Talk:Point To Peer - Revision history

Matt Maier: /* Thoughts */

2012-03-25T21:28:05Z

Thoughts

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:28, 25 March 2012
Line 21:		Line 21:

	==Thoughts==		==Thoughts==
	Seems like you might be able to get some nice synergy out of the tower structure necessary for a solar concentrator and the tower structure necessary for radio-based communication. It might just be a matter of bolting the radio hardware on to a pre-existing solar concentrator design. I'm curious to see the business plan. Individuals participating in an information sharing network is one thing, because the data transfer rarely increases their cost. But individuals participating in relaying the EM itself seems less attractive since each person would be responsible for the electricity necessary to transmit.		Seems like you might be able to get some nice synergy out of the tower structure necessary for a solar concentrator and the tower structure necessary for radio-based communication. It might just be a matter of bolting the radio hardware on to a pre-existing solar concentrator design. I'm curious to see the business plan. Individuals participating in an information sharing network is one thing, because the data transfer rarely increases their cost. But individuals participating in relaying the EM itself seems less attractive since each person would be responsible for the electricity necessary to transmit. - [[Matt_Maier]] 25MAR2012

Matt Maier at 21:27, 25 March 2012

2012-03-25T21:27:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:27, 25 March 2012
Line 20:		Line 20:
	Does this discussion and its associated article have an rss feed? [[User:Mark Elliott\|Mark Elliott]]		Does this discussion and its associated article have an rss feed? [[User:Mark Elliott\|Mark Elliott]]

	==Thoughts==\		==Thoughts==
	Seems like you might be able to get some nice synergy out of the tower structure necessary for a solar concentrator and the tower structure necessary for radio-based communication. It might just be a matter of bolting the radio hardware on to a pre-existing solar concentrator design. I'm curious to see the business plan. Individuals participating in an information sharing network is one thing, because the data transfer rarely increases their cost. But individuals participating in relaying the EM itself seems less attractive since each person would be responsible for the electricity necessary to transmit.		Seems like you might be able to get some nice synergy out of the tower structure necessary for a solar concentrator and the tower structure necessary for radio-based communication. It might just be a matter of bolting the radio hardware on to a pre-existing solar concentrator design. I'm curious to see the business plan. Individuals participating in an information sharing network is one thing, because the data transfer rarely increases their cost. But individuals participating in relaying the EM itself seems less attractive since each person would be responsible for the electricity necessary to transmit.

Matt Maier at 21:27, 25 March 2012

2012-03-25T21:27:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:27, 25 March 2012
Line 19:		Line 19:

	Does this discussion and its associated article have an rss feed? [[User:Mark Elliott\|Mark Elliott]]		Does this discussion and its associated article have an rss feed? [[User:Mark Elliott\|Mark Elliott]]

			==Thoughts==\
			Seems like you might be able to get some nice synergy out of the tower structure necessary for a solar concentrator and the tower structure necessary for radio-based communication. It might just be a matter of bolting the radio hardware on to a pre-existing solar concentrator design. I'm curious to see the business plan. Individuals participating in an information sharing network is one thing, because the data transfer rarely increases their cost. But individuals participating in relaying the EM itself seems less attractive since each person would be responsible for the electricity necessary to transmit.

Mark Elliott: RSS?

2008-03-31T00:09:07Z

RSS?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:09, 31 March 2008
Line 15:		Line 15:
	http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/FLOSS_and_education		http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/FLOSS_and_education
	http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Society_as_ecology [[User:Lucychili\|Lucychili]] 16:16, 30 March 2008 (PDT)		http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Society_as_ecology [[User:Lucychili\|Lucychili]] 16:16, 30 March 2008 (PDT)

			== RSS? ==

			Does this discussion and its associated article have an rss feed? [[User:Mark Elliott\|Mark Elliott]]

Mark Elliott: /* Participation */

2008-03-30T23:19:06Z

Participation

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:19, 30 March 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:

	While I'm not exactly sure what I have to offer at this point, I would like to be involved in this project. At the very least I'll follow along here. Are there email exchanges that I might be be included in (if of course you're interested :-).		While I'm not exactly sure what I have to offer at this point, I would like to be involved in this project. At the very least I'll follow along here. Are there email exchanges that I might be be included in (if of course you're interested :-).

			See my addition to the heading 'Related existing data or facts that support theory'.

	Great ideas! [[User:Mark Elliott\|Mark Elliott]] 16:06, 30 March 2008 (PDT)		Great ideas! [[User:Mark Elliott\|Mark Elliott]] 16:06, 30 March 2008 (PDT)

Lucychili: parallel writings

2008-03-30T23:16:23Z

parallel writings

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:16, 30 March 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Great ideas! [[User:Mark Elliott\|Mark Elliott]] 16:06, 30 March 2008 (PDT)		Great ideas! [[User:Mark Elliott\|Mark Elliott]] 16:06, 30 March 2008 (PDT)

			http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/FLOSS_and_education
			http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Society_as_ecology [[User:Lucychili\|Lucychili]] 16:16, 30 March 2008 (PDT)

Mark Elliott: Participation

2008-03-30T23:06:12Z

Participation

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:06, 30 March 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Of course http://fon.com is also very relevant.		Of course http://fon.com is also very relevant.

			== Participation ==

			While I'm not exactly sure what I have to offer at this point, I would like to be involved in this project. At the very least I'll follow along here. Are there email exchanges that I might be be included in (if of course you're interested :-).

			Great ideas! [[User:Mark Elliott\|Mark Elliott]] 16:06, 30 March 2008 (PDT)

AGNUcius: fon.com

2008-02-27T23:42:42Z

fon.com

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:42, 27 February 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~nrs32/pubs/hotnets6.pdf ''Nishanth Sastry, Karen Sollins, Jon Crowcroft: "Architecting Citywide Ubiquitous Wi-Fi Access". The Sixth Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets-VI).		http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~nrs32/pubs/hotnets6.pdf ''Nishanth Sastry, Karen Sollins, Jon Crowcroft: "Architecting Citywide Ubiquitous Wi-Fi Access". The Sixth Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets-VI).

			Of course http://fon.com is also very relevant.

AGNUcius: "Architecting Citywide Ubiquitous Wi-Fi Access" paper

2008-02-27T23:40:20Z

"Architecting Citywide Ubiquitous Wi-Fi Access" paper

New page

Just found this earlier today, and thought it might apply:

http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~nrs32/pubs/hotnets6.pdf ''Nishanth Sastry, Karen Sollins, Jon Crowcroft: "Architecting Citywide Ubiquitous Wi-Fi Access". The Sixth Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets-VI).