People Showing Up - Revision history

Marcin: /* Seed Eco-Home */

2021-10-24T23:16:22Z

Seed Eco-Home

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:16, 24 October 2021
Line 24:		Line 24:
	#Finish productization of Seed Eco-Home 2 with brochure and house tours to start by year-end 2021.		#Finish productization of Seed Eco-Home 2 with brochure and house tours to start by year-end 2021.
	#Release regular Seed Eco-Home Builder Crash Courses to give people a flavor of the build and to provide more product visibility.		#Release regular Seed Eco-Home Builder Crash Courses to give people a flavor of the build and to provide more product visibility.
			#Start v2 Apprenticeship program with cohorts of 12. Once fist cohort is successful, replicate to more cohorts.

Marcin: /* Introduction */

2021-10-24T22:57:09Z

Introduction

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:57, 24 October 2021
Line 5:		Line 5:
	We have tried. From Wiki house to RepRap to FarmBot, and countless others - nobody was willing to or in a position to collaborate on creating a [[Distributive Enterprise]].		We have tried. From Wiki house to RepRap to FarmBot, and countless others - nobody was willing to or in a position to collaborate on creating a [[Distributive Enterprise]].

	Who are qualified candidates? Individuals with well-developed products, ready for commercialization.~~'''Bold text'''~~		Who are qualified candidates? Individuals with well-developed products, ready for commercialization.

	=Moving Forward=		=Moving Forward=

Marcin: /* Near Precedents */

2021-10-24T22:53:38Z

Near Precedents

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:53, 24 October 2021
Line 19:		Line 19:
	But imagine the possibility:		But imagine the possibility:
	#Collaborative development enables various companies to produce better product. Hasn't happened. Very little open source innovation occurred since 2012. As such, open source 3D printing remains in its infancy, and printing with 99% of available plastics is still not possible, printing in metal or other materials is not possible, etc - and plastic recycling for 3D printing has not materialized. All are low-hanging fruit - pending open collaboration		#Collaborative development enables various companies to produce better product. Hasn't happened. Very little open source innovation occurred since 2012. As such, open source 3D printing remains in its infancy, and printing with 99% of available plastics is still not possible, printing in metal or other materials is not possible, etc - and plastic recycling for 3D printing has not materialized. All are low-hanging fruit - pending open collaboration

			==Seed Eco-Home==
			How do we have people show up?
			#Finish productization of Seed Eco-Home 2 with brochure and house tours to start by year-end 2021.
			#Release regular Seed Eco-Home Builder Crash Courses to give people a flavor of the build and to provide more product visibility.

Marcin: /* Near Precedents */

2021-10-24T22:49:20Z

Near Precedents

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:49, 24 October 2021
Line 13:		Line 13:
	The closest example may be [[RepRap]] - though still far from any notion of true [[Distributive Enterprise]].		The closest example may be [[RepRap]] - though still far from any notion of true [[Distributive Enterprise]].

	Where did RepRap succeed? In bringing about a project. But never a product. Products came from individuals who forked and succeeded - proprietary or open. But NONE of the success stories went to the level of active collaboration on widespread enterprise incubation - a part of the [[Distributive Enterprise]] paradigm.		Where did RepRap succeed? In bringing about a project. But never a product. Products came from individuals who forked and succeeded - proprietary or open. This indeed created an entire consumer 3D printing industry - now Billions of revenue in strength - all out of the RepRap project.

			But NONE of the success stories went to the level of active collaboration on widespread enterprise incubation, collaboration, or product inprovement- a part of the [[Distributive Enterprise]] paradigm.

	But imagine the possibility:		But imagine the possibility:
	#Collaborative development enables various companies to produce better product. Hasn't happened. Very little open source innovation occurred since 2012. As such, open source 3D printing remains in its infancy, and printing with 99% of available plastics is still no possible, printing in metal or other materials is not possible, etc - and plastic recycling for 3D printing has not materialized. All are low-hanging fruit - pending open collaboration		#Collaborative development enables various companies to produce better product. Hasn't happened. Very little open source innovation occurred since 2012. As such, open source 3D printing remains in its infancy, and printing with 99% of available plastics is still not possible, printing in metal or other materials is not possible, etc - and plastic recycling for 3D printing has not materialized. All are low-hanging fruit - pending open collaboration

Marcin at 22:46, 24 October 2021

2021-10-24T22:46:37Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Transitioning from the open source ecology vision of the [[TED Talk]] to execution faces a significant challenge of [[Collaborative Literacy]], especially in its [[Economic Time Binding]] sense. The world population as of 2021 is not evolved in this sense. Thus, we found no single individual or organization to date which is interested in open source product collaboration. This means: anyone who has a product ready for commercialization (beyond initial R&D phase).
 We have tried. From Wiki house to RepRap to FarmBot, and countless others - nobody was willing to or in a position to collaborate on creating a [[Distributive Enterprise]].
-Who are qualified candidates? Individuals with well-developed products, ready for commercialization.
+Who are qualified candidates? Individuals with well-developed products, ready for commercialization.'''Bold text'''

Marcin at 22:36, 24 October 2021

2021-10-24T22:36:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:36, 24 October 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Transitioning from the open source ecology vision of the [[TED Talk]] to execution faces a significant challenge of [[Collaborative Literacy]], especially in its [[Economic Time Binding]] sense. The world population as of 2021 is not evolved in this sense. Thus, we found no single individual or organization to date which is interested in open source product collaboration. This means: anyone who has a product ready for commercialization (beyond initial R&D phase).		Transitioning from the open source ecology vision of the [[TED Talk]] to execution faces a significant challenge of [[Collaborative Literacy]], especially in its [[Economic Time Binding]] sense. The world population as of 2021 is not evolved in this sense. Thus, we found no single individual or organization to date which is interested in open source product collaboration. This means: anyone who has a product ready for commercialization (beyond initial R&D phase).

	We have tried. From Wiki house to RepRap to ~~Farm it~~, and countless others - nobody was willing to or in a position to collaborate on creating a [[Distributive Enterprise]].		We have tried. From Wiki house to RepRap to FarmBot, and countless others - nobody was willing to or in a position to collaborate on creating a [[Distributive Enterprise]].

	Who are qualified candidates? Individuals with well-developed products, ready for commercialization.		Who are qualified candidates? Individuals with well-developed products, ready for commercialization.

Marcin at 22:22, 24 October 2021

2021-10-24T22:22:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:22, 24 October 2021
Line 2:		Line 2:

	We have tried. From Wiki house to RepRap to Farm it, and countless others - nobody was willing to or in a position to collaborate on creating a [[Distributive Enterprise]].		We have tried. From Wiki house to RepRap to Farm it, and countless others - nobody was willing to or in a position to collaborate on creating a [[Distributive Enterprise]].

			Who are qualified candidates? Individuals with well-developed products, ready for commercialization.

Marcin at 22:21, 24 October 2021

2021-10-24T22:21:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:21, 24 October 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Transitioning from vision of the [[TED Talk]] to execution faces a significant challenge of [[Collaborative Literacy]], especially in ~~it's~~ [[Economic Time Binding]] sense.		Transitioning from the open source ecology vision of the [[TED Talk]] to execution faces a significant challenge of [[Collaborative Literacy]], especially in its [[Economic Time Binding]] sense. The world population as of 2021 is not evolved in this sense. Thus, we found no single individual or organization to date which is interested in open source product collaboration. This means: anyone who has a product ready for commercialization (beyond initial R&D phase).

			We have tried. From Wiki house to RepRap to Farm it, and countless others - nobody was willing to or in a position to collaborate on creating a [[Distributive Enterprise]].

Marcin: Created page with "Transitioning from vision of the TED Talk to execution faces a significant challenge of Collaborative Literacy, especially in it's Economic Time Binding sense."

2021-10-24T22:16:33Z

Created page with "Transitioning from vision of the TED Talk to execution faces a significant challenge of Collaborative Literacy, especially in it's Economic Time Binding sense."

New page

Transitioning from vision of the [[TED Talk]] to execution faces a significant challenge of [[Collaborative Literacy]], especially in it's [[Economic Time Binding]] sense.