https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3APivotal_Task_TrackerTalk:Pivotal Task Tracker - Revision history2026-04-18T03:20:36ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.39.13https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Talk:Pivotal_Task_Tracker&diff=31689&oldid=prevJeb: questions and comments2011-06-19T16:27:05Z<p>questions and comments</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>We need a listing with links to '''active''' PT projects. Searching for "OSE" in the [https://www.pivotaltracker.com/public_projects public listing] currently brings up too many false positives, so I'd suggest changing the naming convention to "OSEcology" to eliminate false positives -- same as the [[Twitter]] ID, btw. Checking OSE projects there yesterday, many appear to be inactive now. If we're not going to use a project, it should probably be retired to avoid confusion and stagnation. The thing I've noticed about PM tools like Basecamp in the past is that more "projects" are not better... it's better to organize by workgroups, and only split off projects "when the noise hurts" and/or there are different people involved. I'm not a PT expert yet... '''Is it possible move items between projects in Pivotal to consolidate or split things off as needed?''' ''That's a fairly new feature in Basecamp that I've used extensively.'' --[[User:Jeb|Jeb]] 09:27, 19 June 2011 (PDT)</div>Jeb