<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Feedback_on_STEAM_Camp</id>
	<title>Feedback on STEAM Camp - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Feedback_on_STEAM_Camp"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Feedback_on_STEAM_Camp&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-22T20:38:05Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.13</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Feedback_on_STEAM_Camp&amp;diff=199042&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Marcin: Created page with &quot; =William Neal=  Here is a little feedback about the STEAM camp - How it Works page.  (1) Not sure about this point - clarify? : Each instructor provides relevant technology -...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Feedback_on_STEAM_Camp&amp;diff=199042&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2019-09-17T17:24:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot; =William Neal=  Here is a little feedback about the STEAM camp - How it Works page.  (1) Not sure about this point - clarify? : Each instructor provides relevant technology -...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=William Neal=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a little feedback about the STEAM camp - How it Works page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Not sure about this point - clarify? :&lt;br /&gt;
Each instructor provides relevant technology - most important because technology is the foundation of our product. Without technology, we could not substantiate practical development of open source products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) Any reason for 12 simultaneous camps?  Might 2-3 be better to begin with? Seems that a modest expansion would allow for us to work out the technical hurdles with a smaller audience.  Otherwise, perhaps a ommunications consultant / platform should be hired to ensure smooth online collaboration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(3) Rationale for the 9 day timeline?  5-7 days may be more manageable for people to commit to...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(4) OSE is the IP holder for all the knowledge generated vs. All curriculum and design is published as open source to promote rapid learning worlwide as a service to humanity. The intent is to make the curriculum available to anyone who wants to teach it, as an open educational resource. - not sure what the &amp;quot;IP Holder&amp;quot; means exactly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(5) How about some certificates - (1) Open Source Hardware Trainer (2) Open Source Hardware Practitioner/Camp Participant - these may evolve in to transcendent qualifications that eventually supersede the outmoded papers of the prevailing order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(6) Suggest to review the prices for the two levels of participation - (1) remote - reduce the cost to increase the participation - perhaps $25 per participant? (2) In-person - not sure how to work this as each venue may have a different underlying cost structure - should the prices be averaged?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking forward to further discussion about this.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marcin</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>