Leveling the Playing Field - Revision history

Marcin at 23:28, 27 October 2024

2024-10-27T23:28:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:28, 27 October 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
			=About=
			Leveling the playing field means creating a world in which everyone has a fair chance to prosper in freedom.

	=Philosophy=		=Philosophy=
	The desire for fairness is a potent motivator. Making society both more productive and humane, a la [[Drucker]], involves leveling the playing field. This has profound implications for ending [[Class Warfare]]. Here are our principles.		The desire for fairness is a potent motivator. Making society both more productive and humane, a la [[Drucker]], involves leveling the playing field. This has profound implications for ending [[Class Warfare]]. Here are our principles.

Marcin: /* Tactics */

2024-06-03T16:43:51Z

Tactics

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:43, 3 June 2024
Line 18:		Line 18:
	*Standards optimization for product ecologies and interoperability, as well as for a [[Construction Set Approach]]		*Standards optimization for product ecologies and interoperability, as well as for a [[Construction Set Approach]]
	*[[Real Education]]		*[[Real Education]]
			*Abolishing the profit motive in both the healthcare and prison industries.

Marcin: /* philosophy */

2024-06-03T16:22:04Z

philosophy

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:22, 3 June 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=~~philosophy~~=		=Philosophy=
	Making society both more productive and humane, a la [[Drucker]], involves leveling the playing field. Here are our principles.		The desire for fairness is a potent motivator. Making society both more productive and humane, a la [[Drucker]], involves leveling the playing field. This has profound implications for ending [[Class Warfare]]. Here are our principles.

	#Product effectiveness - if something can be done more effectively at lower cost, let it. For example, we commit not to have the only option of a more expensive product, if a lower cost product - which cannibalizes a part of the more expensive market - can be sold to provide for lower needs. The answer is both - but never solely the expensive shiny option because we would make less money selling the generic one. Example: does Arduino sell a bare bones Arduino at a fraction of the cost but without the bells and whistles, or does it cannibalize too much of its upper scale market? Inclusion: this is important to include options at all price scales - to maximize the humane nature of economics.		#Product effectiveness - if something can be done more effectively at lower cost, let it. For example, we commit not to have the only option of a more expensive product, if a lower cost product - which cannibalizes a part of the more expensive market - can be sold to provide for lower needs. The answer is both - but never solely the expensive shiny option because we would make less money selling the generic one. Example: does Arduino sell a bare bones Arduino at a fraction of the cost but without the bells and whistles, or does it cannibalize too much of its upper scale market? Inclusion: this is important to include options at all price scales - to maximize the humane nature of economics.

Marcin: /* Tactics */

2024-06-03T15:22:22Z

Tactics

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:22, 3 June 2024
Line 17:		Line 17:
	*Robustification		*Robustification
	*Standards optimization for product ecologies and interoperability, as well as for a [[Construction Set Approach]]		*Standards optimization for product ecologies and interoperability, as well as for a [[Construction Set Approach]]
			*[[Real Education]]

Marcin: /* Tactics */

2024-06-03T15:21:54Z

Tactics

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:21, 3 June 2024
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*Proactively publishing product, enterprise, and operations blueprints		*Proactively publishing product, enterprise, and operations blueprints
	*[[Abundant Money]]		*[[Abundant Money]]
			*[[Open Sector]] creation of [[Universal Basic Assets]]
			*Open collaboration
			*[[OSPD]]
			*[[DE]] towards [[DMS]]
			*Open Source microfactory
			*[[OSES]]
			*Robustification
			*Standards optimization for product ecologies and interoperability, as well as for a [[Construction Set Approach]]

Marcin at 15:17, 3 June 2024

2024-06-03T15:17:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:17, 3 June 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
			=philosophy=
	Making society both more productive and humane, a la [[Drucker]], involves leveling the playing field. Here are our principles.		Making society both more productive and humane, a la [[Drucker]], involves leveling the playing field. Here are our principles.

	#Product effectiveness - if something can be done more effectively at lower cost, let it. For example, we commit not to have the only option of a more expensive product, if a lower cost product - which cannibalizes a part of the more expensive market - can be sold to provide for lower needs. The answer is both - but never solely the expensive shiny option because we would make less money selling the generic one. Example: does Arduino sell a bare bones Arduino at a fraction of the cost but without the bells and whistles, or does it cannibalize too much of its upper scale market? Inclusion: this is important to include options at all price scales - to maximize the humane nature of economics.		#Product effectiveness - if something can be done more effectively at lower cost, let it. For example, we commit not to have the only option of a more expensive product, if a lower cost product - which cannibalizes a part of the more expensive market - can be sold to provide for lower needs. The answer is both - but never solely the expensive shiny option because we would make less money selling the generic one. Example: does Arduino sell a bare bones Arduino at a fraction of the cost but without the bells and whistles, or does it cannibalize too much of its upper scale market? Inclusion: this is important to include options at all price scales - to maximize the humane nature of economics.
	#Abundant resources - hydrogen qualifies here. Right now, with 1.2 cent/kwhr cost of solar (see [[Seed Eco-Home PV System]]), and 55 kWhr/kg hydrogen energy cost - means production energy costs of 66 cents per gallon equivalent. The capital expenditures are half the cost of hyrogen production, bringing GGE cost of hydrogen to $1.32. Trillion dollar idea. Electricity cost is half the total cost [https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/hydrogen-production-cost] but that is for more expensive electricity, meaning that most of the cost could possibly be capital expenditure.		#Abundant resources - hydrogen qualifies here. Right now, with 1.2 cent/kwhr cost of solar (see [[Seed Eco-Home PV System]]), and 55 kWhr/kg hydrogen energy cost - means production energy costs of 66 cents per gallon equivalent. The capital expenditures are half the cost of hyrogen production, bringing GGE cost of hydrogen to $1.32. Trillion dollar idea. Electricity cost is half the total cost [https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/hydrogen-production-cost] but that is for more expensive electricity, meaning that most of the cost could possibly be capital expenditure.

			=Tactics=
			*Eradication of patents and trade secrets is the obvious
			*Proactively publishing product, enterprise, and operations blueprints
			*[[Abundant Money]]

Marcin at 21:11, 22 April 2024

2024-04-22T21:11:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:11, 22 April 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:

	#Product effectiveness - if something can be done more effectively at lower cost, let it. For example, we commit not to have the only option of a more expensive product, if a lower cost product - which cannibalizes a part of the more expensive market - can be sold to provide for lower needs. The answer is both - but never solely the expensive shiny option because we would make less money selling the generic one. Example: does Arduino sell a bare bones Arduino at a fraction of the cost but without the bells and whistles, or does it cannibalize too much of its upper scale market? Inclusion: this is important to include options at all price scales - to maximize the humane nature of economics.		#Product effectiveness - if something can be done more effectively at lower cost, let it. For example, we commit not to have the only option of a more expensive product, if a lower cost product - which cannibalizes a part of the more expensive market - can be sold to provide for lower needs. The answer is both - but never solely the expensive shiny option because we would make less money selling the generic one. Example: does Arduino sell a bare bones Arduino at a fraction of the cost but without the bells and whistles, or does it cannibalize too much of its upper scale market? Inclusion: this is important to include options at all price scales - to maximize the humane nature of economics.
	#Abundant resources - hydrogen qualifies here. Right now, with 1.2 cent/kwhr cost of solar (see [[Seed Eco-Home PV System]]), and 55 kWhr/kg hydrogen energy cost - means production energy costs of 66 cents per gallon equivalent. The capital expenditures are half the cost of hyrogen production, bringing GGE cost of hydrogen to $1.32. Trillion dollar idea.		#Abundant resources - hydrogen qualifies here. Right now, with 1.2 cent/kwhr cost of solar (see [[Seed Eco-Home PV System]]), and 55 kWhr/kg hydrogen energy cost - means production energy costs of 66 cents per gallon equivalent. The capital expenditures are half the cost of hyrogen production, bringing GGE cost of hydrogen to $1.32. Trillion dollar idea. Electricity cost is half the total cost [https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/hydrogen-production-cost] but that is for more expensive electricity, meaning that most of the cost could possibly be capital expenditure.

Marcin at 21:08, 22 April 2024

2024-04-22T21:08:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:08, 22 April 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:

	#Product effectiveness - if something can be done more effectively at lower cost, let it. For example, we commit not to have the only option of a more expensive product, if a lower cost product - which cannibalizes a part of the more expensive market - can be sold to provide for lower needs. The answer is both - but never solely the expensive shiny option because we would make less money selling the generic one. Example: does Arduino sell a bare bones Arduino at a fraction of the cost but without the bells and whistles, or does it cannibalize too much of its upper scale market? Inclusion: this is important to include options at all price scales - to maximize the humane nature of economics.		#Product effectiveness - if something can be done more effectively at lower cost, let it. For example, we commit not to have the only option of a more expensive product, if a lower cost product - which cannibalizes a part of the more expensive market - can be sold to provide for lower needs. The answer is both - but never solely the expensive shiny option because we would make less money selling the generic one. Example: does Arduino sell a bare bones Arduino at a fraction of the cost but without the bells and whistles, or does it cannibalize too much of its upper scale market? Inclusion: this is important to include options at all price scales - to maximize the humane nature of economics.
	#Abundant resources - hydrogen qualifies here. Right now, with 1.2 cent/kwhr cost of solar (see [[Seed Eco-Home PV System]]), and 55 kWhr/kg hydrogen energy cost - means 66 cents per gallon equivalent. The capital expenditures are half the cost of hyrogen production, bringing GGE cost of hydrogen to $1.32. Trillion dollar idea.		#Abundant resources - hydrogen qualifies here. Right now, with 1.2 cent/kwhr cost of solar (see [[Seed Eco-Home PV System]]), and 55 kWhr/kg hydrogen energy cost - means production energy costs of 66 cents per gallon equivalent. The capital expenditures are half the cost of hyrogen production, bringing GGE cost of hydrogen to $1.32. Trillion dollar idea.

Marcin at 21:00, 22 April 2024

2024-04-22T21:00:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:00, 22 April 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Making society both more productive and ~~human~~, a la [[Drucker]], involves leveling the playing field. Here are our principles.		Making society both more productive and humane, a la [[Drucker]], involves leveling the playing field. Here are our principles.

	#Product effectiveness - if something can be done more effectively at lower cost, let it. For example, we commit not to have the only option of a more expensive product, if a lower cost product - which cannibalizes a part of the more expensive market - can be sold to provide for lower needs. The answer is both - but never solely the expensive shiny option because we would make less money selling the generic one. Example: does Arduino sell a bare bones Arduino at a fraction of the cost but without the bells and whistles, or does it cannibalize too much of its upper scale market?		#Product effectiveness - if something can be done more effectively at lower cost, let it. For example, we commit not to have the only option of a more expensive product, if a lower cost product - which cannibalizes a part of the more expensive market - can be sold to provide for lower needs. The answer is both - but never solely the expensive shiny option because we would make less money selling the generic one. Example: does Arduino sell a bare bones Arduino at a fraction of the cost but without the bells and whistles, or does it cannibalize too much of its upper scale market? Inclusion: this is important to include options at all price scales - to maximize the humane nature of economics.
			#Abundant resources - hydrogen qualifies here. Right now, with 1.2 cent/kwhr cost of solar (see [[Seed Eco-Home PV System]]), and 55 kWhr/kg hydrogen energy cost - means 66 cents per gallon equivalent. The capital expenditures are half the cost of hyrogen production, bringing GGE cost of hydrogen to $1.32. Trillion dollar idea.

Marcin: Created page with "Making society both more productive and human, a la Drucker, involves leveling the playing field. Here are our principles. #Product effectiveness - if something can be do..."

2024-04-22T20:58:08Z

Created page with "Making society both more productive and human, a la Drucker, involves leveling the playing field. Here are our principles. #Product effectiveness - if something can be do..."

New page

Making society both more productive and human, a la [[Drucker]], involves leveling the playing field. Here are our principles.

#Product effectiveness - if something can be done more effectively at lower cost, let it. For example, we commit not to have the only option of a more expensive product, if a lower cost product - which cannibalizes a part of the more expensive market - can be sold to provide for lower needs. The answer is both - but never solely the expensive shiny option because we would make less money selling the generic one. Example: does Arduino sell a bare bones Arduino at a fraction of the cost but without the bells and whistles, or does it cannibalize too much of its upper scale market?