On Freedom - Revision history

Marcin: /* Notes */

2024-12-03T16:09:26Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:09, 3 December 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:

	=Notes=		=Notes=
			*Friedrich Hayek rightly insisted that the government break up monopolies, which he said were no better than Soviet central planning.
	*You cannot be a better parent than the structures around you permit you to be.		*You cannot be a better parent than the structures around you permit you to be.
	*When Kościuszko was finally compensated with an estate, well after the war, he asked his friend Thomas Jefferson to sell it to manumit and educate slaves (including Jefferson’s).		*When Kościuszko was finally compensated with an estate, well after the war, he asked his friend Thomas Jefferson to sell it to manumit and educate slaves (including Jefferson’s).

Marcin: /* Notes */

2024-12-03T16:05:41Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:05, 3 December 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:

	=Notes=		=Notes=
			*You cannot be a better parent than the structures around you permit you to be.
	*When Kościuszko was finally compensated with an estate, well after the war, he asked his friend Thomas Jefferson to sell it to manumit and educate slaves (including Jefferson’s).		*When Kościuszko was finally compensated with an estate, well after the war, he asked his friend Thomas Jefferson to sell it to manumit and educate slaves (including Jefferson’s).
	*To regard freedom as central is liberal. The conviction that freedom is about virtues is conservative. The belief that structures gird values is socialist.		*To regard freedom as central is liberal. The conviction that freedom is about virtues is conservative. The belief that structures gird values is socialist.

Marcin: /* Notes */

2024-12-03T14:57:11Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 3 December 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:

	=Notes=		=Notes=
			*When Kościuszko was finally compensated with an estate, well after the war, he asked his friend Thomas Jefferson to sell it to manumit and educate slaves (including Jefferson’s).
	*To regard freedom as central is liberal. The conviction that freedom is about virtues is conservative. The belief that structures gird values is socialist.		*To regard freedom as central is liberal. The conviction that freedom is about virtues is conservative. The belief that structures gird values is socialist.
	*If the Right can accept that a concept needs structures, and the Left that structures need a concept, then freedom could become the basis of a broad agreement about the structure of government in the United States		*If the Right can accept that a concept needs structures, and the Left that structures need a concept, then freedom could become the basis of a broad agreement about the structure of government in the United States

Marcin: /* Notes */

2024-12-03T02:07:48Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:07, 3 December 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:

	=Notes=		=Notes=
			*To regard freedom as central is liberal. The conviction that freedom is about virtues is conservative. The belief that structures gird values is socialist.
	*If the Right can accept that a concept needs structures, and the Left that structures need a concept, then freedom could become the basis of a broad agreement about the structure of government in the United States		*If the Right can accept that a concept needs structures, and the Left that structures need a concept, then freedom could become the basis of a broad agreement about the structure of government in the United States
	*The space between what is and what ought to be is where we roam as free people, extending the borderland of the unpredictable		*The space between what is and what ought to be is where we roam as free people, extending the borderland of the unpredictable

Marcin: /* Notes */

2024-12-03T02:06:15Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 3 December 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:

	=Notes=		=Notes=
			*If the Right can accept that a concept needs structures, and the Left that structures need a concept, then freedom could become the basis of a broad agreement about the structure of government in the United States
	*The space between what is and what ought to be is where we roam as free people, extending the borderland of the unpredictable		*The space between what is and what ought to be is where we roam as free people, extending the borderland of the unpredictable
	*Solidarity is the mark of a just person.		*Solidarity is the mark of a just person.

Marcin: /* Notes */

2024-12-03T01:56:37Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:56, 3 December 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:

	=Notes=		=Notes=
			*The space between what is and what ought to be is where we roam as free people, extending the borderland of the unpredictable
	*Solidarity is the mark of a just person.		*Solidarity is the mark of a just person.
	*Getting at the truth requires determined and cooperative work. Factuality, in other words, depends on solidarity.		*Getting at the truth requires determined and cooperative work. Factuality, in other words, depends on solidarity.

Marcin: /* Notes */

2024-12-02T19:59:51Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:59, 2 December 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:

	=Notes=		=Notes=
			*Solidarity is the mark of a just person.
	*Getting at the truth requires determined and cooperative work. Factuality, in other words, depends on solidarity.		*Getting at the truth requires determined and cooperative work. Factuality, in other words, depends on solidarity.
	*Freedom of speech for people means safe circumstances in which to express oneself, and an opportunity to learn, so as to have something to say—which means access to journalism, access to science, access to education		*Freedom of speech for people means safe circumstances in which to express oneself, and an opportunity to learn, so as to have something to say—which means access to journalism, access to science, access to education

Marcin: /* Notes */

2024-12-02T19:57:19Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:57, 2 December 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:

	=Notes=		=Notes=
			*Getting at the truth requires determined and cooperative work. Factuality, in other words, depends on solidarity.
	*Freedom of speech for people means safe circumstances in which to express oneself, and an opportunity to learn, so as to have something to say—which means access to journalism, access to science, access to education		*Freedom of speech for people means safe circumstances in which to express oneself, and an opportunity to learn, so as to have something to say—which means access to journalism, access to science, access to education
	*Speech is not oppressed. People who speak are oppressed.		*Speech is not oppressed. People who speak are oppressed.

Marcin: /* Notes */

2024-12-02T19:56:09Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, 2 December 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:

	=Notes=		=Notes=
			*Freedom of speech for people means safe circumstances in which to express oneself, and an opportunity to learn, so as to have something to say—which means access to journalism, access to science, access to education
	*Speech is not oppressed. People who speak are oppressed.		*Speech is not oppressed. People who speak are oppressed.
	*From the most basic facts we can build a scaffolding of hope. We need to ground ourselves in history and science to take a turn toward a better future. It is all within our reach.		*From the most basic facts we can build a scaffolding of hope. We need to ground ourselves in history and science to take a turn toward a better future. It is all within our reach.

Marcin: /* Notes */

2024-12-02T19:55:04Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:55, 2 December 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:

	=Notes=		=Notes=
			*Speech is not oppressed. People who speak are oppressed.
	*From the most basic facts we can build a scaffolding of hope. We need to ground ourselves in history and science to take a turn toward a better future. It is all within our reach.		*From the most basic facts we can build a scaffolding of hope. We need to ground ourselves in history and science to take a turn toward a better future. It is all within our reach.
	*Our own materialists, the Silicon Valley ones, have followed the same trajectory as the Soviet and post-Soviet elite: they no longer promise a brighter future but instead tell us that the present is as good as it gets.		*Our own materialists, the Silicon Valley ones, have followed the same trajectory as the Soviet and post-Soviet elite: they no longer promise a brighter future but instead tell us that the present is as good as it gets.