Pets and Health - Revision history

Marcin at 23:35, 12 December 2018

2018-12-12T23:35:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:35, 12 December 2018
Line 2:		Line 2:
	*Facts and myths about pets - [https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animals-and-us/201208/puppies-kittens-and-human-health-science-versus-wishful-thinking]		*Facts and myths about pets - [https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animals-and-us/201208/puppies-kittens-and-human-health-science-versus-wishful-thinking]
	*Psychology Today -Having pets doesn't influence loneliness - [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/dont-delay/201002/living-alone-can-canine-companionship-help-beat-loneliness%3famp]		*Psychology Today -Having pets doesn't influence loneliness - [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/dont-delay/201002/living-alone-can-canine-companionship-help-beat-loneliness%3famp]
	*PubMed - pets do not influence loneliness - [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/7862783/]		*PubMed - pets do not influence loneliness in single people- [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/7862783/]
			*American Pssychological Association - pets help loneliness - [https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2011/07/cats-dogs.aspx]

	=Are Pets a Positive Substitute for Human Relationships?=		=Are Pets a Positive Substitute for Human Relationships?=

Marcin at 23:32, 12 December 2018

2018-12-12T23:32:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:32, 12 December 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*Human friends make people live longer. Pets do not make a person live longer. Not eating pets does make you live longer. More research is needed on pets and longevity. [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animals-and-us/201307/why-do-human-friends-not-pets-make-people-live-longer%3famp]		*Human friends make people live longer. Pets do not make a person live longer. Not eating pets does make you live longer. More research is needed on pets and longevity. [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animals-and-us/201307/why-do-human-friends-not-pets-make-people-live-longer%3famp]
	*Facts and myths about pets - [https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animals-and-us/201208/puppies-kittens-and-human-health-science-versus-wishful-thinking]		*Facts and myths about pets - [https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animals-and-us/201208/puppies-kittens-and-human-health-science-versus-wishful-thinking]
	*Having pets doesn't influence loneliness - [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/dont-delay/201002/living-alone-can-canine-companionship-help-beat-loneliness%3famp		*Psychology Today -Having pets doesn't influence loneliness - [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/dont-delay/201002/living-alone-can-canine-companionship-help-beat-loneliness%3famp]
			*PubMed - pets do not influence loneliness - [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/7862783/]

	=Are Pets a Positive Substitute for Human Relationships?=		=Are Pets a Positive Substitute for Human Relationships?=

Marcin at 23:31, 12 December 2018

2018-12-12T23:31:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:31, 12 December 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*Human friends make people live longer. Pets do not make a person live longer. Not eating pets does make you live longer. More research is needed on pets and longevity. [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animals-and-us/201307/why-do-human-friends-not-pets-make-people-live-longer%3famp]		*Human friends make people live longer. Pets do not make a person live longer. Not eating pets does make you live longer. More research is needed on pets and longevity. [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animals-and-us/201307/why-do-human-friends-not-pets-make-people-live-longer%3famp]
	*Facts and myths about pets - [https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animals-and-us/201208/puppies-kittens-and-human-health-science-versus-wishful-thinking]		*Facts and myths about pets - [https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animals-and-us/201208/puppies-kittens-and-human-health-science-versus-wishful-thinking]
			*Having pets doesn't influence loneliness - [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/dont-delay/201002/living-alone-can-canine-companionship-help-beat-loneliness%3famp

	=Are Pets a Positive Substitute for Human Relationships?=		=Are Pets a Positive Substitute for Human Relationships?=
	*There is some evidence that people who score high on pet attachment indices have fewer social networks (Stallones, Marx, Garrity, & Johnson, 1990) and more prevalent negative life events, such as bereavement (~~Nynke~~, 1990, as cited in Brown & Katcher, 1997). Another study found that cats appear to be an additional source of emotional support, especially for those participants who are strongly attached to their animals (Stammbach & Turner, 1999). According to Melson (2003) many pet-owning children derive emotional support from their pet because of the lack of human social support. - [https://jeps.efpsa.org/articles/10.5334/jeps.ao/]		*There is some evidence that people who score high on pet attachment indices have fewer social networks (Stallones, Marx, Garrity, & Johnson, 1990) and more prevalent negative life events, such as bereavement (N]ynke, 1990, as cited in Brown & Katcher, 1997). Another study found that cats appear to be an additional source of emotional support, especially for those participants who are strongly attached to their animals (Stammbach & Turner, 1999). According to Melson (2003) many pet-owning children derive emotional support from their pet because of the lack of human social support. - [https://jeps.efpsa.org/articles/10.5334/jeps.ao/]
	*Pets facilitate social support (conversations with strangers when walking down the street)		*Pets facilitate social support (conversations with strangers when walking down the street)
	*No relationship between ability to connect to humans and connecting to pets -same reference		*No relationship between ability to connect to humans and connecting to pets -same reference

Marcin at 23:23, 12 December 2018

2018-12-12T23:23:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:23, 12 December 2018
Line 6:		Line 6:
	*Pets facilitate social support (conversations with strangers when walking down the street)		*Pets facilitate social support (conversations with strangers when walking down the street)
	*No relationship between ability to connect to humans and connecting to pets -same reference		*No relationship between ability to connect to humans and connecting to pets -same reference
			*Pets give more benefit to owners who are not lonely - [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/dont-delay/201002/living-alone-can-canine-companionship-help-beat-loneliness%3famp]
	=Statistics=		=Statistics=
	*14% of pet owners would choose a pet over their partner - [https://www.google.com/amp/s/healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2011/03/22/amp/pet-compatibility-in-relationships-between-people.aspx]		*14% of pet owners would choose a pet over their partner - [https://www.google.com/amp/s/healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2011/03/22/amp/pet-compatibility-in-relationships-between-people.aspx]

Marcin: /* Are Pets a Positive Substitute for Human Relationships? */

2018-12-12T23:22:39Z

Are Pets a Positive Substitute for Human Relationships?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:22, 12 December 2018
Line 5:		Line 5:
	*There is some evidence that people who score high on pet attachment indices have fewer social networks (Stallones, Marx, Garrity, & Johnson, 1990) and more prevalent negative life events, such as bereavement (Nynke, 1990, as cited in Brown & Katcher, 1997). Another study found that cats appear to be an additional source of emotional support, especially for those participants who are strongly attached to their animals (Stammbach & Turner, 1999). According to Melson (2003) many pet-owning children derive emotional support from their pet because of the lack of human social support. - [https://jeps.efpsa.org/articles/10.5334/jeps.ao/]		*There is some evidence that people who score high on pet attachment indices have fewer social networks (Stallones, Marx, Garrity, & Johnson, 1990) and more prevalent negative life events, such as bereavement (Nynke, 1990, as cited in Brown & Katcher, 1997). Another study found that cats appear to be an additional source of emotional support, especially for those participants who are strongly attached to their animals (Stammbach & Turner, 1999). According to Melson (2003) many pet-owning children derive emotional support from their pet because of the lack of human social support. - [https://jeps.efpsa.org/articles/10.5334/jeps.ao/]
	*Pets facilitate social support (conversations with strangers when walking down the street)		*Pets facilitate social support (conversations with strangers when walking down the street)
	*No relationship between ~~connecting~~ to humans and connecting to pets -same reference		*No relationship between ability to connect to humans and connecting to pets -same reference

	=Statistics=		=Statistics=
	*14% of pet owners would choose a pet over their partner - [https://www.google.com/amp/s/healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2011/03/22/amp/pet-compatibility-in-relationships-between-people.aspx]		*14% of pet owners would choose a pet over their partner - [https://www.google.com/amp/s/healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2011/03/22/amp/pet-compatibility-in-relationships-between-people.aspx]

Marcin at 23:07, 12 December 2018

2018-12-12T23:07:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:07, 12 December 2018
Line 6:		Line 6:
	*Pets facilitate social support (conversations with strangers when walking down the street)		*Pets facilitate social support (conversations with strangers when walking down the street)
	*No relationship between connecting to humans and connecting to pets -same reference		*No relationship between connecting to humans and connecting to pets -same reference
			=Statistics=
			*14% of pet owners would choose a pet over their partner - [https://www.google.com/amp/s/healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2011/03/22/amp/pet-compatibility-in-relationships-between-people.aspx]

Marcin: /* Are Pets a Positive Substitute for Human Relationships? */

2018-12-12T23:06:05Z

Are Pets a Positive Substitute for Human Relationships?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:06, 12 December 2018
Line 5:		Line 5:
	*There is some evidence that people who score high on pet attachment indices have fewer social networks (Stallones, Marx, Garrity, & Johnson, 1990) and more prevalent negative life events, such as bereavement (Nynke, 1990, as cited in Brown & Katcher, 1997). Another study found that cats appear to be an additional source of emotional support, especially for those participants who are strongly attached to their animals (Stammbach & Turner, 1999). According to Melson (2003) many pet-owning children derive emotional support from their pet because of the lack of human social support. - [https://jeps.efpsa.org/articles/10.5334/jeps.ao/]		*There is some evidence that people who score high on pet attachment indices have fewer social networks (Stallones, Marx, Garrity, & Johnson, 1990) and more prevalent negative life events, such as bereavement (Nynke, 1990, as cited in Brown & Katcher, 1997). Another study found that cats appear to be an additional source of emotional support, especially for those participants who are strongly attached to their animals (Stammbach & Turner, 1999). According to Melson (2003) many pet-owning children derive emotional support from their pet because of the lack of human social support. - [https://jeps.efpsa.org/articles/10.5334/jeps.ao/]
	*Pets facilitate social support (conversations with strangers when walking down the street)		*Pets facilitate social support (conversations with strangers when walking down the street)
	*N relationship between connecting to humans and connecting to pets -same reference		*No relationship between connecting to humans and connecting to pets -same reference

Marcin: /* Are Pets a Positive Substitute for Human Relationships? */

2018-12-12T22:43:51Z

Are Pets a Positive Substitute for Human Relationships?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:43, 12 December 2018
Line 5:		Line 5:
	*There is some evidence that people who score high on pet attachment indices have fewer social networks (Stallones, Marx, Garrity, & Johnson, 1990) and more prevalent negative life events, such as bereavement (Nynke, 1990, as cited in Brown & Katcher, 1997). Another study found that cats appear to be an additional source of emotional support, especially for those participants who are strongly attached to their animals (Stammbach & Turner, 1999). According to Melson (2003) many pet-owning children derive emotional support from their pet because of the lack of human social support. - [https://jeps.efpsa.org/articles/10.5334/jeps.ao/]		*There is some evidence that people who score high on pet attachment indices have fewer social networks (Stallones, Marx, Garrity, & Johnson, 1990) and more prevalent negative life events, such as bereavement (Nynke, 1990, as cited in Brown & Katcher, 1997). Another study found that cats appear to be an additional source of emotional support, especially for those participants who are strongly attached to their animals (Stammbach & Turner, 1999). According to Melson (2003) many pet-owning children derive emotional support from their pet because of the lack of human social support. - [https://jeps.efpsa.org/articles/10.5334/jeps.ao/]
	*Pets facilitate social support (conversations with strangers when walking down the street)		*Pets facilitate social support (conversations with strangers when walking down the street)
			*N relationship between connecting to humans and connecting to pets -same reference

Marcin: /* Are Pets a Positive Substitute for Human Relationships? */

2018-12-12T22:38:05Z

Are Pets a Positive Substitute for Human Relationships?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:38, 12 December 2018
Line 4:		Line 4:
	=Are Pets a Positive Substitute for Human Relationships?=		=Are Pets a Positive Substitute for Human Relationships?=
	*There is some evidence that people who score high on pet attachment indices have fewer social networks (Stallones, Marx, Garrity, & Johnson, 1990) and more prevalent negative life events, such as bereavement (Nynke, 1990, as cited in Brown & Katcher, 1997). Another study found that cats appear to be an additional source of emotional support, especially for those participants who are strongly attached to their animals (Stammbach & Turner, 1999). According to Melson (2003) many pet-owning children derive emotional support from their pet because of the lack of human social support. - [https://jeps.efpsa.org/articles/10.5334/jeps.ao/]		*There is some evidence that people who score high on pet attachment indices have fewer social networks (Stallones, Marx, Garrity, & Johnson, 1990) and more prevalent negative life events, such as bereavement (Nynke, 1990, as cited in Brown & Katcher, 1997). Another study found that cats appear to be an additional source of emotional support, especially for those participants who are strongly attached to their animals (Stammbach & Turner, 1999). According to Melson (2003) many pet-owning children derive emotional support from their pet because of the lack of human social support. - [https://jeps.efpsa.org/articles/10.5334/jeps.ao/]
			*Pets facilitate social support (conversations with strangers when walking down the street)

Marcin at 22:35, 12 December 2018

2018-12-12T22:35:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:35, 12 December 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*Human friends make people live longer. Pets do not make a person live longer. Not eating pets does make you live longer. More research is needed on pets and longevity. [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animals-and-us/201307/why-do-human-friends-not-pets-make-people-live-longer%3famp]		*Human friends make people live longer. Pets do not make a person live longer. Not eating pets does make you live longer. More research is needed on pets and longevity. [https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animals-and-us/201307/why-do-human-friends-not-pets-make-people-live-longer%3famp]
	*Facts and myths about pets - [https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animals-and-us/201208/puppies-kittens-and-human-health-science-versus-wishful-thinking]		*Facts and myths about pets - [https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animals-and-us/201208/puppies-kittens-and-human-health-science-versus-wishful-thinking]

			=Are Pets a Positive Substitute for Human Relationships?=
			*There is some evidence that people who score high on pet attachment indices have fewer social networks (Stallones, Marx, Garrity, & Johnson, 1990) and more prevalent negative life events, such as bereavement (Nynke, 1990, as cited in Brown & Katcher, 1997). Another study found that cats appear to be an additional source of emotional support, especially for those participants who are strongly attached to their animals (Stammbach & Turner, 1999). According to Melson (2003) many pet-owning children derive emotional support from their pet because of the lack of human social support. - [https://jeps.efpsa.org/articles/10.5334/jeps.ao/]