https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3ATHHN_vs_THWN_vs_Romex_vs_XHHWTalk:THHN vs THWN vs Romex vs XHHW - Revision history2026-04-21T17:31:25ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.39.13https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/index.php?title=Talk:THHN_vs_THWN_vs_Romex_vs_XHHW&diff=295956&oldid=prevEric: Added some thoughts of mine2024-04-29T02:06:02Z<p>Added some thoughts of mine</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>Yeah romex is just about the bare minimum, then you got if it's a damp/wet location, max temp, if it needs chemical resistance and whatnot but yeah these reference sheets and whatnot are the way to go. Interesting bit, one of the higher end ones, i forget the name but it was basically [[FMC]] ''COATED'' in the [[UHMWPE]] or whatever the "higher end" of coatings was. You could essentially have boiling acid drip on it and it would just ''take it'', wild stuff.<br />
<br />
(Sidenote there was a bill to make the NEC or codes in general free somewhere, hope i'm not too late to fill in that petition and whatnot. It really is wild though, especially given ALL of the OSHA stuff is up for free and easily searchable, no reason NEC/NFPA stuff should be behind a paywall. Granted with stack exchange type things and websites like this you can usually get most of what you need to know ''in theory'' / quotations from the book)<br />
<br />
--[[User:Eric|Eric]] ([[User talk:Eric|talk]]) 02:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC)</div>Eric