<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=MicroTrac_Design_Discussion</id>
	<title>MicroTrac Design Discussion - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=MicroTrac_Design_Discussion"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=MicroTrac_Design_Discussion&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-17T22:17:15Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.13</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=MicroTrac_Design_Discussion&amp;diff=130077&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Marcin: Created page with &quot;Lex Berezhny	6:14 PM Marcin: Does the length matter? Maybe if the platform is longer the powercube could be placed directly on platform without interfering with tracks? I assu...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=MicroTrac_Design_Discussion&amp;diff=130077&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2015-07-01T23:22:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;Lex Berezhny	6:14 PM Marcin: Does the length matter? Maybe if the platform is longer the powercube could be placed directly on platform without interfering with tracks? I assu...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Lex Berezhny	6:14 PM&lt;br /&gt;
Marcin: Does the length matter? Maybe if the platform is longer the powercube could be placed directly on platform without interfering with tracks?&lt;br /&gt;
I assume the width is importan to fit through standard openings?&lt;br /&gt;
But length could be longer, right?&lt;br /&gt;
It&amp;#039;s that dang Universal Rotor, it&amp;#039;s just so huge for a &amp;quot;micro&amp;quot; tractor :-D&lt;br /&gt;
me	6:16 PM&lt;br /&gt;
To within practical limits of maneuverability. The longer they are, the more radial stress on axles upon turning. Our general design principle is not longer than wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Toro is 70&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.toro.com/professional/sws/brochure/Track_specs.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
Remember that we are using gutterpunk bearing systems - common 4-bolt flange bearings not designed for axial thrust.&lt;br /&gt;
Lex Berezhny	6:16 PM&lt;br /&gt;
okay, i&amp;#039;ll keep that in mind, i&amp;#039;ll try to modify the sketch, unfortunately i accidentally deleted the one i did yesterday, but that&amp;#039;s okay, i&amp;#039;ll try to make a new, better, one&lt;br /&gt;
me	6:17 PM&lt;br /&gt;
Otherwise, price goes way up.&lt;br /&gt;
That&amp;#039;s why we are doing articulated design - to allow huge machines with minimal axial thrust.&lt;br /&gt;
sorry, radial thrust.&lt;br /&gt;
Lex Berezhny	6:17 PM&lt;br /&gt;
And there is no way to reduce the size of the rotor, right?&lt;br /&gt;
me	6:17 PM&lt;br /&gt;
Articulation for larger machines.&lt;br /&gt;
No.&lt;br /&gt;
Lex Berezhny	6:18 PM&lt;br /&gt;
okay&lt;br /&gt;
I&amp;#039;ll think about it and try to come up with a new design and post it, I&amp;#039;ll make sure to upload the sketch to wharehouse this time&lt;br /&gt;
me	6:18 PM&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, the above allows 10-100 cost reduction over industry standard Cat D7 bulldozer.&lt;br /&gt;
Uplaod the old one too.&lt;br /&gt;
Lex Berezhny	6:19 PM&lt;br /&gt;
I accidentally deleted it. If i can&amp;#039;t come up with a new/better design I&amp;#039;ll recreate the one I did yesterday and upload that.&lt;br /&gt;
me	6:19 PM&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.facebook.com/OpenSourceEcology/photos/a.10151381815921562.574965.66469461561/10154027343551562/?type=1&amp;amp;theater&lt;br /&gt;
Lex Berezhny	6:20 PM&lt;br /&gt;
cool&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marcin</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>