<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AHigh_Altitude_Pseudosatellites</id>
	<title>Talk:High Altitude Pseudosatellites - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AHigh_Altitude_Pseudosatellites"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Talk:High_Altitude_Pseudosatellites&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-16T15:38:22Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.13</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Talk:High_Altitude_Pseudosatellites&amp;diff=295346&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Eric: Added some thoughts of mine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Talk:High_Altitude_Pseudosatellites&amp;diff=295346&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2024-04-20T16:01:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Added some thoughts of mine&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;These get really neat!  Granted i have to check myself before a [[Von Braun Complex]] or [[Oppenheimer Complex]] gets the best of me, but they are really neat.  Between those Solar Planes, those Crewed [[HALE Planes]] (Although those were largely replaced with &amp;quot;Globalhawk&amp;quot; etc since as with Nuclear Submarines your main limit to mission endurance...is the sentient meat that needs fed/watered/sewage systems etc)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was also some sort of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;airship&amp;#039;&amp;#039; DARPA had a project for.  They were going to have some of the external membrane be an antenna of sorts for the SAR or whatever.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a decent video done on it on YouTube, although original reporting by VICE or Vox or whoever + some article digging / wikipedia rabbit holes did way better, but that Wide Area Motion Imagery these enable can get a bit spooky in the wrong hands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolutely amazing technology though, and if we don&amp;#039;t get around to making Refurbish/Take Down like they Planned to/did a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;bit&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of (Re: Hubble Telescope Repairs), keeping things out of orbit to begin with is an interesting way to reduce [[Orbital Debris]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sidenote NASA Funds being abysmally low killed it off, but they had a Telescope in the back of a big airliner that was really neat.  Could get &amp;quot;top of a mountain&amp;quot; / borderline space performance, but be anywhere within it&amp;#039;s range (so fuel+airstrip etc).  Also like ground telescopes it could be modified/repaired real easily.  Granted some Swarm Robot type thing but with JWST Mirrors and a whole ecosystem of vehicles maintaining that/taking modules up and down would be way more powerful!  Also we have that Lunar Crater Radiotelescope in the works!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thats enough gushing/ranting on my part lol, i see HALO Aircraft / Pseudosatellites and i gotta infodump a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;little&amp;#039;&amp;#039;!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Eric|Eric]] ([[User talk:Eric|talk]]) 16:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Eric</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>