<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Red_Bull</id>
	<title>Red Bull - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Red_Bull"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Red_Bull&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-05T18:12:40Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.13</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Red_Bull&amp;diff=294605&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Marcin: Created page with &quot;Red Bull has a business model based on cross-subsidy. It markets an outsourced product, to cross-subsidize its business based on extreme performance.  Take a look from this so...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Red_Bull&amp;diff=294605&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2024-03-21T00:00:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;Red Bull has a business model based on cross-subsidy. It markets an outsourced product, to cross-subsidize its business based on extreme performance.  Take a look from this so...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Red Bull has a business model based on cross-subsidy. It markets an outsourced product, to cross-subsidize its business based on extreme performance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Take a look from this source [https://plus.thebulwark.com/p/red-bull-elon-musk-and-matt-gaetz?r=37wyg&amp;amp;utm_campaign=post&amp;amp;utm_medium=web]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This piece on Red Bull in the Generalist was enough to make me subscribe, all by itself. I can’t recommend it enough. But if you don’t want to pony up the $$$ (it’s not cheap) the takeaway that’s important for our purposes is this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Geof Rayner, a Professor at Brunel University, summarized: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Red Bull is an interesting case because they don&amp;#039;t make anything at all. It&amp;#039;s an Austrian marketing company... that&amp;#039;s it!... It is just a brand. Without any manufacturing plants or anything!” . . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather than manufacturing its core product, Red Bull outsources, relying on partners like Rauch, a juice producer. That allows [Red Bull the company] to focus on what it does best: marketing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over time, that&amp;#039;s created a peculiar company, hell-bent on dominating the cultural conversation but disinterested in its actual product. Like one of Darwin&amp;#039;s long-beaked finches, Red Bull bears the marks of a business with one specific attribute selected for over and over again: garnering attention. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=OSE Learnings=&lt;br /&gt;
Red Bull engages in cross-subsidization. Cross-subsidization is a common business model. In the broadest sense, it applies to any organization which gets its revenue from another source than the core work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OSE is evolving to a cross-subsidy business model, where revenue from enterprise, such as the Seed Eco-Home, cross-subsidizes further development of the Global Village Construction Set in its v1.0, v2.0, and v3.0 executions. Read more details about this at [[GVCS]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marcin</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>