User:Elifarley/mathjax - Revision history

Elifarley at 00:38, 17 October 2011

2011-10-17T00:38:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:38, 17 October 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	and a $2.4M budget - which we abbreviate as our [[50/2/2]] program.		and a $2.4M budget - which we abbreviate as our [[50/2/2]] program.

	$ \~~sfrac~~{a}{b} $ - Is MathJax active?		$ s\frac{a}{b} $ - Is MathJax active?


Line 11:		Line 11:

	Test $2		Test $2


			Standard:
			<math>\frac{a}{b}</math>

Elifarley at 12:47, 13 October 2011

2011-10-13T12:47:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:47, 13 October 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	and a $2.4M budget - which we abbreviate as our [[50/2/2]] program.		and a $2.4M budget - which we abbreviate as our [[50/2/2]] program.

	$ \sfrac{a}{b} $ - ~~Does it look right~~?		$ \sfrac{a}{b} $ - Is MathJax active?


	See [[Crash course on OSE]] (replace ''2.4M dollars budget'' with ''$2.4M budget'')		See [[Crash course on OSE]] (replace ''2.4M dollars budget'' with ''$2.4M budget'')


	==Overview for New People==		==Overview for New People==

	~~Start with our [http://opensourceecology.org Main OSE Website].~~		Test $2

	To see what we do, see the {{LinkLang\|GVCS in 2 Minutes}} video. Open Source Ecology was founded in 2004 by [[Marcin Jakubowski]]. We are a network of farmers, engineers, and supporters that for the last two years has been creating the {{LinkLang\|Global Village Construction Set}}, an open-source, low-cost, high performance technological platform that allows for the easy, DIY fabrication of the 50 different Industrial Machines that it takes to build a sustainable civilization with modern comforts. The GVCS lowers the barriers to entry into farming, building, and manufacturing and can be seen as a life-size lego-like set of modular tools that can create entire economies, whether in rural Missouri, where the project was founded, in urban redevelopment, or in the heart of Africa.

	~~See [[:Category: Factor e Farm Logs\|logs of the on-site participants]] at Factor e Farm.~~

	~~'''We have an ambitious program for product release of the 49 remaining technologies within 2 years and a~~ $2~~.4M budget - which we abbreviate as our [[50/2/2]] program. The period for this is 2011-2012.'''~~

Elifarley at 23:42, 12 October 2011

2011-10-12T23:42:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:42, 12 October 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	and a $2.4M budget - which we abbreviate as our [[50/2/2]] program.		and a $2.4M budget - which we abbreviate as our [[50/2/2]] program.

	Does it look right?		$ \sfrac{a}{b} $ - Does it look right?

	~~$ \sfrac{a}{b} $~~

	See [[Crash course on OSE]](replace ''2.4M dollars budget'' with ''$2.4M budget'')		See [[Crash course on OSE]] (replace ''2.4M dollars budget'' with ''$2.4M budget'')


			==Overview for New People==

			Start with our [http://opensourceecology.org Main OSE Website].

			To see what we do, see the {{LinkLang\|GVCS in 2 Minutes}} video. Open Source Ecology was founded in 2004 by [[Marcin Jakubowski]]. We are a network of farmers, engineers, and supporters that for the last two years has been creating the {{LinkLang\|Global Village Construction Set}}, an open-source, low-cost, high performance technological platform that allows for the easy, DIY fabrication of the 50 different Industrial Machines that it takes to build a sustainable civilization with modern comforts. The GVCS lowers the barriers to entry into farming, building, and manufacturing and can be seen as a life-size lego-like set of modular tools that can create entire economies, whether in rural Missouri, where the project was founded, in urban redevelopment, or in the heart of Africa.

			See [[:Category: Factor e Farm Logs\|logs of the on-site participants]] at Factor e Farm.

			'''We have an ambitious program for product release of the 49 remaining technologies within 2 years and a $2.4M budget - which we abbreviate as our [[50/2/2]] program. The period for this is 2011-2012.'''

Elifarley at 23:35, 12 October 2011

2011-10-12T23:35:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:35, 12 October 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Does it look right?		Does it look right?

			$ \sfrac{a}{b} $

			See [[Crash course on OSE]](replace ''2.4M dollars budget'' with ''$2.4M budget'')

Elifarley: Created page with "Testing $ sign problem: and a $2.4M budget - which we abbreviate as our 50/2/2 program. Does it look right?"

2011-10-12T23:20:31Z

Created page with "Testing $ sign problem: and a $2.4M budget - which we abbreviate as our 50/2/2 program. Does it look right?"

New page

Testing $ sign problem:

and a $2.4M budget - which we abbreviate as our [[50/2/2]] program.

Does it look right?