OSE License for Distributive Enterprise - Revision history

Marcin at 22:35, 18 January 2017

2017-01-18T22:35:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:35, 18 January 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Intent=		=Intent=
	The intent of the OSE License for Distributive entrprise is to be completely open source, [[OSHWA]] compliant, and to emphasize the economic goals of distributing the production of wealth. We believe that by unleashing economically significant information - distributed economies will be more regenerative and environmentally sounds - due to improved feedback loops between more localized production and more localized natural resources. The assumption is that an economy has an optimal scale - if wealth distribution is concerned - and the scale of critical material production should not be global, but more localized. While we believe that trade is good, we also believe that a more localized economic system is more resilient from shocks and from manipulation by third parties. ~~That is~~ obvious, by definition.		The intent of the OSE License for Distributive entrprise is to be completely open source, [[OSHWA]] compliant, and to emphasize the economic goals of distributing the production of wealth. We believe that by unleashing economically significant information - distributed economies will be more regenerative and environmentally sounds - due to improved feedback loops between more localized production and more localized natural resources. The assumption is that an economy has an optimal scale - if wealth distribution is concerned - and the scale of critical material production should not be global, but more localized. While we believe that trade is good, we also believe that a more localized economic system is more resilient from shocks and from manipulation by third parties. The last statement appears obvious, by definition.

	=Economic Feedback Loops=		=Economic Feedback Loops=

Marcin at 22:34, 18 January 2017

2017-01-18T22:34:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:34, 18 January 2017
Line 13:		Line 13:
	In sum, we believe that open source hardware enterprises are the future - because they create better products - in all ways that 'better' can be defined. Better means lower cost, robust, highly efficient and optimized, more flexible, made from local and recycled materials, designed for lifetime, not obsolescence. Industrial productivity can be achieved on a small scale, and that knowhow can be distributed.		In sum, we believe that open source hardware enterprises are the future - because they create better products - in all ways that 'better' can be defined. Better means lower cost, robust, highly efficient and optimized, more flexible, made from local and recycled materials, designed for lifetime, not obsolescence. Industrial productivity can be achieved on a small scale, and that knowhow can be distributed.

	To ~~describe how~~ the current economic system ~~sucks to one~~ of ~~its fervent supporters~~ is like trying to convince people that the earth spins around the sun before Copernicus.		To convince a fervent mainstream economist that the current economic system has essential flaws in its notions of Intelletual Property - is like trying to convince people that the earth spins around the sun before Copernicus. There will be no convincing - just compelling - with evidence of [[Distributive Enterprise]] taking hold.

			Are you up to the challenge?

Marcin at 22:31, 18 January 2017

2017-01-18T22:31:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 18 January 2017
Line 12:		Line 12:

	In sum, we believe that open source hardware enterprises are the future - because they create better products - in all ways that 'better' can be defined. Better means lower cost, robust, highly efficient and optimized, more flexible, made from local and recycled materials, designed for lifetime, not obsolescence. Industrial productivity can be achieved on a small scale, and that knowhow can be distributed.		In sum, we believe that open source hardware enterprises are the future - because they create better products - in all ways that 'better' can be defined. Better means lower cost, robust, highly efficient and optimized, more flexible, made from local and recycled materials, designed for lifetime, not obsolescence. Industrial productivity can be achieved on a small scale, and that knowhow can be distributed.

			To describe how the current economic system sucks to one of its fervent supporters is like trying to convince people that the earth spins around the sun before Copernicus.

Marcin: /* Economic Feedback Loops */

2017-01-18T22:29:21Z

Economic Feedback Loops

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:29, 18 January 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:

	In the Distributive Enterprise model, collaborative development zeroes out many costs via volunteer effort - and everyone benefits by gaining access to products. In principle, Distributive Enerprises can scale virally - if they provide better marketability. We believed that improved marketability can occur by more environmentally friendly, economically distributive, flexible, lifetime design products.		In the Distributive Enterprise model, collaborative development zeroes out many costs via volunteer effort - and everyone benefits by gaining access to products. In principle, Distributive Enerprises can scale virally - if they provide better marketability. We believed that improved marketability can occur by more environmentally friendly, economically distributive, flexible, lifetime design products.

			To promote large-scale uptake of open source product development towards significant global impact, we believe that [[Distributive Enterprise]] is the key that takes us there. We believe that this is inevitable, and we believe that the first solid example of this - created within the context of the currect economomy - will disrupt the current economy. We believe that to be substance for a Nobel peace prize or equivalent, as eliminating artificial scarcity from the human economic system has the potential to end resource conflicts and other ills based on material scarcity.

	In sum, we believe that open source hardware enterprises are the future - because they create better products - in all ways that 'better' can be defined. Better means lower cost, robust, highly efficient and optimized, more flexible, made from local and recycled materials, designed for lifetime, not obsolescence. Industrial productivity can be achieved on a small scale, and that knowhow can be distributed.		In sum, we believe that open source hardware enterprises are the future - because they create better products - in all ways that 'better' can be defined. Better means lower cost, robust, highly efficient and optimized, more flexible, made from local and recycled materials, designed for lifetime, not obsolescence. Industrial productivity can be achieved on a small scale, and that knowhow can be distributed.

Marcin: Created page with "=Intent= The intent of the OSE License for Distributive entrprise is to be completely open source, OSHWA compliant, and to emphasize the economic goals of distributing the..."

2017-01-18T22:25:46Z

Created page with "=Intent= The intent of the OSE License for Distributive entrprise is to be completely open source, OSHWA compliant, and to emphasize the economic goals of distributing the..."

New page

=Intent=
The intent of the OSE License for Distributive entrprise is to be completely open source, [[OSHWA]] compliant, and to emphasize the economic goals of distributing the production of wealth. We believe that by unleashing economically significant information - distributed economies will be more regenerative and environmentally sounds - due to improved feedback loops between more localized production and more localized natural resources. The assumption is that an economy has an optimal scale - if wealth distribution is concerned - and the scale of critical material production should not be global, but more localized. While we believe that trade is good, we also believe that a more localized economic system is more resilient from shocks and from manipulation by third parties. That is obvious, by definition.

=Economic Feedback Loops=
We believe that all information should be free, to optimize the distribution of wealth. Currently, the global market system is optimized for the production of wealth, at the expense of both distribution of wealth and of environmental degradation. If we create a truly competitive (no protectionism) enterprise system - how do people create wealth? Abundantly, as nobody has an unfair advantage - or nobody can manipulate the system to socialize costs and privatize the benefits.

Can a truly open source, [[Distributive Enterprise]] scale? Yes, and its business model is not based on monetizing intellectual property. In one scenario, intellectual property is used for competitive advantage, profits are large, and costs are large. In the open source production scenario, costs go down, and society in general transitions to less energy spent procuring a certain lifestyle. So a transition can begin towards self-determination. The leading mechanism for a transition to self-determination is the lessening of negative marketing - such as that leading to deathly diet, bad health due to stress, consumerism, fear-mongering for militarism.

In the Distributive Enterprise model, collaborative development zeroes out many costs via volunteer effort - and everyone benefits by gaining access to products. In principle, Distributive Enerprises can scale virally - if they provide better marketability. We believed that improved marketability can occur by more environmentally friendly, economically distributive, flexible, lifetime design products.

In sum, we believe that open source hardware enterprises are the future - because they create better products - in all ways that 'better' can be defined. Better means lower cost, robust, highly efficient and optimized, more flexible, made from local and recycled materials, designed for lifetime, not obsolescence. Industrial productivity can be achieved on a small scale, and that knowhow can be distributed.