Review - Revision history

Marcin: /* Past Workshops */

2022-06-21T23:33:36Z

Past Workshops

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:33, 21 June 2022
Line 23:		Line 23:
	See [[Past Workshop Participants]]		See [[Past Workshop Participants]]

	*Microhouse 3 (Faculty House) build - [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XJsOgq3JOy3L_L95JePbb_wiBDPzBYytjVJucDMoOfI/edit#gid=847200485]		*Microhouse 3 (Faculty House) build - 7 out 11 positive reviews; [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XJsOgq3JOy3L_L95JePbb_wiBDPzBYytjVJucDMoOfI/edit#gid=847200485]

	=OSE Review=		=OSE Review=

Marcin: /* Past Workshops */

2022-06-21T23:28:43Z

Past Workshops

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:28, 21 June 2022
Line 23:		Line 23:
	See [[Past Workshop Participants]]		See [[Past Workshop Participants]]

	*Microhouse 2 build [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XJsOgq3JOy3L_L95JePbb_wiBDPzBYytjVJucDMoOfI/edit#gid=847200485]		*Microhouse 3 (Faculty House) build - [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XJsOgq3JOy3L_L95JePbb_wiBDPzBYytjVJucDMoOfI/edit#gid=847200485]

	=OSE Review=		=OSE Review=

Marcin: /* Introduction and About */

2022-06-21T23:16:59Z

Introduction and About

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:16, 21 June 2022
Line 18:		Line 18:

	To enable technical review of product design in particular, we publish a Google Presentation that goes through conceptual design, CAD, or pictures of a machine - and requests feedback on certain specified items. Individuals can participate in a formal review meeting, or they can use the Review Form in an ad-hoc fashion below to submit comments and suggestions. [[Pull Request]]s can also be reviewed. [[Working Team]] members are usually given edit access to prepare review documents.		To enable technical review of product design in particular, we publish a Google Presentation that goes through conceptual design, CAD, or pictures of a machine - and requests feedback on certain specified items. Individuals can participate in a formal review meeting, or they can use the Review Form in an ad-hoc fashion below to submit comments and suggestions. [[Pull Request]]s can also be reviewed. [[Working Team]] members are usually given edit access to prepare review documents.

			=Past Workshops=

			See [[Past Workshop Participants]]

			*Microhouse 2 build [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XJsOgq3JOy3L_L95JePbb_wiBDPzBYytjVJucDMoOfI/edit#gid=847200485]

	=OSE Review=		=OSE Review=

Marcin: /* If you have suggestions, use our Review Form */

2022-05-16T15:50:54Z

If you have suggestions, use our Review Form

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:50, 16 May 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:


			=Various Review Strategies=

			*An obvious one is online forums. There are many subjects that forums and other online media, such as enterprise forums like [[Hacker News]]. A simple post may yield usable feedback. Such as plumbing design on a plumbing forum. Upvoting or discussion should then take place on the [[OSE Upvoting Site]].

	=If you have suggestions, use our Review Form=		=If you have suggestions, use our Review Form=

Marcin: /* Review Questions */

2020-06-15T17:13:10Z

Review Questions

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 15 June 2020
Line 18:		Line 18:

	==Review Questions==		==Review Questions==
	#Take the subject matter being reviewed and break it into components		Take the subject matter being reviewed and break it into components
	#State what worked for each component		#State what worked for each component
	#State what needs improvement		#State what needs improvement
	#Take CAD images o and mark them up		#Take CAD images and mark them up
	#If it's a product ready for production engineering work, state what production engineering points must be addressed		#If it's a product ready for production engineering work, state what production engineering points must be addressed
	#Draw up a production facility layout including workflow, materials logistics, supply chain delivery, tooling, quality control		#Production engineering review - Draw up a production facility layout including workflow, materials logistics, supply chain delivery, tooling, quality control -
	#Design Manufacturing Execution System for online order automation		#Design Manufacturing Execution System for online order automation

Marcin: /* Formal Review */

2020-06-15T17:10:46Z

Formal Review

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:10, 15 June 2020
Line 28:		Line 28:
	==Formal Review==		==Formal Review==
	Whether it's the build of a module, machine, house, or of a development process or enterprise concept - the formal review should take place in the form of a detailed point-by-point presentation with pictures, videos, and other supporting information. This should be a cloud editable document that can be marked up. Pictures should have arrows pointing to specific features. Small videos can be uploaded to discuss specific details via webcast. The second half of formal review is an audience:		Whether it's the build of a module, machine, house, or of a development process or enterprise concept - the formal review should take place in the form of a detailed point-by-point presentation with pictures, videos, and other supporting information. This should be a cloud editable document that can be marked up. Pictures should have arrows pointing to specific features. Small videos can be uploaded to discuss specific details via webcast. The second half of formal review is an audience:
	#Submission to the [[OSE Network]] using the [[Minds]] platform.		#<strike>Submission to the [[OSE Network]] using the [[Minds]] platform.</strike>
	#Submission to [[OBI Advisors]], [[OSE Advisors]], and other [[Subject Matter Experts]]		#Submission to [[OBI Advisors]], [[OSE Advisors]], and other [[Subject Matter Experts]]
	#[[HR]] should engage in active recruiting of [[SMEs]] for review purposes		#[[HR]] should engage in active recruiting of [[SMEs]] for review purposes

Marcin: /* Review Questions */

2019-03-18T19:27:37Z

Review Questions

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:27, 18 March 2019
Line 21:		Line 21:
	#State what worked for each component		#State what worked for each component
	#State what needs improvement		#State what needs improvement
	#Take images and mark them up		#Take CAD images o and mark them up
			#If it's a product ready for production engineering work, state what production engineering points must be addressed
			#Draw up a production facility layout including workflow, materials logistics, supply chain delivery, tooling, quality control
			#Design Manufacturing Execution System for online order automation

	==Formal Review==		==Formal Review==

Marcin: /* Review Form Micro-Review */

2019-03-18T19:23:45Z

Review Form Micro-Review

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:23, 18 March 2019
Line 17:		Line 17:
	=OSE Review=		=OSE Review=

	==Review ~~Form Micro-Review~~==		==Review Questions==
	~~There are 2 ways to do this. One is a formal one,~~ and ~~the other one is the simple Review Form above which can be used to capture learnings. The Review Form below is fully open~~ for ~~access, such that anyone in the project can submit specific review points:~~		#Take the subject matter being reviewed and break it into components
			#State what worked for each component
			#State what needs improvement
			#Take images and mark them up

	==Formal Review==		==Formal Review==

Marcin: /* Technical Review */

2018-07-07T08:53:22Z

Technical Review

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:53, 7 July 2018
Line 57:		Line 57:
	#Projects - are the projects priorities chosen in a way that helps the company grow, while considering constraints and opportinities?		#Projects - are the projects priorities chosen in a way that helps the company grow, while considering constraints and opportinities?
	#Learning - what mechanisms are built in so that the company is a learning organization?		#Learning - what mechanisms are built in so that the company is a learning organization?

	~~==Technical Review==~~
	~~You can use this form to submit technical review. If you want others to submit technical review, use various communication channels to solicit a response.~~

	=Implementation=		=Implementation=

Marcin at 08:52, 7 July 2018

2018-07-07T08:52:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:52, 7 July 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=~~General~~=
	[[Kaizen]] in continuous quality improvement in a [[Learning Organization]]. One step to this is review. Review refers to any aspect of OSE's work~~, though primarily to the review of OSE's products~~. OSE's review process is open to the public, in that all review documents are published online. Review can also occur on other levels - such as organizational learning or development processes.
			=If you have suggestions, use our Review Form=

			==This applies to technical review of machines, or organizational and process review.==
			<html><iframe src="https://docs.google.com/a/opensourceecology.org/forms/d/1J9n1T3kXr9w1_hOkjvsfJwtLST5AWIm1A3R_aKAsHBM/viewform?embedded=true" width="760" height="500" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading...</iframe></html>

			[https://docs.google.com/a/opensourceecology.org/spreadsheets/d/1ji_WNyHOlwDIZxs-s1Xr5HZC2fyA5CTKiSVQpz9Z8TU/edit#gid=518279671 Results]

			[https://docs.google.com/a/opensourceecology.org/forms/d/1J9n1T3kXr9w1_hOkjvsfJwtLST5AWIm1A3R_aKAsHBM/edit edit]

			=Introduction and About=
			[[Kaizen]] in continuous quality improvement in a [[Learning Organization]]. One step to this is review. Review refers to any aspect of OSE's work. OSE's review process is open to the public, in that all review documents are published online. Review can also occur on other levels - such as organizational learning or development processes.

	To enable technical review of product design in particular, we publish a Google Presentation that goes through conceptual design, CAD, or pictures of a machine - and requests feedback on certain specified items. Individuals can participate in a formal review meeting, or they can use the Review Form in an ad-hoc fashion below to submit comments and suggestions. [[Pull Request]]s can also be reviewed. [[Working Team]] members are usually given edit access to prepare review documents.		To enable technical review of product design in particular, we publish a Google Presentation that goes through conceptual design, CAD, or pictures of a machine - and requests feedback on certain specified items. Individuals can participate in a formal review meeting, or they can use the Review Form in an ad-hoc fashion below to submit comments and suggestions. [[Pull Request]]s can also be reviewed. [[Working Team]] members are usually given edit access to prepare review documents.
Line 7:		Line 18:

	==Review Form Micro-Review==		==Review Form Micro-Review==
	There are 2 ways to do this. One is a formal one, and the other one is the simple Review Form ~~below~~ which can be used to capture learnings. The Review Form below is fully open for access, such that anyone in the project can submit specific review points:		There are 2 ways to do this. One is a formal one, and the other one is the simple Review Form above which can be used to capture learnings. The Review Form below is fully open for access, such that anyone in the project can submit specific review points:

	==Formal Review==		==Formal Review==
Line 15:		Line 26:
	#[[HR]] should engage in active recruiting of [[SMEs]] for review purposes		#[[HR]] should engage in active recruiting of [[SMEs]] for review purposes

	=Protocol=		=Protocol for Formal Review=
	(See discussion above)		(See discussion above)