Russian Invastion of Ukraine: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Analysis= | =Analysis Mar 8, 2022= | ||
*First, understand nuclear strategy - [https://twitter.com/kamilkazani/status/1500168838356381703] | *First, understand nuclear strategy - [https://twitter.com/kamilkazani/status/1500168838356381703] | ||
*One possibility is that the Rubicon has been crossed - [https://twitter.com/igorsushko/status/1498716381759475715] | *One possibility is that the Rubicon has been crossed - [https://twitter.com/igorsushko/status/1498716381759475715] | ||
Revision as of 07:47, 8 March 2022
Analysis Mar 8, 2022
- First, understand nuclear strategy - [1]
- One possibility is that the Rubicon has been crossed - [2]
- Then, read about an analysis interpreted on Mar 5, 2022 regarding a possible fall of Russia according to a leaked document from Russian intelligence known as FSB - - is this document verified or fake? - [3]. Case made is not impossible. It may be likely - logic there appears to be sound.
Truth Wins
- Here's a possitive outlook - [4]
Military Analysis
- Air Force Magazine - [5]
Losses
Military Aid Needs
- Mar 1 - in Defense News - [8]
Intro
Recents on Twitter - https://twitter.com/search?q=ukraine%20news&src=typed_query&f=live
Check out this contrarian viewpoint - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vdiEABLFoo from the feed. at about 4 AM Sunday CST USA. From Coach Red Pill on Telegram. How fascinating.
It is interesting to see the arguments promoted by each side. From the assumptions that the good or evil side takes, their respective conclusions appear sound. Their conclusions depend on the assumptions that they are making. And assumptions depend on admissible information - which information the viewpoint includes and which it omits in its considerations. And what values it holds. Thus, one could gain reconciliation or admit to differences based on admissible information and therefore the assumptions made.