https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3ABasic_Economic_Analysis_of_Printing_with_Large_Nozzles 2026-04-06T13:40:32Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.39.13 https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Talk:Basic_Economic_Analysis_of_Printing_with_Large_Nozzles&diff=215264&oldid=prev 2020-03-30T18:45:49Z

<p>Added some thoughts of mine</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>This wouldn&#039;t be neccisary for most applications but we may want to look into some of the effects of this. Main is surface finish, which shouldn&#039;t be too neccisary, but perhaps tolerances/friction? Also i don&#039;t know if there are any structual problems etc. Yet again looks aren&#039;t needed for structual parts, and the structual issues probably aren&#039;t that bad.<br /> <br /> Main point:<br /> <br /> Might be good to build a universal test machine, and do some tests<br /> <br /> Also perhaps some long term durability tests. (Leave stuff outside, and see what &quot;fails&quot; first, putting stuff in similar devices (perhaps even a device that runs cycles just for adding cycles till something breaks (may be an industry term, have seen their use for various devices)<br /> <br /> All this just to get some hard data<br /> <br /> Also depending on results either we can factor in a 0.4 or below nozzle station (a few for needed work, large for the main stuff), a resin station, or post processing such as powder blasting, solvent smoothing, heat treatment, or some sort of coating<br /> <br /> --[[User:Eric|Eric]] ([[User talk:Eric|talk]]) 18:45, 30 March 2020 (UTC)</div>

Eric