Hydrogen ICE - Revision history

Marcin at 08:50, 9 May 2023

2023-05-09T08:50:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 9 May 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
			=2023=
			*Totota is going ICE:

			<html><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/rTawvzH0MQ4" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe></html>

			=About=
	Hydrogen internal combustion engine - good overview paper comparing ICE, hydrogen ICE, and fuel cell vehicles.		Hydrogen internal combustion engine - good overview paper comparing ICE, hydrogen ICE, and fuel cell vehicles.

Marcin: /* Industry Standards */

2022-07-09T18:19:14Z

Industry Standards

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:19, 9 July 2022
Line 8:		Line 8:

	=Industry Standards=		=Industry Standards=
	*Aquarius Engines - https://interestingengineering.com/tiny-22-lb-hydrogen-engine-may-replace-the-traditional-combustion-engine		*Aquarius Engines - https://interestingengineering.com/tiny-22-lb-hydrogen-engine-may-replace-the-traditional-combustion-engine. MJ comment - Nice! Exactly. Looks like it's linear hydrogen ICE dynamo with built in magnets around center so this thing appears to put out electricity instead of crank motion. That is how you get the super simplest, electrically controlled engine. I would do this exactly, or a hydraulic engine which outputs high pressure fluid for hydraulics since that is more interesting for universal applications whereas electric is 10x more expensive for heavy machines. The sweet thing is that a simple reciprocator is a pump, or a linear dynamo. Both are challenging but very doable, not the realm of rocket science. So this, when it works, is the kernel of a hydrogen economy. I would not go with crankshafts and circular motion to simplify design, as the Aquarius engine shows.

	=See Also=		=See Also=

	- [[Open Source Motor/Engine Construction Set]]		- [[Open Source Motor/Engine Construction Set]]

Marcin at 18:13, 9 July 2022

2022-07-09T18:13:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 9 July 2022
Line 7:		Line 7:


			=Industry Standards=
			*Aquarius Engines - https://interestingengineering.com/tiny-22-lb-hydrogen-engine-may-replace-the-traditional-combustion-engine

	=See Also=		=See Also=

	- [[Open Source Motor/Engine Construction Set]]		- [[Open Source Motor/Engine Construction Set]]

Eric: Added a link to the Open Source Motor/Engine Construction Set

2018-01-28T00:22:30Z

Added a link to the Open Source Motor/Engine Construction Set

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 28 January 2018
Line 4:		Line 4:

	One remarkable learning is that the hydrogen ICE is 40% efficient, while a fuel cell is 50% efficient - only 25% better - making the case for hydrogen ICE strong based on price and immediate possibility.		One remarkable learning is that the hydrogen ICE is 40% efficient, while a fuel cell is 50% efficient - only 25% better - making the case for hydrogen ICE strong based on price and immediate possibility.





			=See Also=

			- [[Open Source Motor/Engine Construction Set]]

Marcin at 19:01, 27 January 2018

2018-01-27T19:01:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:01, 27 January 2018
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[File:hydrogenice.pdf]]		[[File:hydrogenice.pdf]]

			One remarkable learning is that the hydrogen ICE is 40% efficient, while a fuel cell is 50% efficient - only 25% better - making the case for hydrogen ICE strong based on price and immediate possibility.

Marcin: Created page with "Hydrogen internal combustion engine - good overview paper comparing ICE, hydrogen ICE, and fuel cell vehicles. File:hydrogenice.pdf"

2018-01-27T18:50:04Z

Created page with "Hydrogen internal combustion engine - good overview paper comparing ICE, hydrogen ICE, and fuel cell vehicles. File:hydrogenice.pdf"

New page

Hydrogen internal combustion engine - good overview paper comparing ICE, hydrogen ICE, and fuel cell vehicles.

[[File:hydrogenice.pdf]]