	**This may not be good in how the open standards body is created, its overhead, etc. it must be fully open access, not a proprietary consortiumm.		**This may not be good in how the open standards body is created, its overhead, etc. it must be fully open access, not a proprietary consortiumm.
			*In general, the courageous approach is ([[Brene Brown]] style) vulnerability, which recognizes that there is an elephant in the room - the system that is already in place to kill, steal, and plunder. Only solution is personal responsibility to not participate, which is currently impossible but must be worked on.

Marcin at 22:15, 27 October 2024

2024-10-27T22:15:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 27 October 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*proliferation of potentially dangerous capacity [https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/GBAzW4pZ5JgJqGMJg/against-the-open-source-closed-source-dichotomy-regulated]		*proliferation of potentially dangerous capacity [https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/GBAzW4pZ5JgJqGMJg/against-the-open-source-closed-source-dichotomy-regulated]
	**OSE perspective - this danger fails to address the [[~~Compliler~~ Problem]]		**OSE perspective - this danger fails to address the [[Compiler Problem]]
	**This is good in terms of open standards bodies		**This is good in terms of open standards bodies
	**This may not be good in how the open standards body is created, its overhead, etc. it must be fully open access, not a proprietary consortiumm.		**This may not be good in how the open standards body is created, its overhead, etc. it must be fully open access, not a proprietary consortiumm.

Marcin: Created page with "*proliferation of potentially dangerous capacity [https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/GBAzW4pZ5JgJqGMJg/against-the-open-source-closed-source-dichotomy-regulated] **OSE..."

2024-10-27T22:15:12Z

Created page with "*proliferation of potentially dangerous capacity [https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/GBAzW4pZ5JgJqGMJg/against-the-open-source-closed-source-dichotomy-regulated] **OSE..."

New page

*proliferation of potentially dangerous capacity [https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/GBAzW4pZ5JgJqGMJg/against-the-open-source-closed-source-dichotomy-regulated]
**OSE perspective - this danger fails to address the [[Compliler Problem]]
**This is good in terms of open standards bodies
**This may not be good in how the open standards body is created, its overhead, etc. it must be fully open access, not a proprietary consortiumm.