Licensing Templates - Revision history

Kienle: /* YouTube */

2020-04-24T17:13:34Z

YouTube

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 24 April 2020
Line 38:		Line 38:
	* CC BY		* CC BY

	The YT license essentially allows Google to host your video and other users to view the video on YT. (Users are not allowed to download ~~for~~ modify it.) So, giving a suitable license makes sense.		The YT license essentially allows Google to host your video and other users to view the video on YT. (Users are not allowed to download or modify it.) So, giving a suitable license makes sense.

	If you have several videos in a playlist, you can state the '''notice in the playlist''' description (but users may not see it):		If you have several videos in a playlist, you can state the '''notice in the playlist''' description (but users may not see it):
	All content on this playlist is copyrighted by the owner of this playlist.		All content on this playlist is copyrighted by the owner of this playlist.
	All content on this playlist is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA) 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). '''Attribute this work to "OSE, www.opensourceecology.org"'''.		All content on this playlist is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA) 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). '''Attribute this work to "OSE, www.opensourceecology.org"'''.

Kienle at 13:48, 11 February 2020

2020-02-11T13:48:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:48, 11 February 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
			[[Category:OSE]]
			[[Category: Licenses]]
	{{Hint\|This page is a proposal and needs to be discussed further. Please comment!!}}		{{Hint\|This page is a proposal and needs to be discussed further. Please comment!!}}

Kienle at 13:43, 11 February 2020

2020-02-11T13:43:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:43, 11 February 2020
Line 22:		Line 22:

	It is not required/necessary that OSE is the copyright holder because on the next line you state a ''suitable'' license that makes it easy for OSE and others to re-use it. [Is it possible/preferable to name OSE as the copyright holder with or w/o its permission?]		It is not required/necessary that OSE is the copyright holder because on the next line you state a ''suitable'' license that makes it easy for OSE and others to re-use it. [Is it possible/preferable to name OSE as the copyright holder with or w/o its permission?]

			=CC BY-SA Boilerplate=

			OSE favors a copyleft/reciprocal license such as CC's Share-Alike (SA). This Wiki does so.

			So, this notice is typically what you should do:
			Copyright 2020 John Doe
			Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA) 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). '''Attribute this work to "OSE, www.opensourceecology.org"'''.

	=YouTube=		=YouTube=
Line 31:		Line 39:
	The YT license essentially allows Google to host your video and other users to view the video on YT. (Users are not allowed to download for modify it.) So, giving a suitable license makes sense.		The YT license essentially allows Google to host your video and other users to view the video on YT. (Users are not allowed to download for modify it.) So, giving a suitable license makes sense.

	~~OSE favors a copyleft/reciprocal license such as CC's Share-Alike (SA). This Wiki does so.~~		If you have several videos in a playlist, you can state the '''notice in the playlist''' description (but users may not see it):

	If you have several videos in a playlist, you can state the notice in the playlist description (but users may not see it):
	All content on this playlist is copyrighted by the owner of this playlist.		All content on this playlist is copyrighted by the owner of this playlist.
	All content on this playlist is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA) 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). '''Attribute this work to "OSE, www.opensourceecology.org"'''.		All content on this playlist is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA) 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). '''Attribute this work to "OSE, www.opensourceecology.org"'''.

Kienle at 13:39, 11 February 2020

2020-02-11T13:39:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:39, 11 February 2020
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Copyright 2020 John Doe		Copyright 2020 John Doe
	This work is licensed under A Suitable License		This work is licensed under A Suitable License Requiring Attribution. '''Attribute this work to "OSE, www.opensourceecology.org"'''

	Since you created the work, put your name (instead of John Doe) as the copyright holder.		Since you created the work, put your name (instead of John Doe) as the copyright holder.

Kienle: Created page with " {{Hint|This page is a proposal and needs to be discussed further. Please comment!!}} Collection of boilerplate for licensing that can be used for OSE-related content. This..."

2020-02-11T13:37:44Z

Created page with " {{Hint|This page is a proposal and needs to be discussed further. Please comment!!}} Collection of boilerplate for licensing that can be used for OSE-related content. This..."

New page

{{Hint|This page is a proposal and needs to be discussed further. Please comment!!}}

Collection of boilerplate for licensing that can be used for OSE-related content.

This page assumes that you know about [[Creative Commons]] (CC) licenses.

=Rationale=

Any work (e.g., text, image, video) that you create is "automatically" protected by copyright. (No explicit copyright notice is required!) If you want others to re-use and build upon your work, you - as the copyright holder - have to give others an explicit license.

A clearly visible license
* makes it easy for others use and build upon OSE-related content.
* helps to promote OSE, by requiring attribution to OSE.

=Generic Boilerplate=

Copyright 2020 John Doe
This work is licensed under A Suitable License

Since you created the work, put your name (instead of John Doe) as the copyright holder.

It is not required/necessary that OSE is the copyright holder because on the next line you state a ''suitable'' license that makes it easy for OSE and others to re-use it. [Is it possible/preferable to name OSE as the copyright holder with or w/o its permission?]

=YouTube=

YouTube (YT) offers (only) two licenses:
* YouTube license [https://www.youtube.com/static?template=terms&gl=US]
* CC BY

The YT license essentially allows Google to host your video and other users to view the video on YT. (Users are not allowed to download for modify it.) So, giving a suitable license makes sense.

OSE favors a copyleft/reciprocal license such as CC's Share-Alike (SA). This Wiki does so.

If you have several videos in a playlist, you can state the notice in the playlist description (but users may not see it):
All content on this playlist is copyrighted by the owner of this playlist.
All content on this playlist is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA) 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). '''Attribute this work to "OSE, www.opensourceecology.org"'''.