First Principle Build Analysis - Revision history

Marcin at 18:01, 12 May 2026

2026-05-12T18:01:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 12 May 2026
Line 14:		Line 14:
	It turns out that any novice can generate such build information with AI assist. Here's how - [https://chatgpt.com/share/6a0358ea-621c-83e8-b848-9e89125581f4]		It turns out that any novice can generate such build information with AI assist. Here's how - [https://chatgpt.com/share/6a0358ea-621c-83e8-b848-9e89125581f4]

	'''Bottom line: once we deconstruct the build process to simple elements, we can derive accurate procedures from available CAD files, and use a number of such instances to train AI to come up with a robust, generalized schema for producing instructionals automatically for any new instance.'''		'''Bottom line: once we deconstruct the build process to simple elements, we can derive accurate procedures from available CAD files, and use a number of such instances to train AI to come up with a robust, generalized schema for producing instructionals automatically for any new instance.''' To validate, check against existing build pictures, add Cheatsheet Generators that summarize build procedures and where people can comment during actual builds. The cheatsheets are collected with comments, and are used to improve and build procedure details.

Marcin at 17:18, 12 May 2026

2026-05-12T17:18:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:18, 12 May 2026
Line 14:		Line 14:
	It turns out that any novice can generate such build information with AI assist. Here's how - [https://chatgpt.com/share/6a0358ea-621c-83e8-b848-9e89125581f4]		It turns out that any novice can generate such build information with AI assist. Here's how - [https://chatgpt.com/share/6a0358ea-621c-83e8-b848-9e89125581f4]

	'''Bottom line: once we deconstruct the build process to simple elements, we can derive accurate procedures, and use a number of such instances to train AI to come up with a robust, generalized schema for producing instructionals automatically for any new instance~~, provided that CAD is available for what we want to build~~'''		'''Bottom line: once we deconstruct the build process to simple elements, we can derive accurate procedures from available CAD files, and use a number of such instances to train AI to come up with a robust, generalized schema for producing instructionals automatically for any new instance.'''

Marcin at 17:03, 12 May 2026

2026-05-12T17:03:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:03, 12 May 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	#Materials are used		#Materials are used
	#Fasteners are used		#Fasteners are used
	#Existing build techniques		#Existing build techniques and designs
	#OSE-specific techniques		#OSE-specific techniques and designs - which are simpler due to [[Degeneracy]]
	#Machines, materials, and tools - and properties of each		#Machines, materials, and tools - and properties of each
	#Building codes which specify design features but no so much build procedures		#Building codes which specify design features but no so much build procedures

Marcin at 17:02, 12 May 2026

2026-05-12T17:02:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:02, 12 May 2026
Line 10:		Line 10:
	#Building codes which specify design features but no so much build procedures		#Building codes which specify design features but no so much build procedures

	'''The critical element of interest is procedural information''' - which enable any novice to approach the build speed of professionals with only a bit of practice. In fact, an instructional/blueprint enabled novice can easily outperform a 'seasoned professional' without such build procedures - who would need to spend time deriving their own procedures. This is how it is normally done, and works well for obvious design - but fails at anything more complex where thinking is required.		'''The critical element of interest is detailed procedural information''' - which enable any novice to approach the build speed of professionals with only a bit of practice. In fact, an instructional/blueprint enabled novice can easily outperform a 'seasoned professional' without such build procedures - who would need to spend time deriving their own procedures. This is how it is normally done, and works well for obvious design - but fails at anything more complex where thinking is required.

			It turns out that any novice can generate such build information with AI assist. Here's how - [https://chatgpt.com/share/6a0358ea-621c-83e8-b848-9e89125581f4]

			'''Bottom line: once we deconstruct the build process to simple elements, we can derive accurate procedures, and use a number of such instances to train AI to come up with a robust, generalized schema for producing instructionals automatically for any new instance, provided that CAD is available for what we want to build'''

Marcin at 17:00, 12 May 2026

2026-05-12T17:00:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:00, 12 May 2026
Line 10:		Line 10:
	#Building codes which specify design features but no so much build procedures		#Building codes which specify design features but no so much build procedures

	'''The critical element of interest is procedural information''' - which enable any novice to approach the build speed of professionals with only a bit of practice. In fact, an instructional/blueprint enabled novice can easily outperform a 'seasoned professional' without such build procedures ~~- but with blueprints only~~ - who would need to spend time deriving their own procedures ~~- which~~ is how it is normally done~~. This may be effective~~ for ~~simple~~ design, but ~~for anything of substantial complexity (~~anything more ~~than 'obvious') - this becomes comically inefficient without access to well-developed instructionals~~.		'''The critical element of interest is procedural information''' - which enable any novice to approach the build speed of professionals with only a bit of practice. In fact, an instructional/blueprint enabled novice can easily outperform a 'seasoned professional' without such build procedures - who would need to spend time deriving their own procedures. This is how it is normally done, and works well for obvious design - but fails at anything more complex where thinking is required.

Marcin at 16:58, 12 May 2026

2026-05-12T16:58:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:58, 12 May 2026
Line 10:		Line 10:
	#Building codes which specify design features but no so much build procedures		#Building codes which specify design features but no so much build procedures

	'''The critical element of interest is procedural information''' - which enable any novice to approach the build speed of professionals with only a bit of practice.~~'''~~ In fact, an instructional/blueprint enabled novice can easily outperform a 'seasoned professional' without such build procedures - but with blueprints only - who would need to spend time deriving their own procedures - which is how it is normally done. This may be effective for simple design, but for anything of substantial complexity (anything more than 'obvious') - this becomes comically inefficient without access to well-developed instructionals.		'''The critical element of interest is procedural information''' - which enable any novice to approach the build speed of professionals with only a bit of practice. In fact, an instructional/blueprint enabled novice can easily outperform a 'seasoned professional' without such build procedures - but with blueprints only - who would need to spend time deriving their own procedures - which is how it is normally done. This may be effective for simple design, but for anything of substantial complexity (anything more than 'obvious') - this becomes comically inefficient without access to well-developed instructionals.

Marcin at 16:58, 12 May 2026

2026-05-12T16:58:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:58, 12 May 2026
Line 10:		Line 10:
	#Building codes which specify design features but no so much build procedures		#Building codes which specify design features but no so much build procedures

	~~We need an ontology~~ - ~~or breakdown,~~ of ~~all the elements~~ of a ~~sound~~ build ~~procedure~~.		'''The critical element of interest is procedural information''' - which enable any novice to approach the build speed of professionals with only a bit of practice.''' In fact, an instructional/blueprint enabled novice can easily outperform a 'seasoned professional' without such build procedures - but with blueprints only - who would need to spend time deriving their own procedures - which is how it is normally done. This may be effective for simple design, but for anything of substantial complexity (anything more than 'obvious') - this becomes comically inefficient without access to well-developed instructionals.

Marcin at 16:43, 12 May 2026

2026-05-12T16:43:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:43, 12 May 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Using [[First Principles Thinking]] to derive build procedures from existing CAD design files.		Using [[First Principles Thinking]] to derive build procedures from existing CAD design files.

			There are many things that are already implicit in building:

			#Materials are used
			#Fasteners are used
			#Existing build techniques
			#OSE-specific techniques
			#Machines, materials, and tools - and properties of each
			#Building codes which specify design features but no so much build procedures

			We need an ontology - or breakdown, of all the elements of a sound build procedure.

Marcin: Created page with "Using First Principles Thinking to derive build procedures from existing CAD design files."

2026-05-12T16:29:28Z

Created page with "Using First Principles Thinking to derive build procedures from existing CAD design files."

New page

Using [[First Principles Thinking]] to derive build procedures from existing CAD design files.