Comparison of 3D Printers: Difference between revisions

From Open Source Ecology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Adding stereolithography as a 3d printing technique)
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Overview=
=Overview=
While there are many advanced 3D printing technologies, it is the low-cost ones that are of primary interest to OSE. The end goal of 3D printing technology is low-end 3D printers able to fabricate more advanced designs semi-autonomously. Achieving this [[Digital Fabrication]] objective has fairly wide-reaching economic implications.
While there are many advanced [[3D Printer|3D printing]] technologies, it is the low-cost ones that are of primary interest to OSE. The end goal of 3D printing technology is low-end 3D printers able to fabricate more advanced designs semi-autonomously. Achieving this [[Digital Fabrication]] objective has fairly wide-reaching economic implications, particularly when printed objects are used to bootstrap other manufacturing processes. (see Lost-PLA Casting)


=Background=


The low-cost (sometimes called 'consumer-grade') 3D printers have been developed not by the corporate additive manufacturing developers, but by researchers and DIY enthusiasts mimicking the methods of commercial processes.  The RepRap and Fab@Home projects both started with the goal of creating open source, desktop-sized, additive manufacturing platforms.  RepRap was designed to use Fused Filament Fabrication (Compare with FDM), extruding ABS and eventually PLA.  These materials allowed the production of structurally useful parts, allowing partial self-replication of RepRap systems.  This has lead to their proliferation and mutation toward better and more robust designs through user-driven 'natural selection' process (A principle which will hopefully be applied to OSE designs!)  Compare the success and proliferation of RepRap-based systems with those of the Fab@Home, which were not suitable for self-replication without a laser cutter (or a lot of effort). 
Ideally, the construction of a 3D printer must be made with some understanding of the types of parts to be made. 
What size will they be?  Your printer will have a build volume which limits the size of the parts it can produce.  Check your build volume for any given design.  If you're not making giant parts with it, your printer will not need a large build volume.
What material do you want to print with?  PLA is a fine starting choice, making solid parts and exhibiting limited warp when printed onto room temperature painter's tape. PLA prints at ~200C, and so almost any extruder should be capable of using it.  ABS requires a higher nozzle temperature and exhibits significant warp without a heated bed (a useful upgrade).  Higher-temperature thermoplastics (i.e. polycarbonate) require temperatures that most hot tips are not designed to handle, and these are not suggested for beginners.
=Research=




=Research
==Machines==
==Machines==
Consumer-grade 3D printers
*[[RepRap]]
*Fab@Home
*MakerBot
*Ultimaker
*[[3D Ceramic]]
A comparison of 3D printer prices (for kits and assembled units) can be found here: http://www.3ders.org/pricecompare/3dprinters/


Commercial-grade 3D printers (typically >$5k)
*ZCorp






====Spreadsheet====
<html>[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApN4BXK1pgnKdFdXenFkbnZxR1pIUGljR09MOWlLbkE&hl=en_US edit spreadsheet]
*<iframe width='800' height='600' frameborder='0' src='https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?hl=en_US&hl=en_US&key=0ApN4BXK1pgnKdFdXenFkbnZxR1pIUGljR09MOWlLbkE&output=html&widget=true'></iframe></html>


==Techniques==
==Techniques==
[From Mind Tribe http://mindtribe.com/2011/01/3d-printing-rapid-prototyping-comparison/]
*ZCorp (selective binding powder bed, proprietary materials  :(   )
 
*Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), aka Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)
3D Printing/ Rapid Prototyping Comparison
*Syringe based extrusion (both mechanical and pressure based)
JANUARY 14TH, 2011 by CHET
*Open Source Metal Printing (Using MIG-welder)
With all the new 3D printing machines on the market, it can be confusing to figure out the different types of technologies they employ and their relative advantages. This blog post specifically compares FDM, Projet/Polyjet/Eden, ZCorp, and SLA.
*Solar Sintering
 
*SLA (Stereolithography)
 
The technologies compared here are similar in some ways in how they produce the final 3D object. The desired 3D computer model is sliced up into many layers spanning the horizontal plane. Each of the machines mentioned here then ‘prints’ each layer starting from the bottommost layer, cures or hardens that layer, then the respective platform in the machines holding the object lowers, allowing each of the machines to ’print’ the next layer. This process is continued until each of the machines are finished with the topmost layer.
 
The tables below highlight the key differences and give a rough reference of achievable resolution of ‘pixels’. More detailed information follows the tables.
 
FDM – Fused Deposition Modeling
Companies Stratasys (Dimension Printing, Fortus)
Technology A ‘hot glue gun’ dispensing ABS layer by layer
Great for High strength and durability. Won’t shrink/warp or absorb moisture.
Limitations Slow speed, rough resolution
Resolution (mm) Z: 0.178, XY: 0.089
Build Material Spools of ABS or PC
Support Material Soluble resin
Post Processing Support material to be removed by hand and ultrasonic bath
Videos Detail Overview, Fish
Polyjet/Eden/Projet
Companies Objet (Eden, Polyjet), 3D Systems (Projet)
Technology UV cured photopolymer resin built up layer by layer
Great for High resolution, wide selection of materials (color, clear, rubber)
Limitations High cost
Resolution (mm) Z: 0.016 , Y: 0.085, X:0.042
Build Material Photopolymer resin (liquid)
Support Material Wax-like resin
Post Processing Support material can be removed by hand but needs to be washed off thoroughly by water jet. Can be soaked in NaOH solution for extra cleaning.
Videos Detail Overview
Z Corp
Companies Z Corp (ZPrinter)
Technology Using ‘super glue with color’ to bind fine powder layer by layer
Great for Colorful models. Multicolor surfaces created during printing (i.e. no need for manual painting). Rubber available.
Limitations Low strength
Resolution (mm) Z: 0.089, X: 0.042, Y: 0.047
Build Material Fine powder with ‘super glue’
Support Material Fine powder
Post Processing Blow/brush dust off model, then optional infiltration with strengthening resin
Videos Bearing, Human Head, Robot
SLA- Stereolithography
Companies 3D Systems
Technology A vat of resin cured by laser layer by layer
Great for High resolution and stiff parts
Limitations Slow speed
Resolution (mm) Z: 0.025, XY: 0.032
Build Material Photopolymer resin
Support Material Photopolymer resin
Post Processing Support material removed by hand and ultrasonic bath
Videos Car bumper, Chair, Model
FDM
 
How it works: FDM is an additive prototyping process in which parts are built layer by layer from the ground up. The simplest analogy is that of a hot glue gun mounted on a motorized XY printer table. This glue gun deposits molten glue on the movable platform where a solid part is desired. The molten glue cools and solidifies. The platform then moves downward (Z-direction) to allow the glue gun to print the next layer on the now solid lower layer. In FDM, the glue stick is a long fine thread (~1.8mm diameter) of ABS or PC plastic. The printing process actually uses molten ABS or PC. The glue gun nozzle is the print head. The platform starts at the highest point closest to the glue gun, then steps down 0.178mm at a time to allow the glue gun to print the next layer.
 
Simplified view.
 
How it’s used: FDM models are used often when strength and durability of the part are critical. The parts are made of actual ABS or PC material, thus shrinkage, warping, or moisture absorption will not be issues. One thing to note is that the weakest bond in the material is in the Z-direction layers since the bond is made by molten material on an already solidified layer. Thus in the unlikely event that the part breaks, it will most likely be along the Z-direction layers. The resolution of the part is not as good as other technologies, thus this is not the ideal candidate for cosmetic models.
 
ZCorp
 
How it works: ZCorp Zprinter works by printing binders (think superglue) onto a layer of powder (think fine sand) where the part is to be solid. Once a layer is finished, the platform lowers and another layer of loose powder is added on top of the finished layer. The print head again deposits binders where the part is to be solid. Once the printing is complete, the excess powder is removed by a brush and air gun. The part can then be infiltrated with a low-viscosity resin that helps strengthen the part. One of the big advantages of the ZCorp system is that it is able to add color pigments to the binders, thus allowing for multicolor parts to be made. Other technologies would require manual painting of the parts if different colors are desired on a single part.


Simplified view.
==Specifications==


How it’s used: ZCorp printed models are great for presentation and cosmetic models since they come full-color out of the machine. It has been widely used for architectural models as well as mockups of product for sales models. I was fooled by a full-color ZCorp printing of a multimeter the first time I saw it since it was so close to the real thing. However, ZCorp models are not great for making functional models where strength and stability are important.


SLA and Polyjet/Projet/Eden technologies (along with machining and SLS) are described in more detail here:
http://mindtribe.com/2009/06/been-there-prototyped-that-what-process-and-when/




This entry was posted in MindTribe Tech and tagged 3D printing, FDM, rapid prototyping, SLA. Bo
==Links==
[http://mindtribe.com/2011/01/3d-printing-rapid-prototyping-comparison/ 3d printing rapid prototyping comparison/]
[[Category:3D Printer]]
[[Category:Comparison]]
[[Category:Industry Standards]]

Latest revision as of 18:48, 12 August 2014

Overview

While there are many advanced 3D printing technologies, it is the low-cost ones that are of primary interest to OSE. The end goal of 3D printing technology is low-end 3D printers able to fabricate more advanced designs semi-autonomously. Achieving this Digital Fabrication objective has fairly wide-reaching economic implications, particularly when printed objects are used to bootstrap other manufacturing processes. (see Lost-PLA Casting)

Background

The low-cost (sometimes called 'consumer-grade') 3D printers have been developed not by the corporate additive manufacturing developers, but by researchers and DIY enthusiasts mimicking the methods of commercial processes. The RepRap and Fab@Home projects both started with the goal of creating open source, desktop-sized, additive manufacturing platforms. RepRap was designed to use Fused Filament Fabrication (Compare with FDM), extruding ABS and eventually PLA. These materials allowed the production of structurally useful parts, allowing partial self-replication of RepRap systems. This has lead to their proliferation and mutation toward better and more robust designs through user-driven 'natural selection' process (A principle which will hopefully be applied to OSE designs!) Compare the success and proliferation of RepRap-based systems with those of the Fab@Home, which were not suitable for self-replication without a laser cutter (or a lot of effort).

Ideally, the construction of a 3D printer must be made with some understanding of the types of parts to be made. What size will they be? Your printer will have a build volume which limits the size of the parts it can produce. Check your build volume for any given design. If you're not making giant parts with it, your printer will not need a large build volume. What material do you want to print with? PLA is a fine starting choice, making solid parts and exhibiting limited warp when printed onto room temperature painter's tape. PLA prints at ~200C, and so almost any extruder should be capable of using it. ABS requires a higher nozzle temperature and exhibits significant warp without a heated bed (a useful upgrade). Higher-temperature thermoplastics (i.e. polycarbonate) require temperatures that most hot tips are not designed to handle, and these are not suggested for beginners.

Research

Machines

Consumer-grade 3D printers

A comparison of 3D printer prices (for kits and assembled units) can be found here: http://www.3ders.org/pricecompare/3dprinters/

Commercial-grade 3D printers (typically >$5k)

  • ZCorp


Spreadsheet

[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApN4BXK1pgnKdFdXenFkbnZxR1pIUGljR09MOWlLbkE&hl=en_US edit spreadsheet] *

Techniques

  • ZCorp (selective binding powder bed, proprietary materials  :( )
  • Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), aka Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)
  • Syringe based extrusion (both mechanical and pressure based)
  • Open Source Metal Printing (Using MIG-welder)
  • Solar Sintering
  • SLA (Stereolithography)

Specifications

Links

3d printing rapid prototyping comparison/