<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=MicroTrac_Log</id>
	<title>MicroTrac Log - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=MicroTrac_Log"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=MicroTrac_Log&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-09T04:44:38Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.13</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=MicroTrac_Log&amp;diff=130078&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Marcin: Created page with &quot;=Wed Jul 1, 2015= Lex Berezhny 6:14 PM Marcin: Does the length matter? Maybe if the platform is longer the powercube could be placed directly on platform without interfering w...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=MicroTrac_Log&amp;diff=130078&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2015-07-01T23:23:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;=Wed Jul 1, 2015= Lex Berezhny 6:14 PM Marcin: Does the length matter? Maybe if the platform is longer the powercube could be placed directly on platform without interfering w...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;=Wed Jul 1, 2015=&lt;br /&gt;
Lex Berezhny 6:14 PM Marcin: Does the length matter? Maybe if the platform is longer the powercube could be placed directly on platform without interfering with tracks? I assume the width is importan to fit through standard openings? But length could be longer, right? It&amp;#039;s that dang Universal Rotor, it&amp;#039;s just so huge for a &amp;quot;micro&amp;quot; tractor :-D me 6:16 PM To within practical limits of maneuverability. The longer they are, the more radial stress on axles upon turning. Our general design principle is not longer than wide. Toro is 70&amp;quot;. http://www.toro.com/professional/sws/brochure/Track_specs.pdf Remember that we are using gutterpunk bearing systems - common 4-bolt flange bearings not designed for axial thrust. Lex Berezhny 6:16 PM okay, i&amp;#039;ll keep that in mind, i&amp;#039;ll try to modify the sketch, unfortunately i accidentally deleted the one i did yesterday, but that&amp;#039;s okay, i&amp;#039;ll try to make a new, better, one me 6:17 PM Otherwise, price goes way up. That&amp;#039;s why we are doing articulated design - to allow huge machines with minimal axial thrust. sorry, radial thrust. Lex Berezhny 6:17 PM And there is no way to reduce the size of the rotor, right? me 6:17 PM Articulation for larger machines. No. Lex Berezhny 6:18 PM okay I&amp;#039;ll think about it and try to come up with a new design and post it, I&amp;#039;ll make sure to upload the sketch to wharehouse this time me 6:18 PM Basically, the above allows 10-100 cost reduction over industry standard Cat D7 bulldozer. Uplaod the old one too. Lex Berezhny 6:19 PM I accidentally deleted it. If i can&amp;#039;t come up with a new/better design I&amp;#039;ll recreate the one I did yesterday and upload that. me 6:19 PM https://www.facebook.com/OpenSourceEcology/photos/a.10151381815921562.574965.66469461561/10154027343551562/?type=1&amp;amp;theater Lex Berezhny 6:20 PM cool&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marcin</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>