Development Infrastructure: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


=Notes on Wiki Infrastructure for Open Engineering=
=Notes on Wiki Infrastructure for Open Engineering=
Mel's Comment:
Marcin and I just spoke about this on the phone - Marcin, reminderping
to coordinate a discussion w/ Chris (cc'd) & Vinay on the wiki-merge issue.
The way I see it, Appropedia can become a Sourceforge for open
engineering. (Sure, it could use a better infrastructure for projects,
but... we can work on that.)* It's a place where individual open
engineering projects related to appropriate technology can have project
websites, host files, etc. Development work, instructions on how to
build a hexayurt, etc. would all be here.
OSE can then go and say things like "Look at all these different pieces
of the puzzle that exist - full-fledged technologies being developed
independently on places like Appropedia. Here's how you could combine
them all into a working village - for housing, you could build hexayurts
like this <link to hexayurt-building instruction pages on Appropedia>
which would mean X, Y, and Z for the economics/dynamics/environmental
impact of the village."
But that's just my $0.02, and I'll leave the discussion to Marcin,
Vinay, and Chris.
-Mel
----


Marcin's comments:
Marcin's comments:

Revision as of 19:50, 29 August 2007

This page was tagged as a candidate for deletion. If this page does not meet our criteria for deletion, please remove this notice.

(Explanation: deprecated, use Template: Under construction instead)

This page is a draft.
There may be relevant discussion on the talk page

Notes on Wiki Infrastructure for Open Engineering

Marcin's comments:

  • We need: a Platform for Open Engineering
  • Marcin's personal attempt: openfarmtech.org - under Development Template.
    • However, this has a particular spec for its open engineering - it it open engineering + OSE Specifications (see Main Page)
  • Once a better infrastructure for projects exists at Appropedia, then we could consider using it for some technical developments.
  • Summary: unless someone can show me a better development platform, the Development Template is good enough for now. It embodies OSE Spec.

Critical additional comment:

  • OSE adds value in that (1) attempts open engineering, (2) does so according to a very unique goal - replicable villages with particular attributes as described on the Main Page
  • It is the addition of value according to a unique goal that adds value to the open engineering itself. It is what drives the specifications for open engineering.
  • I don't think one would come up with an option for creating OSE's replicable village if one just took a number of technologies and put them together. The OSE Specification (look on Main Page) is a glue for the type of engineering that goes on. Without that glue, you'd never arrive at the type of engineering proposed.

Comments?