<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Electronics_Checklist</id>
	<title>Electronics Checklist - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Electronics_Checklist"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Electronics_Checklist&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-07T16:51:48Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.13</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Electronics_Checklist&amp;diff=89157&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Marcin: Created page with &quot;From Tom Igoe:   Nate&#039;s document (http://www.oshwa.org/sharing-best-practices/) seems like a good starting point, although I&#039;d suggest rephrasing it to clarify which activitie...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Electronics_Checklist&amp;diff=89157&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2013-03-08T02:08:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;From Tom Igoe:   Nate&amp;#039;s document (http://www.oshwa.org/sharing-best-practices/) seems like a good starting point, although I&amp;#039;d suggest rephrasing it to clarify which activitie...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;From Tom Igoe:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Nate&amp;#039;s document (http://www.oshwa.org/sharing-best-practices/) seems like a good starting point, although I&amp;#039;d suggest rephrasing it to clarify which activities are core to the practice of open-source hardware (i.e. sharing original source / design files) and which are simply useful additions. Should we make a Google Doc (or use a wiki) to edit it collaboratively? Anyone have any specific suggestions for changes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is indeed a good document, and I wish I&amp;#039;d have known it existed before now. Perhaps one thing that&amp;#039;d be good to do is an OSHWA newsletter or something of that sort, for when new things like this are released. Maybe I just missed a mail.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few comments on it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&amp;#039;s a good checklist for electronics.  What about making it an online checklist? I&amp;#039;m imagining a tool that generates a file manifest for your repo, something like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Photos:&lt;br /&gt;
* Design:&lt;br /&gt;
* BOM:&lt;br /&gt;
* Code:&lt;br /&gt;
* Required Tools:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&amp;#039;d be a form, basically, and you just go through and enter file names, and at the end it generates a document for you. It doesn&amp;#039;t really do a lot, but it reminds you what to release, and gives you a handy way to gather that info. Might even be possible as a Google docs spreadsheet with a form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Taking it a step further, you could put, by each document, a field to enter the license for that document if there is one. Might list the tool used to generate the document too. The tool could then generate something like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photos &lt;br /&gt;
	(licensed under CC_BY_SA):&lt;br /&gt;
		Topview.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
		sideview.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
		detail.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Design:&lt;br /&gt;
	Electrical&lt;br /&gt;
	 	(released under CC_BY_SA):&lt;br /&gt;
		(made with Eagle)&lt;br /&gt;
			foo.sch&lt;br /&gt;
			foo.brd&lt;br /&gt;
			etc.&lt;br /&gt;
	mechanical&lt;br /&gt;
		(released under CC_BY_SA)&lt;br /&gt;
		(made with Illustrator)&lt;br /&gt;
			case.dxf&lt;br /&gt;
			top.dxf&lt;br /&gt;
			(etc)	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firmware&lt;br /&gt;
	(released under LGPL)		* note: for complex projects you might have a line by line license list&lt;br /&gt;
	(made with avr-gcc):&lt;br /&gt;
		foo.h&lt;br /&gt;
		foo.c&lt;br /&gt;
		&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The advantage of something like this is that it could offer an informal documentation standard based on the best practices list.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marcin</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>