Cynefin - Revision history

Aaron Makaruk at 00:28, 24 September 2012

2012-09-24T00:28:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:28, 24 September 2012
Line 18:		Line 18:
	The fifth domain is '''Disorder''', which is the state of not knowing what type of causality exists, in which state people will revert to their own comfort zone in making a decision.		The fifth domain is '''Disorder''', which is the state of not knowing what type of causality exists, in which state people will revert to their own comfort zone in making a decision.
	In full use, the Cynefin framework has sub-domains, and the boundary between simple and chaotic is seen as a catastrophic one: complacency leads to failure.		In full use, the Cynefin framework has sub-domains, and the boundary between simple and chaotic is seen as a catastrophic one: complacency leads to failure.

			*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7oz366X0-8 The Cynefin Framework Video]

Aaron Makaruk at 00:08, 24 September 2012

2012-09-24T00:08:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:08, 24 September 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:
	''the data precedes the framework''		''the data precedes the framework''
	[[File:280px-Cynefin_framework_Feb_2011.jpeg\|200px\|right\|thumb\|Dave Snowden's Cynefin Framework Sense-making Model]]		[[File:280px-Cynefin_framework_Feb_2011.jpeg\|200px\|right\|thumb\|Dave Snowden's Cynefin Framework Sense-making Model]]

			The Cynefin framework has five domains.<ref> Snowden, D (2005) “Multi-ontology sense making – a new simplicity in decision making” in Informatics in Primary Health Care 2005:13:00</ref> The first four domains are:
			*'''Simple''', in which the relationship between cause and effect is obvious to all, the approach is to ''Sense - Categorise - Respond'' and we can apply ''best'' practice.
			*'''Complicated''', in which the relationship between cause and effect requires analysis or some other form of investigation and/or the application of expert knowledge, the approach is to ''Sense - Analyze - Respond'' and we can apply ''good'' practice.
			*'''Complex''', in which the relationship between cause and effect can only be perceived in retrospect, but not in advance, the approach is to ''Probe - Sense - Respond'' and we can sense ''emergent'' practice.
			*'''Chaotic''', in which there is no relationship between cause and effect at systems level, the approach is to ''Act - Sense - Respond'' and we can discover ''novel'' practice.
			The fifth domain is '''Disorder''', which is the state of not knowing what type of causality exists, in which state people will revert to their own comfort zone in making a decision.
			In full use, the Cynefin framework has sub-domains, and the boundary between simple and chaotic is seen as a catastrophic one: complacency leads to failure.

Aaron Makaruk at 00:06, 24 September 2012

2012-09-24T00:06:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:06, 24 September 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
			===Categorization Models===
	[[File:3388665757_3cc844bd74_o.jpg\|thumb\|200px\|right\|Ken Wilber's AQAL Categorization Model]]		[[File:3388665757_3cc844bd74_o.jpg\|thumb\|200px\|right\|Ken Wilber's AQAL Categorization Model]]
	~~===Categorization Models===~~
	''the framework precedes the data''		''the framework precedes the data''

	As an inevitable corollary of their nature as a simultaneous part and whole, each holon (every entity and concept shares a dual role: being both an autonomous, self-reliant unit (whole entity) unto itself, and also a part of one (or more) other wholes) inherently has an interior and an exterior perspective (the perception or equivalent of the holon and the perspective of other separate entities), and also may be considered in the sense of an individual or as a plurality or collective.		As an inevitable corollary of their nature as a simultaneous part and whole, each holon (''every entity and concept shares a dual role: being both an autonomous, self-reliant unit (whole entity) unto itself, and also a part of one (or more) other wholes'') inherently has an interior and an exterior perspective (the perception or equivalent of the holon and the perspective of other separate entities), and also may be considered in the sense of an individual or as a plurality or collective.

	According to Ken Wilber, this means that multiple viewpoints are inherent in the nature and existence of holons, as a natural consequence of holon-ness and each of the four approaches has a valid perspective to offer. The subjective emotional pain of a person who suffers a tragedy is one perspective and the social statistics about such tragedies are different perspectives on the same matter, the former being from the viewpoint of an individual and their subjective experience, the latter being a view of individuals in the plural and their objective assessment from outside. Putting these together, Wilber identifies four perspectives valid for any holon: the subjective (interior) and objective (exterior) views of a holon individually, and the same for a plurality of holons. Wilber states that it is important to consider all four perspectives as valid, as all are needed for real appreciation of a matter. To collapse them all together or dismiss one of these perspectives is often a serious mistake.		According to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AQAL Ken Wilber], this means that multiple viewpoints are inherent in the nature and existence of holons, as a natural consequence of holon-ness and each of the four approaches has a valid perspective to offer. The subjective emotional pain of a person who suffers a tragedy is one perspective and the social statistics about such tragedies are different perspectives on the same matter, the former being from the viewpoint of an individual and their subjective experience, the latter being a view of individuals in the plural and their objective assessment from outside. Putting these together, Wilber identifies four perspectives valid for any holon: the subjective (interior) and objective (exterior) views of a holon individually, and the same for a plurality of holons. Wilber states that it is important to consider all four perspectives as valid, as all are needed for real appreciation of a matter. To collapse them all together or dismiss one of these perspectives is often a serious mistake.

	===Sense-Making Models===		===Sense-Making Models===
	''the data precedes the framework''		''the data precedes the framework''
			[[File:280px-Cynefin_framework_Feb_2011.jpeg\|200px\|right\|thumb\|Dave Snowden's Cynefin Framework Sense-making Model]]

Aaron Makaruk: Created page with "Ken Wilber's AQAL Categorization Model ===Categorization Models=== ''the framework precedes the data'' As an inevitable c..."

2012-09-24T00:02:28Z

Created page with "thumb|200px|right|Ken Wilber's AQAL Categorization Model ===Categorization Models=== ''the framework precedes the data'' As an inevitable c..."

New page

[[File:3388665757_3cc844bd74_o.jpg|thumb|200px|right|Ken Wilber's AQAL Categorization Model]]
===Categorization Models===
''the framework precedes the data''

As an inevitable corollary of their nature as a simultaneous part and whole, each holon (every entity and concept shares a dual role: being both an autonomous, self-reliant unit (whole entity) unto itself, and also a part of one (or more) other wholes) inherently has an interior and an exterior perspective (the perception or equivalent of the holon and the perspective of other separate entities), and also may be considered in the sense of an individual or as a plurality or collective.

According to Ken Wilber, this means that multiple viewpoints are inherent in the nature and existence of holons, as a natural consequence of holon-ness and each of the four approaches has a valid perspective to offer. The subjective emotional pain of a person who suffers a tragedy is one perspective and the social statistics about such tragedies are different perspectives on the same matter, the former being from the viewpoint of an individual and their subjective experience, the latter being a view of individuals in the plural and their objective assessment from outside. Putting these together, Wilber identifies four perspectives valid for any holon: the subjective (interior) and objective (exterior) views of a holon individually, and the same for a plurality of holons. Wilber states that it is important to consider all four perspectives as valid, as all are needed for real appreciation of a matter. To collapse them all together or dismiss one of these perspectives is often a serious mistake.

===Sense-Making Models===
''the data precedes the framework''