Humility - Revision history

Marcin at 08:50, 21 September 2024

2024-09-21T08:50:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 21 September 2024
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*'''The All-Knowing.'''Awareness that one can never know everything, and that what one does know may be incomplete and inaccurate - as in the basic premise of general semantics.		*'''The All-Knowing.'''Awareness that one can never know everything, and that what one does know may be incomplete and inaccurate - as in the basic premise of general semantics.
	*'''Peak Performance.''' Awareness that there are always people who are better than you at something. Or if there aren't, there will be in the future.		*'''Peak Performance.''' Awareness that there are always people who are better than you at something. Or if there aren't, there will be in the future.
	And to top it all off, humility is a characteristic that allows one to not be trapped in the morasse of patent protection tendencies:		And to top it all off, humility is a characteristic that allows one to not be trapped in the morasse of competitive development, such as proprietary information and design, patent protection tendencies, trade secrets, etc:
	*'''Enclosure of Intellectual Property''' Finding enclosure of intellectual property - as in the patent system - repugnant. This stems from understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of giants. This means believing that we all add only a small drop to the vast pool of human knowledge. As such, the concept of 'patenting an idea' is ridiculous to the humble person, because 99.9% of that idea is enabled by prior human knowledge and invention - and is nothing new. And that the number of 9s after the decimal is increasing - as any new human knowledge builds upon an ever expanding body of work. To claim that a trifling addition now becomes one's sole property at the exclusion of others using it is a disgrace to the human race that prevents genuine progress from happening. The counterargument to this is that intellectual property allows a temporary monopoly to fund research. The counterargument to this counterargument is that the funding mechanisms for research need to be disrupted to allow more rapid progress. Progress by monopoly is competitive waste, and does not from first principles lead to optimal innovation.		*'''Enclosure of Intellectual Property''' Finding enclosure of intellectual property - as in the patent system - repugnant. This stems from understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of giants. This means believing that we all add only a small drop to the vast pool of human knowledge. As such, the concept of 'patenting an idea' is ridiculous to the humble person, because 99.9% of that idea is enabled by prior human knowledge and invention - and is nothing new. And that the number of 9s after the decimal is increasing - as any new human knowledge builds upon an ever expanding body of work. To claim that a trifling addition now becomes one's sole property at the exclusion of others using it is a disgrace to the human race that prevents genuine progress from happening. The counterargument to this is that intellectual property allows a temporary monopoly to fund research. The counterargument to this counterargument is that the funding mechanisms for research need to be disrupted to allow more rapid progress. Progress by monopoly is competitive waste, and does not from first principles lead to optimal innovation.

Marcin: /* More */

2023-08-20T18:13:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 20 August 2023
Line 11:		Line 11:
	And to top it all off, humility is a characteristic that allows one to not be trapped in the morasse of patent protection tendencies:		And to top it all off, humility is a characteristic that allows one to not be trapped in the morasse of patent protection tendencies:
	*'''Enclosure of Intellectual Property''' Finding enclosure of intellectual property - as in the patent system - repugnant. This stems from understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of giants. This means believing that we all add only a small drop to the vast pool of human knowledge. As such, the concept of 'patenting an idea' is ridiculous to the humble person, because 99.9% of that idea is enabled by prior human knowledge and invention - and is nothing new. And that the number of 9s after the decimal is increasing - as any new human knowledge builds upon an ever expanding body of work. To claim that a trifling addition now becomes one's sole property at the exclusion of others using it is a disgrace to the human race that prevents genuine progress from happening. The counterargument to this is that intellectual property allows a temporary monopoly to fund research. The counterargument to this counterargument is that the funding mechanisms for research need to be disrupted to allow more rapid progress. Progress by monopoly is competitive waste, and does not from first principles lead to optimal innovation.		*'''Enclosure of Intellectual Property''' Finding enclosure of intellectual property - as in the patent system - repugnant. This stems from understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of giants. This means believing that we all add only a small drop to the vast pool of human knowledge. As such, the concept of 'patenting an idea' is ridiculous to the humble person, because 99.9% of that idea is enabled by prior human knowledge and invention - and is nothing new. And that the number of 9s after the decimal is increasing - as any new human knowledge builds upon an ever expanding body of work. To claim that a trifling addition now becomes one's sole property at the exclusion of others using it is a disgrace to the human race that prevents genuine progress from happening. The counterargument to this is that intellectual property allows a temporary monopoly to fund research. The counterargument to this counterargument is that the funding mechanisms for research need to be disrupted to allow more rapid progress. Progress by monopoly is competitive waste, and does not from first principles lead to optimal innovation.

			=Humblebrag=

			See article by Brooks on [[Humblebrag]]

	=More=		=More=
	*How letting go of ideas can set you free - [https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2021/03/to-get-happier-admit-when-youre-wrong/618245/]		*How letting go of ideas can set you free - [https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2021/03/to-get-happier-admit-when-youre-wrong/618245/]
	*Jim Collins puts it well - humility and will to do what it takes - is what makes a Level 5 leader. [https://youtu.be/RbA2H6WT6p4?t=285]. This is mission neutral - companies without 'purpose' can be level 5. Humility of a special kind, is what differentiates the great leader from the good leader.		*Jim Collins puts it well - humility and will to do what it takes - is what makes a Level 5 leader. [https://youtu.be/RbA2H6WT6p4?t=285]. This is mission neutral - companies without 'purpose' can be level 5. Humility of a special kind, is what differentiates the great leader from the good leader.

Marcin: /* More */

2023-07-09T07:25:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:25, 9 July 2023
Line 14:		Line 14:
	=More=		=More=
	*How letting go of ideas can set you free - [https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2021/03/to-get-happier-admit-when-youre-wrong/618245/]		*How letting go of ideas can set you free - [https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2021/03/to-get-happier-admit-when-youre-wrong/618245/]
			*Jim Collins puts it well - humility and will to do what it takes - is what makes a Level 5 leader. [https://youtu.be/RbA2H6WT6p4?t=285]. This is mission neutral - companies without 'purpose' can be level 5. Humility of a special kind, is what differentiates the great leader from the good leader.

Marcin at 16:10, 11 March 2021

2021-03-11T16:10:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 11 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
			=Introduction=
	[[File:egoequalsoneoverknowledge.jpeg]]		[[File:egoequalsoneoverknowledge.jpeg]]

Line 10:		Line 11:
	And to top it all off, humility is a characteristic that allows one to not be trapped in the morasse of patent protection tendencies:		And to top it all off, humility is a characteristic that allows one to not be trapped in the morasse of patent protection tendencies:
	*'''Enclosure of Intellectual Property''' Finding enclosure of intellectual property - as in the patent system - repugnant. This stems from understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of giants. This means believing that we all add only a small drop to the vast pool of human knowledge. As such, the concept of 'patenting an idea' is ridiculous to the humble person, because 99.9% of that idea is enabled by prior human knowledge and invention - and is nothing new. And that the number of 9s after the decimal is increasing - as any new human knowledge builds upon an ever expanding body of work. To claim that a trifling addition now becomes one's sole property at the exclusion of others using it is a disgrace to the human race that prevents genuine progress from happening. The counterargument to this is that intellectual property allows a temporary monopoly to fund research. The counterargument to this counterargument is that the funding mechanisms for research need to be disrupted to allow more rapid progress. Progress by monopoly is competitive waste, and does not from first principles lead to optimal innovation.		*'''Enclosure of Intellectual Property''' Finding enclosure of intellectual property - as in the patent system - repugnant. This stems from understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of giants. This means believing that we all add only a small drop to the vast pool of human knowledge. As such, the concept of 'patenting an idea' is ridiculous to the humble person, because 99.9% of that idea is enabled by prior human knowledge and invention - and is nothing new. And that the number of 9s after the decimal is increasing - as any new human knowledge builds upon an ever expanding body of work. To claim that a trifling addition now becomes one's sole property at the exclusion of others using it is a disgrace to the human race that prevents genuine progress from happening. The counterargument to this is that intellectual property allows a temporary monopoly to fund research. The counterargument to this counterargument is that the funding mechanisms for research need to be disrupted to allow more rapid progress. Progress by monopoly is competitive waste, and does not from first principles lead to optimal innovation.

			=More=
			*How letting go of ideas can set you free - [https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2021/03/to-get-happier-admit-when-youre-wrong/618245/]

Marcin at 14:45, 1 May 2020

2020-05-01T14:45:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:45, 1 May 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
			[[File:egoequalsoneoverknowledge.jpeg]]

	OSE considers these properties characteristic of a humble mindset:		OSE considers these properties characteristic of a humble mindset:
	*'''Being Teachable'''. Lack of a know-it-all attitude allows one to be open to learning new things. Respecting that no matter how much one knows, there are always new insights and depths of knowing.		*'''Being Teachable'''. Lack of a know-it-all attitude allows one to be open to learning new things. Respecting that no matter how much one knows, there are always new insights and depths of knowing.

Marcin at 13:17, 14 April 2018

2018-04-14T13:17:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:17, 14 April 2018
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*'''Peak Performance.''' Awareness that there are always people who are better than you at something. Or if there aren't, there will be in the future.		*'''Peak Performance.''' Awareness that there are always people who are better than you at something. Or if there aren't, there will be in the future.
	And to top it all off, humility is a characteristic that allows one to not be trapped in the morasse of patent protection tendencies:		And to top it all off, humility is a characteristic that allows one to not be trapped in the morasse of patent protection tendencies:
	*'''Enclosure of Intellectual Property''' Finding enclosure of intellectual property -		*'''Enclosure of Intellectual Property''' Finding enclosure of intellectual property - as in the patent system - repugnant. This stems from understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of giants. This means believing that we all add only a small drop to the vast pool of human knowledge. As such, the concept of 'patenting an idea' is ridiculous to the humble person, because 99.9% of that idea is enabled by prior human knowledge and invention - and is nothing new. And that the number of 9s after the decimal is increasing - as any new human knowledge builds upon an ever expanding body of work. To claim that a trifling addition now becomes one's sole property at the exclusion of others using it is a disgrace to the human race that prevents genuine progress from happening. The counterargument to this is that intellectual property allows a temporary monopoly to fund research. The counterargument to this counterargument is that the funding mechanisms for research need to be disrupted to allow more rapid progress. Progress by monopoly is competitive waste, and does not from first principles lead to optimal innovation.
	as in the patent system - repugnant. This stems from understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of giants. This means believing that we all add only a small drop to the vast pool of human knowledge. As such, the concept of 'patenting an idea' is ridiculous to the humble person, because 99.9% of that idea is enabled by prior human knowledge and invention - and is nothing new. And that the number of 9s after the decimal is increasing - as any new human knowledge builds upon an ever expanding body of work. To claim that a trifling addition now becomes one's sole property at the exclusion of others using it is a disgrace to the human race that prevents genuine progress from happening. The counterargument to this is that intellectual property allows a temporary monopoly to fund research. The counterargument to this counterargument is that the funding mechanisms for research need to be disrupted to allow more rapid progress. Progress by monopoly is competitive waste, and does not from first principles lead to optimal innovation.

Marcin at 13:05, 14 April 2018

2018-04-14T13:05:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:05, 14 April 2018
Line 8:		Line 8:
	And to top it all off, humility is a characteristic that allows one to not be trapped in the morasse of patent protection tendencies:		And to top it all off, humility is a characteristic that allows one to not be trapped in the morasse of patent protection tendencies:
	*'''Enclosure of Intellectual Property''' Finding enclosure of intellectual property -		*'''Enclosure of Intellectual Property''' Finding enclosure of intellectual property -
	as in the patent system - repugnant. This stems from understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of giants. This means believing that we all add only a small drop to the vast pool of human knowledge. As such, the concept of 'patenting an idea' is ridiculous to the humble person, because 99.9% of that idea is enabled by prior human knowledge and invention - and is nothing new. And that the number of 9s after the decimal is increasing - as any new human knowledge builds upon an ever expanding body of work. To claim that a trifling addition now becomes one's sole property at the exclusion of others using it is a disgrace to the human race that prevents genuine progress from happening. The counterargument to this is that intellectual property allows a temporary monopoly to fund research. The counterargument to this counterargument is that the funding mechanisms for research need to be disrupted to allow more rapid progress. Progress by monopoly is competitive waste, and does not from first principles lead to optimal innovation.		as in the patent system - repugnant. This stems from understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of giants. This means believing that we all add only a small drop to the vast pool of human knowledge. As such, the concept of 'patenting an idea' is ridiculous to the humble person, because 99.9% of that idea is enabled by prior human knowledge and invention - and is nothing new. And that the number of 9s after the decimal is increasing - as any new human knowledge builds upon an ever expanding body of work. To claim that a trifling addition now becomes one's sole property at the exclusion of others using it is a disgrace to the human race that prevents genuine progress from happening. The counterargument to this is that intellectual property allows a temporary monopoly to fund research. The counterargument to this counterargument is that the funding mechanisms for research need to be disrupted to allow more rapid progress. Progress by monopoly is competitive waste, and does not from first principles lead to optimal innovation.

Marcin at 13:05, 14 April 2018

2018-04-14T13:05:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:05, 14 April 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	OSE considers these properties characteristic of a humble mindset:		OSE considers these properties characteristic of a humble mindset:
	*~~Bering teachable~~. Lack of a know-it-all attitude ~~which prevents the individual from~~ learning new things. Respecting that no matter how much one knows, there are always new insights and depths of knowing.		*'''Being Teachable'''. Lack of a know-it-all attitude allows one to be open to learning new things. Respecting that no matter how much one knows, there are always new insights and depths of knowing.
	*Understanding the distinction between knowing theory and knowing how to put that theory into practice.		*'''Theory and Practice.''' Understanding the distinction between knowing theory and knowing how to put that theory into practice.
	*Understanding that the more one knows, the more ~~they are~~ aware of how little ~~they know~~		*'''Growing.''' Understanding that the more one knows, the more one is aware of how little one knows
	*Awareness of both one's trifling insignificance - and of one's importance. One's importance is understanding that the initiative of a single person or a small group of people is how the work moves forward.		*'''Importance and Trifling Insignificance.''' Awareness of both one's trifling insignificance - and of one's importance. One's importance is understanding that the initiative of a single person or a small group of people is how the work moves forward. One's trifling insignificance involves understanding that
	*Awareness that one can never know everything, and that what one does know may be incomplete and inaccurate - as in the basic premise of general semantics.		*'''The All-Knowing.'''Awareness that one can never know everything, and that what one does know may be incomplete and inaccurate - as in the basic premise of general semantics.
	*Awareness that there are always people who are better than you at something. Or if there aren't, there will be in the future.		*'''Peak Performance.''' Awareness that there are always people who are better than you at something. Or if there aren't, there will be in the future.
	And to top it all off, humility is a characteristic that allows one to not be trapped in the morasse of patent protection tendencies:		And to top it all off, humility is a characteristic that allows one to not be trapped in the morasse of patent protection tendencies:
	*Finding enclosure of intellectual property repugnant. This stems from understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of giants. This means believing that we all add only a small drop to the vast pool of human knowledge. As such, the concept of 'patenting an idea' is ridiculous to the humble person, because 99.9% of that idea is enabled by prior human knowledge and invention - and is nothing new. And that the number of 9s after the decimal is increasing - as any new human knowledge builds upon an ever expanding body of work. To claim that a trifling addition now becomes one's sole property at the exclusion of others using it is a disgrace to the human race that prevents genuine progress from happening.		*'''Enclosure of Intellectual Property''' Finding enclosure of intellectual property -
			as in the patent system - repugnant. This stems from understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of giants. This means believing that we all add only a small drop to the vast pool of human knowledge. As such, the concept of 'patenting an idea' is ridiculous to the humble person, because 99.9% of that idea is enabled by prior human knowledge and invention - and is nothing new. And that the number of 9s after the decimal is increasing - as any new human knowledge builds upon an ever expanding body of work. To claim that a trifling addition now becomes one's sole property at the exclusion of others using it is a disgrace to the human race that prevents genuine progress from happening. The counterargument to this is that intellectual property allows a temporary monopoly to fund research. The counterargument to this counterargument is that the funding mechanisms for research need to be disrupted to allow more rapid progress. Progress by monopoly is competitive waste, and does not from first principles lead to optimal innovation.

Marcin: Created page with "OSE considers these properties characteristic of a humble mindset: *Bering teachable. Lack of a know-it-all attitude which prevents the individual from learning new things. Re..."

2018-04-14T12:58:24Z

Created page with "OSE considers these properties characteristic of a humble mindset: *Bering teachable. Lack of a know-it-all attitude which prevents the individual from learning new things. Re..."

New page

OSE considers these properties characteristic of a humble mindset:
*Bering teachable. Lack of a know-it-all attitude which prevents the individual from learning new things. Respecting that no matter how much one knows, there are always new insights and depths of knowing.
*Understanding the distinction between knowing theory and knowing how to put that theory into practice.
*Understanding that the more one knows, the more they are aware of how little they know
*Awareness of both one's trifling insignificance - and of one's importance. One's importance is understanding that the initiative of a single person or a small group of people is how the work moves forward.
*Awareness that one can never know everything, and that what one does know may be incomplete and inaccurate - as in the basic premise of general semantics.
*Awareness that there are always people who are better than you at something. Or if there aren't, there will be in the future.
And to top it all off, humility is a characteristic that allows one to not be trapped in the morasse of patent protection tendencies:
*Finding enclosure of intellectual property repugnant. This stems from understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of giants. This means believing that we all add only a small drop to the vast pool of human knowledge. As such, the concept of 'patenting an idea' is ridiculous to the humble person, because 99.9% of that idea is enabled by prior human knowledge and invention - and is nothing new. And that the number of 9s after the decimal is increasing - as any new human knowledge builds upon an ever expanding body of work. To claim that a trifling addition now becomes one's sole property at the exclusion of others using it is a disgrace to the human race that prevents genuine progress from happening.