OSE Platform - Revision history

Marcin: /* Specifics, 2022 */

2022-04-13T22:06:49Z

Specifics, 2022

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:06, 13 April 2022
Line 2:		Line 2:
	*'''Open Source Microfactory''' (OSM) - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future where nobody is left behind. It is how we not fund oppressive regimes when we're addicted to their goods. Only access to the open source microfactory paradigm in the broad sense can ensure the world of access to independence - of an option to not compromise ourselves because of our dependence. For the OSM to work, a billion or so in funding can produce 1000 goods, which can proliferate towards [[Distributed Market Substitution]] of all goods.		*'''Open Source Microfactory''' (OSM) - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future where nobody is left behind. It is how we not fund oppressive regimes when we're addicted to their goods. Only access to the open source microfactory paradigm in the broad sense can ensure the world of access to independence - of an option to not compromise ourselves because of our dependence. For the OSM to work, a billion or so in funding can produce 1000 goods, which can proliferate towards [[Distributed Market Substitution]] of all goods.
	*'''Regenerative Housing''' - to make housing not decrease biodiversity loss or tree cover loss, zero energy so it contributes nothing to global warming, and wastewater systems that serve as fertilizer for local biological production. Homes that produce fuel for cars, and products for industry. How zero tree loss? If you take it down, replant it. Edible and natural landscaping. How zero energy? Enough PV and wind power to provide all energy needs.		*'''Regenerative Housing''' - to make housing not decrease biodiversity loss or tree cover loss, zero energy so it contributes nothing to global warming, and wastewater systems that serve as fertilizer for local biological production. Homes that produce fuel for cars, and products for industry. How zero tree loss? If you take it down, replant it. Edible and natural landscaping. How zero energy? Enough PV and wind power to provide all energy needs.
	*'''Time Liberation''' - most of production in society (goods, services) are quite inefficient, which we are correcting in the Seed Eco-Home project for a house that is the easiest, highest quality house possible to build. However, its this un-ease that is key to preventing the Promise of Technology - ie, that each person's life becomes less complicated and more enjoyable. Instead, tremendous amounts of time are spent on non-lifetime-design goods - which require constant maintenance. The solution is designing the technosphere in such a way that people have to work less to accomplish the same goals of a quality life. This is largely a shift in mindset, and if accepted, allows for un-jobbing much earlier in one's career.		*'''Time Liberation''' - most of production in society (goods, services) are quite inefficient, which we are correcting in the Seed Eco-Home project for a house that is the easiest, highest quality house possible to build. However, its this un-ease that is key to preventing the Promise of Technology - ie, that each person's life becomes less complicated and more enjoyable. Instead, tremendous amounts of time are spent on non-lifetime-design goods - which require constant maintenance. The solution is designing the technosphere in such a way that people have to work less to accomplish the same goals of a quality life. This is largely a shift in mindset, and if accepted, allows for un-jobbing much earlier in one's career. OSE addresses this point by providing easy-to-build and maintain designs, products and services. This is the OSE [[Respects Your Time]] certification.
	*[[Outstanding USA Issues]]		*[[Outstanding USA Issues]]

Marcin: /* Specifics, 2022 */

2022-04-13T22:05:04Z

Specifics, 2022

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:05, 13 April 2022
Line 2:		Line 2:
	*'''Open Source Microfactory''' (OSM) - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future where nobody is left behind. It is how we not fund oppressive regimes when we're addicted to their goods. Only access to the open source microfactory paradigm in the broad sense can ensure the world of access to independence - of an option to not compromise ourselves because of our dependence. For the OSM to work, a billion or so in funding can produce 1000 goods, which can proliferate towards [[Distributed Market Substitution]] of all goods.		*'''Open Source Microfactory''' (OSM) - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future where nobody is left behind. It is how we not fund oppressive regimes when we're addicted to their goods. Only access to the open source microfactory paradigm in the broad sense can ensure the world of access to independence - of an option to not compromise ourselves because of our dependence. For the OSM to work, a billion or so in funding can produce 1000 goods, which can proliferate towards [[Distributed Market Substitution]] of all goods.
	*'''Regenerative Housing''' - to make housing not decrease biodiversity loss or tree cover loss, zero energy so it contributes nothing to global warming, and wastewater systems that serve as fertilizer for local biological production. Homes that produce fuel for cars, and products for industry. How zero tree loss? If you take it down, replant it. Edible and natural landscaping. How zero energy? Enough PV and wind power to provide all energy needs.		*'''Regenerative Housing''' - to make housing not decrease biodiversity loss or tree cover loss, zero energy so it contributes nothing to global warming, and wastewater systems that serve as fertilizer for local biological production. Homes that produce fuel for cars, and products for industry. How zero tree loss? If you take it down, replant it. Edible and natural landscaping. How zero energy? Enough PV and wind power to provide all energy needs.
	*'''Time Liberation''' - most of production in society (goods, services) are quite inefficient, which we are correcting in the Seed Eco-Home project for a house that is the easiest, highest quality house possible.		*'''Time Liberation''' - most of production in society (goods, services) are quite inefficient, which we are correcting in the Seed Eco-Home project for a house that is the easiest, highest quality house possible to build. However, its this un-ease that is key to preventing the Promise of Technology - ie, that each person's life becomes less complicated and more enjoyable. Instead, tremendous amounts of time are spent on non-lifetime-design goods - which require constant maintenance. The solution is designing the technosphere in such a way that people have to work less to accomplish the same goals of a quality life. This is largely a shift in mindset, and if accepted, allows for un-jobbing much earlier in one's career.
	*[[Outstanding USA Issues]]		*[[Outstanding USA Issues]]

Marcin: /* Specifics, 2022 */

2022-04-13T22:02:05Z

Specifics, 2022

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 13 April 2022
Line 2:		Line 2:
	*'''Open Source Microfactory''' (OSM) - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future where nobody is left behind. It is how we not fund oppressive regimes when we're addicted to their goods. Only access to the open source microfactory paradigm in the broad sense can ensure the world of access to independence - of an option to not compromise ourselves because of our dependence. For the OSM to work, a billion or so in funding can produce 1000 goods, which can proliferate towards [[Distributed Market Substitution]] of all goods.		*'''Open Source Microfactory''' (OSM) - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future where nobody is left behind. It is how we not fund oppressive regimes when we're addicted to their goods. Only access to the open source microfactory paradigm in the broad sense can ensure the world of access to independence - of an option to not compromise ourselves because of our dependence. For the OSM to work, a billion or so in funding can produce 1000 goods, which can proliferate towards [[Distributed Market Substitution]] of all goods.
	*'''Regenerative Housing''' - to make housing not decrease biodiversity loss or tree cover loss, zero energy so it contributes nothing to global warming, and wastewater systems that serve as fertilizer for local biological production. Homes that produce fuel for cars, and products for industry. How zero tree loss? If you take it down, replant it. Edible and natural landscaping. How zero energy? Enough PV and wind power to provide all energy needs.		*'''Regenerative Housing''' - to make housing not decrease biodiversity loss or tree cover loss, zero energy so it contributes nothing to global warming, and wastewater systems that serve as fertilizer for local biological production. Homes that produce fuel for cars, and products for industry. How zero tree loss? If you take it down, replant it. Edible and natural landscaping. How zero energy? Enough PV and wind power to provide all energy needs.
			*'''Time Liberation''' - most of production in society (goods, services) are quite inefficient, which we are correcting in the Seed Eco-Home project for a house that is the easiest, highest quality house possible.
	*[[Outstanding USA Issues]]		*[[Outstanding USA Issues]]

Marcin: /* Specifics, 2022 */

2022-04-13T20:14:51Z

Specifics, 2022

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 13 April 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Specifics, 2022=		=Specifics, 2022=
	*'''Open Source Microfactory''' (OSM) - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future where nobody is left behind. It is how we not fund oppressive regimes when we're addicted to their goods. Only access to the open source microfactory paradigm in the broad sense can ensure the world of access to independence - of an option to not compromise ourselves because of our dependence. For the OSM to work, a billion or so in funding can produce 1000 goods, which can proliferate towards [[Distributed Market Substitution]] of all goods.		*'''Open Source Microfactory''' (OSM) - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future where nobody is left behind. It is how we not fund oppressive regimes when we're addicted to their goods. Only access to the open source microfactory paradigm in the broad sense can ensure the world of access to independence - of an option to not compromise ourselves because of our dependence. For the OSM to work, a billion or so in funding can produce 1000 goods, which can proliferate towards [[Distributed Market Substitution]] of all goods.
	*Regenerative Housing - to make housing not decrease biodiversity loss or tree cover loss, zero energy so it contributes nothing to global warming, and wastewater systems that serve as fertilizer for local biological production. Homes that produce fuel for cars, and products for industry.		*'''Regenerative Housing''' - to make housing not decrease biodiversity loss or tree cover loss, zero energy so it contributes nothing to global warming, and wastewater systems that serve as fertilizer for local biological production. Homes that produce fuel for cars, and products for industry. How zero tree loss? If you take it down, replant it. Edible and natural landscaping. How zero energy? Enough PV and wind power to provide all energy needs.
	*[[Outstanding USA Issues]]		*[[Outstanding USA Issues]]

Marcin: /* Specifics, 2022 */

2022-04-13T20:13:49Z

Specifics, 2022

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:13, 13 April 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Specifics, 2022=		=Specifics, 2022=
	*'''Open Source Microfactory''' (OSM) - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future where nobody is left behind. It is how we not fund oppressive regimes when we're addicted to their goods. Only access to the open source microfactory paradigm in the broad sense can ensure the world of access to independence - of an option to not compromise ourselves because of our dependence. For the OSM to work, a billion or so in funding can produce 1000 goods, which can proliferate towards [[Distributed Market Substitution]] of all goods.		*'''Open Source Microfactory''' (OSM) - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future where nobody is left behind. It is how we not fund oppressive regimes when we're addicted to their goods. Only access to the open source microfactory paradigm in the broad sense can ensure the world of access to independence - of an option to not compromise ourselves because of our dependence. For the OSM to work, a billion or so in funding can produce 1000 goods, which can proliferate towards [[Distributed Market Substitution]] of all goods.
			*Regenerative Housing - to make housing not decrease biodiversity loss or tree cover loss, zero energy so it contributes nothing to global warming, and wastewater systems that serve as fertilizer for local biological production. Homes that produce fuel for cars, and products for industry.
	*[[Outstanding USA Issues]]		*[[Outstanding USA Issues]]

Marcin: /* Specifics, 2022 */

2022-04-13T19:58:46Z

Specifics, 2022

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 13 April 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Specifics, 2022=		=Specifics, 2022=
	*'''Open Source Microfactory''' (OSM) - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future where nobody is left behind. It is how we not fund oppressive regimes when we're addicted to their goods. Only access to the open source microfactory paradigm in the broad sense can ensure the world of access to independence - of an option to not compromise ourselves because of our dependence. For the OSM to work, a billion or so in funding can produce 1000 goods, which can proliferate towards [[Distributed Market Substitution]] of all goods.		*'''Open Source Microfactory''' (OSM) - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future where nobody is left behind. It is how we not fund oppressive regimes when we're addicted to their goods. Only access to the open source microfactory paradigm in the broad sense can ensure the world of access to independence - of an option to not compromise ourselves because of our dependence. For the OSM to work, a billion or so in funding can produce 1000 goods, which can proliferate towards [[Distributed Market Substitution]] of all goods.
			*[[Outstanding USA Issues]]

	=Introduction, 2016=		=Introduction, 2016=

Marcin: /* Specifics, 2022 */

2022-04-13T19:41:35Z

Specifics, 2022

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:41, 13 April 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Specifics, 2022=		=Specifics, 2022=
	*Open Source Microfactory - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future where nobody is left behind. It is how we not fund oppressive regimes when we're addicted to their goods. Only access to the open source microfactory paradigm in the broad sense can ensure the world of access to independence - of an option to not compromise ourselves because of our dependence.		*'''Open Source Microfactory''' (OSM) - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future where nobody is left behind. It is how we not fund oppressive regimes when we're addicted to their goods. Only access to the open source microfactory paradigm in the broad sense can ensure the world of access to independence - of an option to not compromise ourselves because of our dependence. For the OSM to work, a billion or so in funding can produce 1000 goods, which can proliferate towards [[Distributed Market Substitution]] of all goods.

	=Introduction, 2016=		=Introduction, 2016=

Marcin: /* Specifics, 2022 */

2022-04-13T19:40:39Z

Specifics, 2022

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:40, 13 April 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Specifics, 2022=		=Specifics, 2022=
	*Open Source Microfactory - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future where nobody is left behind. It is how we not fund oppressive regimes when we're addicted to their goods. Only access to the open source microfactory paradigm in the broad sense can ensure the world of an option to not compromise ourselves because of our dependence.		*Open Source Microfactory - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future where nobody is left behind. It is how we not fund oppressive regimes when we're addicted to their goods. Only access to the open source microfactory paradigm in the broad sense can ensure the world of access to independence - of an option to not compromise ourselves because of our dependence.

	=Introduction, 2016=		=Introduction, 2016=

Marcin: /* Specifics, 2022 */

2022-04-13T19:40:21Z

Specifics, 2022

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:40, 13 April 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Specifics, 2022=		=Specifics, 2022=
	*Open Source Microfactory - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future where nobody is left behind.		*Open Source Microfactory - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future where nobody is left behind. It is how we not fund oppressive regimes when we're addicted to their goods. Only access to the open source microfactory paradigm in the broad sense can ensure the world of an option to not compromise ourselves because of our dependence.

	=Introduction, 2016=		=Introduction, 2016=

Marcin: /* Specifics, 2022 */

2022-04-13T19:23:43Z

Specifics, 2022

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:23, 13 April 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Specifics, 2022=		=Specifics, 2022=
	*Open Source Microfactory - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future.		*Open Source Microfactory - just like China gained manufacturing dominance from 1980-2020, so must the world move on to the next paradigm. With open source microfactories, fueled by collaborative design - which leverages global collaboration for improving product quality while solving for the distribution of wealth. This is especially pressing when [[Chinese Opium]], Chinese human rights violations, and potential territorial aggression are at risk. It is a case where a global superpower, a non-democratic one - should cease to be funded by everyone who buys its goods. This is not to exclude China - but to include China in a new paradigm where countries and cities produce all that they need. This allows for more resilient economies which contribute less to global geopolitical power struggles. The open source microfactory concept is not a hippie ideal - it is a moral imperative for a democratic world of the future where nobody is left behind.

	=Introduction, 2016=		=Introduction, 2016=