Development Infrastructure - Revision history

YK: Redirected page to Tech Development

2012-12-22T23:14:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:14, 22 December 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:


	~~=Organization=~~

	~~Workshop needs a lot of organization. 100 hours should get it to a much more workable state.~~

	#REDIRECT [[Tech Development]]		#REDIRECT [[Tech Development]]

	~~=Inventory=~~

	~~Standard stock of fasteners needs to be ordered and organized.~~

	~~Stock of hydraulic hoses and fittings needs ordering and organizing.~~

	~~Stock of electronic components needs ordering and organizing.~~

YK: /* Maintenance */

2012-12-22T23:14:11Z

Maintenance

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Workshop needs a lot of organization. 100 hours should get it to a much more workable state.
-=Maintenance=
+#REDIRECT [[Tech Development]]
 =Inventory=

YK at 23:12, 22 December 2012

2012-12-22T23:12:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:12, 22 December 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{Tech Development}}~~

	=Organization=		=Organization=
Line 6:		Line 6:

	=Maintenance=		=Maintenance=

			Hablab air gaps are wreaking havoc on the inside temperature - a few bottles of expanding foam <30$ and <1hr should handle some of the big gaps.

	A lot of tools need maintaining.		A lot of tools need maintaining.
Line 13:		Line 15:
	Lathe needs to get operational.		Lathe needs to get operational.

	Surface grinder needs to get dressed.		Surface grinder needs to get dressed. Diamond point dressing bit is 50$, magnetic bit holder can be easily made with <20$ A36 steel block with holes and a setscrew.

	First mill needs to be lubricated. 3/4" dia collet mounting problem needs to be fixed.		First mill needs to be lubricated. 3/4" dia collet mounting problem needs to be fixed.

YK at 21:25, 22 December 2012

2012-12-22T21:25:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:25, 22 December 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~under construction~~}}		{{Tech Development}}

	=~~Notes on Wiki Infrastructure for Open Engineering~~=		=Organization=

	~~Marcin's comments:~~		Workshop needs a lot of organization. 100 hours should get it to a much more workable state.

	*We need: a Platform for Open Engineering		=Maintenance=
	*Marcin's personal attempt: openfarmtech.org - under Development Template.
	**However, this has a particular spec for its open engineering - it is open engineering + OSE Specifications (see Main Page)
	*Once a better infrastructure for projects exists at Appropedia, then we could consider using it for some technical developments.
	*Summary: unless someone can show me a better development platform, the Development Template is good enough for now. It embodies OSE Spec.

	~~'''Critical additional comment''':~~		A lot of tools need maintaining.
	*OSE adds value in that (1) attempts open engineering, (2) does so according to a very unique goal - replicable villages with particular attributes as described on the Main Page
	*It is the addition of ~~value according to a unique goal that adds value to the open engineering itself. It is what drives the specifications for open engineering.~~
	*I don't think one would come up with an option for creating OSE's replicable village if one just took a number of technologies and put them together. The OSE Specification (look on Main Page) is a glue for the type of engineering that goes on. Without that glue, you'd never arrive at the type of engineering proposed.

	~~Comments?~~		Second mill needs to be fixed.
	~~----~~
			Lathe needs to get operational.

			Surface grinder needs to get dressed.

			First mill needs to be lubricated. 3/4" dia collet mounting problem needs to be fixed.

			Bandsaw needs cutting fluid refill.

			Problematic welders need troubleshooting and repair.

			=Inventory=

			Standard stock of fasteners needs to be ordered and organized.

			Stock of hydraulic hoses and fittings needs ordering and organizing.

			Stock of electronic components needs ordering and organizing.

Mjn: /* Notes on Wiki Infrastructure for Open Engineering */ minor spelling correction.

2011-05-04T12:47:23Z

Notes on Wiki Infrastructure for Open Engineering: minor spelling correction.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:47, 4 May 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*We need: a Platform for Open Engineering		*We need: a Platform for Open Engineering
	*Marcin's personal attempt: openfarmtech.org - under Development Template.		*Marcin's personal attempt: openfarmtech.org - under Development Template.
	**However, this has a particular spec for its open engineering - it it open engineering + OSE Specifications (see Main Page)		**However, this has a particular spec for its open engineering - it is open engineering + OSE Specifications (see Main Page)
	*Once a better infrastructure for projects exists at Appropedia, then we could consider using it for some technical developments.		*Once a better infrastructure for projects exists at Appropedia, then we could consider using it for some technical developments.
	*Summary: unless someone can show me a better development platform, the Development Template is good enough for now. It embodies OSE Spec.		*Summary: unless someone can show me a better development platform, the Development Template is good enough for now. It embodies OSE Spec.

Syk0 saje at 11:53, 4 May 2011

2011-05-04T11:53:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:53, 4 May 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~draft~~}}		{{under construction}}

	=Notes on Wiki Infrastructure for Open Engineering=		=Notes on Wiki Infrastructure for Open Engineering=

WikiSysop at 19:50, 29 August 2007

2007-08-29T19:50:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:50, 29 August 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	=Notes on Wiki Infrastructure for Open Engineering=		=Notes on Wiki Infrastructure for Open Engineering=

	~~Mel's Comment:~~

	~~Marcin and I just spoke about this on the phone - Marcin, reminderping~~
	~~to coordinate a discussion w/ Chris (cc'd) & Vinay on the wiki-merge issue.~~

	~~The way I see it, Appropedia can become a Sourceforge for open~~
	~~engineering. (Sure, it could use a better infrastructure for projects,~~
	~~but... we can work on that.)* It's a place where individual open~~
	~~engineering projects related to appropriate technology can have project~~
	~~websites, host files, etc. Development work, instructions on how to~~
	~~build a hexayurt, etc. would all be here.~~

	~~OSE can then go and say things like "Look at all these different pieces~~
	~~of the puzzle that exist - full-fledged technologies being developed~~
	~~independently on places like Appropedia. Here's how you could combine~~
	~~them all into a working village - for housing, you could build hexayurts~~
	~~like this <link to hexayurt-building instruction pages on Appropedia>~~
	~~which would mean X, Y, and Z for the economics/dynamics/environmental~~
	~~impact of the village."~~

	~~But that's just my $0.02, and I'll leave the discussion to Marcin,~~
	~~Vinay, and Chris.~~

	~~-Mel~~

	~~----~~

	Marcin's comments:		Marcin's comments:

WikiSysop: /* Notes on Wiki Infrastructure for Open Engineering */

2007-08-29T19:50:13Z

Notes on Wiki Infrastructure for Open Engineering

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 =Notes on Wiki Infrastructure for Open Engineering=
 Mel's Comment:
@@ Line 39: / Line 28: @@
 -Mel
-OSE Brand Identity is what Vinay proposes, but I think it is as simple as 2 things.
+----

WikiSysop: New page: {{draft}} =Notes on Wiki Infrastructure for Open Engineering= We need: a Platform for Open Engineering Marcin's personal attempt: openfarmtech.org - under Development Template. Marcin...

2007-08-29T19:40:45Z

New page: {{draft}} =Notes on Wiki Infrastructure for Open Engineering= We need: a Platform for Open Engineering Marcin's personal attempt: openfarmtech.org - under Development Template. Marcin...

New page

{{draft}}

=Notes on Wiki Infrastructure for Open Engineering=

We need: a Platform for Open Engineering

Marcin's personal attempt: openfarmtech.org - under Development Template.

Marcin's summary: unless someone can show me a better development platform, the Development Template is good enough for now.

Once a better infrastructure for projects exists at Appropedia, then we could consider using it.

----
Mel's Comment:

Marcin and I just spoke about this on the phone - Marcin, reminderping
to coordinate a discussion w/ Chris (cc'd) & Vinay on the wiki-merge issue.

The way I see it, Appropedia can become a Sourceforge for open
engineering. (Sure, it could use a better infrastructure for projects,
but... we can work on that.)* It's a place where individual open
engineering projects related to appropriate technology can have project
websites, host files, etc. Development work, instructions on how to
build a hexayurt, etc. would all be here.

OSE can then go and say things like "Look at all these different pieces
of the puzzle that exist - full-fledged technologies being developed
independently on places like Appropedia. Here's how you could combine
them all into a working village - for housing, you could build hexayurts
like this <link to hexayurt-building instruction pages on Appropedia>
which would mean X, Y, and Z for the economics/dynamics/environmental
impact of the village."

But that's just my $0.02, and I'll leave the discussion to Marcin,
Vinay, and Chris.

-Mel

OSE Brand Identity is what Vinay proposes, but I think it is as simple as 2 things.