User talk:Mjn - Revision history

Mjn at 20:56, 21 February 2014

2014-02-21T20:56:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:56, 21 February 2014
Line 20:		Line 20:
	I've noticed your contributions to the Nickel-Iron battery concept. I'd like to compare notes with you, as I have only a basic understanding of its chemistry. I've got a decent design figured out, using sheet steel and nickel hydroxide (build the battery discharged, then charge it). Turns out that a 1kWh cell is quite feasible. Anyway, I hope to learn a thing or two from you and I hope we can flesh this battery out as well.		I've noticed your contributions to the Nickel-Iron battery concept. I'd like to compare notes with you, as I have only a basic understanding of its chemistry. I've got a decent design figured out, using sheet steel and nickel hydroxide (build the battery discharged, then charge it). Turns out that a 1kWh cell is quite feasible. Anyway, I hope to learn a thing or two from you and I hope we can flesh this battery out as well.
	<br> Thanks! [[User:Colin\|Colin]] 14:38, 16 May 2011 (PDT)		<br> Thanks! [[User:Colin\|Colin]] 14:38, 16 May 2011 (PDT)

	~~Sent to your GMail account [[User:Mjn\|Mjn]] 15:54, Feb. 21, 2014~~


Line 56:		Line 54:

	As an idea should we also generally provide the source files used to generate any images like flow charts for future modification? -[[User:Andrew_Graham]] 21:14, 21 February 2014‎		As an idea should we also generally provide the source files used to generate any images like flow charts for future modification? -[[User:Andrew_Graham]] 21:14, 21 February 2014‎

			-- Sent to your GMail account [[User:Mjn\|Mjn]] 15:54, Feb. 21, 2014

Mjn at 20:55, 21 February 2014

2014-02-21T20:55:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:55, 21 February 2014
Line 20:		Line 20:
	I've noticed your contributions to the Nickel-Iron battery concept. I'd like to compare notes with you, as I have only a basic understanding of its chemistry. I've got a decent design figured out, using sheet steel and nickel hydroxide (build the battery discharged, then charge it). Turns out that a 1kWh cell is quite feasible. Anyway, I hope to learn a thing or two from you and I hope we can flesh this battery out as well.		I've noticed your contributions to the Nickel-Iron battery concept. I'd like to compare notes with you, as I have only a basic understanding of its chemistry. I've got a decent design figured out, using sheet steel and nickel hydroxide (build the battery discharged, then charge it). Turns out that a 1kWh cell is quite feasible. Anyway, I hope to learn a thing or two from you and I hope we can flesh this battery out as well.
	<br> Thanks! [[User:Colin\|Colin]] 14:38, 16 May 2011 (PDT)		<br> Thanks! [[User:Colin\|Colin]] 14:38, 16 May 2011 (PDT)

			Sent to your GMail account [[User:Mjn\|Mjn]] 15:54, Feb. 21, 2014


	== CAD for a steam engine ==		== CAD for a steam engine ==

Kunda: /* Missing soil pulverizor for CEB press flowchart */ signing off with: ~~~~ will give username and timestamp

2014-02-21T20:24:38Z

Missing soil pulverizor for CEB press flowchart: signing off with: ~~~~ will give username and timestamp

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 21 February 2014
Line 52:		Line 52:
	http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/File:4b-Constructioneco.png#filelinks		http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/File:4b-Constructioneco.png#filelinks

	As an idea should we also generally provide the source files used to generate any images like flow charts for future modification?		As an idea should we also generally provide the source files used to generate any images like flow charts for future modification? -[[User:Andrew_Graham]] 21:14, 21 February 2014‎

Andrew Graham: /* Missing soil pulverizor for CEB press flowchart */

2014-02-21T20:14:56Z

Missing soil pulverizor for CEB press flowchart

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 21 February 2014
Line 51:		Line 51:

	http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/File:4b-Constructioneco.png#filelinks		http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/File:4b-Constructioneco.png#filelinks

			As an idea should we also generally provide the source files used to generate any images like flow charts for future modification?

Andrew Graham: /* missing soil pulverizor for CEB press flowchart */

2014-02-21T19:42:08Z

missing soil pulverizor for CEB press flowchart

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 21 February 2014
Line 46:		Line 46:
	I'm all for each GVCS tool fabricator organizing his or her respective nav system, we just need a way for people to be able to see where they are and where they want to go at any time more easily. I think having ToolTemplate over a GVCS tool-specific navbar is the best way to cover all our bases. [[User:Ryan Lutz\|Ryan Lutz]] 04:41, 26 July 2011 (CEST)		I'm all for each GVCS tool fabricator organizing his or her respective nav system, we just need a way for people to be able to see where they are and where they want to go at any time more easily. I think having ToolTemplate over a GVCS tool-specific navbar is the best way to cover all our bases. [[User:Ryan Lutz\|Ryan Lutz]] 04:41, 26 July 2011 (CEST)

	== ~~missing~~ soil pulverizor for CEB press flowchart ==		== Missing soil pulverizor for CEB press flowchart ==

	Hey there. I thought I'd point out something I noticed in documentation. In this diagram we have soil that points into the CEB press, but it also looks like the soil pulverizer and tractor are dependencies for this to work. If you want to give me the file you used to generate the image I can update it for you if you think this is correct.		Hey there. I thought I'd point out something I noticed in documentation. In this diagram we have soil that points into the CEB press, but it also looks like the soil pulverizer and tractor are dependencies for this to work. If you want to give me the file you used to generate the image I can update it for you if you think this is correct.

	http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/File:4b-Constructioneco.png#filelinks		http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/File:4b-Constructioneco.png#filelinks

Andrew Graham: /* missing soil pulverizor for CEB press flowchart */ new section

2014-02-21T19:39:10Z

missing soil pulverizor for CEB press flowchart: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:39, 21 February 2014
Line 45:		Line 45:

	I'm all for each GVCS tool fabricator organizing his or her respective nav system, we just need a way for people to be able to see where they are and where they want to go at any time more easily. I think having ToolTemplate over a GVCS tool-specific navbar is the best way to cover all our bases. [[User:Ryan Lutz\|Ryan Lutz]] 04:41, 26 July 2011 (CEST)		I'm all for each GVCS tool fabricator organizing his or her respective nav system, we just need a way for people to be able to see where they are and where they want to go at any time more easily. I think having ToolTemplate over a GVCS tool-specific navbar is the best way to cover all our bases. [[User:Ryan Lutz\|Ryan Lutz]] 04:41, 26 July 2011 (CEST)

			== missing soil pulverizor for CEB press flowchart ==

			Hey there. I thought I'd point out something I noticed in documentation. In this diagram we have soil that points into the CEB press, but it also looks like the soil pulverizer and tractor are dependencies for this to work. If you want to give me the file you used to generate the image I can update it for you if you think this is correct.

			http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/File:4b-Constructioneco.png#filelinks

Ryan Lutz: /* RE: Hierarchy structure */ new section

2011-07-26T02:41:26Z

RE: Hierarchy structure: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:41, 26 July 2011
Line 39:		Line 39:

	Yes, I may do that at some point, but I was sort of waiting until we had better wiki tools like the ones I did research on and posted about in the forum, so it won't take forever. [[User:Gregortheinventor\|Gregor]] 09:01, 13 July 2011 (PDT)		Yes, I may do that at some point, but I was sort of waiting until we had better wiki tools like the ones I did research on and posted about in the forum, so it won't take forever. [[User:Gregortheinventor\|Gregor]] 09:01, 13 July 2011 (PDT)

			== RE: Hierarchy structure ==

			I do believe you're right in using a separate navigation system for the subpages of each GVCS tool, but I think the ToolTemplate should still be at the top of every page so as to give an easy way to jump between larger sections. The way I see it, from any page, one should be able to trace back all the way (i.e. breadcrumb) but with the added functionality of jumping to other sibling sections (i.e. from [[LifeTrac/Manufacturing Instructions/Assembly/Frame]] to [[LifeTrac/User's Manual]]

			I'm all for each GVCS tool fabricator organizing his or her respective nav system, we just need a way for people to be able to see where they are and where they want to go at any time more easily. I think having ToolTemplate over a GVCS tool-specific navbar is the best way to cover all our bases. [[User:Ryan Lutz\|Ryan Lutz]] 04:41, 26 July 2011 (CEST)

Gregortheinventor: /* Incorrect Dimension for Valve */

2011-07-13T16:01:40Z

Incorrect Dimension for Valve

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:01, 13 July 2011
Line 37:		Line 37:

	Re switching to Zn Br, I woudl not advocate switching just yet because while I am personally pretty sure, there shoudl be some hysteresis when it comes to switching the actual project focus. After I learn more I think I probably will recommend switching. There are still some issues, mainly whether the bromine resistant plastics are patented, and the vapor pressure of bromine (if it is above atmospheric that could be a real safety issue) that I need to check, and also to do the financial calculations to compare LA, NiFe and Zn Br to determine roughly how much they are really worth quantitatively. [[User:Gregortheinventor\|Gregor]] 16:37, 25 June 2011 (PDT)		Re switching to Zn Br, I woudl not advocate switching just yet because while I am personally pretty sure, there shoudl be some hysteresis when it comes to switching the actual project focus. After I learn more I think I probably will recommend switching. There are still some issues, mainly whether the bromine resistant plastics are patented, and the vapor pressure of bromine (if it is above atmospheric that could be a real safety issue) that I need to check, and also to do the financial calculations to compare LA, NiFe and Zn Br to determine roughly how much they are really worth quantitatively. [[User:Gregortheinventor\|Gregor]] 16:37, 25 June 2011 (PDT)

			Yes, I may do that at some point, but I was sort of waiting until we had better wiki tools like the ones I did research on and posted about in the forum, so it won't take forever. [[User:Gregortheinventor\|Gregor]] 09:01, 13 July 2011 (PDT)

Ryan Lutz at 05:29, 28 June 2011

2011-06-28T05:29:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:29, 28 June 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Hi Mark! I will of course include you in any changes I make. I suppose my first step after telling everyone who I am is to ask where I can help. I am interested in making this information readily available in a straightforward manner but I don't want to step on any toes. Guess I'm looking for an introduction to the work online here.

			--[[User:Ryan Lutz\|Ryan Lutz]] 22:29, 27 June 2011 (PDT)

	hi mark! would you like me to merge your two pages, [[Mark J Norton]] and [[User:Mjn]]? this way, we can reduce redundancy and avoid confusing people checking out your profile.		hi mark! would you like me to merge your two pages, [[Mark J Norton]] and [[User:Mjn]]? this way, we can reduce redundancy and avoid confusing people checking out your profile.
	you can check out how mine works and tell me if that's fine with you :)		you can check out how mine works and tell me if that's fine with you :)

Gregortheinventor: /* Incorrect Dimension for Valve */

2011-06-25T23:37:42Z

Incorrect Dimension for Valve

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:37, 25 June 2011
Line 32:		Line 32:
	nice work on the build instructions. looks really good. --[[User:Dorkmo\|Dorkmo]] 20:19, 5 June 2011 (PDT)		nice work on the build instructions. looks really good. --[[User:Dorkmo\|Dorkmo]] 20:19, 5 June 2011 (PDT)

	Re switching to Zn Br, I woudl not advocate switching just yet because while I am personally pretty sure, there shoudl be some hysteresis when it comes to switching the actual project focus. After I learn more I think I probably will recommend switching. There are still some issues, mainly whether the bromine resistant plastics are patented, and the vapor pressure of bromine (if it is above atmospheric that could be a real safety issue) that I need to check, and also to do the financial calculations to compare LA, NiFe and Zn Br to determine roughly how much they are really worth quantitatively.		Re switching to Zn Br, I woudl not advocate switching just yet because while I am personally pretty sure, there shoudl be some hysteresis when it comes to switching the actual project focus. After I learn more I think I probably will recommend switching. There are still some issues, mainly whether the bromine resistant plastics are patented, and the vapor pressure of bromine (if it is above atmospheric that could be a real safety issue) that I need to check, and also to do the financial calculations to compare LA, NiFe and Zn Br to determine roughly how much they are really worth quantitatively. [[User:Gregortheinventor\|Gregor]] 16:37, 25 June 2011 (PDT)