Jozef Log - Revision history

JMikler: /* Saturday, September 9th, 2017 */

2017-09-10T01:55:20Z

Saturday, September 9th, 2017

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:55, 10 September 2017
Line 17:		Line 17:
	##I bet new members are probably more likely to show off an OSE membership badge than a skills test with a score of 75, for example. I think it's best for a membership badge to not have a score on it. If you pass the test, you are 100% an OSE developer. Isn't the membership aspect pass/fail?		##I bet new members are probably more likely to show off an OSE membership badge than a skills test with a score of 75, for example. I think it's best for a membership badge to not have a score on it. If you pass the test, you are 100% an OSE developer. Isn't the membership aspect pass/fail?
	#Emailed Marcin, Dixon, and Jean-Baptiste (the 'ad hoc' Graphic Design Lead) about the developer badge and discussed it. (30 min)		#Emailed Marcin, Dixon, and Jean-Baptiste (the 'ad hoc' Graphic Design Lead) about the developer badge and discussed it. (30 min)
	#My design goals were for the ~~[File:Developer Badge]~~ to be:		#My design goals were for the to be:
	##square (more stackable on Logs, also easier to print for patches and stickers, also more layered aesthetic with possibilities of Power Cube, Periodic Table of Elements, etc.)		##square (more stackable on Logs, also easier to print for patches and stickers, also more layered aesthetic with possibilities of Power Cube, Periodic Table of Elements, etc.)
	##include the OSE Logo (to indicate membership)		##include the OSE Logo (to indicate membership)

JMikler: /* Saturday, September 9th, 2017 */

2017-09-10T01:53:38Z

Saturday, September 9th, 2017

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 10 September 2017
Line 10:		Line 10:
	=Saturday, September 9th, 2017=		=Saturday, September 9th, 2017=
	#Attended Study Hall. (2 hrs)		#Attended Study Hall. (2 hrs)
	#Messed with the sample <br> [[File:Developer_Badge.svg\|~~200px~~]] ~~v1.0, (45 min)...~~		#Messed with the sample developer badge v1.0, (45 min)... <br> [[File:Developer_Badge.svg\|250px]]
	#Wrote rationale for why a shift from e FreeCAD badge to a developer Badge (45 min):		#Wrote rationale for why a shift from e FreeCAD badge to a developer Badge (45 min):
	##Since the OSE developer test is actually a membership test, it seems fitting to have an actual membership badge. The current skills test does not indicate a new membership or developer role--it indicates a score.		##Since the OSE developer test is actually a membership test, it seems fitting to have an actual membership badge. The current skills test does not indicate a new membership or developer role--it indicates a score.

JMikler: /* Saturday, September 9th, 2017 */

2017-09-10T01:53:01Z

Saturday, September 9th, 2017

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 10 September 2017
Line 10:		Line 10:
	=Saturday, September 9th, 2017=		=Saturday, September 9th, 2017=
	#Attended Study Hall. (2 hrs)		#Attended Study Hall. (2 hrs)
	#Messed with the sample [[File:Developer_Badge.svg\|~~200~~]] v1.0, (45 min)...		#Messed with the sample <br> [[File:Developer_Badge.svg\|200px]] v1.0, (45 min)...
	#Wrote rationale for why a shift from e FreeCAD badge to a developer Badge (45 min):		#Wrote rationale for why a shift from e FreeCAD badge to a developer Badge (45 min):
	##Since the OSE developer test is actually a membership test, it seems fitting to have an actual membership badge. The current skills test does not indicate a new membership or developer role--it indicates a score.		##Since the OSE developer test is actually a membership test, it seems fitting to have an actual membership badge. The current skills test does not indicate a new membership or developer role--it indicates a score.

JMikler: /* Saturday, September 9th, 2017 */

2017-09-10T01:52:22Z

Saturday, September 9th, 2017

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:52, 10 September 2017
Line 10:		Line 10:
	=Saturday, September 9th, 2017=		=Saturday, September 9th, 2017=
	#Attended Study Hall. (2 hrs)		#Attended Study Hall. (2 hrs)
	#Messed with the sample [[File:Developer_Badge]] v1.0, (45 min)...		#Messed with the sample [[File:Developer_Badge.svg\|200]] v1.0, (45 min)...
	#Wrote rationale for why a shift from e FreeCAD badge to a developer Badge (45 min):		#Wrote rationale for why a shift from e FreeCAD badge to a developer Badge (45 min):
	##Since the OSE developer test is actually a membership test, it seems fitting to have an actual membership badge. The current skills test does not indicate a new membership or developer role--it indicates a score.		##Since the OSE developer test is actually a membership test, it seems fitting to have an actual membership badge. The current skills test does not indicate a new membership or developer role--it indicates a score.

JMikler: /* Saturday, September 9th, 2017 */

2017-09-10T01:52:02Z

Saturday, September 9th, 2017

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:52, 10 September 2017
Line 10:		Line 10:
	=Saturday, September 9th, 2017=		=Saturday, September 9th, 2017=
	#Attended Study Hall. (2 hrs)		#Attended Study Hall. (2 hrs)
	#Messed with the [[File:Developer_Badge]] v1.0, (45 min)...		#Messed with the sample [[File:Developer_Badge]] v1.0, (45 min)...
	#Wrote rationale for why a shift from e FreeCAD badge to a developer Badge (45 min):		#Wrote rationale for why a shift from e FreeCAD badge to a developer Badge (45 min):
	##Since the OSE developer test is actually a membership test, it seems fitting to have an actual membership badge. The current skills test does not indicate a new membership or developer role--it indicates a score.		##Since the OSE developer test is actually a membership test, it seems fitting to have an actual membership badge. The current skills test does not indicate a new membership or developer role--it indicates a score.
Line 16:		Line 16:
	##By the way, based on the survey, FreeCAD is not reportedly the hardest part of the test anyway--so it doesn't necessarily sum up the test, much less the application process. I think a FreeCAD badge would be most suitable as a FreeCAD Badge.		##By the way, based on the survey, FreeCAD is not reportedly the hardest part of the test anyway--so it doesn't necessarily sum up the test, much less the application process. I think a FreeCAD badge would be most suitable as a FreeCAD Badge.
	##I bet new members are probably more likely to show off an OSE membership badge than a skills test with a score of 75, for example. I think it's best for a membership badge to not have a score on it. If you pass the test, you are 100% an OSE developer. Isn't the membership aspect pass/fail?		##I bet new members are probably more likely to show off an OSE membership badge than a skills test with a score of 75, for example. I think it's best for a membership badge to not have a score on it. If you pass the test, you are 100% an OSE developer. Isn't the membership aspect pass/fail?
	#Emailed Marcin, Dixon, and Jean-Baptiste (the 'ad hoc' Graphic Design Lead) about the ~~[[File:Developer_Badge]]~~ and discussed it. (30 min)		#Emailed Marcin, Dixon, and Jean-Baptiste (the 'ad hoc' Graphic Design Lead) about the developer badge and discussed it. (30 min)
	#My design goals were for the [File:Developer Badge] to be:		#My design goals were for the [File:Developer Badge] to be:
	##square (more stackable on Logs, also easier to print for patches and stickers, also more layered aesthetic with possibilities of Power Cube, Periodic Table of Elements, etc.)		##square (more stackable on Logs, also easier to print for patches and stickers, also more layered aesthetic with possibilities of Power Cube, Periodic Table of Elements, etc.)

JMikler: /* Saturday, September 9th, 2017 */

2017-09-10T01:50:25Z

Saturday, September 9th, 2017

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:50, 10 September 2017
Line 10:		Line 10:
	=Saturday, September 9th, 2017=		=Saturday, September 9th, 2017=
	#Attended Study Hall. (2 hrs)		#Attended Study Hall. (2 hrs)
	#Messed with the [[File:Developer_Badge~~.svg~~]] v1.0, (45 min)...		#Messed with the [[File:Developer_Badge]] v1.0, (45 min)...
	#Wrote rationale for why a shift from e FreeCAD badge to a developer Badge (45 min):		#Wrote rationale for why a shift from e FreeCAD badge to a developer Badge (45 min):
	##Since the OSE developer test is actually a membership test, it seems fitting to have an actual membership badge. The current skills test does not indicate a new membership or developer role--it indicates a score.		##Since the OSE developer test is actually a membership test, it seems fitting to have an actual membership badge. The current skills test does not indicate a new membership or developer role--it indicates a score.
Line 16:		Line 16:
	##By the way, based on the survey, FreeCAD is not reportedly the hardest part of the test anyway--so it doesn't necessarily sum up the test, much less the application process. I think a FreeCAD badge would be most suitable as a FreeCAD Badge.		##By the way, based on the survey, FreeCAD is not reportedly the hardest part of the test anyway--so it doesn't necessarily sum up the test, much less the application process. I think a FreeCAD badge would be most suitable as a FreeCAD Badge.
	##I bet new members are probably more likely to show off an OSE membership badge than a skills test with a score of 75, for example. I think it's best for a membership badge to not have a score on it. If you pass the test, you are 100% an OSE developer. Isn't the membership aspect pass/fail?		##I bet new members are probably more likely to show off an OSE membership badge than a skills test with a score of 75, for example. I think it's best for a membership badge to not have a score on it. If you pass the test, you are 100% an OSE developer. Isn't the membership aspect pass/fail?
	#Emailed Marcin, Dixon, and Jean-Baptiste (the 'ad hoc' Graphic Design Lead) about the [[File:Developer_Badge~~.svg~~]] and discussed it. (30 min)		#Emailed Marcin, Dixon, and Jean-Baptiste (the 'ad hoc' Graphic Design Lead) about the [[File:Developer_Badge]] and discussed it. (30 min)
	#My design goals were for the [File:Developer Badge] to be:		#My design goals were for the [File:Developer Badge] to be:
	##square (more stackable on Logs, also easier to print for patches and stickers, also more layered aesthetic with possibilities of Power Cube, Periodic Table of Elements, etc.)		##square (more stackable on Logs, also easier to print for patches and stickers, also more layered aesthetic with possibilities of Power Cube, Periodic Table of Elements, etc.)

JMikler: /* Saturday, September 9th, 2017 */

2017-09-10T01:48:50Z

Saturday, September 9th, 2017

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:48, 10 September 2017
Line 10:		Line 10:
	=Saturday, September 9th, 2017=		=Saturday, September 9th, 2017=
	#Attended Study Hall. (2 hrs)		#Attended Study Hall. (2 hrs)
	#Messed with the [[File:~~Developer Badge~~]] v1.0, (45 min)...		#Messed with the [[File:Developer_Badge.svg]] v1.0, (45 min)...
	#Wrote rationale for why a shift from e FreeCAD badge to a developer Badge (45 min):		#Wrote rationale for why a shift from e FreeCAD badge to a developer Badge (45 min):
	##Since the OSE developer test is actually a membership test, it seems fitting to have an actual membership badge. The current skills test does not indicate a new membership or developer role--it indicates a score.		##Since the OSE developer test is actually a membership test, it seems fitting to have an actual membership badge. The current skills test does not indicate a new membership or developer role--it indicates a score.
Line 16:		Line 16:
	##By the way, based on the survey, FreeCAD is not reportedly the hardest part of the test anyway--so it doesn't necessarily sum up the test, much less the application process. I think a FreeCAD badge would be most suitable as a FreeCAD Badge.		##By the way, based on the survey, FreeCAD is not reportedly the hardest part of the test anyway--so it doesn't necessarily sum up the test, much less the application process. I think a FreeCAD badge would be most suitable as a FreeCAD Badge.
	##I bet new members are probably more likely to show off an OSE membership badge than a skills test with a score of 75, for example. I think it's best for a membership badge to not have a score on it. If you pass the test, you are 100% an OSE developer. Isn't the membership aspect pass/fail?		##I bet new members are probably more likely to show off an OSE membership badge than a skills test with a score of 75, for example. I think it's best for a membership badge to not have a score on it. If you pass the test, you are 100% an OSE developer. Isn't the membership aspect pass/fail?
	#Emailed Marcin, Dixon, and Jean-Baptiste (the 'ad hoc' Graphic Design Lead) about the [[File:~~Developer Badge~~]] and discussed it. (30 min)		#Emailed Marcin, Dixon, and Jean-Baptiste (the 'ad hoc' Graphic Design Lead) about the [[File:Developer_Badge.svg]] and discussed it. (30 min)
	#My design goals were for the [File:Developer Badge] to be:		#My design goals were for the [File:Developer Badge] to be:
	##square (more stackable on Logs, also easier to print for patches and stickers, also more layered aesthetic with possibilities of Power Cube, Periodic Table of Elements, etc.)		##square (more stackable on Logs, also easier to print for patches and stickers, also more layered aesthetic with possibilities of Power Cube, Periodic Table of Elements, etc.)

JMikler: /* Monday September 4th, 2017 */

2017-09-10T01:37:50Z

Monday September 4th, 2017

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:37, 10 September 2017
Line 30:		Line 30:

	=Monday September 4th, 2017=		=Monday September 4th, 2017=
	#Sent ~~Welcome emails~~ to Stephen		#Sent welcome email, badge, and contact info invite to Stephen. (30 Min)
	#Started working on the new [Developer Badge]		#Started working on the new [[File:Developer Badge]] (1 hr)

	=Monday, August 21, 2017=		=Monday, August 21, 2017=

JMikler: /* Saturday, September 9th, 2017 */

2017-09-10T01:35:46Z

Saturday, September 9th, 2017

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:35, 10 September 2017
Line 10:		Line 10:
	=Saturday, September 9th, 2017=		=Saturday, September 9th, 2017=
	#Attended Study Hall. (2 hrs)		#Attended Study Hall. (2 hrs)
	#Messed with the [File:Developer Badge] v1.0, (45 min)...		#Messed with the [[File:Developer Badge]] v1.0, (45 min)...
	#Wrote rationale for why a shift from e FreeCAD badge to a developer Badge (45 min):		#Wrote rationale for why a shift from e FreeCAD badge to a developer Badge (45 min):
	##Since the OSE developer test is actually a membership test, it seems fitting to have an actual membership badge. The current skills test does not indicate a new membership or developer role--it indicates a score.		##Since the OSE developer test is actually a membership test, it seems fitting to have an actual membership badge. The current skills test does not indicate a new membership or developer role--it indicates a score.
Line 16:		Line 16:
	##By the way, based on the survey, FreeCAD is not reportedly the hardest part of the test anyway--so it doesn't necessarily sum up the test, much less the application process. I think a FreeCAD badge would be most suitable as a FreeCAD Badge.		##By the way, based on the survey, FreeCAD is not reportedly the hardest part of the test anyway--so it doesn't necessarily sum up the test, much less the application process. I think a FreeCAD badge would be most suitable as a FreeCAD Badge.
	##I bet new members are probably more likely to show off an OSE membership badge than a skills test with a score of 75, for example. I think it's best for a membership badge to not have a score on it. If you pass the test, you are 100% an OSE developer. Isn't the membership aspect pass/fail?		##I bet new members are probably more likely to show off an OSE membership badge than a skills test with a score of 75, for example. I think it's best for a membership badge to not have a score on it. If you pass the test, you are 100% an OSE developer. Isn't the membership aspect pass/fail?
	#Emailed Marcin, Dixon, and Jean-Baptiste (the 'ad hoc' Graphic Design Lead) about the [File: Developer Badge] and discussed it. (30 min)		#Emailed Marcin, Dixon, and Jean-Baptiste (the 'ad hoc' Graphic Design Lead) about the [[File:Developer Badge]] and discussed it. (30 min)
	#My design goals were for the [File:Developer Badge] to be:		#My design goals were for the [File:Developer Badge] to be:
	##square (more stackable on Logs, also easier to print for patches and stickers, also more layered aesthetic with possibilities of Power Cube, Periodic Table of Elements, etc.)		##square (more stackable on Logs, also easier to print for patches and stickers, also more layered aesthetic with possibilities of Power Cube, Periodic Table of Elements, etc.)

JMikler: /* Saturday, September 9th, 2017 */

2017-09-10T01:35:13Z

Saturday, September 9th, 2017

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:35, 10 September 2017
Line 11:		Line 11:
	#Attended Study Hall. (2 hrs)		#Attended Study Hall. (2 hrs)
	#Messed with the [File:Developer Badge] v1.0, (45 min)...		#Messed with the [File:Developer Badge] v1.0, (45 min)...
	#Wrote rationale for why a shift from e FreeCAD badge to a developer Badge:		#Wrote rationale for why a shift from e FreeCAD badge to a developer Badge (45 min):
	##Since the OSE developer test is actually a membership test, it seems fitting to have an actual membership badge.		##Since the OSE developer test is actually a membership test, it seems fitting to have an actual membership badge. The current skills test does not indicate a new membership or developer role--it indicates a score.
	##The ~~FreeCAD badge is functioning as~~ a membership ~~badge, but I think~~ a ~~FreeCAD badge would be most suitable as a FreeCAD Badge~~.		##The FreeCAD badge seems somewhat overworked and underpaid since the test is larger than FreeCAD (+ISO + Documentation), and the application process is larger than the developer test (+ teamwork, +philosophical alignment, +OS culture). So, a badge for CAD is not well suited to sum up and represent these other criteria of membership.
	##The FreeCAD badge seems somewhat overworked and underpaid since the test ~~has 3 main components~~ (ISO~~, FreeCAD~~, and ~~documentation) FreeCad isn't~~ the ~~only part of~~ the test~~--and based on the survey~~, ~~reportedly not the hardest part. So it seems somewhat inaccurate to label that experience as predominantly about FreeCAD.~~		##By the way, based on the survey, FreeCAD is not reportedly the hardest part of the test anyway--so it doesn't necessarily sum up the test, much less the application process. I think a FreeCAD badge would be most suitable as a FreeCAD Badge.
	~~##FreeCAD is a necessary but not sufficient condition to be an OSE Developer:~~ philosophical alignment, ~~teamwork,~~ OS culture, ~~etc. A~~ badge for a CAD ~~does~~ not represent these other criteria of membership.		##I bet new members are probably more likely to show off an OSE membership badge than a skills test with a score of 75, for example. I think it's best for a membership badge to not have a score on it. If you pass the test, you are 100% an OSE developer. Isn't the membership aspect pass/fail?
	##I bet new members are probably more likely to show off an OSE membership badge than a skills test with a score of 75, for example. I think it's best for a membership badge to not have a score on it. If you pass the test, you are 100% an OSE developer.		#Emailed Marcin, Dixon, and Jean-Baptiste (the 'ad hoc' Graphic Design Lead) about the [File: Developer Badge] and discussed it. (30 min)
			#My design goals were for the [File:Developer Badge] to be:
			##square (more stackable on Logs, also easier to print for patches and stickers, also more layered aesthetic with possibilities of Power Cube, Periodic Table of Elements, etc.)
			##include the OSE Logo (to indicate membership)
			##State role or position, like "Developer", "Marketing" or whatever (this is more flexible for people who have different roles within OSE)
			##Good standing represented completed development cycles in stripes: a flat "ad-hocracy", but those with more experience more frequently taking the role of a lead among equals.
			##FreeCAD icon somewhere since CAD represents the main focus of work.

	=Wednesday, September 6, 2017=		=Wednesday, September 6, 2017=