Military - Revision history

Eric: Minor Typo Fix

2019-04-16T00:08:14Z

Minor Typo Fix

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:08, 16 April 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*USA poll - about 1/3 of the population ~~thanks~~ we are spending too much on the military - [https://news.gallup.com/poll/228137/americans-not-convinced-needs-spend-defense.aspx]		*USA poll - about 1/3 of the population thinks we are spending too much on the military - [https://news.gallup.com/poll/228137/americans-not-convinced-needs-spend-defense.aspx]
	*Aircraft carriers are acceptable politically due to their high effectiveness to cost ratio - [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2016/09/20/five-reasons-the-navys-aircraft-carriers-are-becoming-more-vital-to-u-s-security/amp/]. However, a good case can be made that they are lucrative and doomed targets due to existing and emerging technology because the affair is asymmetric - [https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/us-navy’s-big-mistake—building-tons-aircraft-carriers-44807?page=0%2C1]. Good case is China launching over 1000 long range missiles at a cost same as a single aircraft carrier.		*Aircraft carriers are acceptable politically due to their high effectiveness to cost ratio - [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2016/09/20/five-reasons-the-navys-aircraft-carriers-are-becoming-more-vital-to-u-s-security/amp/]. However, a good case can be made that they are lucrative and doomed targets due to existing and emerging technology because the affair is asymmetric - [https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/us-navy’s-big-mistake—building-tons-aircraft-carriers-44807?page=0%2C1]. Good case is China launching over 1000 long range missiles at a cost same as a single aircraft carrier.

Marcin at 16:30, 15 April 2019

2019-04-15T16:30:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:30, 15 April 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*USA poll - about 1/3 of the population thanks we are spending too much on the military - [https://news.gallup.com/poll/228137/americans-not-convinced-needs-spend-defense.aspx]		*USA poll - about 1/3 of the population thanks we are spending too much on the military - [https://news.gallup.com/poll/228137/americans-not-convinced-needs-spend-defense.aspx]
	*Aircraft carriers are acceptable politically due to their high effectiveness to cost ratio - [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2016/09/20/five-reasons-the-navys-aircraft-carriers-are-becoming-more-vital-to-u-s-security/amp/]. However, a good case can be made that they are lucrative and doomed targets due to existing and emerging technology because the affair is asymmetric - [https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/us-navy’s-big-mistake—building-tons-aircraft-carriers-44807?page=0%2C1]		*Aircraft carriers are acceptable politically due to their high effectiveness to cost ratio - [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2016/09/20/five-reasons-the-navys-aircraft-carriers-are-becoming-more-vital-to-u-s-security/amp/]. However, a good case can be made that they are lucrative and doomed targets due to existing and emerging technology because the affair is asymmetric - [https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/us-navy’s-big-mistake—building-tons-aircraft-carriers-44807?page=0%2C1]. Good case is China launching over 1000 long range missiles at a cost same as a single aircraft carrier.

Marcin at 16:28, 15 April 2019

2019-04-15T16:28:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:28, 15 April 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*USA poll - about 1/3 of the ~~populatyion~~ thanks we are spending too much on the military - [https://news.gallup.com/poll/228137/americans-not-convinced-needs-spend-defense.aspx]		*USA poll - about 1/3 of the population thanks we are spending too much on the military - [https://news.gallup.com/poll/228137/americans-not-convinced-needs-spend-defense.aspx]
	*Aircraft carriers are acceptable politically due to their high effectiveness to cost ratio - [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2016/09/20/five-reasons-the-navys-aircraft-carriers-are-becoming-more-vital-to-u-s-security/amp/]		*Aircraft carriers are acceptable politically due to their high effectiveness to cost ratio - [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2016/09/20/five-reasons-the-navys-aircraft-carriers-are-becoming-more-vital-to-u-s-security/amp/]. However, a good case can be made that they are lucrative and doomed targets due to existing and emerging technology because the affair is asymmetric - [https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/us-navy’s-big-mistake—building-tons-aircraft-carriers-44807?page=0%2C1]

Marcin at 16:04, 15 April 2019

2019-04-15T16:04:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 15 April 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*USA poll - about 1/3 of the populatyion thanks we are spending too much on the military - [https://news.gallup.com/poll/228137/americans-not-convinced-needs-spend-defense.aspx]		*USA poll - about 1/3 of the populatyion thanks we are spending too much on the military - [https://news.gallup.com/poll/228137/americans-not-convinced-needs-spend-defense.aspx]
			*Aircraft carriers are acceptable politically due to their high effectiveness to cost ratio - [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2016/09/20/five-reasons-the-navys-aircraft-carriers-are-becoming-more-vital-to-u-s-security/amp/]

Marcin: Created page with "*USA poll - about 1/3 of the populatyion thanks we are spending too much on the military - [https://news.gallup.com/poll/228137/americans-not-convinced-needs-spend-defense.aspx]"

2019-04-15T15:52:59Z

Created page with "*USA poll - about 1/3 of the populatyion thanks we are spending too much on the military - [https://news.gallup.com/poll/228137/americans-not-convinced-needs-spend-defense.aspx]"

New page

*USA poll - about 1/3 of the populatyion thanks we are spending too much on the military - [https://news.gallup.com/poll/228137/americans-not-convinced-needs-spend-defense.aspx]