STEAM Camps Task Detail - Revision history

Marcin: /* Outsource */

2019-11-02T21:21:00Z

Outsource

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 2 November 2019
Line 14:		Line 14:
	==Outsource==		==Outsource==
	*Marketing strategy - ED		*Marketing strategy - ED
	*Marketing plan - list of venues ~~etc~~		*Marketing plan and copy - list of venues, copy, schedule, assets, process

	==Managing the Development and Organization of Curriculum==		==Managing the Development and Organization of Curriculum==

Marcin: /* Outsource */

2019-11-02T21:20:38Z

Outsource

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:20, 2 November 2019
Line 14:		Line 14:
	==Outsource==		==Outsource==
	*Marketing strategy - ED		*Marketing strategy - ED
	*Marketing plan - list of venues etc		*Marketing plan - list of venues etc
	*and copy
	*

	==Managing the Development and Organization of Curriculum==		==Managing the Development and Organization of Curriculum==

Marcin: /* Candidate Evaluation */

2019-11-02T21:20:14Z

Candidate Evaluation

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:20, 2 November 2019
Line 70:		Line 70:
	#Borrowed all this - [https://www.mediabistro.com/jobs/description/405089/conference-program-specialist/]		#Borrowed all this - [https://www.mediabistro.com/jobs/description/405089/conference-program-specialist/]

	=~~Candidate Evaluation~~=		=Evaluations for STEAM Camps and Instructors=
	==Critical Evaluation Points for STEAM Camp Instructors==		==Critical Evaluation Points for STEAM Camp Instructors==

Marcin: /* Decision Making Process */

2019-11-02T21:15:59Z

Decision Making Process

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 2 November 2019
Line 110:		Line 110:
	*Initially, the ED will oversee and sign off on the decisions of the candidate, and collaborate whenever decision-making steps are required. The goal is to establish trust so that the candidate can make these decisions fully autonomously - and always with the intent of learning from decisions to make better ones in the future. Pay incentive structures should reflect this.		*Initially, the ED will oversee and sign off on the decisions of the candidate, and collaborate whenever decision-making steps are required. The goal is to establish trust so that the candidate can make these decisions fully autonomously - and always with the intent of learning from decisions to make better ones in the future. Pay incentive structures should reflect this.
	*By undergoing collaborative evaluations on a post-event basis (every 3 months), the candidate will collaborate with the ED on making improvements.		*By undergoing collaborative evaluations on a post-event basis (every 3 months), the candidate will collaborate with the ED on making improvements.
			*Event Planner produces schedules, quarterly budget projections, posts events, and makes go/no-go decisions on events.

	=More=		=More=

Marcin: /* Experimental Kit Evaluation - Sold at Cost */

2019-11-02T21:13:39Z

Experimental Kit Evaluation - Sold at Cost

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:13, 2 November 2019
Line 80:		Line 80:

	==Experimental Kit Evaluation - Sold at Cost==		==Experimental Kit Evaluation - Sold at Cost==
	Evaluation spreadsheet - with 0-3 grade. 0 is not done, 1 is partly done, 2 is marginally working, 3 is working excellent		Evaluation spreadsheet - with 0-3 grade. 0 is not done, 1 is partly done, 2 is marginally working, 3 is working excellent. Scorecard: from 0-21.
	*Could they build the Universal Controller successfully?		*Could they build the Universal Controller successfully?
	*Could they print a 3D printed corner?		*Could they print a 3D printed corner?

Marcin: /* Experimental Kit Evaluation - Sold at Cost */

2019-11-02T21:12:51Z

Experimental Kit Evaluation - Sold at Cost

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:12, 2 November 2019
Line 80:		Line 80:

	==Experimental Kit Evaluation - Sold at Cost==		==Experimental Kit Evaluation - Sold at Cost==
			Evaluation spreadsheet - with 0-3 grade. 0 is not done, 1 is partly done, 2 is marginally working, 3 is working excellent
	*Could they build the Universal Controller successfully?		*Could they build the Universal Controller successfully?
	*Could they print a 3D printed corner?		*Could they print a 3D printed corner?

Marcin: /* Experimental Kit Evaluation */

2019-11-02T21:11:34Z

Experimental Kit Evaluation

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:11, 2 November 2019
Line 79:		Line 79:
	*'''Can they learn rapidly''' - This is evaluated by their capacity to build out the experiment kit successfully.		*'''Can they learn rapidly''' - This is evaluated by their capacity to build out the experiment kit successfully.

	==Experimental Kit Evaluation==		==Experimental Kit Evaluation - Sold at Cost==
			*Could they build the Universal Controller successfully?
	*Could they print a 3D printed corner?		*Could they print a 3D printed corner?
	*Can they etch and solder an ~~arduino~~ using circuit plotter and ~~ecological etchant~~?		*Can they convert the Arduino Uno file to an Arduino Uno successfully? Steps from experting CAM files, plotting, etch and solder an Arduino using circuit plotter and Ecological Etchant?
	*Can they ~~draw an OSE sticker label, which is~~ the ~~label they use on~~ their ~~test submission~~?		*Can they upload their build video timelapse for each build using the Raspberry Pi documentation tablet?
	*~~Can~~ they ~~upload~~ a ~~video using~~ the ~~Raspberry Pi documentation tablet~~?		*Did their 3D printed motor work?
			*Did they weld a sample successfully?
			*Did they provide quality feedback on the build procedure?

	==Event Evaluation==		==Event Evaluation==

Marcin: /* Event Evaluation */

2019-11-02T20:49:10Z

Event Evaluation

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:49, 2 November 2019
Line 88:		Line 88:
	*Can they record their session using remote microphone and 2 Raspberry Pi tablets? These are published online, and a bonus is given to the best presenter. Instructors critique each other as part of their evaluation process. Critique requires documentation - hence the Pi Tablet.		*Can they record their session using remote microphone and 2 Raspberry Pi tablets? These are published online, and a bonus is given to the best presenter. Instructors critique each other as part of their evaluation process. Critique requires documentation - hence the Pi Tablet.
	*Writing a What Worked, What Didn't Work, and their improvements for next time if they are interested in continuing.		*Writing a What Worked, What Didn't Work, and their improvements for next time if they are interested in continuing.
	*Event planner ~~prepares~~ and secures surveys from Instructors and participants.		*Event planner adapts survey from [[Workshop_Feedback_Form]] and secures surveys from Instructors and participants. We can add granular (Not required, but Would Appreciate Your Feedback On) - on each curriculum item:
			**Intro
			**FreeCAD and design
			**3D Printer build
			**Circuit Plotter Build
			**Arduino Build
			**Mill Build
			**Battery Packs and charge controller
			**Welder Build
			**Motor Build
			**Universal Power Supply - overall on power electronics part
	*Event Planner - receives documentation, evaluates candidates		*Event Planner - receives documentation, evaluates candidates

Marcin: /* Event Evaluation */

2019-11-02T20:44:48Z

Event Evaluation

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:44, 2 November 2019
Line 88:		Line 88:
	*Can they record their session using remote microphone and 2 Raspberry Pi tablets? These are published online, and a bonus is given to the best presenter. Instructors critique each other as part of their evaluation process. Critique requires documentation - hence the Pi Tablet.		*Can they record their session using remote microphone and 2 Raspberry Pi tablets? These are published online, and a bonus is given to the best presenter. Instructors critique each other as part of their evaluation process. Critique requires documentation - hence the Pi Tablet.
	*Writing a What Worked, What Didn't Work, and their improvements for next time if they are interested in continuing.		*Writing a What Worked, What Didn't Work, and their improvements for next time if they are interested in continuing.
			*Event planner prepares and secures surveys from Instructors and participants.
			*Event Planner - receives documentation, evaluates candidates

	=Decision Making Process=		=Decision Making Process=

Marcin: /* Event Evaluation */

2019-11-02T20:42:55Z

Event Evaluation

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:42, 2 November 2019
Line 87:		Line 87:
	==Event Evaluation==		==Event Evaluation==
	*Can they record their session using remote microphone and 2 Raspberry Pi tablets? These are published online, and a bonus is given to the best presenter. Instructors critique each other as part of their evaluation process. Critique requires documentation - hence the Pi Tablet.		*Can they record their session using remote microphone and 2 Raspberry Pi tablets? These are published online, and a bonus is given to the best presenter. Instructors critique each other as part of their evaluation process. Critique requires documentation - hence the Pi Tablet.
			*Writing a What Worked, What Didn't Work, and their improvements for next time if they are interested in continuing.

	=Decision Making Process=		=Decision Making Process=