Innocence - Revision history

Marcin: /* Personal Perspective */

2023-06-04T18:20:20Z

Personal Perspective

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:20, 4 June 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=~~Personal Perspective~~=		=Principles of Just War=
	*One who ~~is innocent has faith in others~~, ~~[[Gives Them~~ an ~~A]]~~		Principles of the Just War
	*Innocence is not ~~inconsistent~~ with ~~fierce and unremitting protection~~ of ~~justice~~. ~~Even~~ if it ~~includes using violence~~ to ~~defend~~ peace, after ~~all win~~-~~win negotiation has failed~~.
	*~~One should be careful at all times about justifying~~ violence. ~~Is violence justified after peaceful means have been exhausted?~~		#A just war can only be waged as a last resort. All non-violent options must be exhausted before the use of force can be justified.
			#A war is just only if it is waged by a legitimate authority. Even just causes cannot be served by actions taken by individuals or groups who do not constitute an authority sanctioned by whatever the society and outsiders to the society deem legitimate.
			#A just war can only be fought to redress a wrong suffered. For example, self-defense against an armed attack is always considered to be a just cause (although the justice of the cause is not sufficient--see the next point). Further, a just war can only be fought with "right" intentions: the only permissible objective of a just war is to redress the injury.
			#A war can only be just if it is fought with a reasonable chance of success. Deaths and injury incurred in a hopeless cause are not morally justifiable.
			#The ultimate goal of a just war is to re-establish peace. More specifically, the peace established after the war must be preferable to the peace that would have prevailed if the war had not been fought.
			#The violence used in the war must be proportional to the injury suffered. States are prohibited from using force not necessary to attain the limited objective of addressing the injury suffered.
			#The weapons used in war must discriminate between combatants and non-combatants. Civilians are never permissible targets of war, and every effort must be taken to avoid killing civilians. The deaths of civilians are justified only if they are unavoidable victims of a deliberate attack on a military target.

			from Vincent Ferraro, Ruth C. Lawson Professor of International Politics, Mount Holyoke College <http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/pol116/justwar.htm>

			=Nonviolence=
			*Part of nonviolence may include beating the shit out of your oppressor, certainly in self-defense, and in other cases of just violoence. The critical issue to determine what violence is just.

	=Principles of Just War=		=Principles of Just War=

Marcin at 18:17, 4 June 2023

2023-06-04T18:17:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 4 June 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
			=Personal Perspective=
	*One who is innocent has faith in others, [[Gives Them an A]]		*One who is innocent has faith in others, [[Gives Them an A]]
	*Innocence is not inconsistent with fierce and unremitting protection of justice. Even if it includes using violence to defend peace, after all win-win negotiation has failed.		*Innocence is not inconsistent with fierce and unremitting protection of justice. Even if it includes using violence to defend peace, after all win-win negotiation has failed.

Marcin: /* Principles of Just War */

2023-06-04T18:16:55Z

Principles of Just War

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 4 June 2023
Line 12:		Line 12:
	#The ultimate goal of a just war is to re-establish peace. More specifically, the peace established after the war must be preferable to the peace that would have prevailed if the war had not been fought.		#The ultimate goal of a just war is to re-establish peace. More specifically, the peace established after the war must be preferable to the peace that would have prevailed if the war had not been fought.
	#The violence used in the war must be proportional to the injury suffered. States are prohibited from using force not necessary to attain the limited objective of addressing the injury suffered.		#The violence used in the war must be proportional to the injury suffered. States are prohibited from using force not necessary to attain the limited objective of addressing the injury suffered.
			#The weapons used in war must discriminate between combatants and non-combatants. Civilians are never permissible targets of war, and every effort must be taken to avoid killing civilians. The deaths of civilians are justified only if they are unavoidable victims of a deliberate attack on a military target.


	7. The weapons used in war must discriminate between combatants and non-combatants. Civilians are never permissible targets of war, and every effort must be taken to avoid killing civilians. The deaths of civilians are justified only if they are unavoidable victims of a deliberate attack on a military target.



	from Vincent Ferraro, Ruth C. Lawson Professor of International Politics, Mount Holyoke College <http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/pol116/justwar.htm>		from Vincent Ferraro, Ruth C. Lawson Professor of International Politics, Mount Holyoke College <http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/pol116/justwar.htm>

Marcin at 18:16, 4 June 2023

2023-06-04T18:16:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 4 June 2023
Line 2:		Line 2:
	*Innocence is not inconsistent with fierce and unremitting protection of justice. Even if it includes using violence to defend peace, after all win-win negotiation has failed.		*Innocence is not inconsistent with fierce and unremitting protection of justice. Even if it includes using violence to defend peace, after all win-win negotiation has failed.
	*One should be careful at all times about justifying violence. Is violence justified after peaceful means have been exhausted?		*One should be careful at all times about justifying violence. Is violence justified after peaceful means have been exhausted?

			=Principles of Just War=
			Principles of the Just War

			#A just war can only be waged as a last resort. All non-violent options must be exhausted before the use of force can be justified.
			#A war is just only if it is waged by a legitimate authority. Even just causes cannot be served by actions taken by individuals or groups who do not constitute an authority sanctioned by whatever the society and outsiders to the society deem legitimate.
			#A just war can only be fought to redress a wrong suffered. For example, self-defense against an armed attack is always considered to be a just cause (although the justice of the cause is not sufficient--see the next point). Further, a just war can only be fought with "right" intentions: the only permissible objective of a just war is to redress the injury.
			#A war can only be just if it is fought with a reasonable chance of success. Deaths and injury incurred in a hopeless cause are not morally justifiable.
			#The ultimate goal of a just war is to re-establish peace. More specifically, the peace established after the war must be preferable to the peace that would have prevailed if the war had not been fought.
			#The violence used in the war must be proportional to the injury suffered. States are prohibited from using force not necessary to attain the limited objective of addressing the injury suffered.



			7. The weapons used in war must discriminate between combatants and non-combatants. Civilians are never permissible targets of war, and every effort must be taken to avoid killing civilians. The deaths of civilians are justified only if they are unavoidable victims of a deliberate attack on a military target.



			from Vincent Ferraro, Ruth C. Lawson Professor of International Politics, Mount Holyoke College <http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/pol116/justwar.htm>

Marcin at 18:13, 4 June 2023

2023-06-04T18:13:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 4 June 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*One who is innocent has faith in others, [[Gives Them an A]]		*One who is innocent has faith in others, [[Gives Them an A]]
	*Innocence is not inconsistent with fierce and unremitting protection of justice. Even if it includes using violence to defend peace, after all win-win negotiation has failed.		*Innocence is not inconsistent with fierce and unremitting protection of justice. Even if it includes using violence to defend peace, after all win-win negotiation has failed.
			*One should be careful at all times about justifying violence. Is violence justified after peaceful means have been exhausted?

Marcin at 18:13, 4 June 2023

2023-06-04T18:13:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 4 June 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*One who is innocent has faith in others, [[Gives Them an A]]		*One who is innocent has faith in others, [[Gives Them an A]]
			*Innocence is not inconsistent with fierce and unremitting protection of justice. Even if it includes using violence to defend peace, after all win-win negotiation has failed.

Marcin: Created page with "*One who is innocent has faith in others, Gives Them an A"

2023-06-04T18:11:35Z

Created page with "*One who is innocent has faith in others, Gives Them an A"

New page

*One who is innocent has faith in others, [[Gives Them an A]]