HR Team - Revision history

Marcin: /* Strategy */

2017-01-28T23:39:15Z

Strategy

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:39, 28 January 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:
	*We focus around interdisciplinary skill sets. For example, one who knows CAD and one who builds things is the most valuable, as opposed to two people one of whom designs and one of whom builds. The most elite recruit would know how to program, do CAD, diagrams, GIMP, build, and document.		*We focus around interdisciplinary skill sets. For example, one who knows CAD and one who builds things is the most valuable, as opposed to two people one of whom designs and one of whom builds. The most elite recruit would know how to program, do CAD, diagrams, GIMP, build, and document.
	*OSE's promise is Efficient Process to its participants, with a promise to teach code, design, do braphics, build, and documentation skills. The promise is that with efficient protocols, libraries, tools, and templates - this is quite feasible - and in fact, the cornerstone of the OSE program.		*OSE's promise is Efficient Process to its participants, with a promise to teach code, design, do braphics, build, and documentation skills. The promise is that with efficient protocols, libraries, tools, and templates - this is quite feasible - and in fact, the cornerstone of the OSE program.
	*develop OSE Ambassador Training. That person understands the culture of collaborative literacy, tools ~~(CAD, rapid prototyping, render, animation), and processes (such as starting Development Templates and associated wiki pages), and upvoting through an embeddable platform such as [[Disqus]]~~.		*develop OSE Ambassador Training. That person understands the culture of collaborative literacy and tools used.

	=Work Product=		=Work Product=

Marcin: /* Strategy */

2017-01-28T23:38:57Z

Strategy

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:38, 28 January 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:
	*We focus around interdisciplinary skill sets. For example, one who knows CAD and one who builds things is the most valuable, as opposed to two people one of whom designs and one of whom builds. The most elite recruit would know how to program, do CAD, diagrams, GIMP, build, and document.		*We focus around interdisciplinary skill sets. For example, one who knows CAD and one who builds things is the most valuable, as opposed to two people one of whom designs and one of whom builds. The most elite recruit would know how to program, do CAD, diagrams, GIMP, build, and document.
	*OSE's promise is Efficient Process to its participants, with a promise to teach code, design, do braphics, build, and documentation skills. The promise is that with efficient protocols, libraries, tools, and templates - this is quite feasible - and in fact, the cornerstone of the OSE program.		*OSE's promise is Efficient Process to its participants, with a promise to teach code, design, do braphics, build, and documentation skills. The promise is that with efficient protocols, libraries, tools, and templates - this is quite feasible - and in fact, the cornerstone of the OSE program.
	*develop OSE Ambassador Training. That person understands the culture of collaborative literacy, tools (CAD, rapid prototyping, render, animation), and processes (such as starting Development Templates and associated wiki pages), and ~~up outing~~ through an embeddable platform such as [[Disqus]].		*develop OSE Ambassador Training. That person understands the culture of collaborative literacy, tools (CAD, rapid prototyping, render, animation), and processes (such as starting Development Templates and associated wiki pages), and upvoting through an embeddable platform such as [[Disqus]].

	=Work Product=		=Work Product=

Marcin: /* Criteria */

2017-01-28T23:38:01Z

Criteria

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:38, 28 January 2017
Line 20:		Line 20:
	*[[OSAT]]		*[[OSAT]]
	*[[OSPD]]		*[[OSPD]]
	=Criteria=		=Candidate Criteria=
	An excellent candidate answers negative to no more than 2 of the following, neutral to no more than 5, and positive to no less than 5:		An excellent candidate answers negative to no more than 2 of the following, neutral to no more than 5, and positive to no less than 5:
	*Is the candidate mature and ready to settle into serious work? Or exploring the world?		*Is the candidate mature and ready to settle into serious work? Or exploring the world?
	*Are they ready to step into right livelihood creation? Economic time Binding?		*Are they ready to step into right livelihood creation? Economic time Binding?
	*Are they team players? Publish early and often? Time Binding?		*Are they team players? Publish early and often? Time Binding?
	*Are they financially secure? If so, from simplicity or from a trust fund?		*Are they financially secure? If so, from mastery/simplicity or from a trust fund?
	*Are they independent and responsible? Can they risk share on ventures? Adult/child assessments		*Are they independent and responsible? Can they risk share on ventures? Adult/child assessments?
	*Do they have integrated or specialized skillsets? Design or build or both?		*Do they have integrated or specialized skillsets? Design or build or both?
	*Are they ~~open~~ to ~~and capable of learning~~?		*Are they avid learners? Are they willing to learn across many disciplines?
	*Do they see a greater vision regarding the state of the world? Seminal books and vetted/reviewed set of reality books?		*Do they see a greater vision regarding the state of the world? Seminal books and vetted/reviewed set of reality books?
	*Do they have open culture? Do they know the distinction between open source and ~~fake open source~~?		*Do they have open culture? Do they know the distinction between open source and [[Fake Open Source]]?
	*Are they on a solid ethical footing?		*Are they on a solid ethical footing?
	*Do they have soft skills?		*Do they have soft skills?

Marcin at 23:27, 28 January 2017

2017-01-28T23:27:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:27, 28 January 2017
Line 38:		Line 38:
	=Links=		=Links=
	*Older notes at [[Recruiting Strategy]]		*Older notes at [[Recruiting Strategy]]

			[[Category:HR]]

Marcin at 23:27, 28 January 2017

2017-01-28T23:27:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:27, 28 January 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Strategy=		=Strategy=
	*We gather around the platform, "mastering collaborative, open source ~~CAD~~. Without the ability to work effectively in CAD to share and modify design, we will not proceed as a team - but only as individuals who do not time bind their design.		*We gather around the platform, "mastering collaborative, open source product development. Without the ability to work effectively in CAD to share and modify design, we will not proceed as a team - but only as individuals who do not time bind their design.
	*We focus around interdisciplinary skill sets. For example, one who knows CAD and one who builds things is the most valuable, as opposed to two people one of whom designs and one of whom builds. The most elite recruit would know how to program, do CAD, diagrams, GIMP, build, and document.		*We focus around interdisciplinary skill sets. For example, one who knows CAD and one who builds things is the most valuable, as opposed to two people one of whom designs and one of whom builds. The most elite recruit would know how to program, do CAD, diagrams, GIMP, build, and document.
	*OSE's promise is Efficient Process to its participants, with a promise to teach code, design, do braphics, build, and documentation skills. The promise is that with efficient protocols, libraries, tools, and templates - this is quite feasible - and in fact, the cornerstone of the OSE program.		*OSE's promise is Efficient Process to its participants, with a promise to teach code, design, do braphics, build, and documentation skills. The promise is that with efficient protocols, libraries, tools, and templates - this is quite feasible - and in fact, the cornerstone of the OSE program.

Marcin: /* Criteria */

2015-12-18T18:14:29Z

Criteria

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 18 December 2015
Line 34:		Line 34:
	*Do they have soft skills?		*Do they have soft skills?
	*Are they [[Integrated Humans]]?		*Are they [[Integrated Humans]]?
			Interview is recorded for internal purposes.

	=Links=		=Links=
	*Older notes at [[Recruiting Strategy]]		*Older notes at [[Recruiting Strategy]]

Marcin: /* Criteria */

2015-12-18T18:12:39Z

Criteria

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:12, 18 December 2015
Line 23:		Line 23:
	An excellent candidate answers negative to no more than 2 of the following, neutral to no more than 5, and positive to no less than 5:		An excellent candidate answers negative to no more than 2 of the following, neutral to no more than 5, and positive to no less than 5:
	*Is the candidate mature and ready to settle into serious work? Or exploring the world?		*Is the candidate mature and ready to settle into serious work? Or exploring the world?
	*Are they ready to step into right livelihood creation?		*Are they ready to step into right livelihood creation? Economic time Binding?
	*Are they team players? Publish early and often?		*Are they team players? Publish early and often? Time Binding?
	*Are they financially secure? If so, from simplicity or from a trust fund?		*Are they financially secure? If so, from simplicity or from a trust fund?
	*Are they independent and responsible? Can they risk share on ventures? Adult/child assessments		*Are they independent and responsible? Can they risk share on ventures? Adult/child assessments

Marcin: /* Criteria */

2015-12-18T18:11:47Z

Criteria

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:11, 18 December 2015
Line 21:		Line 21:
	*[[OSPD]]		*[[OSPD]]
	=Criteria=		=Criteria=
	An excellent candidate answers negative to no more than 1 of the following, neutral to no more than 5, and positive to no less than 5:		An excellent candidate answers negative to no more than 2 of the following, neutral to no more than 5, and positive to no less than 5:
	*Is the candidate mature and ready to settle into serious work? Or exploring the world?		*Is the candidate mature and ready to settle into serious work? Or exploring the world?
	*Are they ready to step into right livelihood creation?		*Are they ready to step into right livelihood creation?

Marcin: /* Criteria */

2015-12-18T18:11:16Z

Criteria

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:11, 18 December 2015
Line 32:		Line 32:
	*Do they have open culture? Do they know the distinction between open source and fake open source?		*Do they have open culture? Do they know the distinction between open source and fake open source?
	*Are they on a solid ethical footing?		*Are they on a solid ethical footing?
			*Do they have soft skills?
	*Are they [[Integrated Humans]]?		*Are they [[Integrated Humans]]?

	=Links=		=Links=
	*Older notes at [[Recruiting Strategy]]		*Older notes at [[Recruiting Strategy]]

Marcin: /* Criteria */

2015-12-18T18:10:10Z

Criteria

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:10, 18 December 2015
Line 21:		Line 21:
	*[[OSPD]]		*[[OSPD]]
	=Criteria=		=Criteria=
			An excellent candidate answers negative to no more than 1 of the following, neutral to no more than 5, and positive to no less than 5:
	*Is the candidate mature and ready to settle into serious work? Or exploring the world?		*Is the candidate mature and ready to settle into serious work? Or exploring the world?
	*Are they ready to step into right livelihood creation?		*Are they ready to step into right livelihood creation?