Private Clubs - Revision history

Marcin at 20:19, 1 April 2019

2019-04-01T20:19:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 1 April 2019
Line 5:		Line 5:
	*'''Nonprofits''' - These are supposedly Public Clubs, not Private Clubs. In practice, most nonprofits - such as in third world aid - use proprietary know-how, and as such their benefit to the public interest may be abridged.		*'''Nonprofits''' - These are supposedly Public Clubs, not Private Clubs. In practice, most nonprofits - such as in third world aid - use proprietary know-how, and as such their benefit to the public interest may be abridged.
	*'''Social Business''' - Typically for the benefit of large numbers of people, but the intellectual property is typically proprietary.		*'''Social Business''' - Typically for the benefit of large numbers of people, but the intellectual property is typically proprietary.
	*'''[[Distributive Enterprise]]''' - This is the ~~last true survivor~~ in the corporate landscape ~~that~~ is designed for public interest, with open source know-how that is intended for widespread dissemination.		*'''[[Distributive Enterprise]]''' (DE) - This is a true outlier in the in the corporate landscape of Private Clubs. The DE is designed for public interest, with open source know-how that is intended for widespread dissemination.

Marcin at 20:17, 1 April 2019

2019-04-01T20:17:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:17, 1 April 2019
Line 3:		Line 3:
	*'''Corporations''' - Typically proprietary development may be described simply as a Private Clubs with Private Ownership, an Old Boys' Network. Designs are not open source. Great example is [[Apple]]		*'''Corporations''' - Typically proprietary development may be described simply as a Private Clubs with Private Ownership, an Old Boys' Network. Designs are not open source. Great example is [[Apple]]
	*'''Cooperatives''' - May be described as Private Clubs with Collaborative Ownership. New members may be welcome, but outsiders do not get access to intellectual property. Great example here is [[Mondragon]] and organizations with the [[Peer Production License]]		*'''Cooperatives''' - May be described as Private Clubs with Collaborative Ownership. New members may be welcome, but outsiders do not get access to intellectual property. Great example here is [[Mondragon]] and organizations with the [[Peer Production License]]
			*'''Nonprofits''' - These are supposedly Public Clubs, not Private Clubs. In practice, most nonprofits - such as in third world aid - use proprietary know-how, and as such their benefit to the public interest may be abridged.
			*'''Social Business''' - Typically for the benefit of large numbers of people, but the intellectual property is typically proprietary.
			*'''[[Distributive Enterprise]]''' - This is the last true survivor in the corporate landscape that is designed for public interest, with open source know-how that is intended for widespread dissemination.

Marcin: Created page with "Cooperatives may have collaborative ownership, but they are not usually open source organizations. As such, their business practices may be comparable to corporations. *'''Co..."

2019-04-01T20:13:23Z

Created page with "Cooperatives may have collaborative ownership, but they are not usually open source organizations. As such, their business practices may be comparable to corporations. *'''Co..."

New page

Cooperatives may have collaborative ownership, but they are not usually open source organizations. As such, their business practices may be comparable to corporations.

*'''Corporations''' - Typically proprietary development may be described simply as a Private Clubs with Private Ownership, an Old Boys' Network. Designs are not open source. Great example is [[Apple]]
*'''Cooperatives''' - May be described as Private Clubs with Collaborative Ownership. New members may be welcome, but outsiders do not get access to intellectual property. Great example here is [[Mondragon]] and organizations with the [[Peer Production License]]