Talk:CEB Press/Current Downloads - Revision history

John S at 18:35, 2 March 2015

2015-03-02T18:35:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:35, 2 March 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Marcin Writes "the wiki is a mess. IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE THIS WAY." ~~source~~; [[Wiki_Guidelines]] - John S		Marcin Writes "the wiki is a mess. IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE THIS WAY." his explanation is here; [[Wiki_Guidelines]] - John S

	Previously others wrote:		Previously others wrote:

John S at 17:55, 2 March 2015

2015-03-02T17:55:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:55, 2 March 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~My first impression there~~ is ~~some redundancy with the same information in more than one place. Looking at the dates and frequency~~ a ~~page is updated helps me decide to study it or keep scanning~~. ~~The date the page was last edited is found by opening the history tab for that page~~. ~~I find benefit in what last happened, what the first efforts were and who was involved, when. To start, the~~ [[~~Media:Global Village Construction Set~~]] page has an excellent description of the OSE Mission and the [[Machine Index]] provides enough meat to be encouraging. These two pages, MGVCS amd Index combined into one page might be a excellent home page for OSE. I have studied OSE progress, concepts and searched for how others make some of these machines. 1- the videos provide excellent insight, 2- I've found when joining a collaborative effort, that what I think to be a good ideas are not the best ideas for the project. To get over this hump, I try to study 1- what others have done 2- how they have done it 3- what they say they intend to do and then offer some of my thoughts as possibilities to consider and adopt IF they find them to be acceptable and see a transition path. Also, when I offer a suggestion it means I am available to help carry that change forward and probably have the experience to be able to help smooth the way. Mostly I like to simplify things, reduce part counts, improve reliability, efficiency, etc. It seems that MicroHouse has been the focus for a couple of years where OEB and Tractor are getting attention this Spring 2015. - John S		Marcin Writes "the wiki is a mess. IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE THIS WAY." source; [[Wiki_Guidelines]] - John S

	Previously others wrote:		Previously others wrote:

John S at 23:09, 28 February 2015

2015-02-28T23:09:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:09, 28 February 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	My first impression there is ~~much~~ redundancy ~~and looking~~ at the dates and frequency a page is updated helps me decide to study it or keep scanning. The date the page was last edited is found by opening the history tab for that page. I find benefit in what last happened, what the first efforts were and who was involved, when. To start, the [[Media:Global Village Construction Set]] page has an excellent description of the OSE Mission and the [[Machine Index]] provides enough meat to be encouraging. These two pages, MGVCS amd Index combined into one page might be a excellent home page for OSE. I have studied OSE progress, concepts and searched for how others make some of these machines. 1- the videos provide excellent insight, 2- I've found when joining a collaborative effort, that what I think to be a good ideas are not the best ideas for the project. To get over this hump, I try to study 1- what others have done 2- how they have done it 3- what they say they intend to do and then offer some of my thoughts as possibilities to consider and adopt IF they find them to be acceptable and see a transition path. Also, when I offer a suggestion it means I am available to help carry that change forward and probably have the experience to be able to help smooth the way. Mostly I like to simplify things, reduce part counts, improve reliability, efficiency, etc. It seems that MicroHouse has been the focus for a couple of years where OEB and Tractor are getting attention this Spring 2015. - John S		My first impression there is some redundancy with the same information in more than one place. Looking at the dates and frequency a page is updated helps me decide to study it or keep scanning. The date the page was last edited is found by opening the history tab for that page. I find benefit in what last happened, what the first efforts were and who was involved, when. To start, the [[Media:Global Village Construction Set]] page has an excellent description of the OSE Mission and the [[Machine Index]] provides enough meat to be encouraging. These two pages, MGVCS amd Index combined into one page might be a excellent home page for OSE. I have studied OSE progress, concepts and searched for how others make some of these machines. 1- the videos provide excellent insight, 2- I've found when joining a collaborative effort, that what I think to be a good ideas are not the best ideas for the project. To get over this hump, I try to study 1- what others have done 2- how they have done it 3- what they say they intend to do and then offer some of my thoughts as possibilities to consider and adopt IF they find them to be acceptable and see a transition path. Also, when I offer a suggestion it means I am available to help carry that change forward and probably have the experience to be able to help smooth the way. Mostly I like to simplify things, reduce part counts, improve reliability, efficiency, etc. It seems that MicroHouse has been the focus for a couple of years where OEB and Tractor are getting attention this Spring 2015. - John S

	Previously others wrote:		Previously others wrote:

John S at 23:08, 28 February 2015

2015-02-28T23:08:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:08, 28 February 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	My first impression there is much redundancy and looking at the dates and frequency a page is updated helps me decide to study it or keep scanning. The date the page was last edited is found by opening the history tab for that page. I find benefit in what last happened, what the first efforts were and who was involved, when. To start, the [[Media:Global Village Construction Set]] page has an excellent description of the OSE Mission and the [[Machine Index]] provides enough meat to be encouraging. These two pages, MGVCS amd Index combined into one page might be a excellent home page for OSE. I have studied OSE progress, concepts and searched for how others make some of these machines. 1- the videos provide excellent insight, 2- ~~the~~ I've found when joining a collaborative effort, that what I think to be my best ideas ~~and experiences are as strange to them as theirs sometimes are to me~~. To get over this hump, I try to 1- ~~study~~ what ~~they~~ have done 2- how they have done it 3- what they say they intend to do and then offer some of my thoughts as possibilities to consider and adopt IF they find them to be acceptable and see a transition path. Also, when I offer a suggestion it means I am available to help carry that change forward and probably have the experience to be able to help smooth the way. Mostly I like to simplify things, reduce part counts, improve reliability, efficiency, etc. It seems that MicroHouse has been the focus for a couple of years where OEB and Tractor are getting attention this Spring 2015. - John S		My first impression there is much redundancy and looking at the dates and frequency a page is updated helps me decide to study it or keep scanning. The date the page was last edited is found by opening the history tab for that page. I find benefit in what last happened, what the first efforts were and who was involved, when. To start, the [[Media:Global Village Construction Set]] page has an excellent description of the OSE Mission and the [[Machine Index]] provides enough meat to be encouraging. These two pages, MGVCS amd Index combined into one page might be a excellent home page for OSE. I have studied OSE progress, concepts and searched for how others make some of these machines. 1- the videos provide excellent insight, 2- I've found when joining a collaborative effort, that what I think to be a good ideas are not the best ideas for the project. To get over this hump, I try to study 1- what others have done 2- how they have done it 3- what they say they intend to do and then offer some of my thoughts as possibilities to consider and adopt IF they find them to be acceptable and see a transition path. Also, when I offer a suggestion it means I am available to help carry that change forward and probably have the experience to be able to help smooth the way. Mostly I like to simplify things, reduce part counts, improve reliability, efficiency, etc. It seems that MicroHouse has been the focus for a couple of years where OEB and Tractor are getting attention this Spring 2015. - John S

	Previously others wrote:		Previously others wrote:

John S at 22:45, 28 February 2015

2015-02-28T22:45:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:45, 28 February 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
			My first impression there is much redundancy and looking at the dates and frequency a page is updated helps me decide to study it or keep scanning. The date the page was last edited is found by opening the history tab for that page. I find benefit in what last happened, what the first efforts were and who was involved, when. To start, the [[Media:Global Village Construction Set]] page has an excellent description of the OSE Mission and the [[Machine Index]] provides enough meat to be encouraging. These two pages, MGVCS amd Index combined into one page might be a excellent home page for OSE. I have studied OSE progress, concepts and searched for how others make some of these machines. 1- the videos provide excellent insight, 2- the I've found when joining a collaborative effort, that what I think to be my best ideas and experiences are as strange to them as theirs sometimes are to me. To get over this hump, I try to 1- study what they have done 2- how they have done it 3- what they say they intend to do and then offer some of my thoughts as possibilities to consider and adopt IF they find them to be acceptable and see a transition path. Also, when I offer a suggestion it means I am available to help carry that change forward and probably have the experience to be able to help smooth the way. Mostly I like to simplify things, reduce part counts, improve reliability, efficiency, etc. It seems that MicroHouse has been the focus for a couple of years where OEB and Tractor are getting attention this Spring 2015. - John S

			Previously others wrote:


	You do realize that this is a totally retarded way of organizing the documentation for the CEB press?		You do realize that this is a totally retarded way of organizing the documentation for the CEB press?

Dorkmo: /* torrent */ new section

2013-01-13T21:03:24Z

torrent: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, 13 January 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	It would be much easier to just keep all this stuff in a git repository w/ README files, etc. This takes care of all versioning, etc. You can branch stuff off for various versions of the CEB or whatever. Then if someone wants to build a CEB press, you just give them git url.		It would be much easier to just keep all this stuff in a git repository w/ README files, etc. This takes care of all versioning, etc. You can branch stuff off for various versions of the CEB or whatever. Then if someone wants to build a CEB press, you just give them git url.

			== torrent ==

			should we make all this into a torrent file? --[[User:Dorkmo\|Dorkmo]] ([[User talk:Dorkmo\|talk]]) 22:03, 13 January 2013 (CET)

Bubbapizza: Created page with "You do realize that this is a totally retarded way of organizing the documentation for the CEB press? It would be much easier to just keep all this stuff in a git repository ..."

2013-01-13T16:54:23Z

Created page with "You do realize that this is a totally retarded way of organizing the documentation for the CEB press? It would be much easier to just keep all this stuff in a git repository ..."

New page

You do realize that this is a totally retarded way of organizing the documentation for the CEB press?

It would be much easier to just keep all this stuff in a git repository w/ README files, etc. This takes care of all versioning, etc. You can branch stuff off for various versions of the CEB or whatever. Then if someone wants to build a CEB press, you just give them git url.