Project Management Software - Revision history

Dorkmo at 05:30, 23 November 2015

2015-11-23T05:30:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:30, 23 November 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:
	**Strength - great on decision-making		**Strength - great on decision-making
	**Critique - documents are separate from platform		**Critique - documents are separate from platform
			*[https://www.kde.org/applications/office/plan/ Plan] by KDE
	*[[Teambox]] - https://teambox.com		*[[Teambox]] - https://teambox.com
	*[http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Trello Trello]		*[http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Trello Trello]

Nikos Vasileiadis at 08:01, 19 June 2013

2013-06-19T08:01:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:01, 19 June 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:
	**Critique - documents are separate from platform		**Critique - documents are separate from platform
	*[[Teambox]] - https://teambox.com		*[[Teambox]] - https://teambox.com
	*[~~[Trello]] - https~~://~~trello~~.~~com~~/		*[http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Trello Trello]

	General critique: it does not appear that the above solutions are consistent with infinite scalability, even if that scalability		General critique: it does not appear that the above solutions are consistent with infinite scalability, even if that scalability

Nikos Vasileiadis at 07:43, 19 June 2013

2013-06-19T07:43:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:43, 19 June 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:
	**Critique - documents are separate from platform		**Critique - documents are separate from platform
	*[[Teambox]] - https://teambox.com		*[[Teambox]] - https://teambox.com
			*[[Trello]] - https://trello.com/

	General critique: it does not appear that the above solutions are consistent with infinite scalability, even if that scalability		General critique: it does not appear that the above solutions are consistent with infinite scalability, even if that scalability

Nikos Vasileiadis at 07:42, 19 June 2013

2013-06-19T07:42:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:42, 19 June 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	**Strength - great on decision-making		**Strength - great on decision-making
	**Critique - documents are separate from platform		**Critique - documents are separate from platform
			*[[Teambox]] - https://teambox.com

	General critique: it does not appear that the above solutions are consistent with infinite scalability, even if that scalability		General critique: it does not appear that the above solutions are consistent with infinite scalability, even if that scalability

Marshall Smith at 21:58, 30 August 2011

2011-08-30T21:58:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:58, 30 August 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*Asana - http://asana.com/		*Asana - http://asana.com/
	**Critique - is there a repository?		**Critique - is there a repository?
	*Bettermeans - https://secure.bettermeans.com/		*[[Bettermeans]] - https://secure.bettermeans.com/
	**Strength - great on decision-making		**Strength - great on decision-making
	**Critique - documents are separate from platform		**Critique - documents are separate from platform

Syk0 saje at 15:37, 23 May 2011

2011-05-23T15:37:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:37, 23 May 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Conclusions: Link recording of communications (civiCRM with emailing functionality) with openly-editable data (wiki). CiviCRM has databasing; wiki has content; JomSocial could add email and phone communications for the interaction side. It seems that the best solution for today for OSE project management is CiviCRM, with simple manual recording of transactions, and searching by topic. If CiviCRM tags appropriately (by project name) then we could manage infinite complexity. This would do until a complete custom solution is created for OSE.		Conclusions: Link recording of communications (civiCRM with emailing functionality) with openly-editable data (wiki). CiviCRM has databasing; wiki has content; JomSocial could add email and phone communications for the interaction side. It seems that the best solution for today for OSE project management is CiviCRM, with simple manual recording of transactions, and searching by topic. If CiviCRM tags appropriately (by project name) then we could manage infinite complexity. This would do until a complete custom solution is created for OSE.

			[[Category: Software]]

Marcin: Created page with "*Asana - http://asana.com/ **Critique - is there a repository? *Bettermeans - https://secure.bettermeans.com/ Strength - great on decision-making Critique - documents are sep..."

2011-02-12T01:56:43Z

Created page with "*Asana - http://asana.com/ **Critique - is there a repository? *Bettermeans - https://secure.bettermeans.com/ **Strength - great on decision-making **Critique - documents are sep..."

New page

*Asana - http://asana.com/
**Critique - is there a repository?
*Bettermeans - https://secure.bettermeans.com/
**Strength - great on decision-making
**Critique - documents are separate from platform

General critique: it does not appear that the above solutions are consistent with infinite scalability, even if that scalability

Conclusions: Link recording of communications (civiCRM with emailing functionality) with openly-editable data (wiki). CiviCRM has databasing; wiki has content; JomSocial could add email and phone communications for the interaction side. It seems that the best solution for today for OSE project management is CiviCRM, with simple manual recording of transactions, and searching by topic. If CiviCRM tags appropriately (by project name) then we could manage infinite complexity. This would do until a complete custom solution is created for OSE.