OSE Enterprise Brainstorming - Revision history

Marcin: /* OSE Narrative */

2019-02-20T17:13:13Z

OSE Narrative

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 20 February 2019
Line 40:		Line 40:
	*Most likely to succeed if poeple have a direct stake, if the project is not too hard. Cordless drill qualifies.		*Most likely to succeed if poeple have a direct stake, if the project is not too hard. Cordless drill qualifies.
	*Can a cordless drill be a breakthrough?		*Can a cordless drill be a breakthrough?

			=Summary of Value Proposition=
			*Creating a new industry by open source production engineering, distributed quality control, and access to supply chains.
			*Creating lifetime design as the norm
			*10x overall lower cost

	[[Category:HeroX]][[Category:Incentive Challenge]]		[[Category:HeroX]][[Category:Incentive Challenge]]

Marcin: /* OSE Narrative */

2019-02-20T17:11:12Z

OSE Narrative

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 20 February 2019
Line 23:		Line 23:
	What are known ways to use crowd development to achieve public-interest results? How can we innovate on this?		What are known ways to use crowd development to achieve public-interest results? How can we innovate on this?

	Ideally, a crowd-supported project would involve ~~interested stakeholders~~ providing sufficient development support to bring a product to market. Ideally, an incentive prize element exists, such that contributors are incentivized. It must likewise guarantee long-term involvement for continuity, thus a stable platform like [[OSE Clubs]]. It must include education, so we are creating a new culture.		Ideally, a crowd-supported project would involve:
			*Strong Stakeholders providing sufficient development support to bring a product to market.
			*Ideally, an incentive prize element exists, such that contributors are incentivized.
			*It must likewise guarantee long-term involvement for continuity, thus a stable platform like [[OSE Clubs]].
			*It must include education, so we are creating a new culture.
	*Prize must be sufficiently high to incentivize many people		*Prize must be sufficiently high to incentivize many people
			*A new industry should be built as a result - open source cordless drill industry.
			*Outcome is a lifetime design product - that is the main incentive.
	*Problem must be too difficult for a single person in order to produce a comprehensive product: it's not possible for a single person to do everything. Thus, incentive must reward collaboration.		*Problem must be too difficult for a single person in order to produce a comprehensive product: it's not possible for a single person to do everything. Thus, incentive must reward collaboration.
	*How to reward collaboration?		*How to reward collaboration? First, set up documentation platform, and use only open tools
	*Prize is divided for partial contributions		*Prize is divided for partial contributions
	*Issue: prize division may disincentivize people		*Issue: prize division may disincentivize people. Solution: non-gameable prize structure, with ample enough prize that many people are rewarded.
	*Issue: not easy for someone to tackle a problem that is too big. Would this incentivize ethical contributors?		*Issue: not easy for someone to tackle a problem that is too big. Would this incentivize ethical contributors?
	*Central issue is how to select for ethical contributors. May be impossible.		*Central issue is how to select for ethical contributors. May be impossible.
Line 35:		Line 40:
	*Most likely to succeed if poeple have a direct stake, if the project is not too hard. Cordless drill qualifies.		*Most likely to succeed if poeple have a direct stake, if the project is not too hard. Cordless drill qualifies.
	*Can a cordless drill be a breakthrough?		*Can a cordless drill be a breakthrough?

			[[Category:HeroX]][[Category:Incentive Challenge]]

	=Learnings=		=Learnings=

Marcin at 17:07, 20 February 2019

2019-02-20T17:07:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:07, 20 February 2019
Line 23:		Line 23:
	What are known ways to use crowd development to achieve public-interest results? How can we innovate on this?		What are known ways to use crowd development to achieve public-interest results? How can we innovate on this?

	Ideally, a crowd-supported project would involve interested stakeholders providing sufficient development support to bring a product to market. Ideally, an incentive prize element exists, such that contributors are incentivized.		Ideally, a crowd-supported project would involve interested stakeholders providing sufficient development support to bring a product to market. Ideally, an incentive prize element exists, such that contributors are incentivized. It must likewise guarantee long-term involvement for continuity, thus a stable platform like [[OSE Clubs]]. It must include education, so we are creating a new culture.

	*Prize must be sufficiently high to incentivize many people		*Prize must be sufficiently high to incentivize many people
	*Problem must be too difficult for a single person		*Problem must be too difficult for a single person in order to produce a comprehensive product: it's not possible for a single person to do everything. Thus, incentive must reward collaboration.
			*How to reward collaboration?
	*Prize is divided for partial contributions		*Prize is divided for partial contributions
	*Issue: prize division may disincentivize people		*Issue: prize division may disincentivize people
Line 32:		Line 33:
	*Central issue is how to select for ethical contributors. May be impossible.		*Central issue is how to select for ethical contributors. May be impossible.
	*Ideally, we focus millions of otherwise tinkering individuals towards a common goal.		*Ideally, we focus millions of otherwise tinkering individuals towards a common goal.
	*~~Only possible~~ if ~~they~~ have a direct stake, if the project is not too hard. Cordless drill qualifies.		*Most likely to succeed if poeple have a direct stake, if the project is not too hard. Cordless drill qualifies.
	*Can a cordless drill be a breakthrough?		*Can a cordless drill be a breakthrough?

Marcin: /* OSE Narrative */

2019-02-20T16:57:01Z

OSE Narrative

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 20 February 2019
Line 19:		Line 19:
	*[[CAD Crowd]] - post challenges online. Most interesting is that people post private challenges online. [https://www.cadcrowd.com/projects]		*[[CAD Crowd]] - post challenges online. Most interesting is that people post private challenges online. [https://www.cadcrowd.com/projects]

			*https://www.kkooee.com/about-us - engineers crowdsourced
	=OSE Narrative=		=OSE Narrative=
	What are known ways to use crowd development to achieve public-interest results? How can we innovate on this?		What are known ways to use crowd development to achieve public-interest results? How can we innovate on this?

	Ideally, a crowd-supported project would involve interested stakeholders providing sufficient development support to bring a product to market. Ideally, an incentive prize element exists, such that contributors are incentivized.		Ideally, a crowd-supported project would involve interested stakeholders providing sufficient development support to bring a product to market. Ideally, an incentive prize element exists, such that contributors are incentivized.

			*Prize must be sufficiently high to incentivize many people
			*Problem must be too difficult for a single person
			*Prize is divided for partial contributions
			*Issue: prize division may disincentivize people
			*Issue: not easy for someone to tackle a problem that is too big. Would this incentivize ethical contributors?
			*Central issue is how to select for ethical contributors. May be impossible.
			*Ideally, we focus millions of otherwise tinkering individuals towards a common goal.
			*Only possible if they have a direct stake, if the project is not too hard. Cordless drill qualifies.
			*Can a cordless drill be a breakthrough?

	=Learnings=		=Learnings=

Marcin at 16:40, 20 February 2019

2019-02-20T16:40:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:40, 20 February 2019
Line 17:		Line 17:
	*[[OpenIDEO]] model - someone funds a challenge. Public design. Private enclosure of results (no requirement on result openness). [https://www.openideo.com/approach]		*[[OpenIDEO]] model - someone funds a challenge. Public design. Private enclosure of results (no requirement on result openness). [https://www.openideo.com/approach]
	*[[Idea Connection]] - [https://www.ideaconnection.com/] - Open innovation for proprietary enclosure.		*[[Idea Connection]] - [https://www.ideaconnection.com/] - Open innovation for proprietary enclosure.
			*[[CAD Crowd]] - post challenges online. Most interesting is that people post private challenges online. [https://www.cadcrowd.com/projects]

	=OSE Narrative=		=OSE Narrative=
	What are known ways to use crowd development to achieve public-interest results? How can we innovate on this?		What are known ways to use crowd development to achieve public-interest results? How can we innovate on this?

Marcin at 16:33, 20 February 2019

2019-02-20T16:33:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:33, 20 February 2019
Line 14:		Line 14:
	*[[L'Atelier Paysan]] - model of proprietary development of agriculture tools.		*[[L'Atelier Paysan]] - model of proprietary development of agriculture tools.
	*[[China Model of Innovation and Technology Transfer]] - develop and disseminate best practice to ALL companies		*[[China Model of Innovation and Technology Transfer]] - develop and disseminate best practice to ALL companies
	*[[Innocentive]] model - you put up a prize. They help you formulate the problem statement. Can that be crowd funded in addition to Innocentive? No reqiurement of open results.		*[[Innocentive]] model - you put up a prize. They help you formulate the problem statement. Can that be crowd funded in addition to Innocentive? No reqiurement of open results. [https://www.innocentive.com/about-us/]
	*[[OpenIDEO]] model - someone funds a challenge. Public design. Private enclosure of results (no requirement on result openness). [https://www.openideo.com/approach]		*[[OpenIDEO]] model - someone funds a challenge. Public design. Private enclosure of results (no requirement on result openness). [https://www.openideo.com/approach]
	*[[Idea Connection]] - [https://www.ideaconnection.com/] - Open innovation for proprietary enclosure.		*[[Idea Connection]] - [https://www.ideaconnection.com/] - Open innovation for proprietary enclosure.

Marcin at 16:31, 20 February 2019

2019-02-20T16:31:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:31, 20 February 2019
Line 16:		Line 16:
	*[[Innocentive]] model - you put up a prize. They help you formulate the problem statement. Can that be crowd funded in addition to Innocentive? No reqiurement of open results.		*[[Innocentive]] model - you put up a prize. They help you formulate the problem statement. Can that be crowd funded in addition to Innocentive? No reqiurement of open results.
	*[[OpenIDEO]] model - someone funds a challenge. Public design. Private enclosure of results (no requirement on result openness). [https://www.openideo.com/approach]		*[[OpenIDEO]] model - someone funds a challenge. Public design. Private enclosure of results (no requirement on result openness). [https://www.openideo.com/approach]
			*[[Idea Connection]] - [https://www.ideaconnection.com/] - Open innovation for proprietary enclosure.
	=OSE Narrative=		=OSE Narrative=
	What are known ways to use crowd development to achieve public-interest results? How can we innovate on this?		What are known ways to use crowd development to achieve public-interest results? How can we innovate on this?

Marcin at 16:29, 20 February 2019

2019-02-20T16:29:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 20 February 2019
Line 15:		Line 15:
	*[[China Model of Innovation and Technology Transfer]] - develop and disseminate best practice to ALL companies		*[[China Model of Innovation and Technology Transfer]] - develop and disseminate best practice to ALL companies
	*[[Innocentive]] model - you put up a prize. They help you formulate the problem statement. Can that be crowd funded in addition to Innocentive? No reqiurement of open results.		*[[Innocentive]] model - you put up a prize. They help you formulate the problem statement. Can that be crowd funded in addition to Innocentive? No reqiurement of open results.
	*[[OpenIDEO]] model - someone funds a challenge. Public design. Private enclosure of results (no requirement on result openness).		*[[OpenIDEO]] model - someone funds a challenge. Public design. Private enclosure of results (no requirement on result openness). [https://www.openideo.com/approach]

	=OSE Narrative=		=OSE Narrative=

Marcin at 16:29, 20 February 2019

2019-02-20T16:29:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 20 February 2019
Line 13:		Line 13:
	*[[GrabCAD]] - incentive challenges - designs remain free.		*[[GrabCAD]] - incentive challenges - designs remain free.
	*[[L'Atelier Paysan]] - model of proprietary development of agriculture tools.		*[[L'Atelier Paysan]] - model of proprietary development of agriculture tools.
			*[[China Model of Innovation and Technology Transfer]] - develop and disseminate best practice to ALL companies
			*[[Innocentive]] model - you put up a prize. They help you formulate the problem statement. Can that be crowd funded in addition to Innocentive? No reqiurement of open results.
			*[[OpenIDEO]] model - someone funds a challenge. Public design. Private enclosure of results (no requirement on result openness).

	=OSE Narrative=		=OSE Narrative=

Marcin: /* Learnings */

2019-02-20T16:16:21Z

Learnings

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:16, 20 February 2019
Line 22:		Line 22:

	*99 Designs - ''We find that higher financial incentives do not translate to more effort by individual designers, but nonetheless have an impact on the quality outcome of contests by attracting a larger pool of designers'' - [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256484454_99designs_An_Analysis_of_Creative_Competition_in_Crowdsourced_Design]		*99 Designs - ''We find that higher financial incentives do not translate to more effort by individual designers, but nonetheless have an impact on the quality outcome of contests by attracting a larger pool of designers'' - [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256484454_99designs_An_Analysis_of_Creative_Competition_in_Crowdsourced_Design]
	*Interesting HeroX challenge - $1M student space rocket challenge. [https://spaceq.ca/herox-helps-bring-base-11-1-million-student-rocket-challenge-to-canada/]		*Interesting HeroX challenge - $1M student space rocket challenge. Organized by Base 11. [https://spaceq.ca/herox-helps-bring-base-11-1-million-student-rocket-challenge-to-canada/]