Distributive Market Substitution - Revision history

Marcin at 22:44, 5 April 2026

2026-04-05T22:44:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:44, 5 April 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Hint\|This should be called Distributive Market Substitution, because distributed technology does not always distribute power. Thus, the proper term is ''distributive''.}}		{{Hint\|This should be called Distributive Market Substitution rather than Distributed Market Substitution, because distributed technology does not always distribute power. Thus, the proper term is ''distributive''.}}

	=Introduction=		=Introduction=

Marcin: Marcin moved page Distributed Market Substitution to Distributive Market Substitution over redirect

2026-04-05T22:43:56Z

Marcin moved page Distributed Market Substitution to Distributive Market Substitution over redirect

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:43, 5 April 2026
(No difference)

Marcin: Protected "Distributed Market Substitution" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))

2026-03-27T08:04:20Z

Protected "Distributed Market Substitution" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))

← Older revision	Revision as of 08:04, 27 March 2026
(No difference)

Marcin at 08:03, 27 March 2026

2026-03-27T08:03:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:03, 27 March 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Hint\|This should be called Distributive Market Substitution, because distributed technology does not always distribute power. Thus, the proper term is ''distributive''.}}

	=Introduction=		=Introduction=

Marcin: /* War and Peace */

2024-06-04T16:35:43Z

War and Peace

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:35, 4 June 2024
Line 31:		Line 31:

	DMS means that production has transitioned into the hands of open source, collaborative agents. Such individuals are assumed to have a high level of [[Moral Intelligence]], which is the essence of open, collaborative culture. With Such intelligence in place, the economic agents are now able to negotiate properly with pariah states, regardless of government policy. Sanctions.are enforced by by the economic agents, regardless of policy. The decision is made lower in the chain of global command - in the hands of responsible.stewards. thus, evil empires can be banished for.the first time. The only way that evil empires, such as Russia or North Korea - survive - is by trade with assholes who do not subscribe to sanctions. Removed from such assistance - the belligerents must submit to a rules-based word order instead of their proposed anarchy.		DMS means that production has transitioned into the hands of open source, collaborative agents. Such individuals are assumed to have a high level of [[Moral Intelligence]], which is the essence of open, collaborative culture. With Such intelligence in place, the economic agents are now able to negotiate properly with pariah states, regardless of government policy. Sanctions.are enforced by by the economic agents, regardless of policy. The decision is made lower in the chain of global command - in the hands of responsible.stewards. thus, evil empires can be banished for.the first time. The only way that evil empires, such as Russia or North Korea - survive - is by trade with assholes who do not subscribe to sanctions. Removed from such assistance - the belligerents must submit to a rules-based word order instead of their proposed anarchy.

			This is simply a case for defunding any illicit or undemocratic global activity

			For this reason, DMS is not a hippy ideal - but a moral imperative of one is interested in world peace. Therefore, OSE proposes that any [[Global Steward]] take on a part in DMS. This applies especially to 'strategic' production such as energy and semiconductors - but also to common goods such as homes or consumer goods. Because if there is security in basic goods, there is a foundation for acting without fear of survival.

			In sum - if resource conflicts bother you - subscribe to and engage in DMS as a way to sublimate the entire issue. Yes, it is a fundamental shift - it is up to responsible individuals to make it happen.

			This is the ultimate in responsibility or global stewardship that anyone can take on. Not only does this secure for a region the basic goods and services for prosperity - but it also frees us from a weak negotiating position with assholes.

			This should not be confused with isolationism. This is global collaboration to the max, as DMS relies on open, collaborative design. And then why would the pariah state not subvert this? They could, if they subscribe to open collaboration. Such a shift would be a positive strep that can assist the pariah state in joining the global community as a friend,.not foe. This is just an affordable of open collaboration. But that means that it starts at home - we must fix our own backyards because the 'weayern.democracies' are not open-collaborative. They too are stuck in proprietary, non-collaborative violence and comfortable unfreedom. Not as bad as the pure evil empires, but to a smaller extent.

	=OSE Milestones=		=OSE Milestones=

Marcin: /* War and Peace */

2024-06-04T16:22:34Z

War and Peace

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:22, 4 June 2024
Line 30:		Line 30:
	As global resource conflicts rage on, the connection of DMS to world peace must be established.		As global resource conflicts rage on, the connection of DMS to world peace must be established.

	DMS means that production has transitioned into the hands of open source, collaborative agents. Such individuals are assumed to have a high level of [[Moral Intelligence]], which is the essence of open, collaborative culture. With Such intelligence in place, the economic agents are now able to negotiate properly with pariah states, regardless of government policy. Sanctions.are enforced by by the economic agents, regardless of policy. The decision is made lower in the chain of global command - in the hands of responsible.stewards. thus, evil empires can be banished for.the first time. The only way that evil empires, such as Russia or North Korea - survive - is ~~nybyrade~~ with ~~others~~. Removed from such assistance - the belligerents must submit to a rules-based word order instead of their proposed anarchy.		DMS means that production has transitioned into the hands of open source, collaborative agents. Such individuals are assumed to have a high level of [[Moral Intelligence]], which is the essence of open, collaborative culture. With Such intelligence in place, the economic agents are now able to negotiate properly with pariah states, regardless of government policy. Sanctions.are enforced by by the economic agents, regardless of policy. The decision is made lower in the chain of global command - in the hands of responsible.stewards. thus, evil empires can be banished for.the first time. The only way that evil empires, such as Russia or North Korea - survive - is by trade with assholes who do not subscribe to sanctions. Removed from such assistance - the belligerents must submit to a rules-based word order instead of their proposed anarchy.

	=OSE Milestones=		=OSE Milestones=

Marcin: /* Introduction */

2024-06-04T16:20:53Z

Introduction

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 4 June 2024
Line 24:		Line 24:

	The idea is that as barriers to entry are lowered, and product design is designed-for-flexible-fabrication in open source microfactories. To lower entry barriers, productization and marketing capacity is developed to assist in distributed production. If these capacities are developed, then a 1000x or more wider production of the specific good can occur. The logic behind this is that the most robust production is local production, as it creates unjobs in a decentralized + distributed scenario. The incentive behind this is enterprise startup in communities. This can happen as open design becomes available - as open source microfactory technology becomes available - and barriers to entry are lowered - such that the value chain shifts to efficiency (no competitive waste, no transportation, local and recycled materials). It is theorized here that global supply chains cannot compete with truly efficient local production because local production enables improved lifecycle stewardhip.		The idea is that as barriers to entry are lowered, and product design is designed-for-flexible-fabrication in open source microfactories. To lower entry barriers, productization and marketing capacity is developed to assist in distributed production. If these capacities are developed, then a 1000x or more wider production of the specific good can occur. The logic behind this is that the most robust production is local production, as it creates unjobs in a decentralized + distributed scenario. The incentive behind this is enterprise startup in communities. This can happen as open design becomes available - as open source microfactory technology becomes available - and barriers to entry are lowered - such that the value chain shifts to efficiency (no competitive waste, no transportation, local and recycled materials). It is theorized here that global supply chains cannot compete with truly efficient local production because local production enables improved lifecycle stewardhip.

			=War and Peace=
			Added 6/24

			As global resource conflicts rage on, the connection of DMS to world peace must be established.

			DMS means that production has transitioned into the hands of open source, collaborative agents. Such individuals are assumed to have a high level of [[Moral Intelligence]], which is the essence of open, collaborative culture. With Such intelligence in place, the economic agents are now able to negotiate properly with pariah states, regardless of government policy. Sanctions.are enforced by by the economic agents, regardless of policy. The decision is made lower in the chain of global command - in the hands of responsible.stewards. thus, evil empires can be banished for.the first time. The only way that evil empires, such as Russia or North Korea - survive - is nybyrade with others. Removed from such assistance - the belligerents must submit to a rules-based word order instead of their proposed anarchy.

	=OSE Milestones=		=OSE Milestones=

Marcin: /* Introduction */

2024-04-28T18:07:05Z

Introduction

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:07, 28 April 2024
Line 3:		Line 3:
	=Introduction=		=Introduction=

	'''Distributed Market Substition (DMS) is an essential outcome of the [[Open Source Economy]]. It is a condition in the economy marked by distribution of production to a scale that can be engaged efficiently and effectively within a framework of open, collaborative product design. The intended result is the leveling of the economic playing field to solve for the equitable distribution of wealth in society. This is a meritocratic (as opposed to monopoly, totalitarian, terrorist, welfare, kleptocratic, etc state) where value can be produced without barriers to entry - with only one's ~~initiative~~ as the guiding light. The assumption here is one of abundant renewable energy, a condition that is met at the current [[Kardashev Scale]] rating of Earth.'''		'''Distributed Market Substition (DMS) is an essential outcome of the [[Open Source Economy]]. It is a condition in the economy marked by distribution of production to a scale that can be engaged efficiently and effectively within a framework of open, collaborative product design. The intended result is the leveling of the economic playing field to solve for the equitable distribution of wealth in society. This is a meritocratic value chain (as opposed to monopoly, totalitarian, terrorist, welfare, kleptocratic, etc state) where value can be produced without barriers to entry - with only one's self-actualization as the guiding light. The assumption here is one of abundant renewable energy, a condition that is met at the current [[Kardashev Scale]] rating of Earth.'''

	'''A condition whereby full open-sourcing of a product and its enterprise infrastructure results in substitution of centralized, proprietary production with distributed, open source, flexible, small enterprise for any given sector or product in the maintstream economy, paving the way for a distributed, open economic organization as the new model of the human enterprise.''' The products that this applies to are diverse - in that this may apply to product development in the standard sense - but in OSE's sense - it also includes product ecosystems such as governance systems, institutions, natural life support systems, R&D efforts, and any other enterprises. For example - this could apply to replacing authoritarianism with democratic governance as a large [[BHAG]] product ecosystem. This may be in the form of a [[Network State]], except with a focus on open collaborative economic development.		'''A condition whereby full open-sourcing of a product and its enterprise infrastructure results in substitution of centralized, proprietary production with distributed, open source, flexible, small enterprise for any given sector or product in the maintstream economy, paving the way for a distributed, open economic organization as the new model of the human enterprise.''' The products that this applies to are diverse - in that this may apply to product development in the standard sense - but in OSE's sense - it also includes product ecosystems such as governance systems, institutions, natural life support systems, R&D efforts, and any other enterprises. For example - this could apply to replacing authoritarianism with democratic governance as a large [[BHAG]] product ecosystem. This may be in the form of a [[Network State]], except with a focus on open collaborative economic development.

Marcin: /* Introduction */

2024-03-25T03:28:22Z

Introduction

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:28, 25 March 2024
Line 21:		Line 21:
	OSE's proposed solution is the obvious concept of distributing production via open source hardware and enterprise.		OSE's proposed solution is the obvious concept of distributing production via open source hardware and enterprise.

	The idea is to distribute wealth more equitably by enabling enterise to be more distributed, bringing wealth back to communities as opposed to being highly centralized. This can happen for most of light manufacturing, as well as a significant fraction of the primary sector + heavy industry - such as [[Solar Steel]], [[Solar Concrete]], or [[Solar Hydrogen]]. OSE is working on demonstrating this feasibility. Light manufacturing can happen in ~~open source~~ microfactories ~~in communities~~. Local materials can be extracted using the processes of chemistry, a well developed art in civilization which unfortunately remains a mystery to the population due to its [[Scientific Illiteracy]].		The idea is to distribute wealth more equitably by enabling enterise to be more distributed, bringing wealth back to communities as opposed to being highly centralized. This can happen for most of light manufacturing, as well as a significant fraction of the primary sector + heavy industry - such as [[Solar Steel]], [[Solar Concrete]], or [[Solar Hydrogen]]. OSE is working on demonstrating this feasibility. Light manufacturing can happen in various [[Universal Basic Assets]]-producing facilities such as solar microfactories. Local materials can be extracted using the processes of chemistry, a well developed art in civilization which unfortunately remains a mystery to the population due to its [[Scientific Illiteracy]].

	The idea is that as barriers to entry are lowered, and product design is designed-for-flexible-fabrication in open source microfactories. To lower entry barriers, productization and marketing capacity is developed to assist in distributed production. If these capacities are developed, then a 1000x or more wider production of the specific good can occur. The logic behind this is that the most robust production is local production, as it creates unjobs in a decentralized + distributed scenario. The incentive behind this is enterprise startup in communities. This can happen as open design becomes available - as open source microfactory technology becomes available - and barriers to entry are lowered - such that the value chain shifts to efficiency (no competitive waste, no transportation, local and recycled materials). It is theorized here that global supply chains cannot compete with truly efficient local production because local production enables improved lifecycle stewardhip.		The idea is that as barriers to entry are lowered, and product design is designed-for-flexible-fabrication in open source microfactories. To lower entry barriers, productization and marketing capacity is developed to assist in distributed production. If these capacities are developed, then a 1000x or more wider production of the specific good can occur. The logic behind this is that the most robust production is local production, as it creates unjobs in a decentralized + distributed scenario. The incentive behind this is enterprise startup in communities. This can happen as open design becomes available - as open source microfactory technology becomes available - and barriers to entry are lowered - such that the value chain shifts to efficiency (no competitive waste, no transportation, local and recycled materials). It is theorized here that global supply chains cannot compete with truly efficient local production because local production enables improved lifecycle stewardhip.

Marcin: /* Introduction */

2024-03-25T03:27:08Z

Introduction

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:27, 25 March 2024
Line 21:		Line 21:
	OSE's proposed solution is the obvious concept of distributing production via open source hardware and enterprise.		OSE's proposed solution is the obvious concept of distributing production via open source hardware and enterprise.

	The idea is to distribute wealth more equitably by enabling ~~thousands of producers~~ to ~~bring small enterprise~~ back to communities. This can happen for most of light manufacturing, as well as a significant fraction of the primary sector + heavy industry. OSE is working on demonstrating this feasibility. Light manufacturing can happen in open source microfactories in communities. Local materials can be extracted using the processes of chemistry, a well developed art in civilization which unfortunately remains a mystery to the population due to its [[Scientific Illiteracy]].		The idea is to distribute wealth more equitably by enabling enterise to be more distributed, bringing wealth back to communities as opposed to being highly centralized. This can happen for most of light manufacturing, as well as a significant fraction of the primary sector + heavy industry - such as [[Solar Steel]], [[Solar Concrete]], or [[Solar Hydrogen]]. OSE is working on demonstrating this feasibility. Light manufacturing can happen in open source microfactories in communities. Local materials can be extracted using the processes of chemistry, a well developed art in civilization which unfortunately remains a mystery to the population due to its [[Scientific Illiteracy]].

	The idea is that as barriers to entry are lowered, and product design is designed-for-flexible-fabrication in open source microfactories. To lower entry barriers, productization and marketing capacity is developed to assist in distributed production. If these capacities are developed, then a 1000x or more wider production of the specific good can occur. The logic behind this is that the most robust production is local production, as it creates unjobs in a decentralized + distributed scenario. The incentive behind this is enterprise startup in communities. This can happen as open design becomes available - as open source microfactory technology becomes available - and barriers to entry are lowered - such that the value chain shifts to efficiency (no competitive waste, no transportation, local and recycled materials). It is theorized here that global supply chains cannot compete with truly efficient local production because local production enables improved lifecycle stewardhip.		The idea is that as barriers to entry are lowered, and product design is designed-for-flexible-fabrication in open source microfactories. To lower entry barriers, productization and marketing capacity is developed to assist in distributed production. If these capacities are developed, then a 1000x or more wider production of the specific good can occur. The logic behind this is that the most robust production is local production, as it creates unjobs in a decentralized + distributed scenario. The incentive behind this is enterprise startup in communities. This can happen as open design becomes available - as open source microfactory technology becomes available - and barriers to entry are lowered - such that the value chain shifts to efficiency (no competitive waste, no transportation, local and recycled materials). It is theorized here that global supply chains cannot compete with truly efficient local production because local production enables improved lifecycle stewardhip.