<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Global_Nonviolence_Strategy</id>
	<title>Global Nonviolence Strategy - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Global_Nonviolence_Strategy"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Global_Nonviolence_Strategy&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-25T12:23:10Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.13</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Global_Nonviolence_Strategy&amp;diff=71241&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Marcin: Created page with &quot;Hi John, http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/  Also - here is an immediate question for review. We are proposing a community model which transcends belligerence via introducing l...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Global_Nonviolence_Strategy&amp;diff=71241&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2012-08-17T21:47:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;Hi John, http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/  Also - here is an immediate question for review. We are proposing a community model which transcends belligerence via introducing l...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Hi John, http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also - here is an immediate question for review. We are proposing a community model which transcends belligerence via introducing local production as a ubiquitous option. Do warmongers dispute its validity? Please comment on this - if our social model is to be replicable - we need to address HOW we provide peace without standing armies. Here&amp;#039;s my conclusion - what are the holes in my argument? This question needs a rigorous response if I want our paradigm to succeed. How would you position the response to the argument that &amp;#039;humans will always kill each other and a Resilient Community will be prey to outside belligerence&amp;#039;? I think productivity is stronger than arms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please read my answer below. I am taking this to the TED Collaboratorium for discussion as part of my business plan. I have an assumption that &amp;#039;things will be beautiful once barriers to material security are annihilated.&amp;#039; I need to be able to defend 2 points: 1. We will annihilate barriers to material security of the general population; 2. Once these are annihilated, the pressure towards resource conflicts will be reduced drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks, &lt;br /&gt;
Marcin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Autonomous Communities and Security&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It appears that one major preoccupation of humanity is protectionism – such as evidenced by large standing armies. This needs to be questioned, as alternative negotiation of security issues is desired over the standing army – if our goal is to build peaceful, productive communities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One typical critique is that peace will never happen - as humans are subhuman - and human relationships easily degenerate into armed conflict,whether in adults, or in children as in The Lord of the Flies. Is thare an alternative?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We are proposing material security – combined with the re-weaving of the community fabric via relocalization - as the ultimate solution to the global security issue. Has any solution more robust ever been proposed as a sound theory or practice?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a community is able to produce all of its essential needs for thriving, then by design – the tendency towards resource conflicts is mitigated. An autonomous person – and only an autonomous person – is able to negotiated with others in a healthy way. The same applies to communities.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marcin</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>