Open Source Freeze Dryer Product Architecture: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Freeze-Dried Product Forms (Reference) | '''Freeze-Dried Product Forms (Reference)''' | ||
Freeze-dried products can be classified by physical geometry, particle structure, and functional intent. The freeze dryer itself produces a porous solid; the final form depends on pre-processing (cutting, molding, formulation) and post-processing (breaking, milling, agglomeration, coating). | Freeze-dried products can be classified by physical geometry, particle structure, and functional intent. The freeze dryer itself produces a porous solid; the final form depends on pre-processing (cutting, molding, formulation) and post-processing (breaking, milling, agglomeration, coating). | ||
| Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
Extremely porous structures for research or biomedical use. | Extremely porous structures for research or biomedical use. | ||
Design Relevance for Open-Source Freeze Dryers | ''' | ||
Design Relevance for Open-Source Freeze Dryers''' | |||
Geometry strongly affects drying time and energy per kg | Geometry strongly affects drying time and energy per kg | ||
| Line 149: | Line 150: | ||
The same freeze dryer can serve multiple markets by changing form | The same freeze dryer can serve multiple markets by changing form | ||
https://chatgpt.com/share/6970f9ad-3534-8012-ba22-d634f955036b | |||
Latest revision as of 16:07, 21 January 2026
What to produce? Powdered Whole Fruit? Freeze dried juice. Which fruits are needed?
Freeze dried fruit vs powder?
Blue Alpine Large model, with capacity to receive 10 fresh kilos and output 1 kilo of freeze dried.
The goal on first validation is the cost of processing 1 kilogram or liter of freeze dried fruit product.
Connected to grid and with PV System Integration.
The goal is to reduce the cost at 0.01 USD per KW used in the process of freeze drying.
After achieving the cost of Kw. Received feedback on what the current ingredient market wants, The next validation is Product development. And then Choosing the equipment to scale to serve customer needs.
[[ https://bluealpinefreezedryers.com/collections/freeze-dryers/products/rev-3-large-freeze-dryer?_pos=4&_fid=6f59314cb&_ss=c&variant=54296442700067%7COff the shelf Freeze dryer Information:]]
Freeze-Dried Product Forms (Reference)
Freeze-dried products can be classified by physical geometry, particle structure, and functional intent. The freeze dryer itself produces a porous solid; the final form depends on pre-processing (cutting, molding, formulation) and post-processing (breaking, milling, agglomeration, coating).
This classification is useful for design decisions, energy modeling, and target use cases.
1. Whole and Intact Forms
Macro-structure preserved
Whole units Entire fruits, vegetables, herbs, or biological materials dried intact. Uses: premium foods, snacks, visual identity products.
Sliced forms Rings, discs, slabs, or cross-sections. Advantages: faster drying, uniform sublimation, predictable rehydration.
Cubed / diced forms Regular geometry (typically 5–20 mm). Uses: soups, ready meals, space food.
2. Fragmented Solid Forms
Broken but not milled
Chunks Irregular large pieces resulting from manual or mechanical breaking.
Flakes / shards Thin fractured sheets formed naturally in tray freeze-drying.
Crumbles / grits Small fragments between flakes and granules.
3. Powder and Particle Forms
Particle size controlled after drying
Standard milled powder Coarsely ground freeze-dried solids (≈200–800 µm).
Micronized / fine powder Finely milled material with high surface area (≈20–200 µm).
Granules Larger particles (≈0.5–2 mm) with improved flowability.
Agglomerated powder Fine powders re-formed into porous clusters for instant wetting.
4. Engineered Geometry Forms
Shape defined intentionally
Pellets / beads Spherical or near-spherical units with excellent flow characteristics.
Cylinders / plugs Molded to specific dimensions, common in vials.
Wafers Thin, fragile discs optimized for fast dissolution.
5. Monolithic Forms
Freeze-dried as a single body
Blocks / bricks Large porous monoliths dried as one piece.
Porous solids from pastes or slurries Formulated mixtures freeze-dried into rigid structures.
6. Sheet and Film Forms
Very thin geometries
Sheets Large, thin layers dried on trays and later cut or milled.
Films Ultra-thin freeze-dried layers, sometimes flexible.
7. Composite and Formulated Forms
Freeze-drying combined with formulation
Carrier-based forms Actives embedded in sugars, proteins, or polymers.
Encapsulated forms Freeze-dried cores later coated for protection or controlled release.
Layered structures Multiple compositions freeze-dried together in a single body.
8. Functional Classification (Use-Driven)
Independent of geometry
Instant-rehydration forms Optimized porosity for rapid wetting.
Controlled or slow-rehydration forms Higher density or coated structures.
Direct-eat crunchy forms Texture prioritized over rehydration.
9. Non-Food and Technical Forms
Lyophilized biologicals Microorganisms, enzymes, vaccines, starter cultures.
Freeze-dried foams Extremely porous structures for research or biomedical use.
Design Relevance for Open-Source Freeze Dryers
Geometry strongly affects drying time and energy per kg
Porosity determines rehydration speed
Most commercial “forms” are achieved by post-processing
Tray freeze dryers naturally produce sheets, flakes, and blocks
Molds and vials enable plugs, wafers, and pellets
The same freeze dryer can serve multiple markets by changing form
https://chatgpt.com/share/6970f9ad-3534-8012-ba22-d634f955036b